Search

Abstract: Tafasitamab plus lenalidomide (TAFA-LEN) treatment relevance pre- or post-anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is debated. We analyzed patients with large B-cell lymphoma in the DESCAR-T registry treated with axi[1]cel or tisa-cel in ≥3rd line and TAFA-LEN before (n = 15, "TL-pre-CAR-T" set) or directly after (n = 52, "TL-post-CAR-T" set) CAR T-cell therapy. We compared TAFA-LEN v. other treatments using inverse probability weighting in the TL-post-CAR[1]T set. In the TL-post-CAR-T set, the median progression-free survival (mPFS), overall survival (mOS), and duration of response (mDOR) since the first treatment for progression (mPFS2/mOS2/mDOR2) were 3, 4.7, and 8.1 months, respectively. The best overall response rate (bORR) and best complete response rate (bCRR) after TAFA-LEN were 13.5% and 7.7%, respectively. Outcomes were better for patients who relapsed >6 months after CAR T-cell therapy (mPFS2: 5.6 vs 2 months, P = .0138; mOS2: not reached vs 3.8 months, P = .0034). The bORR and bCRR between TAFA-LEN and other treatments were 20.6% vs 24.9% and 11.6% vs 15.6%, respectively. Outcomes were similar between TAFA-LEN and other treatments (mPFS2: 2.9 vs 2.4 months, P = .91; mOS2: 3.3 vs 5.5 months, P = .06). In an exploratory analysis of the TL-pre-CAR-T set, the median TAFA-LEN treatment duration before CAR-T was 3.7 months with no patient becoming CD19 negative. The bORR, bCRR, 6- month PFS, and OS rates after CAR T-cell infusion were 45.5%, 36.4%, 20.1%, and 58.2%, respectively. Neither TAFA-LEN nor comparative salvage treatment improved outcomes for patients relapsing after CAR T-cell therapy., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. The primary analysis of the Ro-CHOP phase III randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01796002) established that romidepsin (Ro) plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (CHOP) did not yield an increased efficacy compared with CHOP alone as first-line treatment of peripheral T-cell lymphoma. We report the planned final analysis 5 years after the last patient enrolled. With a median follow-up of 6 years, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.0 months compared with 10.2 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.79 [95% CI, 0.62 to 1.005]; P = .054), while median overall survival was 62.2 months (35.7-86.6 months) and 43.8 months (30.1-70.2 months; HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.68 to 1.14]; P = .324) in the Ro-CHOP and CHOP arms, respectively. In an exploratory analysis, the median PFS in the centrally reviewed follicular helper T-cell lymphoma subgroup was significantly longer in the Ro-CHOP arm (19.5 v 10.6 months, HR, 0.703 [95% CI, 0.502 to 0.985]; P = .039). Second-line treatments were given to 251 patients with a median PFS2 and OS2 after relapse or progression of 3.3 months and 11.5 months, respectively. Within the limits of highly heterogeneous second-line treatments, no specific regimen seemed to provide superior disease control. However, a potential benefit was observed with brentuximab vedotin in association with chemotherapy even after excluding anaplastic large-cell lymphoma subtype or after adjusting for histology and international prognostic index in a multivariate model (HR for PFS, 0.431 [95% CI, 0.238 to 0.779]; P = .005).

Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) mature T- and natural killer (NK)-cell neoplasms lack effective treatments after failure of standard therapies. This phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor tislelizumab in these patients. Seventy-seven patients were treated with 200 mg tislelizumab every 3 weeks. Twenty-two patients with extranodal NK-/T-cell lymphomas were enrolled in cohort 1; 44 patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) were enrolled in cohort 2 (21 patients had PTCL not otherwise specified, 11 patients had angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, and 12 patients had anaplastic large-cell lymphoma). Cohort 3 comprised 11 patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, of which 8 patients had mycosis fungoides (MF) and 3 had Sézary syndrome. Of the 77 patients, 76.6% had advanced-stage disease, 51.9% had refractory disease, and 49.4% received ≥3 prior systemic regimens. Promising efficacy was observed in cohort 3 (median follow-up [FU], 16.6 months; overall response rate [ORR], 45.5%; complete response [CR], 9.1%; median duration of response [DOR], 11.3 months; median progression-free survival, 16.8 months; median overall survival, not reached). Modest efficacy was observed in cohort 1 (median FU, 8.4 months; ORR, 31.8%; CR, 18.2%; median DOR, not reached) and cohort 2 (median FU, 9.3 months; ORR, 20.5%; CR, 9.1%; median DOR, 8.2 months). Most treatment-related adverse events were grade 1 or 2, and the safety profile was consistent with the known safety profile of tislelizumab. In conclusion, tislelizumab was well tolerated, achieving modest efficacy in R/R mature T- and NK-cell neoplasms, with some long-lasting remissions. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03493451., (© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Purpose: Rituximab improves progression-free survival (PFS) and time to next treatment (TTNT) when compared with the watch and wait strategy for patients with low-tumor burden follicular lymphoma (FL). Prolonged rituximab maintenance did not prolong TTNT, whereas it raises concerns about resources use and patient adhesion. Our aim was then to investigate the use of short rituximab maintenance using the subcutaneous (SC) route in patients with low-tumor burden FL., Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed CD20 + low-tumor burden FL were randomly assigned to receive either rituximab, 375 mg/m 2 once daily on D1, D8, D15, and D22, intravenous route (IV, control arm), or rituximab, 375 mg/m 2 , on day 1 (D1), IV followed by rituximab 1,400 mg total dose, SC once daily on D8, D15, and D22, with maintenance at months 3 (M3), M5, M7, and M9 (experimental arm). The primary end point was PFS. Secondary end points included safety, overall response rates, TTNT, and overall survival (OS)., Results: Two hundred two patients with low-tumor burden FL were randomly assigned to the experimental (n = 100) or control arm (n = 102). The primary end point was met: the 4-year PFS was 58.1% (95% CI, 47.5 to 67.4) and 41.2% (95% CI, 30.6 to 51.6) in experimental and control arms, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.585 [0.393 to 0.871]; P = .0076). Complete response (CR) rates were 59.0% (95% CI, 48.7 to 68.7) in the experimental arm and 36.3% (95% CI, 27.0 to 46.4) in the control arm ( P = .001). TTNT and OS were not significantly different. CR was associated with longer PFS and TTNT. High rituximab exposure during the first three months was independently associated with higher CR, PFS, and TTNT., Conclusion: SC rituximab improves PFS for patients with low-tumor burden FL when used in induction followed by short maintenance. High rituximab exposure during the first 3 months after treatment initiation is, however, the only parameter influencing patient outcomes.

Splenomegaly is a hallmark of myelofibrosis, a debilitating haematological malignancy for which the only curative option is allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Considerable splenic enlargement might be associated with a higher risk of delayed engraftment and graft failure, increased non-relapse mortality, and worse overall survival after HCT as compared with patients without significantly enlarged splenomegaly. Currently, there are no standardised guidelines to assist transplantation physicians in deciding optimal management of splenomegaly before HCT. Therefore, the aim of this Position Paper is to offer a shared position statement on this issue. An international group of haematologists, transplantation physicians, gastroenterologists, surgeons, radiotherapists, and radiologists with experience in the treatment of myelofibrosis contributed to this Position Paper. The key issues addressed by this group included the assessment, prevalence, and clinical significance of splenomegaly, and the need for a therapeutic intervention before HCT for the control of splenomegaly. Specific scenarios, including splanchnic vein thrombosis and COVID-19, are also discussed. All patients with myelofibrosis must have their spleen size assessed before allogeneic HCT. Myelofibrosis patients with splenomegaly measuring 5 cm and larger, particularly when exceeding 15 cm below the left costal margin, or with splenomegaly-related symptoms, could benefit from treatment with the aim of reducing the spleen size before HCT. In the absence of, or loss of, response, patients with increasing spleen size should be evaluated for second-line options, depending on availability, patient fitness, and centre experience. Splanchnic vein thrombosis is not an absolute contraindication for HCT, but a multidisciplinary approach is warranted. Finally, prevention and treatment of COVID-19 should adhere to standard recommendations for immunocompromised patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests CH received grants from Novartis and Constellation Pharmaceutical; consulting fees from Keros, Galecto, AOP, and Roche; payment for presentations from Novartis, Celgene, CTI BioPharma, AbbVie, Jansen, Constellation Pharmaceuticals, Galecto, CTI BioPharma, Roche, Geron, Promedior, AbbVie, and AOP Pharma; support for attending meetings from Novartis; participated on advisory boards for Galecto and Keros; and held leadership or fiduciary roles in European Hematology Association, British Society for Haematology, Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Voice, and Blood Cancer UK. NK received research grants from Novartis; consulting fees from Novartis; payments or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Novartis and Neovii; support for attending meetings and travel from Neovii; participated on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Hovon and Novartis; and held leadership or fiduciary roles in other boards, societies, committees or advocacy groups, paid or unpaid, for the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, German Society for Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, and the German Registry for Stem Cell Transplantation. RM received funding from Celgene, Incyte, AbbVie, Samus, Genotech, Promedior, CTI, Constellation, Mays Cancer Center, and P30 Cancer Center; support grants from National Cancer Institute (grant number CA054174); and consulting fees from Novartis, Sierra Onc, LaJolla, Pharma, and Constellation. NPe received support from the National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute (award number P30 CA016672); grants from Affymetrix, US Department of Defence, and SagerStrong foundation; royalties from Karger Publishers; consulting fees from Pacylex Pharmaceuticals, ImmunoGen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Blueprint Medicines, Clearview Healthcare Partners, Astellas Pharma US, and Protagonist Therapeutics; honoraria from Incyte, Novartis, LFB Biotechnologies, Stemline Therapeutics, Celgene, AbbVie, MustangBio, Roche Diagnostics, Blueprint Medicines, DAVA Oncology, Springer Science + Business Media, Aptitude Health, and CareDx; support for attending meetings from Stemline Therapeutics, Celgene, MustangBio, DAVA oncology, AbbVie; participated on a data safety monitoring board and advisory board for ASCO Leukemia Advisory Panel; held leadership or fiduciary role in other boards, societies, committees or advocacy groups, paid or unpaid for by American Society of Hematology Communications Committee, Dan's House of Hope, and HemOnc Times/Oncology Times; and received equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing support, gifts, or other services from Novartis, Stemline Therapeutics, Samus Therapeutics, AbbVie, CEllectis, Affymetrix, Daiichi Sankyo, and Plexxikon. UP received research funding from Bayer, Novartis, AbbVie, and Incyte. AMV participated in advisory boards for Novartis; and provided consulting services for Novartis. IY-A received honoraria from Novartis. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: No study has focused on the economic burden in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) survivors, even though this knowledge is essential. This study reports on health care resource use and associated health care costs as well as related factors in a series of 1671 French long-term NHL survivors., Methods: Health care costs were measured from the payer perspective. Only direct medical costs (medical consultations, outpatient treatments, hospitalizations, and medical transport) in the past 12 months were included (reference year 2015). Multiple linear regression was used to search for explanatory factors of health care costs., Results: In total, 1100 survivors (66%) reported having used at least 1 health care resource, and 867 (52%) reported having used at least 1 outpatient treatment. After the authors accounted for missing data, the mean health care cost was estimated at €702 ± €2221. Hospitalizations and outpatient treatments were the main cost drivers. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. For the 1100 survivors who reported using at least 1 health care resource, the mean health care cost was €1067 ± €2268. Several factors demonstrated statistically significant relationships with health care costs. For instance, cardiovascular disorders increased costs by 66% ± 16%. In contrast, rituximab or autologous stem cell transplantation as initial therapy had no effect on health care costs., Conclusions: The consideration of economic constraints in health care is now a reality. This retrospective study reports on a better understanding of health care resource use and associated health care costs as well as related factors. It may help health care professionals in their ongoing efforts to design person-centered health care pathways., (© 2021 American Cancer Society.)

Distinguishing chronic lymphoproliferative disorders of NK cells (CLPD-NK) from reactive NK-cell expansion is challenging. We assessed the value of killer immunoglobulin-like receptor(KIR) phenotyping and targeted high-throughput sequencing in a cohort of 114 consecutive patients with NK cell proliferation, retrospectively assigned to a CLPD-NK group (n = 46) and a reactive NK group (n = 68). We then developed an NK-cell clonality score combining flow cytometry and molecular profiling with a positive predictive value of 93%. STAT3 and TET2 mutations were respectively identified in 27% and 34% of the patients with CLPD-NK, constituting a new diagnostic hallmark for this disease. TET2-mutated CLPD-NK preferentially exhibited a CD16low phenotype, more frequently displayed a lower platelet count, and was associated with other hematologic malignancies such as myelodysplasia. To explore the mutational clonal hierarchy of CLPD-NK, we performed whole-exome sequencing of sorted, myeloid, T, and NK cells and found that TET2 mutations were shared by myeloid and NK cells in 3 of 4 cases. Thus, we hypothesized that TET2 alterations occur in early hematopoietic progenitors which could explain a potential link between CLPD-NK and myeloid malignancies. Finally, we analyzed the transcriptome by RNA sequencing of 7 CLPD-NK and evidenced 2 groups of patients. The first group displayed STAT3 mutations or SOCS3 methylation and overexpressed STAT3 target genes. The second group, including 2 TET2-mutated cases, significantly underexpressed genes known to be downregulated in angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma. Our results provide new insights into the pathogenesis of NK-cell proliferative disorders and, potentially, new therapeutic opportunities., (© 2021 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Background: Activating mutations of EZH2, an epigenetic regulator, are present in approximately 20% of patients with follicular lymphoma. We investigated the activity and safety of tazemetostat, a first-in-class, oral EZH2 inhibitor, in patients with follicular lymphoma., Methods: This study was an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial done at 38 clinics or hospitals in France, the UK, Australia, Canada, Poland, Italy, Ukraine, Germany, and the USA. Eligible patients were adults (≥18 years) with histologically confirmed follicular lymphoma (grade 1, 2, 3a, or 3b) that had relapsed or was refractory to two or more systemic therapies, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and had sufficient tumour tissue for central testing of EZH2 mutation status. Patients were categorised by EZH2 status: mutant (EZH2 mut ) or wild-type (EZH2 WT ). Patients received 800 mg of tazemetostat orally twice per day in continuous 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate based on the 2007 International Working Group criteria for non-Hodgkin lymphoma, assessed by an independent radiology committee. Activity and safety analyses were done in patients who received one dose or more of tazemetostat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01897571, and follow-up is ongoing., Findings: Between July 9, 2015, and May 24, 2019, 99 patients (45 in the EZH2 mut cohort and 54 in the EZH2 WT cohort) were enrolled in the study. At data cutoff for the analysis (Aug 9, 2019), the median follow-up was 22·0 months (IQR 12·0-26·7) for the EZH2 mut cohort and 35·9 months (24·9-40·5) for the EZH2 WT cohort. The objective response rate was 69% (95% CI 53-82; 31 of 45 patients) in the EZH2 mut cohort and 35% (23-49; 19 of 54 patients) in the EZH2 WT cohort. Median duration of response was 10·9 months (95% CI 7·2-not estimable [NE]) in the EZH2 mut cohort and 13·0 months (5·6-NE) in the EZH2 WT cohort; median progression-free survival was 13·8 months (10·7-22·0) and 11·1 months (3·7-14·6). Among all 99 patients, treatment-related grade 3 or worse adverse events included thrombocytopenia (three [3%]), neutropenia (three [3%]), and anaemia (two [2%]). Serious treatment-related adverse events were reported in four (4%) of 99 patients. There were no treatment-related deaths., Interpretation: Tazemetostat monotherapy showed clinically meaningful, durable responses and was generally well tolerated in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma. Tazemetostat is a novel treatment for patients with follicular lymphoma., Funding: Epizyme., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The considerable progress made in the field of cancer treatment has led to a dramatic improvement in the prognosis of patients with cancer. However, toxicities resulting from these treatments represent a cost that can be harmful to short- and long-term outcomes. Adverse events affecting the cardiovascular system are one of the greatest challenges in the overall management of patients with cancer, as they can compromise the success of the optimal treatment against the tumor. Such adverse events are associated not only with older chemotherapy drugs such as anthracyclines but also with many targeted therapies and immunotherapies. Recognizing this concern, several American and European governing societies in oncology and cardiology have published guidelines on the cardiovascular monitoring of patients receiving potentially cardiotoxic cancer therapies, as well as on the management of cardiovascular toxicities. However, the low level of evidence supporting these guidelines has led to numerous discrepancies, leaving clinicians without a consensus strategy to apply. A cardio-oncology expert panel from the French Working Group of Cardio-Oncology has undertaken an ambitious effort to analyze and harmonize the most recent American and European guidelines to propose roadmaps and decision algorithms that would be easy for clinicians to use in their daily practice. In this statement, the experts addressed the cardiovascular monitoring strategies for the cancer drugs associated with the highest risk of cardiovascular toxicities, as well as the management of such toxicities.

Objective: The aim of this study was to describe return to work determinants in patients with haematological malignancy., Results: This medico-social pilot study included patients with haematological malignancy in the département of Calvados, aged 18 to 55 years, diagnosed between 1st January and 31st December 2010 and alive at 1st January 2015. Patients were identified via consultation of the Lower Normandy haematological malignancy Registry. They completed a specially developed self-questionnaire, in addition to validated questionnaires for anxiety-depression, quality of life and fatigue. Of the patients contacted, 50% accepted to participate. The mean age at diagnosis was 49.8 years, and the majority of patients (79.2%) was professionally active at the time of diagnosis. Only 64.9% of subjects had stopped work due to illness. The psychological impact (demonstrated anxiety) was significantly greater in men (p = 0.01). The majority of subjects returned to work after treatment (80.7%) and among them, the mean duration of absence from work was 16.1 months. Only 52.6% of subjects had informed their occupational physician and 56.7% had benefited from a pre-return visit. The satisfactory response rate obtained is promising for the extension of the present project as a prospective multicentric study.

Congenital neutropenias (CNs) are rare heterogeneous genetic disorders, with about 25% of patients without known genetic defects. Using whole-exome sequencing, we identified a heterozygous mutation in the SRP54 gene, encoding the signal recognition particle (SRP) 54 GTPase protein, in 3 sporadic cases and 1 autosomal dominant family. We subsequently sequenced the SRP54 gene in 66 probands from the French CN registry. In total, we identified 23 mutated cases (16 sporadic, 7 familial) with 7 distinct germ line SRP54 mutations including a recurrent in-frame deletion (Thr117del) in 14 cases. In nearly all patients, neutropenia was chronic and profound with promyelocytic maturation arrest, occurring within the first months of life, and required long-term granulocyte colony-stimulating factor therapy with a poor response. Neutropenia was sometimes associated with a severe neurodevelopmental delay (n = 5) and/or an exocrine pancreatic insufficiency requiring enzyme supplementation (n = 3). The SRP54 protein is a key component of the ribonucleoprotein complex that mediates the co-translational targeting of secretory and membrane proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). We showed that SRP54 was specifically upregulated during the in vitro granulocytic differentiation, and that SRP54 mutations or knockdown led to a drastically reduced proliferation of granulocytic cells associated with an enhanced P53-dependent apoptosis. Bone marrow examination of SRP54 -mutated patients revealed a major dysgranulopoiesis and features of cellular ER stress and autophagy that were confirmed using SRP54 -mutated primary cells and SRP54 knockdown cells. In conclusion, we characterized a pathological pathway, which represents the second most common cause of CN with maturation arrest in the French CN registry., (© 2018 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Background: The ZOHé study was a prospective, observational, multicenter study in France to assess use of biosimilar filgrastim Zarzio in routine clinical practice in patients undergoing neutropenia-inducing chemotherapy., Patients and Methods: Patients ≥ 18 years undergoing chemotherapy for a malignant disease and with a first prescription for Zarzio were enrolled in 2 cohorts: solid tumor (1174 patients) or hematological malignancy (633 patients); the latter is reported here. Analyses primarily described the prescription and use of Zarzio in current practice, and included identification of factors linked to prescription for primary prophylaxis, comparison of use in relation to European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) guidelines, and estimation of chemotherapy dose intensity maintenance in patients given Zarzio., Results: Use of Zarzio in clinical practice was relatively standardized and followed label indication in 96.7% of the analysis population (633 patients). Most patients had ≥ 2 EORTC patient-related risk factors for febrile neutropenia (FN). Chemotherapy dose intensity was maintained in 85.2% of evaluable patients and 89.6% of patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma receiving R-CHOP (rituximab-cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone). The safety profile of Zarzio was confirmed., Conclusions: In routine clinical practice in France, Zarzio is mostly used as primary prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients with hematological malignancies. Patient-related risk factors appear to have more weight in clinicians' decisions to give Zarzio than the FN risk category of the chemotherapy regimen alone in real-world practice., (Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: J.-B. Méar et G.L. Damaj déclarent n’avoir aucun lien d’intérêts

The treatment of acquired hemophilia (AH) involves discussing whether corticosteroids should be administered alone or combined with immunosuppressant drugs, which increase the risk of infection especially in elderly patients and/or those with autoimmunity or neoplastic diseases, who represent the target population of the disease. Prognostic factors highlighting adequate responses to corticosteroids alone must be identified for satisfactory clinical response and lower infectious risk.We aimed to evaluating the efficacy of corticosteroids alone in the management of AH depending on factor VIII (FVIII, ≥ or <1 IU/dL) levels and/or inhibitor (INH, ≤ or >20 Bethesda units per milliliter [BU/mL]) titer.We conducted a retrospective single-center study including 24 patients treated for AH with corticosteroids alone.Time to achieve partial remission (PR: absence of hemorrhage and FVIII levels >50 IU/dL) was significantly shorter in the FVIII ≥ 1 IU/dL group than in the FVIII < 1 IU/dL group (20 [10-55] vs 39 [20-207] days, P = 0.044) and in the INH ≤ 20 BU/mL and FVIII ≥ 1 IU/dL group than in the FVIII < 1 IU/dL and/or INH > 20 BU/mL group (15 [11-35] vs 41 [20-207] days, P = 0.003). In both subgroups, time to achieve complete remission (CR: negative INH and corticosteroids below 10 mg/d) was also significantly shorter than that observed in the opposite subgroups. INH titer, considered alone, did not affect the length of time to onset of PR or CR. CR and PR rates did not differ significantly depending on these variables.Our study suggests that in AH, patients with FVIII levels ≥1 IU/dL considered alone or combined with INH titer ≤20 BU/mL could be treated by corticosteroids alone, given that this subgroup of patients displayed faster therapeutic responses to this strategy., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.