Search

Importance: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), comprising apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and dabigatran, are commonly used medications to treat patients with atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. Decisions about how to manage DOACs in patients undergoing a surgical or nonsurgical procedure are important to decrease the risks of bleeding and thromboembolism., Observations: For elective surgical or nonsurgical procedures, a standardized approach to perioperative DOAC management involves classifying the risk of procedure-related bleeding as minimal (eg, minor dental or skin procedures), low to moderate (eg, cholecystectomy, inguinal hernia repair), or high risk (eg, major cancer or joint replacement procedures). For patients undergoing minimal bleeding risk procedures, DOACs may be continued, or if there is concern about excessive bleeding, DOACs may be discontinued on the day of the procedure. Patients undergoing a low to moderate bleeding risk procedure should typically discontinue DOACs 1 day before the operation and restart DOACs 1 day after. Patients undergoing a high bleeding risk procedure should stop DOACs 2 days prior to the operation and restart DOACs 2 days after. With this perioperative DOAC management strategy, rates of thromboembolism (0.2%-0.4%) and major bleeding (1%-2%) are low and delays or cancellations of surgical and nonsurgical procedures are infrequent. Patients taking DOACs who need emergent (<6 hours after presentation) or urgent surgical procedures (6-24 hours after presentation) experience bleeding rates up to 23% and thromboembolism as high as 11%. Laboratory testing to measure preoperative DOAC levels may be useful to determine whether patients should receive a DOAC reversal agent (eg, prothrombin complex concentrates, idarucizumab, or andexanet-α) prior to an emergent or urgent procedure., Conclusions and Relevance: When patients who are taking a DOAC require an elective surgical or nonsurgical procedure, standardized management protocols can be applied that do not require testing DOAC levels or heparin bridging. When patients taking a DOAC require an emergent, urgent, or semiurgent surgical procedure, anticoagulant reversal agents may be appropriate when DOAC levels are elevated or not available.

Background: Dabigatran directly inhibits thrombin and is used in primary and secondary stroke prevention in individuals with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. The prodrug dabigatran etexilate is absorbed by enteral P-glycoprotein (ABCB1) and then activated by hepatic and intestinal carboxylesterases (CES1) to produce active metabolites. Variations in dabigatran metabolism because of genetics may affect concentration levels and clinical outcomes., Study Question: We conducted a study to assess how polymorphisms in the CES1 (rs2244613) and ABCB1 (rs4148738) genes affect the through plasma level (c min ) of dabigatran and its correlation to clinical outcomes., Study Design: Retrospective multicentric study of consecutive patients on dabigatran therapy. Examination of CES1 rs2244613 and ABCB1 rs4148738 polymorphisms, c min 12 hours after administration, clinical follow-up (ischemic stroke, major or clinically relevant hemorrhage, myocardial infarction, other thromboembolism, and death)., Measures and Outcomes: A total of 432 patients received treatment for an average of 19.78 months (SD of 20.165). The sex distribution of the patients was 56.5% male, and the average age was 67.56 years (SD of 14.7). The ABCB1 variant genotype was present in 67.8% of patients, whereas 37.5% carried the CES1 polymorphism., Results: Compared with wild-type patients, patients with the CES1 variant had significantly lower dabigatran plasma levels (with a mean difference of 16.986; 95% confidence interval, 5.794-28.178 ng/mL, P = 0.003). We also found a significant risk of major bleeding in patients carrying the ABCB1 rs4148738 allele (hazard ratio = 1.99, confidence interval 95% 1.10 to 3.59, P = 0.024)., Conclusions: The CES1 variant genotype rs2244613 is closely linked with reduced c min of dabigatran. Carriers of the ABCB1 rs4148738 polymorphism exhibit a tendency toward higher plasma levels of dabigatran, which leads to a significantly increased risk of bleeding., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Dabigatran (DBG), marketed as Pradaxa, is an anticoagulant medication prescribed for the treatment and mitigation of blood clots and to lower the risk of stroke in individuals with the heart condition known as atrial fibrillation. This medication is specifically indicated for preventing blood clots post hip or knee replacement surgeries and in patients with a prior history of clots. Compared to warfarin, dabigatran serves as a viable alternative that does not necessitate routine blood monitoring tests. The complimentary benefits associated with SALL (salting-out assisted liquid-liquid extraction) and the fluorogenic capabilities of benzofurazan. These methods were combined to provide an affordable and sensitive DBG assaying method. The spectral strength of the yellow luminous product was examined at 533.8 nm and by adjustment of a wavelength of 474.7 nm for excitation. To assess its linearity, the calibration chart was tested across a DBG concentration range of 30-500 ng/ml. Via accurate computation based on ICH, the detection limit (LD) was determined to be 9.5 ng/ml, and the strategy can quantify the DBG to a limit of 28 ng/ml. To ensure success, various crucial parameters for method implementation have been extensively studied and adapted. The validation of the strategy adhered to the policies outlined by ICH, affirming its precision in quantifying DBG in capsules. Furthermore, the inclusion of SALLE steps facilitated accurate monitoring of DBG in plasma samples, introducing a unique and advanced methodology for analyzing this compound in biological samples., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Routine monitoring of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) levels is not recommended but may be useful in certain clinical situations. There is a knowledge gap regarding the clinical use of DOAC levels in Australian hospitals., Aims: To evaluate the clinical settings, indications and changes to anticoagulant management associated with DOAC levels in a tertiary hospital in Northern Tasmania, Australia., Methods: Patients with one or more DOAC levels (dabigatran, rivaroxaban or apixaban) requested between January 2017 and December 2022 were identified. Retrospective chart review was performed to evaluate the clinical settings, indications, adequacy of request information and changes to clinical management associated with the measurement of DOAC levels., Results: One hundred and twenty-nine DOAC measurements (54 rivaroxaban, 66 apixaban and nine dabigatran) were performed in 98 patients between January 2017 and December 2022. Annual requests for DOAC levels increased significantly between 2017 and 2019 and remained stable between 2020 and 2021 but declined in 2022. Overall, the most common indication for a DOAC level was renal impairment, followed by bleeding and recurrent thrombosis. Approximately 25% of requests were for acute bleeding with a reversal/haemostatic agent given in 45% of patients, while 10% were prior to urgent surgery. Measurement of DOAC levels was associated with a change in management in 50% of cases. 10% of requests did not specify anticoagulant history., Conclusion: Trends in requests for DOAC levels have changed over time. Clinician education regarding the importance of providing specific anticoagulant history is essential. Future prospective studies investigating the clinical utility of DOAC levels in different clinical settings are needed., (© 2024 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.)

Dabigatran etexilate (DBG) is a new anticoagulant drug (commercially sold under the names Pradaxa® and Pradax™) that replaces Warfarin, the landmark agent for anticoagulation therapy. Inadequate administration of DBG or in the cases of massive bleeding that occurs after renal impairment, DBG therapy can carry a substantial life-threatening risks. One of the major limitations of DBG treatment is the lack of a simple and quick tool for measuring its level in blood in the case of massive bleedings or emergency operations. In this work, we have incorporated a previously isolated aptamer for DBG to develop a simple competitive lateral flow aptasensor (LFA) for the determination of DBG in buffer and blood samples. A full-length 60-mer aptamer as well as a truncated 38-mer aptamer were conjugated to gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) via thiol-Au coupling chemistry. After appropriate AuNP surface passivation steps, the aptamer's core region was hybridized with 8-mer biotinylated sequences. The conjugated particles could be capture on the test line by the interaction of the biotin molecules with a previously deposited streptavidin. Incubation of the conjugated particles with DBG causes the aptamer to undergo a conformational change that releases the 8-mer biotinylated sequences and result in the disappearance of the test line. Lysozyme protein was used to construct the control line that non-specifically interacts with the conjugated particles whether or not the target compound is present. The developed LFA achieves 20 nM detection level in buffer and blood samples, operates within the nanomolar range, and shows excellent selectivity against potential interfering molecules. The developed sensor could help assessing the levels of DBG in medical conditions that require rapid interventions., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

It is unclear whether elderly patients established on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have greater exposure to these drugs, which could subsequently increase their risk of bleeding. We assessed DOAC exposure and factors affecting it in a real-world elderly cohort of patients. For this, 151 medically stable hospital inpatients (76 established on apixaban, 61 on rivaroxaban, 14 on dabigatran) with a median [interquartile range (IQR)] age of 84 (78-89) years were recruited. Patients provided blood samples for measurement of peak and trough plasma DOAC concentrations. There was up to 48-fold and 13-fold variation in trough and peak plasma drug concentrations respectively. A significantly greater proportion of patients on apixaban had peak plasma drug concentrations within the reported ranges compared to those on either rivaroxaban or dabigatran (82·9% vs. 44·3% vs. 64·3% respectively; P < 0·001). A third of the variability in DOAC plasma concentrations was attributed to the influences of DOAC dosage, renal function and gender. To what extent the observed increases in DOAC exposure in the older patients is the cause of their increased risk of bleeding, which could potentially be ameliorated by dosing titration, requires further investigation., (© 2021 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

In this study, we evaluated the in vitro stability of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in blood samples of 57 patients under different storage conditions using functional coagulation assays. We determined the analyte concentrations (1) immediately after blood collection (baseline); (2) after storage of citrated whole blood (agitated) at room temperature and citrated plasma at room temperature and at 4 °C for 4, 8, and 24 h, respectively; and (3) after storage of citrated plasma at -20 °C for 30, 60, and 90 days. According to the concept of acceptable change limits (ACL), analytes were considered stable if the mean relative analyte recovery at a given time was >78%. The mean baseline values (range) of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban were 115 ng/mL (62-217), 129 ng/mL (31-215), 156 ng/mL (49-362), and 101 ng/mL (33-283), respectively. After applying the analyte stability limit, all four DOACs were stable for 24 h at room temperature and at 4 °C. The mean recovery after 24 h was 102-111% for dabigatran, 88-97% for rivaroxaban, 95-98% for apixaban, and 90-96% for edoxaban. When plasma samples were stored at -20 °C, the mean percentage deviation after 90 days for all four DOACs was ≤10%, even after three freeze-thaw cycles. Thus, for the correct determination of DOAC plasma concentrations, blood samples do not have to be analyzed immediately and can be stored at room temperature for up to 24 h before analysis. In clinical practice, blood sample transport and storage for DOAC measurements appear to be unproblematic.

Abstract: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) on long-term direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may be at higher risk of bleeding because of higher anti-Xa or anti-IIa levels. However, there is no postmarketing study investigating these DOAC plasma levels at the time of bleeding. The aim of this study was to evaluate DOAC levels at the time of a bleeding emergency. We analyzed 5440 patients examined at our Emergency Department in from April 1, 2019, to September 30, 2019. During this period, we prospective identified 105 consecutive patients with bleeding while on long-term antithrombotic therapy; 49 patients had AF on DOACs. We compared DOAC levels in patients who bled against a control sample of 55 patients who tolerated long-term high dose DOAC therapy without any emergency. Samples of these patients were tested with drug-specific anti-Xa chromogenic analysis (rivaroxaban and apixaban) and with Hemoclot Thrombin Inhibitor assay (dabigatran). Dabigatran-treated patients who bled had significantly higher anti-IIa levels when compared with trough (261.4 ± 163.7 vs. 85.4 ± 57.2 ng/mL, P < 0.001) and peak samples of controls (261.4 ± 163.7 vs. 138.8 ± 78.7 ng/mL, P < 0.05). Similarly, there were significantly higher anti-Xa levels in rivaroxaban-treated and apixaban-treated patients with bleeding compared with trough control samples (rivaroxaban: 245.9 ± 150.2 vs. 52.5 ± 36.4 ng/mL, P <0.001 and apixaban: 311.8 ± 142.5 vs. 119.9 ± 81.7 ng/mL, P < 0.001), as well as in apixaban-treated patients when compared with peak control samples (311.8 ± 142.5 vs. 210.9 ± 88.7 ng/mL, P < 0.05). Finally, rivaroxaban anti-Xa levels in patients who bled tended to be higher compared with peak control samples (245.9 ± 150.2 vs. 177.6 ± 38.6 ng/mL, P = 0.13). This observational study showed a significant difference in anti-IIa and anti-Xa plasma levels in patients with AF with bleeding complications compared with those who tolerated long-term high-dose DOAC therapy without bleeding complications., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose:  Accurate and rapid assessment of coagulation status is necessary to guide thrombolysis or reversal of anticoagulation in stroke patients, but commercially available point-of-care (POC) assays are not suited for coagulation testing in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). We aimed to evaluate the direct thrombin monitoring (DTM) test card by Helena Laboratories (Texas, United States) for anti-IIa-specific POC coagulation testing, hypothesizing that its POC-ecarin clotting time (POC-ECT) accurately reflects dabigatran plasma concentrations., Methods:  A prospective single-center diagnostic study (ClinicalTrials.gov-identifier: NCT02825394) was conducted enrolling patients receiving a first dose of dabigatran and patients already on dabigatran treatment. Blood samples were collected before drug intake and 0.5, 1, 2, 8, and 12 hours after intake. POC-ECT was performed using whole blood (WB), citrated blood (CB), and citrated plasma (CP). Dabigatran plasma concentrations were determined by mass spectrometry., Results:  In total, 240 blood samples from 40 patients contained 0 to 275 ng/mL of dabigatran. POC-ECT with WB/CB/CP ranged from 20 to 186/184/316 seconds. Pearson's correlation coefficient showed a strong correlation between dabigatran concentrations and POC-ECT with WB/CB/CP ( R2  = 0.78/0.90/0.92). Dabigatran concentrations >30 and >50 ng/mL (thresholds for thrombolysis, surgery, and reversal therapy according to clinical guidelines) were detected by POC-ECT with WB/CB/CP (>36/35/45 and >43/45/59 seconds) with 95/97/97 and 96/98/97% sensitivity, and 81/87/94 and 74/60/91% specificity., Conclusion:  This first study evaluating DOAC-specific POC coagulation testing revealed an excellent correlation of POC-ECT with actual dabigatran concentrations. Detecting clinically relevant dabigatran levels with high sensitivity/specificity, the DTM assay represents a suitable diagnostic tool in acute stroke, hemorrhage, and urgent surgery., Competing Interests: F.H. reports nonfinancial support from Helena Laboratories, during the conduct of the study; other from Bayer, other from Daiichi Sankyo, outside the submitted work. I.B. reports personal fees and other from Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, grants and personal fees from Siemens Healthcare, personal fees from CSL Behring, other from Aspen, other from LFB Biomedicaments, outside the submitted work. H.R. reports nonfinancial support from Helena Laboratories, during the conduct of the study. U.Z. reports nonfinancial support from Helena Laboratories, during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from Biogen Idec, personal fees from Bayer Vital, personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, personal fees from CorTec, personal fees from Medtronic, grants from Servier, grants from Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, outside the submitted work. S.P. reports nonfinancial support from Helena Laboratories, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Bayer, grants and personal fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, grants and personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, grants and personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo, personal fees from Werfen, outside the submitted work., (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).)

A rapid and reliable assessment of the dabigatran effect is desirable in dabigatran treated patients with uncontrolled bleeding or before acute surgery. The aim of this study was to study the anticoagulant effects of dabigatran in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) as assessed by the whole blood assays ROTEM, and how data from these methods correlate to plasma dabigatran concentrations measured by Hemoclot. ROTEM was performed with ROTEM Gamma (Pentapharm GmbH, Munich, Germany). The assays used in our study were Ex-tem and In-tem assay. Plasma dabigatran concentrations were determined by hemoclot thrombin inhibitor assay (Hyphen BioMed, France) at trough and post-dose in 27 patients on dabigatran 150 mg BID. Median plasma dabigatran concentrations at trough were 74 ng/mL (11.2-250) and post-dose (2 h after ingestion) 120 ng/mL (31-282). The ROTEM clotting time (CT) and maximum clot firmnes (MCF) correlated strongly with dabigatran concentrations when activated with the reagents Ex-tem (p < 0.0001) and In-tem (p < 0.0001). In summary, in our study, we have found that the ROTEM variable CT and MCF, when activated with triggers Ex-tem and In-tem, has a strong and highly significant correlation with the plasma dabigatran concentration in a real-life population of AF-patients and could thereby be an alternative to estimate dabigatran concentration in emergency situations. However, additional studies are needed to further validate these findings.

Approximately 1-2% of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation have an acute ischemic stroke (AIS) while on direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) treatment every year. However, current evidence on stroke subtypes, pathophysiology and factors leading to the failure of DOAC preventive therapy in a "real world" setting is still scanty. This study aimed at investigating whether there is any relationship between DOAC plasma levels and the stroke occurrence, on the basis of the phenotypic classification and pathophysiology of the stroke, in a cohort of DOAC-treated patients admitted to our hospital for AIS over 1-year period. A total of 28 patients had DOAC plasma levels determined in emergency and were included in the study, nine patients receiving dabigatran, 11 rivaroxaban and 8 apixaban. The DOAC levels were low in 8/28 patients (28.6% of the sample), intermediate in 4 (14.3%) and high in 16 (57.1%). The most prevalent stroke subtype was the small vessel disease, according to the A-S-C-O phenotypic classification, in 53.6% of our sample. The most common clinical presentation was "minor stroke" in 71.4% of the cases. There was a significantly higher proportion of patients with high DOAC levels in the small vessel group, compared to the cardioembolic group without other phenotypes. The question arises as to the most suitable clinical management of AIS in these patients on DOACs. In the current absence of clear evidence, taking into account the DOAC levels (low/intermediate/high) and the underlying stroke pathophysiology, we present a flowchart of our proposed clinical management of ischemic stroke in patients while on DOAC.

The attractiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) over vitamin K antagonists, in addition to a better benefit-risk ratio, stems from the fact that no therapeutic drug monitoring is deemed necessary. This has been recently mitigated by the fact that increased dabigatran (D) plasma levels have been associated with hemorrhages, and is currently under scrutiny of the European Medicines Agency. We aimed to evaluate, in real conditions of use, whether patients with out-of-range DOAC blood concentrations (too high or too low) were associated with bleeding or thrombosis. Patients treated with D or rivaroxaban (R) were prospectively included in a hospital cohort. D and R plasma levels were measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry-at the physician's demand. We defined concentration range as "expected" within the 95% confidence interval of the mean concentration obtained from pivotal trials, and "out of range" when concentrations were outside of that interval. A blind assessment of concentrations versus occurrence of bleeding or thrombosis was performed by means of univariate and multivariate analysis. Three hundred and twenty-two patients (mean age 78.5 years ± 13.1), treated with D or R were included consecutively. They had a mean CHA2DS2-VASc at 4.4 ± 1.7 and a mean HAS-BLED score at 1.7 ± 0.9. Irrespective of the DOAC prescribed, patients presenting with out-of-range concentrations had significantly more bleeding or thrombosis than patients with expected concentrations (P < 0.001). Patients with bleeding were more prone to have concentrations beyond the 95 percentile (N = 62, P < 0.001), whereas patients with thrombosis were more likely to have concentrations below the fifth percentile (N = 26, P < 0.05). The main risks associated with hemorrhages were abnormal concentrations, a high HAS-BLED score, the patient's age, and the creatinine blood level. For thrombosis, a concentration below the fifth percentile was the only risk factor that was significant in our cohort. While D and R under current recommendation have a better benefit-risk ratio than warfarin, their safe usage could be further optimized by some degree of therapeutic monitoring.

This article presents the case of a multimorbid male patient with an accidental dabigatran overdose caused by kidney failure in the context of an acute intestinal disorder. After effective initial antagonizing of the dabigatran effect using idarucizumab a dabigatran rebound was detected caused by a single hemodialysis leading to a severe intrapulmonary hemorrhage. As dabigatran plasma level testing was not available and conventional coagulation analysis was out of interpretable range due to the impact of dabigatran, continuous thrombelastography (TEG) was used to detect the effect of dabigatran and monitor the treatment results. The most significant parameter used in the kaolin activated clotting time was the R‑time parameter, which was massively prolonged by the interrupted coagulation cascade.

Background: A liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry assay to determine plasma dabigatran concentrations has been available for routine clinical use at our tertiary institutions since 2017. The aim of the study was to describe (1) the use of the assay over time; (2) the indications for testing; and (3) subsequent dabigatran prescribing decisions., Methods: Patients for whom dabigatran concentrations were measured were identified using the laboratory database, and clinical data were extracted from the associated electronic health records., Results: There were 233 samples in 24 months. The use of dabigatran increased over time, with a mean (95% confidence interval) increase of +0.5 (0.3-0.7) samples per month. Dabigatran concentrations ranged from <1 to 1060 mcg/L. The main reasons for testing were uncertainty about impact on renal function and drug interactions (39%), to inform prescribing decisions after thromboembolic or bleeding events (21%), and for investigation following dose-adjustment (16%). Dabigatran dose was changed after 30% (68/233) of assay results., Conclusions: The clinical use of the dabigatran assay has increased, with almost one-third of results associated with a subsequent change in dabigatran prescribing.

Background: Pharmacokinetic studies and therapeutic drug monitoring of anticoagulants require a simple, rapid, and reliable analytical method for monitoring plasma concentrations. The aims of the current work were to develop and validate a liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method for the simultaneous determination of 3 direct oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban) in human plasma that is suitable for pharmacokinetic studies and routine therapeutic drug monitoring in busy hospital laboratories., Methods: This method included a hydrolysis step to account for the active acylglucuronide metabolites of dabigatran that demonstrate an equivalent anticoagulant effect as dabigatran. After hydrolysis, a simple one-step protein precipitation was used for sample preparation. Total dabigatran (the sum of free dabigatran and the contribution from dabigatran acylglucuronides), rivaroxaban, and apixaban, and their corresponding isotopically labeled internal standards were resolved on a C18(2) column. All compounds were detected using electrospray ionization liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry in the positive mode., Results: For all 3 anticoagulants, standard curves were linear over the concentration range of 1.0-1000 mcg/L (r > 0.99), bias was < ±10%, and intraday and interday coefficients of variation (imprecision) were <10%. The limit of quantification was 1.0 mcg/L. For all 3 anticoagulants and corresponding isotopically labeled internal standards, the absolute recoveries were similar and consistent, with mean values of 93%-102%. No significant matrix effects were observed., Conclusions: This method is simple, rapid, robust, and reliable and can be used to analyze the plasma concentrations of the drugs in patients on dabigatran or rivaroxaban therapy.

Background: Antiviral drugs are administered in patients with severe COVID-19 respiratory syndrome, including those treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Concomitant administration of antiviral agents has the potential to increase their plasma concentration. A series of patients managed in the Cremona Thrombosis Center were admitted at Cremona Hospital for SARS-CoV-2 and started antiviral drugs without stopping DOAC therapy. DOAC plasma levels were measured in hospital and results compared with those recorded before hospitalization., Methods: All consecutive patients on DOACs were candidates for administration of antiviral agents (lopinavir, ritonavir, or darunavir). Plasma samples for DOAC measurement were collected 2to 4 days after starting antiviral treatment, at 12 hours from the last dose intake in patients on dabigatran and apixaban, and at 24 hours in those on rivaroxaban and edoxaban. For each patient, C-trough DOAC level, expressed as ng/mL, was compared with the one measured before hospitalization., Results: Of the 1039 patients hospitalized between February 22 and March 15, 2020 with COVID-19 pneumonia and candidates for antiviral therapy, 32 were on treatment with a DOAC. DOAC was stopped in 20 and continued in the remaining 12. On average, C-trough levels were 6.14 times higher during hospitalization than in the pre-hospitalization period., Conclusion: DOAC patients treated with antiviral drugs show an alarming increase in DOAC plasma levels. In order to prevent bleeding complications, we believe that physicians should consider withholding DOACs from patients with SARS-CoV-2 and replacing them with alternative parenteral antithrombotic strategies for as long as antiviral agents are deemed necessary and until discharge., (© 2020 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.)

To assess bioequivalence of a generic dabigatran etexilate capsule in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions. This was an open-label, single-center, randomized four-period crossover study with a 7-day washout period. A single oral dose of 150 mg generic dabigatran etexilate capsule (test drug) or a commercial dabigatran etexilate capsule (Pradaxa ® , reference drug) was given to healthy volunteers under the fasting and fed conditions. Plasma concentrations of total and free dabigatran were detected using a validated HPLC-MS/MS method. A noncompartmental method was used for pharmacokinetic analysis and established coagulation assays were applied for pharmacodynamic analysis. The 90% CIs of the test/reference ratios of C max , AUC 0-t , and AUC 0-∞ for the total dabigatran concentration were 92.57%-106.58%, 91.63%-106.32%, and 92.54%-106.17%, respectively, under fasting condition, and 99.30%-110.74%, 98.58%-105.37%, and 97.75%-103.99%, respectively, under fed conditions. The 90% CIs of the ratios of the parameters for the free dabigatran were 93.18%-106.98%, 92.13%-107.10%, 92.89%-106.48%, respectively, under fasting condition, and 100.05%-110.89%, 99.37%-106.23%, 97.59%-103.98%, respectively, under the fed condition. Additionally, the upper limit of the 90% CIs for σWT/σWR was below 2.5. There were no significant differences in the coagulation parameters including thrombin clotting time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and anti-IIa activity between the two preparations. The generic dabigatran etexilate capsule is bioequivalent to the brand-named product in healthy Chinese volunteers under fasting and fed conditions. The two products have comparable pharmacodynamic parameters, with a good safety profile. In addition, food intake influences absorption of both products in a similar way., (© 2020 The Authors. Pharmacology Research & Perspectives published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd, British Pharmacological Society and American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.)

Background: Several studies demonstrated that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) co-administrated with dabigatran in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) decreased dabigatran trough and peak plasma levels. However, it is still unknown whether this interaction is reversible or not, and whether the withdrawal of PPI would lead to normalization of dabigatran plasma levels., Aim of Study: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of PPI withdrawal on dabigatran plasma levels in patients with AF., Methods: This pilot prospective study enrolled 23 AF patients on long-term dabigatran and PPI therapy (omeprazole 20 mg twice daily or pantoprazole 40 mg once daily). Dabigatran trough and peak levels (ng/mL) were tested on PPI and after a 2-week period of PPI withdrawal with Hemoclot Thrombin Inhibitor Assay., Results: The analysis of dabigatran plasma levels demonstrated significant elevation in trough dabigatran levels after 2 weeks of PPI withdrawal (97.2 ± 79.7 vs. 163.8 ± 105.5 ng/mL; P < 0.05). Moreover, significantly higher peak dabigatran levels were observed after 2 weeks of PPI withdrawal (142.4 ± 102.8 vs. 255 ± 129.5 ng/mL; P ≤ 0.001)., Conclusions: This study showed that a 2-week period of PPI withdrawal lead to a significant increase in dabigatran trough and peak plasma levels in patients with AF.

Introduction: Dabigatran is effective and widely used to prevent ischemic stroke and systemic embolism (SE) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Chronic kidney disease (CKD) also has implications for choice of any medications, as it alters pharmacokinetic parameters of drugs., Aim: To evaluate trough plasma dabigatran concentration (DTPC) and to analyse potential factors affecting these values in patients with AF and CKD., Methods: Patients with AF and stage 3 CKD were treated with dabigatran 110 mg or 150 mg have been included in the study and allocated into D110 or D150 group. DTPC was evaluated with high-performance liquid chromatography. A plasma trough concentration/dose (C/D) ratio was used as a pharmacokinetic index. Factors affecting the DTPC were investigated., Results: A total of 60 patients, aged 51-89 years, were evaluated. Compared with patients given 150 mg twice a day, those given 110 mg twice a day were older (79 vs 67.5, p < 0.0001) and had lower creatinine clearance (CrCl) (50.5 vs 60.5 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , p = 0.015). During the median follow up of 9.5 months there were 11 bleedings in 9 patients. The C/D ratio was higher in patients aged > 75 years (p = 0.024) and was also affected by CrCl (CrCl < 50 mL/min, p = 0.02). Individuals with CKD 3B had higher concentration of dabigatran were compared with those with 3A stage (488.7 vs 332 pg/ml: mg/day, p = 0.02). However, there was also negative correlation between C/D and CrCl (r = - 0.4, p = 0.0015). Co-prescribed medications did not influence DTPC. In addition, patients with bleeding events were additionally evaluated for C/D and no significant differences were found., Conclusion: Patients on dabigatran treatment showed highly variable trough plasma concentrations. C/D values were significantly higher in patients with CKD 3B stage and were influenced by elder age and comorbidities.

Background: Accurate medication reconciliation in trauma patients is essential but difficult. Currently, there is no established clinical method of detecting direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in trauma patients. We hypothesized that a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LCMS)-based assay can be used to accurately detect DOACs in trauma patients upon hospital arrival., Methods: Plasma samples were collected from 356 patients who provided informed consent including 10 healthy controls, 19 known positive or negative controls, and 327 trauma patients older than 65 years who were evaluated at our large, urban level 1 trauma center. The assay methodology was developed in healthy and known controls to detect apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran using LCMS and then applied to 327 samples from trauma patients. Standard medication reconciliation processes in the electronic medical record documenting DOAC usage were compared with LCMS results to determine overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) of the assay., Results: Of 356 patients, 39 (10.96%) were on DOACs: 21 were on apixaban, 14 on rivaroxaban, and 4 on dabigatran. The overall accuracy of the assay for detecting any DOAC was 98.60%, with a sensitivity of 94.87% and specificity of 99.05% (PPV, 92.50%; NPV, 99.37%). The assay detected apixaban with a sensitivity of 90.48% and specificity of 99.10% (PPV, 86.36%; NPV 99.40%). There were three false-positive results and two false-negative LCMS results for apixaban. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban were detected with 100% sensitivity and specificity., Conclusion: This LCMS-based assay was highly accurate in detecting DOACs in trauma patients. Further studies need to confirm the clinical efficacy of this LCMS assay and its value for medication reconciliation in trauma patients., Level of Evidence: Diagnostic Test, level III.

Background Despite the well-studied safety profile of dabigatran, its interactions with genetic polymorphism parameters are poorly understood, especially in patients with moderate chronic kidney disease (CKD). The study assessed whether genetic factors can contribute to CKD and alter dabigatran concentration. Methods Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and stage 3 CKD treated with dabigatran 110 or 150 mg have been included in the study. Real-time polymerase chain reaction was used to evaluate single-nucleotide polymorphisms of the ABCB1 gene (rs1045642 and rs4148738) and CES1 gene (rs2244613). A plasma trough concentration/dose (C/D) ratio was used as a pharmacokinetic index. Results A total of 96 patients aged 51-89 years (median age: 75 years) were evaluated. Patients on a reduced regimen of 110 mg twice a day were older (79.8 vs. 67.9, p < 0.0001) and had lower creatinine clearance (49.7 vs. 62.3 mL/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.015). Patients with the rs2244613 CC genotype had lower C/D values (70% reduction in the mean C/D vs. AA genotype, p = 0.001). Linear stepwise regression has shown the CKD epidemiology collaboration to be the only significant predictor of C/D among genetic factors and kidney function characteristics. During the median follow-up of 15 months, there were 15 bleedings in 13 patients. Conclusions Polymorphism of CES1 rs2244613 can contribute to the safety of dabigatran in patients with AF and CKD. There was no influence of the aforementioned polymorphisms of ABCB1 on dabigatran trough plasma concentrations and C/D. Kidney function is a mainstay of clinical decision-making on direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) dose, and further knowledge should be accumulated on the role of genetic factors.

Background: Incomplete reversal with a recommended 5-g dose of idarucizumab has been reported in patients with excessively high dabigatran concentrations. A timely detection of reversal failure after idarucizumab using whole blood (WB) coagulation testing is clinically useful. The aims of this study were to determine residual dabigatran activity after idarucizumab on thrombin generation (TG) using in vitro supratherapeutic dabigatran models and to compare 4 WB point-of-care tests (activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT], prothrombin time [PT], and 2 thromboelastometry tests) with the TG results., Methods: Blood samples from 12 healthy volunteers were spiked in vitro with 0-5000 ng/mL of dabigatran. Dabigatran reversal was evaluated by adding 1000 μg/mL of idarucizumab (Praxbind) to dabigatran-spiked samples, which reflect the administration of 5-g idarucizumab to a 70-kg patient. Residual dabigatran activity was assessed using the calibrated automated TG (Thrombinoscope) in platelet-poor plasma samples. The TG results were compared with WB aPTT (DRIHEMATO APTT-S) and PT (DRIHEMATO PT-S) using CG02N analyzer, thromboelastometry (ROTEM) triggered by ellagic acid (INTEM) and tissue factor (EXTEM)., Results: At a therapeutic concentration of dabigatran (200 ng/mL), the lag time was prolonged, and peak TG was decreased. The effects of dabigatran on TG were increased up to 1000 ng/mL, and TG was obliterated at higher supratherapeutic dabigatran levels (P < .001 versus control, respectively). TG was fully restored with idarucizumab when dabigatran was ≤2000 ng/mL, but residual anticoagulant activity was observed at higher dabigatran levels. Dabigatran prolonged WB aPTT and PT concentration dependently, and residual prolongations were observed when idarucizumab was added to 3000 or 5000 ng/mL of dabigatran (P < .001 versus control, respectively). In contrast, both INTEM and EXTEM clotting times were reversed toward reference ranges at all dabigatran concentrations when idarucizumab was added., Conclusions: Our data indicate that the recommended dose of idarucizumab may not restore TG completely with excessively elevated concentrations of dabigatran. All WB measurements with aPTT, PT, and thromboelastometry predicted supratherapeutic dabigatran concentrations, whereas those tests varied in sensitivity to residual anticoagulant activity after reversal. WB aPTT corresponded well with plasma TG changes among those measurements, but the use of thromboelastometry may overestimate the effect of idarucizumab. Caution should be exercised before extrapolating in vitro point-of-care data to the clinical monitoring of dabigatran reversal.

Rapidly available tests might be useful to measure the anticoagulant effect of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAs) in emergency situations as bleedings, surgery, or before thrombolysis. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of DOAs on global thromboelastometry (ROTEM). Coagulation parameters assessed at peak and trough in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation receiving apixaban, dabigatran or rivaroxaban at steady-state (patients) were compared to those of healthy volunteers (controls). Citrated blood samples were tested by ROTEM using diluted EXTEM assay, with and without the addition of an anti-FXa catcher, and using ECATEM-B, with and without the addition of an anti-FIIa catcher. Overall 30 patients (10 for each DOA) and 15 controls were included. The mean clotting time (CT) of patients at peak and trough were significantly higher compared to controls. The mean CT was significantly shortened after the addition of the anti-FXa catcher to apixaban (p = 0.005 for peak and p = 0.009 for trough) and to rivaroxaban samples (p = 0.005 for both peak and trough) and after the addition of anti-FIIa cather to dabigatran samples (p = 0.005 for both peak and trough). ROC curve analyses showed a good accuracy for CT and for CT/CT + catcher (CTc) in measuring dabigatran anticoagulant activity (AUC 1.000 and 0.993, respectively); for CT, CT/CTc and clot formation time (CFT)/CFT + catcher (CFTc) in measuring both apixaban activity (0.917, 0.880 and 0.880, respectively) and rivaroxaban activity (0.973, 0.987 and 0.860, respectively). In this study the use of ad-hoc designed reagents and catcher molecules was able to accurately identify DOAs activity at ROTEM.

Routine coagulation tests do not enable rapid, accurate determination of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy. The ecarin clotting assay (ECA), performed on the ClotPro viscoelastic testing device, may enable sensitive and specific detection of dabigatran. We assessed the association between trough plasma dabigatran concentration and clotting time (CT) in the ClotPro ECA, in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Each patient provided a single venous blood sample, ∼1 hour before dabigatran dosing. The study included 118 patients, of whom 64 were receiving dabigatran 110 mg twice daily and 54 were receiving 150 mg twice daily. ECA CT was moderately correlated with trough plasma dabigatran concentration ( r = 0.80, p < 0.001). Slight trends toward increased plasma dabigatran concentration and prolonged ECA CT were apparent with 150 mg versus the 110 mg dose (differences not statistically significant). Individuals with creatinine clearance below 50 mL/minute had significantly higher plasma dabigatran concentrations and significantly prolonged ECA CT versus those with creatinine clearance ≥50 mL/minute. In conclusion, this preliminary study has demonstrated that CT in the ClotPro ECA reflects the plasma concentration of dabigatran in patients with NVAF. The ECA could potentially be used to assess the impact of dabigatran on a patient's coagulation status.

A new sample extraction protocol was developed for pharmacokinetic studies of dabigatran with high-performance liquid chromatography separation - electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry analysis. After protein precipitation with acetonitrile, free dabigatran and its metabolites are separated into water phase by water-dichloromethane liquid-liquid extraction to purify the sample from proteins and endogenous lipophilic compounds. Chromatographic separation was achieved on an Agilent Zorbax SB-CN column (150 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm)) using 0.1% aqueous solution of formic acid and acetonitrile (80:20) as the mobile phase. Agilent Zorbax SB-CN column was selected to improve sample resolution and to avoided early elution of dabigatran previously seen when using a C18 column. The extended calibration curve was constructed from 5 to 1000 ng/L while precision and accuracy were assessed at four levels across the linear dynamic ranges. Within-run precision was <5.6% and the between-run precision was <3.9%. The method accuracy ranged from 89.8% to 104.4%. The developed method was successfully applied to 30 patient samples to evaluate antithrombotic efficacy and anticoagulant activity of dabigatran following knee endoprosthesis surgery., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The Redual PCI trial has demonstrated the safety of dabigatran and ticagrelor or clopidogrel combination in preventing strokes in patients with atrial fibrillation. There was 15.4% risk of hemorrhage in the dabigatran/ticagrelor or clopidrogel arm, lower than that of triple therapy with warfarin, aspirin and ticagrelor or clopidogrel. While idarucizumab is an effective antidote for dabigatran, there is no good method for antagonizing both dabigatran and ticagrelor. We tested in this study a hemadsorbtion method for removing dabigatran that we had previously successfully applied in the removal of ticagrelor from human blood., Methods: 100 mL 4% BSA solution pre-incubated with dabigatran was passed through 10, 20 and 40 mL sorbent columns and dabigatran concentration was measured from the affluent and effluent solution using LC-MS/MS. For testing the effect of dabigatran removal on the aPTT value one human volunteer was administered oral dabigatran etexilate mesilate 150 mg. Plasma was collected 4 h after dabigatran administration and then in three experiments 20 mL of collected plasma was circulated through three different 10 mL CytoSorb columns over a duration of 5 min. aPTT was measured from plasma at baseline prior to drug administration, then post blood collection (mixed plasma) and from the adsorbed plasma as well., Results: Dabigatran concentration, as measured by LC-MS/MS, decreased from 1456 ± 331 nM (greater than the therapeutic level of 743 nM) to 67 ± 59 nM (P = 0.002) with the 10 mL CytoSorb column, while with the 40 mL column it dropped to undetectable levels. In one human volunteer experiment the aPTT was on average 29.2 ± 0.4 in the 3 baseline samples, 34.7 ± 1.8 s after oral dabigatran (mixed plasma), and 25 ± 0.7 s after plasma was passed through CytoSorb (adsorbed plasma) (P = 0.000025 and 0.0000002 for comparison between baseline plasma and mixed plasma, as well as the dabigatran mixed plasma and post-adsorption values respectively)., Conclusion: Dabigatran is robustly removed by a sorbent hemadsorption method already proven successful for the P2Y12 receptor antagonist ticagrelor. Dabigatran removal restores the aPTT to below baseline values, suggesting that sorbent hemadsorption could clinically reverse the anticoagulant effect of this drug., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Dabigatran and idarucizumab, its reversal agent, are renally cleared., Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the extent of reversal and outcomes according to baseline renal function in dabigatran-treated nondialysis patients receiving idarucizumab., Methods: In 503 patients in RE-VERSE AD (Reversal of Effects of Idarucizumab in Patients on Active Dabigatran), the extent of dabigatran reversal and clinical outcomes were compared according to baseline renal function (creatinine clearance: normal ≥80, mild 50 to <80, moderate 30 to <50, and severe <30 ml/min)., Results: Compared with patients with normal renal function, those with impaired renal function were older, were more often women, and had lower body mass indexes, more comorbidities, higher CHADS 2 scores, and higher dabigatran plasma levels despite more frequent use of lower-dose dabigatran regimens. Regardless of renal function, median reversal measured by dilute thrombin time was 100% within 4 h of idarucizumab administration, and over 98% of patients achieved this with corresponding undetectable levels of unbound dabigatran. By 12 or 24 h, 56% of patients with severe, 29.1% with moderate, and 9.2% with mild renal impairment had dabigatran levels >20 ng/ml compared with 8.3% of patients with normal renal function at baseline. Time to cessation of bleeding and the proportion with normal hemostasis with procedures were similar regardless of renal function, but patients with severe renal impairment had higher 30- and 90-day mortality rates., Conclusions: Idarucizumab completely reverses dabigatran in >98% of patients regardless of renal function. Although re-elevation of dabigatran levels within 12 to 24 h is more common with renal impairment, the time to bleeding cessation and the extent of hemostasis during procedures are similar. (Reversal of Dabigatran Anticoagulant Effect With Idarucizumab; NCT02104947)., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Steady-state plasma concentrations of anticoagulants and the time since the previous administration in mainly outpatients with atrial fibrillation administered standard or reduced doses were analyzed for 110 elderly Japanese subjects (mean age, 76 years) treated with apixaban (2.5 or 5.0 mg twice daily), dabigatran etexilate (110 or 150 mg twice daily), edoxaban (30 or 60 mg once daily) or rivaroxaban (10 or 15 mg once daily) at one general hospital. The pharmacokinetics in patients treated with standard and reduced doses of the four anticoagulants using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was compared with the concentration ranges estimated using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling. Reduced doses of anticoagulants resulted in relatively small pharmacokinetic variations compared with the standard dose. Statistical analyses revealed that renal impairment is likely not the sole determinant factor for high plasma concentrations of apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban and rivaroxaban. Patients with atrial fibrillation should be treated with the correct doses of oral anticoagulants as specified in the package inserts (e.g. reduced doses for elderly patients, patients with low body weights and in combination with P-glycoprotein inhibitor drugs) to avoid excessive or insufficient doses of direct oral anticoagulants.

Background/purpose: Dabigatran is effective in preventing ischemic stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. Although the therapeutic window for dabigatran is wide, its pharmacokinetic properties can differ between specific populations. This study aimed to establish a real-life plasma dabigatran concentration database and investigate potential factors affecting this concentration in Asians., Methods: Patients under dabigatran therapy were recruited. Plasma dabigatran concentration was determined in trough and peak blood samples by using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry analysis. Factors affecting the dabigatran concentration were investigated., Results: A total of 46 patients (33 male, 71.7%) were prospectively enrolled. Most of them were receiving a low dose regimen (110 mg twice daily, n = 38, 82.6%). The trough and peak concentrations were significantly correlated (p < 0.001), and the trough concentration was higher in patients aged ≥75 years, body weight ≤60 kg, creatinine clearance (CrCl) ≤50 mL/min, CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score >3 points, and HAS-BLED score ≥3 points. Multiple linear regression analysis identified body weight and serum creatinine as key factors predicting trough concentration (p = 0.003 and 0.005, respectively). Importantly, drug adherence was the only independent factor associated with low trough concentration, defined as the lowest 20th percentile in our study cohort (n = 10, hazard ratio = 9.07; 95% CI, 1.12 to 73.22; p = 0.004)., Conclusion: Dabigatran monitoring may be considered for patients at risk of overexposure, especially those with low body weight and renal insufficiency, and also for detecting those with extremely low drug concentration., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Essentials Currently, DOACs are given at fixed doses and do not require laboratory monitoring. Direct oral anticoagulant-specific measurements were performed at trough and peak. Patients who developed bleeding events showed higher DOAC plasma levels at peak. This study suggests the need of a more accurate DOAC dose assessment., Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are administered at fixed dose. The aim of the study was to evaluate the relationship between DOAC C-trough or C-peak plasma levels and bleeding complications in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF)., Methods: Five hundred sixty five consecutive naive NVAF patients were enrolled. The DOAC measurements at C-trough and at C-peak (available in 411 patients) were performed at steady state, within the first month of treatment. Major bleeding (MB), clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB), and minor bleeding (MinB), occurring during 1 year of follow-up after blood sampling, were recorded. For each DOAC, interval of C-trough and C-peak levels was subdivided into four equal classes and results were attributed to these classes; the median values of results were also calculated., Results: Two hundred eight patients were on apixaban, 185 on dabigatran, and 172 on rivaroxaban. For 1-[qqqdeletezzz] year follow up for all patients, we observed: 19 MB (3.36%), 6 CRNMB (1.06%), and 47 MinB (8.31%). The prevalence of bleeding patients with anticoagulant levels in the upper classes of C-peak activity (II + III + IV) was higher than that in the lowest class. Normalized results of C-peak levels were higher in patients with bleeding than in those without bleeding., Conclusions: Bleeding complications during DOAC treatment were more frequent among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with higher C-peak anticoagulant levels. In addition to a previous study that showed an increased risk of thrombotic complications in the patients with low C-trough levels, this study seems to indicate that patients with NVAF on DOACs would need a more accurate definition of their optimal therapeutic window., (© 2019 The Authors. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.)

Background The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) offer several advantages over warfarin in the management atrial fibrillation, including the provision of fixed dosing without a requirement for regular monitoring. Recently however the subject of DOAC monitoring has been probed after several post-hoc analyses demonstrated an association between plasma levels and efficacy and safety events. Objective The aim of this pilot study was to explore the acceptability of DOAC plasma monitoring amongst patients with atrial fibrillation and the factors that may influence these attitudes. Method A simple DOAC monitoring schedule based on the dabigatran pharmacokinetic profile was developed. A cross-sectional survey was distributed to patients with atrial fibrillation asking them to indicate their likelihood of taking a particular DOAC subjected to plasma monitoring. Results Thirty patients participated in the study. Most patients (63.3%) favoured taking a DOAC subjected to monitoring under the proposed schedule, citing increased efficacy and reduced toxicity as the reasons for their response. Conclusion There is some suggestion that atrial fibrillation patients may in fact favour taking a DOAC subjected to infrequent monitoring if this enhanced safety and efficacy.

There are no clear and consistent guidelines on how to utilize DOAC assays, and reports on the use of DOAC levels in clinical practice is limited. The objective of this study was to analyze why DOAC levels are ordered, how the results affect clinical decision-making, and to determine if DOAC assays are utilized appropriately. This was a retrospective chart review study analyzing 150 dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban levels performed at a single institution. The majority of DOAC assays were ordered in situations or special patient populations where confirming absence or detecting presence of drug may be useful. The most common indication for ordering assays was prior to an invasive procedure. Most DOAC levels were timed appropriately but peak levels were most likely to be incorrectly ordered. Clinical decisions following level results depended on indication for ordering and were most commonly used to determine whether or not to proceed with an invasive procedure. The results of our study suggest while DOAC assays are generally ordered for useful indications, there is still a lack of understanding of when levels should be drawn and how to interpret DOAC assay results.

Background: Idarucizumab (IDA) is approved for emergency reversal of dabigatran; prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) are recommended in the absence of specific antidote. The combined effects of IDA and PCC in trauma-related bleeding are unknown. The efficacy and safety of combined IDA + PCC were assessed in a lethal porcine model of double trauma under dabigatran anticoagulation., Study Design and Methods: Male pigs (n = 28) received oral dabigatran etexilate (30 mg/kg bid) for 3 days; a non-dabigatran control group (n = 7) received placebo. On Day 4, dabigatran-treated animals were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive placebo + placebo (dabigatran-treated control), IDA + PCC (60 mg/kg + 50 IU/kg), PCC + IDA, or IDA + IDA. Trauma was induced at t = 0 (bilateral femur fractures and blunt liver injury) and t = 60 minutes (second blunt liver injury). Study treatment was administered 15 minutes after each trauma. Animals were monitored for 5 hours or until death., Results: Total blood loss in IDA + PCC, PCC + IDA, and IDA + IDA was 1673 ± 370, 1981 ± 361, and 1417 ± 135 mL, respectively, with 100% survival at 5 hours. Blood loss in dabigatran-treated controls was 4427 ± 162 mL with 100% mortality. With IDA + IDA, plasma coagulation parameters and thrombin generation were similar to non-dabigatran control group levels after the second dose and remained stable over time. In the IDA + PCC and PCC + IDA groups, thrombin generation and d-dimer levels after the second dose were higher than with IDA + IDA. No thromboembolic complications were found., Conclusion: IDA and PCC are effective in treating trauma-related bleeding with dabigatran anticoagulation. IDA is preferable for emergency reversal of dabigatran, but PCC may be valuable when the anticoagulant is unknown., (© 2018 AABB.)

Aims: Effective anticoagulation in patients undergoing electrical cardioversion (ECV) for symptomatic atrial fibrillation is important to prevent adverse events. High medication adherence is a requirement. In patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation (n = 169) who were intended to undergo ECV, the aim of this study was to measure self-reported short- and long-term adherence, evaluate whether dabigatran plasma concentrations reflect adherence, measure treatment satisfaction and assess whether adherence and treatment satisfaction are correlated., Methods and Results: Plasma concentrations (liquid-chromatography tandem mass spectrometry), the 8-point Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) and the Anti-Clot Treatment Scale (ACTS) were measured after 3 weeks and 7 weeks of treatment. Combined mean peak (1-3 h after intake) and trough (10-16 h after intake) plasma concentrations were 175 (SD 109) ng/mL and 75 (SD 45) ng/mL, respectively. There was no relationship between short-term adherence (last 3 days) or long-term adherence (last 3-4 weeks) and plasma concentrations, unless the last intake was more than 48 h ago. After 7 weeks high, moderate, and low adherence, according to the MMAS-8, was seen in 74%, 21%, and 5% of patients, respectively. Treatment satisfaction was high (median ACTS score 68.5, range 46-75 points). Treatment satisfaction and adherence were not correlated., Conclusion: The percentage of patients in the high adherence group (74%) was lower than expected, which is a matter of concern. Dabigatran plasma concentrations could not detect short- or long-term non-adherence, unless the drug was last taken more than 48 h ago. Treatment satisfaction did not correlate with adherence., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2019. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Idarucizumab is a humanized Fab fragment that specifically reverses dabigatran anticoagulation. In trauma, volume expanders are used for resuscitation to compensate for blood loss and hemorrhagic shock, but it is unknown whether volume expanders influence the binding of dabigatran to its antidote. Using a porcine dilutional coagulopathy model, this study investigated whether volume replacement strategies affect binding of dabigatran to idarucizumab., Methods: Twenty-five male pigs were treated orally with dabigatran etexilate (30 mg/kg bid) for 3 days. The following day, animals were anesthetized, infused with dabigatran (total dose 0.645 mg/kg) to achieve supratherapeutic concentrations, and randomized 1:1:1:1:1 (n = 5 per group) to control (no hemodilution) or hemodilution where ~50% of blood volume was substituted with Ringer's solution, 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4, 6% hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5 or 4% gelatin. Idarucizumab was then administered intravenously (30 mg/kg) and serial blood samples were taken for up to 24 hours to measure diluted thrombin time (corresponding with dabigatran activity), total dabigatran (bound to antidote and free drug) and a panel of coagulation parameters., Results: Mean plasma dabigatran levels were 617 ± 16 ng/mL after infusion and 600 ± 114 ng/mL after ~50% hemodilution with no significant differences between groups. Following treatment with idarucizumab, plasma concentrations of unbound dabigatran decreased markedly, with similar reductions in all groups. Dabigatran-induced prolongation of coagulation parameters was rapidly reversed in all groups., Conclusion: This study indicates that several volume expanders used for resuscitation in trauma do not interfere with the binding of idarucizumab to dabigatran., Competing Interests: O.G. has received research funding from Bayer Healthcare, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novo Nordisk, Biotest, CSL Behring and Nycomed. He has also received honoraria for lectures and consultancy support from Bayer Healthcare, Boehringer Ingelheim, CSL Behring, Octapharma, Sanofi, Pfizer and Portola. J.vR. and G.G. are employees of Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Germany. C.Z. declares that he has no competing interests. M.H. has received travel support from Boehringer Ingelheim. R.R. has received honoraria for lectures and consultancy from CSL Behring and Novo Nordisk. H.tC. has received speaker and/or consultancy fees from Bayer, Boehringer, GSK, Leo, Roche Stago and Philips, research funding from CSL Behring, Bayer, Philips, Pfizer and Boehringer Ingelheim, and honoraria for lectures and consultancy from Bayer, Leo Pharma, Boehringer, Pfizer. H.S. has received research funding from Boehringer Ingelheim and honoraria for consultancy from Bayer. These do not alter the authors' adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

To describe the effect of dabigatran on thrombin time (TT) reagents at different concentrations of thrombin. Pooled normal plasma enriched with dabigatran was dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) at concentrations of 0, 20, 50, 100, 200, 300, and 500 ng/mL. Samples with each concentration were evaluated using a semiautomatic coagulation analyzer to assess the effect of dabigatran on internal normalized ratio (INR), thromboplastin time (APTT), and TT, which were purchased from Instrument Laboratory (IL), Sysmex (SYS), and Stago (STA), respectively. Regarding INR, no reagent showed good sensitivity to increasing concentration of dabigatran, despite all reagents showing good linear response curves ( P = .012). Regarding APTT, all reagents had low sensitivity to increasing dabigatran concentration, but SYS-APTT showed a better linear response curve ( P = .001). Regarding TT, all reagents had a good linear response to the concentration of dabigatran; however, SYS-TT was very sensitive at low concentrations of dabigatran (0-100 ng/mL), while IL (TT-5 mL) and STA-TT were sensitive at medium concentrations of dabigatran (0-300 ng/mL), and IL (TT-2 mL) was less sensitive for a wide concentration of dabigatran (0-500 ng/mL; P = .007). Internal normalized ratio and APTT showed low sensitivity and SYS-TT showed high sensitivity to concentrations of dabigatran that were unsuitable to monitor. Both IL (TT-5 mL) and STA-TT were useful at medium concentrations of dabigatran by semiautomatic coagulation analyzer, which calculated results using the end point method of coagulation. Instrument Laboratory (TT-2 mL), which contains a higher concentration of thrombin, had better sensitivity to the concentration of dabigatran than APTT and was suitable for routine monitoring by an automatic analyzer.

Essentials A rapid test to detect thrombin inhibition by dabigatran would be valuable in acute situations. A thrombin-based trigger was applied in whole blood using rotation thromboelastometry. Effects of dabigatran were assessed in vitro and in samples from patients on dabigatran. The test produced data rapidly and was sensitive to dabigatran concentrations from 20 to 500 ng mL -1 . SUMMARY: Background Rapid determination of the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran is essential in emergency situations. Objective To study a viscoelastic test (rotational thromboelastometry [ROTEM]) for rapid determination of dabigatran effects in whole blood samples. Method ROTEM measurements were performed with comparison of two triggers (thrombin-based versus the commercial tissue factor-based trigger Ex-tem) in samples from 10 healthy donors spiked with dabigatran (20-500 ng mL -1 ) and in samples from 35 patients receiving dabigatran treatment; 10 healthy subjects served as controls. Clotting time (CT) and the difference in CT without versus with addition of the dabigatran antidote idarucizumab (CT diff ) were measured. Addition of idarucizumab reveals the contribution of dabigatran to ROTEM measurements and its potential reversibility. Results In vitro studies showed that thrombin CT and thrombin CT diff were more sensitive than Ex-tem CT and Ex-tem CT diff in detecting dabigatran in whole blood samples. In patient samples, when thrombin CT and thrombin CT diff were used, it was possible to detect dabigatran with a cut-off of dabigatran at 20 ng mL -1 , whereas, when Ex-tem CT and Ex-tem CT diff were used, the method was less sensitive. Data from patient samples were obtained within 15 min of blood sampling. Conclusions ROTEM CT with a thrombin-based trigger is more sensitive to dabigatran effects than Ex-tem CT, and detects anticoagulant effects of drug concentrations in the low-very low therapeutic range. Analysis with idarucizumab (CT diff ) reveals dabigatran-specific effects. As data are rapidly obtained, this method could, with further development and validation of its performance, be suitable for detecting clinically significant dabigatran effects in emergency situations., (© 2018 Wallén et. al. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis © 2018 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.)

Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) available for the treatment and prevention of thromboembolic diseases include dabigatran, a direct thrombin (IIa) inhibitor, and apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban, which are direct inhibitors of Stuart factor (Xa). DOACs have a different pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics profiles, with less probable drug-drug interactions than vitamin K antagonists. They do not require systematic therapeutic monitoring except in specific clinical situations such as emergency procedures or drug non-compliance. Furthermore, anticoagulant effects of DOACs could be impacted by renal impairment, drug-drug interactions, food interactions, or pharmacogenetic variability. In this context, we developed a method for simultaneous determination of dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban in human plasma using high performance liquid chromatography coupled with a mass spectrometry assay and applied it to 26 patient samples. Our method presents a total run time of 5 min and extends from 25 to 1000 μg/L for apixaban and dabigatran; and from 5 to 1000 μg/L for rivaroxaban. Intra- and inter-assay accuracy were between -22.3 and 25.4%; and - 23.7 and 3.8%, respectively. Precision at low and high concentrations were below 17.5%. Frozen samples were stable up to 3 months. No significant cross-contamination was observed. In conclusion, our assay can be used during clinical studies and in daily routine practice for the management of specific clinical situations at reasonable cost., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: In patients who are receiving dabigatran, a direct oral anticoagulant, measuring the anticoagulant effect before surgery may be needed in certain circumstances. Although the dilute thrombin time (dTT) can reliably measure dabigatran levels, it is not consistently available. More commonly used coagulation tests, including the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and thrombin time (TT) might have clinical utility but their accuracy is uncertain., Methods: 103 patients stopped dabigatran 1-4 days before an elective surgery/procedure as part of a standardized dabigatran interruption protocol. With a blood sample taken just before surgery, we assessed the accuracy of five aPTT assays (Actin FS, Stago PTT, C.K. PREST, HemosIL aPTT-SP, SynthASil) and TT to measure the residual anticoagulant effect of dabigatran. We determined the sensitivity, specificity and other accuracy indices of these assays to predict a dabigatran level > 30 ng/mL as determined by a reference standard test, the dTT (Hemoclot)., Results: Of five aPTT reagents, four assays had excellent (100%) and one assay had good (93%) sensitivity to detect a level of dabigatran > 30 ng/mL, but all had insufficient specificity (50-74%). A TT > 90 s had good sensitivity (93%) and excellent specificity (100%)., Conclusion: Five aPTT assays had good sensitivity but poor specificity to detect low levels of dabigatran (≤30 ng/mL) after standardized dabigatran interruption before an elective surgery/procedure, thereby limiting the use of aPTT as an alternative to the dTT in preoperative settings., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Calibrated automated thrombinography (CAT) is a sensitive method to assess coagulation. Dabigatran inhibits both free thrombin and the α 2 macroglobulin (α 2 M)-thrombin complex, which results in an erroneously increased peak and endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) without affecting lag time and time-to-peak. The aim of this study was to elucidate the artefacts in CAT when dabigatran is present., Materials and Methods: Thrombin generation (TG) was measured in vitro by using CAT in the presence or absence of 6 μM idarucizumab in plasma spiked with dabigatran. Additionally, ex vivo measurements were performed in plasmas of 63 patients using dabigatran in the presence and absence of idarucizumab., Results: The in vitro experiments confirmed that the ETP, peak and velocity index were artificially increased. This was mainly due to the inhibition of the calibrator by dabigatran and partly due to CAT algorithms. The calibration artefact could be resolved by adding idarucizumab to the calibrator well. However, the second, mathematical artefact remains when dabigatran is present in the TG well. These findings were corroborated by ex vivo experiments i.e. the lag time and time-to-peak were significantly reduced in patients upon addition of idarucizumab, but the ETP and peak were not significantly affected. The velocity index did change significantly, since this is a combination of time-dependent factors and the peak., Conclusions: The peak, ETP and velocity index do not represent the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran on TG measured with CAT. The lag time and time-to-peak, however, do reflect the effect of dabigatran., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Detection of new oral anticoagulant (NOAC) levels by screening, special and global tests, and liquid chromatography-coupled tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is important in clinical situations when the cause of bleeding needs to be determined., Methods: We compared a routine coagulation test, special function test for NOACs, global coagulation test, and an LC-MS/MS method that enables simultaneous determination of apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban in human plasma within one analysis to determine the optimal indication of the comparison methods, including their limitations and interferences., Results: This study was conducted on a set of blood samples from 116 patients treated with NOACs. The results of both specific dilute thrombin time (dTT) tests for dabigatran provided the same results as the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) screening test in comparison with LC-MS/MS as a reference. The dTT assay HemosIL® showed better results for low concentrations when compared to LC-MS/MS than dTT HYPHEN® as HemosIL® uses a non-linear calibration curve. Results of the specific anti-Xa assay yielded better results than the prothrombin time test in comparison with LC-MS/MS as a reference, especially for apixaban, but also for rivaroxaban. Our LC MS/MS method is simply feasible, but only in a specialized laboratory. The method is easy-to-use for the simultaneous determination of all dabigatran, apixaban and rivaroxaban by LC-MS/MS within three minutes with a concentration range of 1 to 500 µg/L without dilution., Conclusions: In the normal practice of the coagulation laboratory, it is advisable to use specific tests for NOAC determination as screening and global assays are not sufficiently specific. The dTT test is the optimal choice for dabigatran determination and for xabans to determine anti-Xa activity. The LC-MS/MS method is suitable as an arbitration method for serious conditions.

Accidental long-term dabigatran etexilate inhalation was associated with subtherapeutic dabigatran serum concentrations in an elderly female patient with restrictive lung disease. A significant improvement in her pulmonary function was noted without other therapy directed towards her bronchopulmonary disease., Competing Interests: Competing interests: VP has received honorary fees from Boehringer ingelheim, Pfitzer, BMS., (© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Introduction: Dabigatran etexilate is an oral direct thrombin inhibitor. Dabigatran excretion is 80% renal, so exposure increases with severity of renal failure. The US Food and Drug Administration-approved dabigatran etexilate 75 mg twice daily (BID) for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) having severely impaired renal function (creatinine clearance: 15-30 mL/min), based on post hoc pharmacokinetic modeling. We assessed dabigatran exposure at trough and peak levels in patients with NVAF and severely impaired renal function and compared with model predictions., Methods: Patients received dabigatran etexilate (75 mg BID) for ≥7 days before blood sampling; C pre,ss (steady-state predose concentration; trough) was taken 10 to 16 hours postdose (prior to next dose), and C 2,ss (steady-state concentration; peak) was taken 2 hours (± 30 minutes) postdose. Pharmacodynamic parameters at baseline (E base ), trough concentrations (E pre,ss ), and peak concentrations (E 2,ss ) were assessed by established coagulation assays., Results: Of the 150 patients screened, 60 were treated, of which 40% were male and 78.3% were white; median age was 84 years. C pre,ss values (n = 51) were close to pharmacokinetic modeling predictions with a geometric mean (gMean) of 155 ng/mL, geometric coefficient of variation (gCV) of 76.9%, and range of 15.6 to 498 ng/mL. The C 2,ss values (n = 59) had a gMean of 202 ng/mL, gCV of 70.6%, and range of 42.0 to 680 ng/mL. Pharmacodynamic effects on coagulation paralleled dabigatran concentrations. Eleven (18.3%) patients had ≥1 adverse event (AE); pharmacokinetic results for these patients versus those without AEs (n = 49) were C pre, ss : gMean = 206 versus 145 ng/mL, gCV = 64.0% versus 78.3%; C 2,ss : gMean = 243 versus 193 ng/mL, gCV = 68.9% versus 70.8%. All bleeding events (8 events in 5 patients) were considered minor by the investigators., Conclusion: Dabigatran exposure levels largely confirmed earlier pharmacokinetic predictions, supporting the use of dabigatran etexilate 75 mg BID in patients with NVAF and severely impaired renal function. Pharmacodynamic results were also in agreement with earlier studies., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01896297.

Methodology for analysis of a microdosing drug cocktail designed to evaluate the contribution of drug transporters and drug metabolizing enzymes to disposition was developed using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based detection. Fast and sensitive methods were developed and qualified for the quantification of statins (pitavastatin, pitavastain lactone, rosuvastatin, atorvastatin, 2-hydroxy, and 4-hydroxy atorvastatin), midazolam, and dabigatran in human plasma. Chromatographic separation was accomplished using reversed-phase liquid chromatography or hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography with gradient elution and detection by tandem mass spectrometry in the positive ionization mode using electrospray ionization. The lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) for the statins assay was 1 pg/mL for the 6 analytes with a linear range from 1 to 1000 pg/mL processing 250 μL plasma sample. The midazolam assay LLOQ was 0.5 pg/mL with a linear range of 0.5 to 1000 pg/mL. For the dabigatran assay, the LLOQ was 10 pg/mL with a linear range of 10 to 5000 pg/mL processing 100 μL plasma sample. The intraday and interday precision and accuracy of the assays were within acceptable ranges, and the assays were successfully applied to support a study where a microdose cocktail was dosed to healthy human subjects for simultaneous assessment of clinical drug-drug interactions mediated by major drug transporters and CYP3A., (Copyright © 2018 American Pharmacists Association®. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The number of elderly individuals with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NV-AF) requiring long-term anticoagulation is rising. The pharmacokinetics of oral anticoagulants in elderly individuals may differ from that for younger patients. The aim of this study was to assess the dabigatran levels in elderly patients with NV-AF., Patients and Methods: A pilot prospective post-marketing study in patients with NV-AF on dabigatran therapy was performed; we enrolled 21 consecutive elderly patients (aged ≥ 75 years) on a reduced dabigatran regimen (110 mg twice daily) and compared them with 13 younger (≤ 70 years) individuals on reduced dabigatran therapy due to renal impairment and with 16 younger patients on standard dabigatran therapy (150 mg twice daily). Blood samples were taken for the assessment of dabigatran trough and peak levels. Dabigatran levels were measured with the Hemoclot ® Thrombin Inhibitor Assay., Results: There were significant differences in dabigatran trough levels when comparing elderly patients on reduced dabigatran with non-elderly patients on reduced dabigatran (99.3 ± 73.6 vs 51.6 ± 25.6 ng/mL; p < 0.01). Similarly, the detected dabigatran peak levels were significantly higher in elderly patients on reduced dabigatran compared with non-elderly patients on reduced dabigatran (173.4 ± 116.2 vs 116.1 ± 19.1 ng/mL; p < 0.01). No significant differences in dabigatran trough and peak levels were found when comparing elderly patients on reduced dabigatran with non-elderly patients on standard dabigatran therapy., Conclusion: This pilot study demonstrated that elderly patients on reduced dabigatran exhibit significantly higher dabigatran levels than younger individuals on a reduced regimen, and similar levels compared with younger individuals on standard dabigatran.