Search

Copyright of Lettre de Medecine Physique et de Readaptation is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article about snake bites that was published in the previous.

Background: Penetrating thoracic injuries (PTIs) is a medicosurgical challenge for civilian and military trauma teams. In civilian European practice, PTIs are most likely due to stab wounds and mostly require a simple chest tube drainage. On the battlefield, combat casualties suffer severe injuries, caused by high-lethality wounding agents.The aim of this study was to analyse and compare the demographics, injury patterns, surgical management and clinical outcomes of civilian and military patients with PTIs., Methods: All patients with PTIs admitted to a Level I Trauma Centre in France or to Role-2 facilities in war theatres between 1 January 2004 and 31 May 2016 were included. Combat casualties' data were analysed from Role-2 medical charts. The hospital manages military casualties evacuated from war theatres who had already received primary surgical care, but also civilian patients issued from the Paris area. During the study period, French soldiers were deployed in Afghanistan, in West Africa and in the Sahelo-Saharan band since 2013., Results: 52 civilian and 17 military patients were included. Main mechanisms of injury were stab wounds for civilian patients, and gunshot wounds and explosive fragments for military casualties. Military patients suffered more severe injuries and needed more thoracotomies. In total, 29 (33%) patients were unstable or in cardiac arrest on admission. Thoracic surgery was performed in 38 (55%) patients (25 thoracotomies and 13 thoracoscopies). Intrahospital mortality was 18.8%., Conclusion: War PTIs are associated with extrathoracic injuries and higher mortality than PTIs in the French civilian area. In order to reduce the mortality of PTIs in combat, our study highlights the need to improve tactical en route care with transfusion capabilities and the deployment of forward surgical units closer to the combatants. In the civilian area, our results indicated that video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is a reliable diagnostic and therapeutic technique for haemodynamically stable patients., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: The specificities of military medicine have led to the maintenance of fresh whole blood (FWB) transfusion., Study Design: The aim of our study was to evaluate this practice at the French military hospital in Kabul between 2006-2009., Patients and Methods: During our study period, 19 FWB transfusions were performed and the data from 15 FWB transfusions could be analyzed. We studied the number of units by recipient, the characteristics of recipients, the results of blood tests performed after transfusion, the incidents in donors and recipients, the period for obtaining a unit of FWB and mortality of recipients., Results: A total of 66 units of FWB were transfused in 15 patients. The median number of FWB units transfused was three per patient. Thirteen out of 15 (87%) were combat-related casualties. All units were tested before transfusion for HIV with rapid diagnostic tests. Every blood samples of donors were negative for pathogens screened at the French Blood Service. No incident in donors and in recipients was reported. The average time between collection and transfusion was 140±197minutes (median 43min). Mortality in recipients was 27% (n=4)., Conclusion: In our study, the FWB transfusion was not associated with incidents. Nonetheless, this practice should be used only for exceptional situations like military conflicts where risks of FWB are lower than the absence of transfusion., (Copyright © 2012 Société française d’anesthésie et de réanimation (Sfar). Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.)