Search

Purpose: In the absence of specific recommendations on blood transfusion in elderly subjects, we carried out a survey to assess transfusion practices in geriatric medicine., Methods: A descriptive, national, cross-sectional survey was conducted in 14 French geriatric departments (12 teaching hospitals and two general hospitals). In each department, five patients receiving transfusions were randomly selected in order to analyze their characteristics, the indications of blood transfusion, the criteria for and the methods of transfusion compared with Afssaps recommendations on transfusion thresholds., Results: Data were analyzed for 70 patients (mean age 86+/-7 years, sex ratio female to male 1.8, with an average of five+/-two pathologies and six+/-three treatments). The indicators of poor tolerance included confusion (23 %), somnolence (22 %), acute heart failure (17 %) or coronary heart disease (16 %), and differed from the Afssaps criteria in the majority of cases. The transfusion threshold that were considered in the absence of poor tolerance (45 % of transfusions) differed from that recommended by Afssaps in 26 % of cases. The main adverse event in transfusion recipients was heart failure., Conclusion: When criteria for poor anaemia tolerance or transfusion thresholds are considered, transfusion practices in geriatric subjects have specific features. Further studies are needed to validate the appropriateness of the practices described in this survey.

Introduction: In the elderly, both the presence of a multiple pathology and multiple medication have been shown to be frequent risk factors for adverse drug events. However, a few studies only have included parameters of standardized geriatric assessment for the purpose of identifying other risk factors. Our study compared the parameters of standard geriatric assessment, in the presence or absence of adverse drug events and evaluated the prevalence of adverse drug events in elderly inpatients, the symptoms, and the drugs involved., Methods: A total of 823 patients were studied during a two-year period. Two groups of patients were identified, according to the presence or absence of an adverse drug event. Eight fields of geriatric assessment were compared: comorbidities, number of drugs, functional status, nutritional status, mobility, mood, neurosensory disorders, and cognition. For patients who experienced an adverse drug event, we also analyzed the drugs involved and the symptoms of the adverse drug events., Results: One hundred and twelve patients (13.6%) aged 82 years+/-7.5 experienced 144 adverse drug events. Significant differences between the two groups were observed in the following: symptoms of depression, problems of mobility, risk of malnutrition (respectively p=0.001, p=0.002, p=0.007), the female sex, number of drugs, number of comorbidities, and the administration of diuretics. Cardiovascular (23.2%), psychotropic (17.9%) and anti-infectious (17%) medicines were the most frequently involved. The symptoms that occurred most frequently were orthostatic hypotension (14.6%), gastrointestinal disorders (12.5%), and neuropsychological (10.4%) disorders., Conclusion: Elderly patients with multiple pathology and multiple medication are at high risk for adverse drug events. Other lesser known factors, such as depression, problems of mobility, and malnutrition must be researched, as they are evidence of the underlying the frailty of the elderly population.

Acute lithium intoxication may occur in circumstances causing kidney failure, when using lithium chronically. This situation may lead to neurological symptoms with coma, gastrointestinal disorders with diarrhea, cardiovascular symptoms with hypotension and metabolic symptoms with hypercalcemia. Nephrogenic diabetes insipidus may also develop. We report the case of a 69-year-old woman suffering from unipolar manic-depressive psychosis and treated by lithium for 10 years. This case highlights the need to monitor serum lithium levels in patients on long-term lithium regimens, especially in circumstances involving dehydration.

Objective: In a context of organization of care where the budget of hospitals is a function of the number and of the severity of the in-patients and not of the duration of stay, stays of long duration (SLD) in short-stay hospitals represent a problem of both medical and administrative management. To identify the characteristics of long-duration stays., Methods: The data used in this retrospective study were drawn from the Standardized Discharge Summaries of the year 1997 of a University Hospital of the Paris area (France). A stay of long duration (SLD) was defined in an arbitrary way as a stay exceeding 30 days. The stays of long duration (> 30 days) were subdivided in "long stays" (from 31 to 60 days) and "very long stays" (more than 60 days)., Results: The SLDs represent 3.7% of the discharge summaries of our hospital, among them, 40% are medical DRGs and 60% surgical DRGs. The patients in SLD more often come from other structures of care than the patients having a short duration stay of (SDS) coming mainly from their residence and were also hospitalised in several different units during their stay. Patients having a long stay were more often classified in DRGs outside the principal activity of this hospital (i.e. cardiovascular diseases)., Conclusion: This first approach suggests that a set of simple descriptive variables (pre-existing and acquired co-morbidity, admission in surgical ward, multi-unit stay...) makes it possible to identify the patients likely to have a long duration stay. Simple variables added to the current hospital minimum medical record would make it possible to consider a predictive approach.