Search

Highlights • IMRT is associated with favorable toxicity rates for patients with anal cancer. • Outcomes were favorable for those with T3-4 tumors or lymph node involvement. • Current smokers are at a higher risk of severe dermatologic toxicity. • Overall treatment duration greater than 39 days is associated with recurrence., Introduction To report long-term efficacy and adverse events (AEs) associated with intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for patients with anal canal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC). Materials and methods This was a retrospective review of patients with ASCC who received curative-intent IMRT and concurrent chemotherapy (98%) between 2003 and 2019. Overall survival (OS), colostomy-free survival (CFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The cumulative incidence of local recurrence (LR), locoregional recurrence (LRR), and distant metastasis (DM) were reported. Acute and late AEs were recorded per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs. Results 127 patients were included. The median patient age was 63 years (interquartile range [IQR] 55–69) and 79% of patients were female. 33% of patients had T3-4 disease and 68% had clinically involved pelvic or inguinal lymph nodes (LNs). The median patient follow-up was 47 months (IQR: 28–89 months). The estimated 4-year OS, CFS, and PFS were 81% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 73%–89%), 77% (95% CI: 68%–86%), and 78% (95% CI: 70%–86%), respectively. The 4-year cumulative incidences of LR, LRR, and DM were 3% (95% CI: 1%–9%), 9% (95% CI: 5%–17%), and 10% (95% CI: 6%–18%), respectively. Overall treatment duration greater than 39 days was associated with an increased risk of LRR (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 5.2, 95% CI: 1.4–19.5, p = 0.015). The most common grade 3+ acute AEs included hematologic (31%), gastrointestinal (GI) (17%), dermatologic (16%), and pain (15%). Grade 3+ late AEs included: GI (3%), genitourinary (GU) (2%), and pain (1%). Current smokers were more likely to experience grade 3+ acute dermatologic toxicity compared to former or never smokers (34% vs. 7%, p

Purpose To investigate the outcomes of adjuvant whole breast radiation therapy (WBRT) in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast (breast IDC) receiving preoperative systemic therapy (PST) and breast-conserving surgery (BCS), and their prognostic factors, considering overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence (LRR), distant metastasis (DM), and disease-free survival. Patients and methods Patients diagnosed as having breast IDC and receiving PST followed by BCS were recruited and categorized by treatment into non-breast radiation therapy [BRT] (control) and WBRT (case) groups, respectively. Cox regression analysis was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and confidence intervals (CIs). Results Multivariate Cox regression analyses indicated that non-BRT, cN3, and pathologic residual tumor (ypT2–4) or nodal (ypN2–3) stages were poor prognostic factors for OS. The adjusted HRs (aHRs; 95% CIs) of the WBRT group to non-BRT group for all-cause mortality were 0.14 (0.03–0.81), 0.32 (0.16–0.64), 0.43 (0.23–0.79), 0.23 (0.13–0.42), 0.52 (0.20–1.33), and 0.34 (0.13–0.87) in the ypT0, ypT1, ypT2–4, ypN0, ypN1, and ypN2–3 stages, respectively. The aHRs (95% CIs) of the WBRT group to non-BRT group for all-cause mortality were 0.09 (0.00–4.07), 0.46 (0.26–0.83), 0.18 (0.06–0.51), 0.28 (0.06–1.34), 0.25 (0.10–0.63), 0.47 (0.23–0.88), and 0.32 in the cT0–1, cT2, cT3, cT4, cN0, cN1, and cN2–3 stages, respectively. The WBRT group exhibited significantly better LRR-free and DM-free survival than the non-BRT group, regardless of the clinical T or N stage or pathologic response after PST. Conclusion WBRT might lead to superior OS and LRR-free and DM-free survival compared with the non-BRT group, regardless of the initial clinical TN stage or pathologic response., Highlights • Outcome patterns of adjuvant RT for patients with breast cancer receiving preoperative systemic therapy and breast-conserving surgery. • Non-breast radiation therapy, cN3, pathologic residual tumor (ypT2–4), or nodal (ypN2–3) stages are poor prognostic factors for survival. • The beneficial effects of RT are superior OS and LRR-free and DM-free survival compared with the non-RT group.

Purpose To use pathologic indicators to determine which patients benefit from postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) for breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and total mastectomy (TM). Patients and methods We enrolled 4236 patients with breast invasive ductal carcinoma who received NACT followed by TM. Cox regression analysis was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and confidence intervals; independent predictors were controlled for or stratified in the analysis. Results After multivariate Cox regression analyses, the adjusted HRs derived for PMRT for all-cause mortality were 0.65 (0.52–0.81, P, Highlights • No large-scale study has estimated detailed outcome patterns of postmastectomy radiation therapy stratified based on postchemotherapy pathologic stages in breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and total mastectomy. • We used pathologic indicators to determine which patients benefit from PMRT for breast cancer after NACT and TM. • For patients with breast cancer ypT3–4, ypN2–3, or pathologic stages IIIA–IIIC receiving NACT and TM, PMRT should be performed if it is associated with survival benefits, regardless of their clinical stages.

Background MicroRNAs(miRNAs) are involved in the formation, maintenance, and metastasis of urologic cancer. Here, we aim to gather and evaluate all of the evidence regarding the potential role of miRNAs as novel predictors of urologic cancer survival. Methods A systematic review was performed to identify and score all of the published studies that evaluated the prognostic effects of miRNAs in kidney (KCa), bladder (BCa) or prostate cancer (PCa). Where appropriate, the summary effects of miRNAs on urologic cancer were meta-analysed. The reliability of those results was then further validated by an integrated analysis of the TCGA cohort and miRNA panel. Results Of 151 datasets, 80 miRNAs were enrolled in this systematic review. A meta-analysis of the prognostic qualities of each miRNA identified an objective association between miRNA and prognosis. miR-21 was identified as an unfavourable miRNA with the overall survival (HR:2.699, 1.76–4.14, P

Highlights • Contralateral regional failure still occurs after bilateral nodal irradiation. • No significant predictive factors were identified for contralateral regional failure. • Overall survival did not differ between patients with ipsi- or contralateral failure., Background The vast majority of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) routinely undergo elective nodal irradiation (ENI) to both sides of the neck. Little is known about the extent to which bilateral ENI prevents regional failure (RF) and contralateral RF (cRF) in particular, while such knowledge is necessary to evaluate the results of more selective approaches like unilateral ENI. We investigated the rate and pattern of RF after bilateral ENI, the rate of cRF in the electively irradiated contralateral neck, and tried to identify risk factors for development of cRF. Materials and methods Retrospective cohort study of a consecutive series of 605 patients with T1-4N0-3 HNSCC treated between 2008 and 2017 with primary (chemo)radiation and bilateral ENI. Results Median follow-up was 43 months (range 1.4–126). Three-year cumulative incidence of RF was 12.7%. Three-year cumulative incidences of ipsilateral RF (iRF) and cRF were 10.6% and 2.8%, respectively. All cRF occurred within the electively treated volume. Salvage treatment was possible in 65% and 59% of patients with iRF and cRF, respectively (p = 0.746). The 3-year overall survival rates after RF in patients with iRF and cRF were 27.4% and 41.2%, respectively (p = 0.713). Three-year cancer-specific survival rates were 31.6% and 48.1%, respectively (p = 0.634). In multivariate analysis, no significant predictive factors were identified for cRF after bilateral ENI. Conclusion Contralateral regional failure is rare, but still occurs in 2.8% of patients treated with bilateral ENI. The possibilities for salvage treatment, the rates of overall survival and cancer-specific survival were comparable to patients with iRF.