Search

Objectives: CT and MRI scans of the shoulder can lead to the identification of incidental findings (IF), which can have a major impact on the further treatment of the patient. The aim of this retrospective study was to record the prevalence of IF, incidentalomas (IT) and malignant IT for CT and MRI examinations of the shoulder and to investigate the effect of patient characteristics on the statistical occurrence of IF, IT and malignant IT., Materials and Methods: A total of 903 shoulder examinations (415 CT, 488 MRI) were retrospectively analyzed for the presence of IF, subsequently categorized (harmless IF, IT requiring clarification, malignant IT) and analyzed regarding patient characteristics. The statistical analysis was carried out using independent t- and chi-square tests. A significance level of p < 0.05 was set., Results: Among the 903 patients evaluated (436 female, 467 male), 153 (16.9%) patients experienced IF (harmless IF: 101 (11.2%) patients, IT: 94 (10.4%), malignant IT: 4 (0.4%). The average age of the patients without IF and IT was significantly lower compared to the patients with IF and IT (p < 0.001). While IF occurred in 31.1% of the CT, IF was only detected in 4.9% of the MRI (p < 0.001)., Conclusion: IF have a high prevalence (16.9%), especially in CT examinations of the shoulder, which increases with age. The exact detection and initiation of appropriate therapy is of great clinical importance, as early detection of life-threatening diseases enables more effective treatment and a potential gain in health and lifespan., Competing Interests: None., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Objective: Implantation of custom-made acetabular components (CMAC) with load transmission onto the remaining bone stock and reconstruction of the "center of rotation" (COR) in cases of severe periacetabular bone defects., Indications: Severe periacetabular bone loss (Paprosky type IIIA/B) with or without pelvic discontinuity after septic or aseptic loosening with inadequate load capacity of the dorsal pillar and/or large supraacetabular defects., Contraindications: Acute or local infections, lack of compliance, taking into account the risks and complications: missing or limited expected postoperative functional gain, multimorbid patients with potential inoperability during the first and/or second intervention., Surgical Technique: Lateral transgluteal or posterolateral approach while protecting neurovascular and muscular structures. Preparation of the implant site based on preoperative planning with augmentation of bone defects as far as possible. Primarily stable anchoring with 2 angle-stable pole screws in the ilium, an optional pole screw in the pubic bone for determination of COR, and stabilization screws in the iliac wing (optionally angle-stable). Use of dual mobility cup according to the soft tissue tension and intraoperative stability., Postoperative Management: For the first 6 weeks postoperative partial weight-bearing (20 kg), followed by a gradual increase of the load (10 kg per week)., Results: Between 2008 and 2018, 47 patients with a Paprosky type III defect underwent implantation of a monoflanged CMAC. Main complication was a periprosthetic joint infection with subsequent need for implant removal in 9 of 10 cases. Harris Hip Score improved from 21.1 to 61.5 points. X‑ray imaging displayed an angle of inclination of 42.3 ± 5.3°, an anteversion of 16.8 ± 6.2°, a ∆ H of 0.5 ± 0.2 mm and a ∆ V of 17.7 ± 1.1 mm according to Roessler et al., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Background: Periprosthetic acetabular fractures are an increasing severe complication in revision arthroplasty. A differentiation is made between periprosthetic acetabular fractures (acute/traumatic fractures) and insufficiency fractures (chronic fractures)., Objective: This article introduces a novel treatment algorithm that provides assistance in therapeutic decision making for implant selection and the anchoring philosophy based on diagnostic decision criteria and the relevant load-bearing osseous structures, taking the defect situation into account., Material and Methods: The article provides an overview of original and review articles., Results: The essential criteria for decisions in treatment planning are based on the stability of the primary cup, the load-bearing ability of the main anatomical structures and the resulting defect situation. For insufficiency fractures the reason for the revision and therefore the exclusion of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) must additionally be considered. In the case of proven PJI a two-stage or multistage prosthesis exchange must be carried out. Based on the extent of apparent bony defects and pelvic discontinuity, the spectrum of treatment options ranges up to implantation of individual patient custom-made acetabular components., Discussion/conclusion: This overview introduces a new treatment algorithm that provides assistance in decision making for traumatic periprosthetic acetabular fractures and insufficiency fractures. It also provides decision criteria for selection of implants and the surgical approach. Due to the complexity of revision arthroplasty often requiring specialized expertise in trauma and orthopedic surgery and experienced revision surgeons, the operative treatment of periprosthetic acetabular fractures should only be carried out in specialized orthopedic and trauma surgery centers with appropriate experience.

Objectives: To prospectively evaluate the diagnostic value and radiation dose of time-resolved CT-Angiography (4D-CTA) in pediatric patients with venous malformations using 3rd generation dual-source CT (DSCT) at 70 kVp tube voltage., Methods: Between November 2014 and August 2015, seven children (2 male, 5 female; median age, 9 years; range 3-12 years) with suspected peripheral, non-cerebral, venous malformations were included in this feasibility study and underwent US, MRI and 4D-CTA. All three imaging modalities were analyzed and compared individually by an experienced interventional radiologist and a pediatric surgeon using a 5-point Likert scale, with regard to diagnosis of the vascular anomaly, additional information like presence of thrombophlebitis and lesion extension, flow dynamics, localization, volume and significance for treatment planning. For quantitative statistical analysis, an unifactorial analysis of variance was performed for every parameter and all three imaging modalities. Radiation dose values as expressed by the volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP) were recorded for of all patients., Results: Three out of six patients had isolated type I venous malformations without peripheral venous drainage which could be demonstrated on MRI and CT. In two out of six patients a type II venous malformation with drainage into normal veins was diagnosed. In one case, 4D-CT was the only imaging modality that revealed a slow-flow venous malformation with shunting supply by a hypodynamic arterial feeder., Treatment Planning: 4D-CTA was rated as the best imaging modality for treatment planning with agreement between radiologist and surgeon, especially with respect to the hemodynamics of the venous malformation., Conclusions: 4D-CTA at 70 kVp is a fast imaging modality that provides comprehensive diagnostic information of venous malformations in pediatric patients and is very valuable for therapy planning. Radiation dose of 4D-CTA must be weighted against the diagnostic information as well as the potential risk for sedation and contrast administration during MRI.