Search

Purpose: Ibrutinib has transformed the management of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), though its use is limited by toxicity and resistance. In this study, we utilized an “add on” approach for patients who had been treated with ibrutinib in the front-line or relapsed/refractory settings with detectable MRD. Umbralisib and ublituximab (U2) were added on to ibrutinib, patients were treated until achieving undetectable-MRD (U-MRD), and then they entered a period of treatment-free observation (TFO). Patients and Methods: Patients were eligible if they received ibrutinib in any line of therapy for at least 6 months and had detectable MRD (flow cytometry, Results: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled of whom 27 were evaluable for efficacy. Patients received ibrutinib for a median of 21 months (range 7–67) prior to study enrollment. Fourteen patients (52%) have achieved U-MRD per protocol whereas 78% had at least one U-MRD evaluation. Seventeen patients (63%) have entered TFO after a median of 6.4 months on triplet therapy. Progression-free survival at 12 months was estimated at 95%. Grade ≥3 adverse events were hypertension 7%, diarrhea 4%, and increased ALT/AST 4%. Conclusions: This triplet approach utilizes the addition of U2 to ibrutinib as an MRD-driven time-limited therapy. This therapy was well tolerated and effective. TFO following this therapy appears durable in ongoing follow-up.

Supplementary Data from Adding Umbralisib and Ublituximab (U2) to Ibrutinib in Patients with CLL: A Phase II Study of an MRD-Driven Approach

Purpose:Ibrutinib has transformed the management of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), though its use is limited by toxicity and resistance. In this study, we utilized an “add on” approach for patients who had been treated with ibrutinib in the front-line or relapsed/refractory settings with detectable MRD. Umbralisib and ublituximab (U2) were added on to ibrutinib, patients were treated until achieving undetectable-MRD (U-MRD), and then they entered a period of treatment-free observation (TFO).Patients and Methods:Patients were eligible if they received ibrutinib in any line of therapy for at least 6 months and had detectable MRD (flow cytometry, –4 cutoff for U-MRD). U2 was added to ibrutinib, and patients were monitored serially for MRD. Once U-MRD was achieved or a total of 24 cycles were administered, patients entered a period of TFO. The primary study objective was rate of U-MRD. Secondary endpoints included safety and durability of clinical benefit after treatment discontinuation.Results:Twenty-eight patients were enrolled of whom 27 were evaluable for efficacy. Patients received ibrutinib for a median of 21 months (range 7–67) prior to study enrollment. Fourteen patients (52%) have achieved U-MRD per protocol whereas 78% had at least one U-MRD evaluation. Seventeen patients (63%) have entered TFO after a median of 6.4 months on triplet therapy. Progression-free survival at 12 months was estimated at 95%. Grade ≥3 adverse events were hypertension 7%, diarrhea 4%, and increased ALT/AST 4%.Conclusions:This triplet approach utilizes the addition of U2 to ibrutinib as an MRD-driven time-limited therapy. This therapy was well tolerated and effective. TFO following this therapy appears durable in ongoing follow-up.

Purpose Intolerance is the most common reason for kinase inhibitor (KI) discontinuation in CLL. Umbralisib a novel, highly selective PI3Kδ/CK1e inhibitor, is active and well tolerated in CLL patients. This phase 2 trial evaluated umbralisib in CLL patients who are intolerant to prior BTK or PI3K inhibitor therapy. Patients and methods In this phase 2 trial (NCT02742090), umbralisib was initiated at 800 mg oral daily in CLL patients requiring therapy per investigator discretion who were intolerant to prior BTK or PI3K inhibitor therapy, until progression or toxicity. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included time to treatment failure and umbralisib safety profile. DNA isolated from buccal swabs was genotyped for polymorphisms in CYP3A4, CYP3A5 and CYP2D6. Results Fifty-one patients were enrolled (44 BTKi and 7 PI3Kδi intolerant). Median age was 70 years (range 48-96), median of 2 prior lines of therapy (1-7), 24% had del17p and/or TP53 mutation, and 65% were IGHV unmutated. Most common AEs leading to prior KI discontinuation were rash (27%), arthralgia (18%), and atrial fibrillation (16%). Median progression free survival (PFS) was 23.5 months (95% CI 13.1-not estimable). 58% of patients were on umbralisib for a longer duration than prior KI. Most common (≥5%) grade ≥3 AEs on umbralisib (all causality) were neutropenia (18%), leukocytosis (14%), thrombocytopenia (12%), pneumonia (12%), and diarrhea (8%). Six patients (12%) discontinued umbralisib due to an AE. Eight patients (16%) had dose reductions and were successfully re-challenged. Conclusions Umbralisib is safe and effective in this BTK and alternate PI3K inhibitor intolerant CLL population. These are the first prospective data to confirm that switching from a BTK or alternate PI3K inhibitor to umbralisib can result in durable, well tolerated responses.

Introduction: Preclinical data suggest that PD-1 and PD-L1/PD-L2 mediate immune evasion in CLL. However, clinical data (Ding, BLOOD 2017) demonstrate that pembrolizumab monotherapy (pembro) is ineffective in relapsed/refractory (r/r) CLL patients (pts) (ORR 0%, med PFS 2.4 months). Additional data with an anti-PD1 demonstrated a 90% failure rate in Richter's Transformation (RT) with a med 2-month OS (Rogers, BJH 2018). Combinations may represent the future of anti-PD-1 therapy in CLL/RT, especially in RT pts rel/ref to ibrutinib, where median OS is ~3.5 mos. We hypothesized synergistic activity with PD-1 + PI3K blockade. Umbralisib (UMB), is a highly-specific PI3K-δ inhibitor with additional effects on casein kinase-1 epsilon (CK-1ε), which may have an inhibitory effect on Treg function (Deng et al, 2016). We tested the safety and activity of UMB in combination with the anti-CD20 mAb ublituximab (UTX) and pembro in r/r CLL and RT - the first reported combination of a PD-1 inhibitor + PI3K-δ inhibitor in this population. Methods: Ph I (3+3 design), multicenter study to assess the safety/efficacy of UMB + UTX + pembro in pts with r/r CLL and RT. Treatment for CLL pts involved three stages: Induction: UMB (800mg daily) and UTX (900mg 3 out of 4 wks) for the first two 28-day cycles. Consolidation: Pembro (dose level 1=100mg, dose level 2=200mg) was then initiated every 3 wks in combination with UMB and UTX (900mg week 2 of cycle 4 and 6) for cycles 3-6. Maintenance: Cycle > 6, UMB 800 mg daily until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable AE. For RT pts, all study drugs are started in cycle 1 with the following schedule: UMB 800 mg daily; UTX 900 mg cycle 1 (D1, 8, 15), D1 cycles 2-4, cycle 7 and q3 cycles thereafter; and pembro D3 of cycle 1 and D2 of cycles 2-4. The primary endpoint is safety of the triple combination with efficacy as a secondary endpoint. Response assessments for CLL, based on the iwCLL 2008 criteria, were performed after cycles 2, 6 and 12. RT response assessments (Cheson 2007) were completed at the end of cycles 2, 4 and every 3 cycles until month 12. Peripheral blood and/or bone marrow biopsy, enriched for mononuclear cells, were obtained for correlative analyses at screening, month 2 and 6. Results: Fourteen pts have been treated to date: 9 with CLL (3 at 100 mg pembro / 6 at 200 mg pembro) and 5 with RT (4 at 100 mg pembro / 1 at 200 mg). Baseline demographics were as follows: male/female (9/5), med age 71 yrs (range 60-81), med prior therapies 2 (1-8), 79% were refractory to immediate prior therapy. 10 pts had prior ibrutinib of which 9 were ibrutinib refractory. 64% of pts had at least 1 high risk genetic feature (del17p, del11q, TP53 mut, NOTCH1 mut or complex karyotype). AE's (all causality) were manageable. Grade 3/4 AE's occurring in ≥ 3 pts included neutropenia (n=6, 43%), ALT/AST increase (n=3, 21%) and hypophosphatemia (n=3, 21%). One DLT occurred in a CLL pt at 200 mg dose level (ALT/AST elevation) which trigged expansion to 6 pts. No additional DLTs were reported, and no MTD was achieved. No increase in expected grade ≥ 3 PI3Kδ-associated toxicities were noted (1 pneumonitis event, no colitis events). ORR was 89% for CLL pts with ORR of 75% in BTK refractory CLL pts (3/4). Notably 2/4 BTK refractory CLL pts achieved a response to UMB + UTX (U2) induction alone prior to the addition of pembro. 4/5 RT pts were eligible for efficacy evaluation with 50% ORR (2/4, CR). The 2 RT CRs were durable and are ongoing (15+ mos and 7+ mos); both pts were ibrutinib refractory and had 7 (including SCT) and 8 prior lines respectively, and one had failed CAR-T. With a med follow up of 15 mos, 10/14 (71%) remain progression free (range 3 - 44 mos, Fig 1), including one CLL pt who completed consolidation and has been off therapy for 27+ mos. Sequential sampling for correlative studies demonstrated modest changes in Tregs numbers (Fig 2). Conclusion: The triplet combination of umbralisib + ublituximab + pembro was well-tolerated. Responses were durable in BTK refractory, high risk pts, including two CR's in RT pts. In contrast to pembro monotherapy, data suggest that CLL/RT pts who achieve ≥ PR with this checkpoint inhibitor-containing regimen can achieve durable responses. Correlative studies suggest that maintenance of Tregs may limit autoimmune sequelae. Enrollment is ongoing in both the CLL (BTK refractory only) and RT cohorts. Disclosures Mato: AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Portola: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Medscape: Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Prime Oncology: Honoraria. Svoboda:Regeneron: Research Funding; KITE: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Schuster:Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Nordic Nanovector: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Dava Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding. Becker:GlycoMimetics: Research Funding. Brander:DTRM: Other: Institutional research funding for non investigator initiated clinical trial, Research Funding; BeiGene: Other: Institutional research funding for non investigator initiated clinical trial, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: DSMB; Pharmacyclics, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Acerta: Other: Institutional research funding for non investigator initiated clinical trial, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Institutional research funding for non investigator initiated clinical trial, Research Funding; Teva: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Institutional research funding for non investigator initiated clinical trial, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Institutional research funding for non investigator initiated clinical trial, Research Funding. Dwivedy Nasta:Aileron: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Debiopharm: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Rafael/WF: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Takeda/Millenium: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Other: DSMC. Landsburg:Takeda: Consultancy; Curis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kennard:AbbVie, Gilead, Verastem: Consultancy. Zelenetz:Abbvie: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Novartis/Sandoz: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding. Purdom:TG Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Paskalis:TG Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sportelli:TG Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Miskin:TG Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Weiss:TG Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shadman:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Beigene: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy; Genentech: Research Funding; Qilu Puget Sound Biotherapeutics: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Mustang Biopharma: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Verastem: Consultancy.

7530Background: Although KI therapies are generally well-tolerated, intolerance is the most common reason for discontinuation, thus representing an unmet medical need. Umbralisib (TGR-1202), a next...

TPS7569 Background: Although kinase inhibitor (KI) therapies, such as ibrutinib, are generally well tolerated, intolerance is the most common reason for discontinuation (d/c) in practice (~50%, Mato et al, Blood 2016). Additionally KI interruptions (≥ 8 days) can shorten OS (Barr et al, ASCO 2015). Fortunately, data suggest that KIs have non-overlapping toxicity profiles. Therefore, pts who d/c KI due to intolerance, with ongoing CLL response, represent an unmet need. TGR-1202 is a next generation, highly-specific PI3K-delta inhibitor with nanomolar inhibitory potency. TGR-1202 is well-tolerated with a d/c rate due to AEs of 8% as demonstrated in an integrated safety analysis of 165 treated pts (Burris et al, ASCO 2016). Methods: A phase 2 investigator initiated study is being conducted to assess the safety and activity of TGR-1202 in CLL pts who are KI intolerant. KI Intolerance is defined as ≥ 1 Gr 3 or ≥ 2 Gr 2 non-heme toxicities, ≥ 1 Gr 3 neutropenia with infection or fever, and/or ≥ 1 Gr 4 heme toxicity leading to KI (BTK and/or PI3K inhibitor) d/c (Table). Toxicities must resolve to ≤ Gr 1 prior to TGR-1202 dosing. Prior KI must be d/c for ≥ 14 days without progression (PD). All eligible pts are treated with TGR-1202 (800mg oral daily) until PD, toxicity or study conclusion. Primary study endpoint is PFS. Secondary endpoints include ORR, duration of response, time to treatment failure and TGR-1202 safety profile. Peripheral blood samples are collected prior to TGR-1202, after 28 days and at PD for correlative analyses to identify markers associated with KI intolerance. The trial commenced 10/1/2016. 55 eligible pts will be enrolled in approximately 12 months with 24 months follow-up. As of 1/2017, 10 study sites are enrolling pts with 10 more to be activated. To date, 10 pts have been enrolled and treated with TGR-1202. Clinical trial information: NCT02742090. [Table: see text]