Search

This study (NCT01288573) investigated plerixafor’s safety and efficacy in children with cancer. Stage 1 investigated the dosage, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and safety of plerixafor + standard mobilization (G-CSF ± chemotherapy). The stage 2 primary endpoint was successful mobilization (doubling of peripheral blood CD34+ cell count in the 24 h prior to first apheresis) in patients treated with plerixafor + standard mobilization vs. standard mobilization alone. In stage 1, three patients per age group (2–<6, 6–<12, and 12–<18 years) were treated at each dose level (160, 240, and 320 µg/kg). Based on PK and PD data, the dose proposed for stage 2 was 240 µg/kg (patients 1–<18 years), in which 45 patients were enrolled (30 plerixafor arm, 15 standard arm). Patient demographics and characteristics were well balanced across treatment arms. More patients in the plerixafor arm (24/30, 80%) met the primary endpoint of successful mobilization than in the standard arm (4/14, 28.6%, p = 0.0019). Adverse events reported as related to study treatment were mild, and no new safety concerns were identified. Plerixafor + standard G-CSF ± chemotherapy mobilization was generally well tolerated and efficacious when used to mobilize CD34+ cells in pediatric cancer patients.

Survival for subgroups of patients with Wilms tumor (WT), such as those who suffer from relapse, is disappointing. Some patients’ treatment plans include high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) with autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (aHCT), although proof for its benefit is lacking. To increase the level of evidence regarding children with WT receiving aHCT as consolidation of first or second remission (after first relapse), we extracted relevant data from the European Blood and Marrow Transplantation Registry concerning 69 patients. Different HDT regimens were administered, mostly either melphalan-containing (n = 34) or thiotepa-containing (n = 14). For the whole population, 5-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) probabilities were 0.67 (±0.06) and 0.63 (±0.06), respectively (median observation time 7.8 years); for children transplanted in first remission, OS and EFS were 0.69 (±0.09) and 0.72 (±0.08). In univariate analysis, male gender and relapse in multiple sites were associated with lower OS probabilities. The use of a given pretransplant regimen (i.e. melphalan alone versus regimens with multiple drugs) did not seem to influence EFS/OS probability after aHCT, but significantly influenced platelet engraftment (more delayed with thiotepa). We here provide further data to improve the basis for future evidence-based clinical decision-making when using HDT and aHCT in relapsed/refractory WT.

Background and Objectives. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is associated with profound neutropenia and significant morbidity and mortality. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of non-glycosylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rHuG-CSF) in accelerating myeloid recovery and its influence on infections, supportive therapy, and transplant-related mortality we carried out a randomized study in pediatric patients receiving HSCT. Design and Methods. Two hundred and twenty-one consecutive children, recipients of an allogeneic or autologous bone marrow (BM) or peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplant, were randomized to either receive rHuG-CSF 10 ug/kg (n=110) or not (n=111) Results. Myeloid engraftment was faster in the treated arm (14 vs 20 days, p=0.0001). Neutrophil recovery was accelerated both in the BM subgroups (allogeneic and autologous, p=0.002) and in the PBPC group (p=0.0005). All the other evaluated variables showed an advantage in favor of rHuG-CSF treated patients that was significant for platelet transfusion independence and time to discharge (p=0.02 and p=0.04, respectively) only in the BM subgroup. Interpretation and Conclusions. We conclude that faster neutrophil recovery in BM recipients receiving rHuG-CSF led to clinical benefits, while, in the PBPC subgroup, it did not translate into clinical advantages.

We investigated the feasibility and efficacy of high‐dose vincristine (4 mg/m2 over 4 d) combined with fractionated total body irradiation (F‐TBI) (200 cGyx2 over 3 d) and cyclophosphamide (60 mg/kg for 2 d) as a preparative regimen in allogeneic (AlloBMT) and autologous (ABMT) bone marrow transplantation for 75 consecutive children (median age at transplant 8‐5 years) with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in second complete remission (CR). Median duration of first CR was 26 and 25 months in the AlloBMT and ABMT group, respectively. Of the 46 patients who underwent AlloBMT, 33 had isolated or combined marrow relapse and 13 isolated extramedullary relapse. Of the 29 patients given ABMT, 23 had preBMT isolated or combined marrow relapse and six isolated extramedullary relapse. 44/75 patients are alive and in CR at a median follow‐up of 35 months (range 10‐90 months). Seven children given AlloBMT (15.8%) and two given ABMT (7%) died from transplant‐related causes. No major early organ toxicity, including vincristine‐related toxicity, was recorded. The overall 3‐year EFS estimate (95% CL) was 53.8% (42‐66%): in particular, 58.2% (40‐76%) for AlloBMT and 27.6% (9‐46%) for ABMT patients who experienced a marrow relapse before transplant. The overall 3‐year relapse rate estimate (95% CL) was 39.2% (27‐51%): in particular, 30.1% (12‐49%) in the AlloBMT group and 72% (54‐91%) in the ABMT group (P < 0.01) who presented a preBMT isolated or combined marrow relapse. We conclude that the conditioning regimen with high‐dose vincristine combined with cyclophosphamide and F‐TBI is feasible and promising, although its therapeutic advantage should be tested in larger series of patients enrolled in randomized studies.

In order to compare the outcomes of unrelated umbilical cord blood transplants (UCBTs) or bone marrow transplants, 541 children with acute leukemia (AL) transplanted with umbilical cord blood (n = 99), T-cell-depleted unrelated bone marrow transplants (T-UBMT) (n = 180), or nonmanipulated (UBMT) (n = 262), were analyzed in a retrospective multicenter study. Comparisons were performed after adjustment for patient, disease, and transplant variables. The major difference between the 3 groups was the higher number in the UCBT group of HLA mismatches (defined by serology for class I and molecular typing for DRB1). The donor was HLA mismatched in 92% of UCBTs, in 18% of UBMTs, and in 43% of T-UBMTs (P<.001). Other significant differences were observed in pretransplant disease characteristics, preparative regimens, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, and number of cells infused. Nonadjusted estimates of 2-year survival and event-free survival rates were 49% and 43%, respectively, in the UBMT group, 41% and 37% in the T-UBMT group, and 35% and 31% in the UCBT group. After adjustment, differences in outcomes appeared in the first 100 days after the transplantation. Compared with UBMT recipients, UCBT recipients had delayed hematopoietic recovery (Hazard ratio [HR] = 0.37; 95% confidence interval [95CI]: 0.27-0.52; P<.001), increased 100 day transplant-related mortality (HR = 2.13; 95CI: 1.20-3.76; P<.01) and decreased acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) (HR = 0.50; 95CI: 0.34-0.73; P<.001). T-UBMT recipients had decreased aGVHD (HR = 0.25; 95CI: 0.17-0.36; P<.0001) and increased risk of relapse (HR = 1.96; 95CI: 1.11-3.45; P =.02). After day 100 posttransplant, the 3 groups achieved similar results in terms of relapse. Chronic GVHD was decreased after T-UBMT (HR = 0.21; 95CI: 0.11-0.37; P<.0001) and UCBT (HR = 0.24; 95CI: 0.01-0.66; P =.002), and overall mortality was higher in T-UBMT recipients (HR = 1.39; 95CI: 0.97-1.99; P<.07). In concl

A randomized trial was carried out comparing cyclosporin A (CsA) and short-term methotrexate (MTX) versus CsA alone for graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) undergoing allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) from a compatible sibling. Seventy-one patients (median age, 19 years; range, 4-46 years) were randomized to receive either CsA and MTX or CsA alone for the first 3 weeks after BMT. Subsequently, both groups received CsA orally, with gradual drug reduction until discontinuation 8 to 12 months after BMT. Patients randomized in both arms had comparable characteristics and received the same preparative regimen (ie, cyclophosphamide 200 mg/kg over 4 days). The median time for neutrophil engraftment was 17 days (range, 11-31 days) and 12 days (range, 4-45 days) for patients in the CsA/MTX group and the CsA alone group, respectively (P =.01). No significant difference was observed in the probability of either grade 2, grade 3, or grade 4 acute GVHD or chronic GVHD developing in the 2 groups. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of 1-year transplantation-related mortality rates for patients given either CsA/MTX or CsA alone were 3% and 15%, respectively (P =.07). With a median follow-up of 48 months from BMT, the 5-year survival probability is 94% for patients in the CsA/MTX group and 78% for those in the CsA alone group (P =. 05). These data indicate that the use of CsA with MTX is associated with improved survival in patients with SAA who receive transplants from compatible siblings. (Blood. 2000;96:1690-1697)