Search

Candidemia is a major cause of in-hospital mortality. Antifungal stewardship programme (AFSP) providing infectious diseases consultation (IDC) might improve the outcome. We evaluate the impact on candidemia mortality of IDC as part of AFSP restricting the use of all antifungals with exception of fluconazole. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients with documented candidemia in our hospital during the period 2012-2014 evaluating the impact of several variables on 30-days in-hospital mortality. We reviewed data on 276 patients with documented candidemia: 200 (72%) were treated without IDC and 76 (28%) with IDC. In the group without IDC, 52 patients (26%) received no antifungal therapy. Antifungals used for treating candidemia were (no IDC/IDC): azoles (74%/42%); echinocandins (0%/46%); liposomal and lipidic complex amphotericin B (0%/12%). The 30-day in-hospital mortality was respectively (no IDC/IDC) 37% vs. 20% (p = 0.011). The multivariate analysis confirmed IDC as independent factor protecting from death (OR 0.511, 95% CI 0.251-0.994; p = 0.046), together with fungemia due to non-albicans Candida (OR 0.565, 95% CI 0.327-0.977; p = 0.042). Age65 years was associated with a higher risk of death (OR 1.989, 95% CI 1.055-3.895; p = 0.038). The additional cost for the use of echinocandins driven by IDC in the study period was €207,000. IDC, as a part of a restrictive front-end antimicrobial stewardship programme (ASP), providing a timely right choice of antifungal therapy, increases the cost of antifungal drugs but might be a contributing protective factor from mortality due to candidemia. Efforts to increase the number of IDC in patients with candidemia seems to be warranted.

The aim of this paper is to analyse the use of anti-TNF drugs in current Italian practice, evaluate clinical responses to treatment, and identify possible predictors of negative response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).DOSE is a non-interventional, prospective study of patients with active RA treated for the first time with anti-TNF agents in 21 Italian hospitals. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients, treatments and outcome measures were assessed. Outcome measures used were EULAR response, DAS28 remission and HAQ remission at 12 months. A stepwise logistic regression model was used to study the predictors of non-response.Of 299 RA patients (mean 53.8 ± 12.8 years, 76.1% female), DAS28 was5.1 in 60.5% of patients and HAQ was1 in 65.9%. Etanercept was the most prescribed anti-TNF. DMARDs were used in 77.6% of patients (methotrexate in 59.2%). Significant improvements in clinical and laboratory parameters were observed at 12 months. The proportion of patients classed as non-responders remained high, and varied according to assessment criteria. The main predictors independently and significantly associated with a high risk of non-response were: age and female gender for all outcome criteria; high DAS28 value for disease remission; and HAQ1 for disability remission.In Italian anti-TNF treatment for RA, age, gender, and high values of both disease activity and disability were predictors of non-response to first-line therapy with anti-TNF drugs. Future studies should consider optimal second-line therapies for RA patients who do not achieve remission to their first anti-TNF treatment.