Search

In multiple sclerosis (MS), increasing disability is considered to occur due to persistent, chronic inflammation trapped within the central nervous system (CNS). This condition, known as smoldering neuroinflammation, is present across the clinical spectrum of MS and is currently understood to be relatively resistant to treatment with existing disease-modifying therapies. Chronic active white matter lesions represent a key component of smoldering neuroinflammation. Initially characterized in autopsy specimens, multiple approaches to visualize chronic active lesions (CALs) in vivo using advanced neuroimaging techniques and postprocessing methods are rapidly emerging. Among these in vivo imaging correlates of CALs, paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs) are defined by the presence of a perilesional rim formed by iron-laden microglia and macrophages, whereas slowly expanding lesions are identified based on linear, concentric lesion expansion over time. In recent years, several longitudinal studies have linked the occurrence of in vivo detected CALs to a more aggressive disease course. PRLs are highly specific to MS and therefore have recently been incorporated into the MS diagnostic criteria. They also have prognostic potential as biomarkers to identify patients at risk of early and severe disease progression. These developments could significantly affect MS care and the evaluation of new treatments. This review describes the latest knowledge on CAL biology and imaging and the relevance of CALs to the natural history of MS. In addition, we outline considerations for current and future in vivo biomarkers of CALs, emphasizing the need for validation, standardization, and automation in their assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs) are chronic active lesions associated with a more severe disease course in multiple sclerosis (MS). Retinal layer thinning measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a biomarker of neuroaxonal damage associated with disability progression in MS. Objective: We aimed to determine a potential association between OCT parameters (peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL), inner nuclear layer (INL) thickness), and PRLs in patients with MS (pwMS). Methods: In this cross-sectional retrospective study, we included pwMS with both 3T brain MRI and an OCT scan. Regression models were calculated with OCT parameters (pRNFL, GCIPL, INL) as dependent variables, and the number of PRLs as an independent variable adjusted for covariates. Results: We analyzed data from 107 pwMS (mean age 34.7 years (SD 10.9), 64.5% female, median disease duration 6 years (IQR 1–13), median EDSS 1.5 (range 0–6.5)). Higher number of PRLs was associated with lower pRNFL (β = −0.18; 95% CI −0.98, −0.03; p = 0.038) and GCIPL thickness (β = −0.21; 95% CI −0.58, −0.02; p = 0.039). Conclusion: The association between higher number of PRLs and lower pRNFL and GCIPL thicknesses provides additional evidence that pwMS with PRLs are affected by a more pronounced neurodegenerative process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Despite strongly overlapping patterns of clinical and histopathologic findings in primary and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis, differences concerning motor symptoms, central nervous system inflammation, atrophy, and demyelination that cannot be accounted for by lesion load alone remain to be elucidated. Purpose: To evaluate the normal-appearing deep gray matter in patients with primary and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis, diffusion tensor imaging was used in this study. Material and Methods: In 14 multiple sclerosis patients with primary and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis, axial echo-planar single-shot diffusion tensor imaging sequences with 32 diffusion-encoding directions and axial FLAIR sequences were acquired on a 3T system using an eight-channel SENSE head coil. FLAIR hyperintense multiple sclerosis lesions were outlined semi-automatically and normal-appearing deep gray matter was outlined manually (caudate nucleus, globus pallidus, putamen, thalamus, substantia nigra, and red nucleus). Fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity values within the normal-appearing deep gray matter for the two groups were compared. Results: Interhemispheric differences in mean diffusivity values (but not in fractional anisotropy), were significantly higher in primary progressive multiple sclerosis than in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis for the substantia nigra (P = 0.04) and the putamen (P = 0.021). Volumes, mean diffusivity, or fractional anisotropy of the remaining normal-appearing deep gray matter did not differ significantly. Conclusion: This study showed a higher interhemispheric difference in the mean diffusivity in the substantia nigra and putamen in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis than in those with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. These changes may represent edema, as well as axonal and myelin loss that can affect the normal-appearing deep gray matter of the two hemispheres differently and may point to differences in the laterality of motor symptoms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The incidence and clinical impact of serum autoantibodies in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) are controversially discussed. The aim of the study was to reassess the value of elevated serum autoantibodies in our MS study cohort. Material & Methods: In total, 176 MS patients were retrospectively analyzed for coexistence and clinical impact of increased serum autoantibody levels. Results: The 18.8% of the MS cohort showed elevated serum autoantibody levels, but only 10.2% of all MS patients were diagnosed with a further autoimmune disease (AI). Patients with elevated serum autoantibodies (AABS) were not significantly more often diagnosed with a clinical manifest AI as compared to patients with negative autoantibodies (P = 0.338). MS patients with disease duration of more than 10 years showed no significant increase of positive autoantibodies as compared to patients with a more recent disease onset (P = 1). MS patients with elevated serum autoantibodies did not exhibit a significantly worse disease course (P = 0.428). Conclusions: According to our data, elevated serum autoantibodies do not have the potential to serve as a prognostic tool for disease severity in patients with MS Since MS patients with positive serum AABS did not significantly more often suffer from clinical manifest AIs than MS patients with negative serum AABS, the role of routine testing of serum AABS in MS patients should be critically called into question. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and purpose Methods Results Conclusions Paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs) are chronic active lesions associated with a severe disease course in multiple sclerosis (MS). This study was undertaken to investigate an association between retinal layer thinning (annualized loss of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer [aLpRNFL] and ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer [aLGCIPL]) and PRLs in patients with MS (pwMS).In this study, pwMS with brain magnetic resonance imaging and ≥2 optical coherence tomography scans were included. Cox proportional hazard regression models were performed using progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) as the dependent variable, and aLpRNFL, aLGCIPL, or the number of PRLs as independent variables, adjusted for covariates.We analyzed data from 97 pwMS (mean age = 35.2 years [SD = 9.9], 71.1% female, median disease duration = 2.3 years [interquartile range = 0.9–9.0]). The number of PRLs was associated with aLpRNFL and aLGCIPL. PIRA was observed in 18 (18.6%) pwMS, with aLpRNFL (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.44 per %/year), aLGCIPL (HR = 1.61 per %/year), and the number of PRLs (HR = 1.24 per PRL) being associated with increased risk of PIRA.The number of PRLs is associated with inner retinal layer thinning and increased risk of PIRA. A combination of PRLs and retinal layer thinning could serve as a surrogate for pwMS at highest risk of disability progression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs) are an imaging biomarker in multiple sclerosis (MS), associated with a more severe disease., Objectives: To determine quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) metrics of PRLs, lesions with diffuse susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI)-hypointense signal (DSHLs) and SWI-isointense lesions (SILs), their surrounding periplaque area (PPA) and the normal-appearing white matter (NAWM)., Methods: In a cross-sectional study, quantitative MRI metrics were measured in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) using the multi-dynamic multi-echo (MDME) sequence post-processing software "SyMRI.", Results: In 30 pwMS, 59 PRLs, 74 DSHLs, and 107 SILs were identified. Beside longer T1 relaxation times of PRLs compared to DSHLs and SILs (2030.5 (1519-2540) vs 1615.8 (1403.3-1953.5) vs 1199.5 (1089.6-1334.6), both p  < 0.001), longer T1 relaxation times were observed in the PRL PPA compared to the SIL PPA and the NAWM but not the DSHL PPA. Patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) had longer T1 relaxation times in PRLs compared to patients with late relapsing multiple sclerosis (lRMS) (2394.5 (2030.5-3040) vs 1869.3 (1491.4-2451.3), p  = 0.015) and also in the PRL PPA compared to patients with early relapsing multiple sclerosis (eRMS) (982 (927-1093.5) vs 904.3 (793.3-958.5), p  = 0.013)., Conclusion: PRLs are more destructive than SILs, leading to diffuse periplaque white matter (WM) damage. The quantitative MRI-based evaluation of the PRL PPA could be a marker for silent progression in pwMS., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: N.K. has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Alexion, BMS/Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi-Genzyme and held a grant for a Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Training Fellowship Programme from the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS). V.S. has nothing to disclose. J.L. has nothing to disclose. L.H. has nothing to disclose. G.B. has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva, and received honoraria for consulting Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva. He has received unrestricted research grants from Celgene/BMS and Novartis. G.K. has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, and received honoraria for consulting from Biogen. F.L. has participated in meetings sponsored by or received honoraria for acting as an advisor/speaker for Bayer, Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Janssen, MedDay, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva. B.K. has received honoraria for speaking and for consulting from Biogen, BMS-Celgene, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Teva, and Sanofi-Genzyme outside of the submitted work. No conflict of interest with respect to this study. P.S.R. has received honoraria for consultancy/speaking from AbbVie, Almirall, Alexion, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva and has received research grants from Amicus, Biogen, Merck, and Roche. T.B. has participated in meetings sponsored by and received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, consultations) from pharmaceutical companies marketing treatments for MS: Allergan, Bayer, Biogen, Bionorica, BMS/Celgene, GSK, GW/Jazz Pharma, Horizon, Janssen-Cilag, MedDay, Merck, Novartis, Octapharma, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva, and UCB. His institution has received financial support in the past 12 months by unrestricted research grants (Biogen, Bayer, BMS/Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva and for participation in clinical trials in multiple sclerosis sponsored by Alexion, Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Octapharma, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva). H.L. has received honoraria for lectures from Novartis, Biogen, ROCHE, Merck, and Sanofi-Aventis. A.D.-B.’s position as junior group leader for Translational Morphology in Neuroscience is supported by a research grant from Biogen. She has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Celgene (BMS), Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi, and has received an unrestricted grant from Merck GmbH, an affiliate of Merck KGaA. S.H. has participated in meetings sponsored by or received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Biogen and Sanofi-Aventis.