Search

The numbers per tiller (abundance) and per unit area of ground (population density) of the dominant cereal aphids in winter wheat crops, Sitobion avenae (Fabricius) and Metopolophium dirhodum (Walker) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) were recorded from 2000–2015. The results were used to test the hypothesis that at the population peak and 4 weeks previously, the population density of aphids in winter wheat crops (Triticum aestivum L., Poaceae) is uniformly distributed with respect to surface area and, as a result, their abundance is high in sparse stands (SPA) where the colonizing aphids are scattered among a small number of tillers (ca. 80 m−2), and low in dense stands (DEN) where they are scattered among a larger number of tillers (ca. 440 m−2). This prediction was verified for S. avenae, the population density of which did not significantly differ between SPA and DEN stands throughout this period. This species feeds mainly on the ears, whose nutritional quality for aphids varies little with crop density and during the course of ripening. In contrast and contrary to our prediction, the population density of M. dirhodum increased throughout this period more rapidly in SPA than in DEN stands. This species lives on leaves whose quality is better and remain present for longer during the course of ripening of the crop in SPA than DEN stands. The abundance of both species was higher in SPA than in DEN stands. Greater direct damage to cereal crops can be expected when using technologies and cultivars of winter wheat that need to be planted sparsely. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The balance between risk and benefit of exploiting resources drives life‐history evolution in organisms. Predators are naturally recognized as major drivers of the life‐history evolution of their prey. Although prey may also influence the life‐history evolution of their predators in the context of an evolutionary arms race, there is far more evidence of the role of predators than of prey.The goal of this study was to investigate the role of prey in life‐history evolution of predators using ladybird beetle predators of aphids and coccids. These particular ladybirds and their prey were chosen because literature shows that the pace of life of aphids is faster than that of coccids and this difference is reflected in the life histories of the ladybirds that specialize on feeding on aphids or coccids.Thirty‐four species of ladybird predators of aphids and eight of coccids belonging to five different tribes were collected and reared in the laboratory. The females were weighed as well as their eggs, and their reproductive investment estimated as the number of ovarioles. Phylogenetic relatedness was controlled for in the statistical analyses.Controlling for female mass revealed that ladybird predators of aphids lay bigger eggs than ladybird predators of coccids. This difference is not influenced by phylogenetic relatedness but only by the type of prey eaten. We suggest that ladybird predators of coccids lay smaller eggs because neonate larvae do not have to search, catch, and subdue prey. Both types of ladybirds have a similar reproductive investment relative to their body mass when phylogeny is controlled for.Recognizing the influence of prey on the life‐history evolution of predators is important for understanding food web dynamics. From an applied perspective, this fine evolutionary tuning of prey–predator relationships should be used to guide and increase the efficiency of biological control programs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Population dynamics of a predator-prey system is usually simulated by the classical Lotka-Volterra models, which were successfully applied to the population dynamics of snowshoe hare and lynx and many other predator-prey systems. Attempts were made to apply them also to insect predator-prey systems, but in terms of biological control, they did not reveal the features of the predators that control the abundance of their prey. The most conspicuous example of failure of Lotka-Volterra models applied to insect predator-prey systems are ladybird-aphid systems, in which these models usually fail to fit empirical data. Because of their practical importance and because they are very well studied, we have chosen aphid-ladybird systems as a model. We summarize the results published on various aspects of the population dynamics of aphid-ladybird systems and present them in the context of empirical data. Using new data, we more closely specify the existing metapopulation model of aphid-ladybird interactions. Based on the arguments presented here, we conclude that the ladybird-aphid case can be generalized to insect (and maybe even other) predator-prey systems, where the ratio of the generation times of the predator to that of the prey (GTR) is large. In such systems, the main selection pressure on predators is choosing the best strategy to maximize survival of their offspring, rather than on maximization of the amount of prey eaten. Thus voracity, which is the main determinant of population dynamics in Lotka-Volterra models, loses its role and is replaced by optimization of the choice of oviposition sites in systems with large GTRs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Harmonia axyridis (Pallas), an invasive non-native species in central Europe, can outcompete other aphidophagous species. The distribution and abundance of H. axyridis vary depending on different host plants, and its effects on native coccinellid communities may change accordingly. The distribution and abundance of coccinellids in central Europe (50°N, 14°E) were investigated from 2010 to 2016. Coccinellids were counted at regular intervals on cereals (Avena, Hordeum, and Triticum), herbaceous plants (Matricaria and Urtica) and trees (Acer, Betula, and Tilia). Additionally, the occurrence over time of each species on these plants was assessed and used as an index of persistence. Across all years, the adults and larvae of H. axyridis were the dominant species of coccinellid on trees. However, H. axyridis was less abundant on herbaceous plants and cereals than on trees. Populations of native coccinellids and H. axyridis co-occurred on trees and persisted for the same length of time, while native coccinellids persisted longer than H. axyridis on herbaceous plants and cereals. Compared to 1976–1986, in the 2010s, the abundance of native species decreased on all plants by 50–70%. The presence of H. axyridis could be considered as a factor driving changes in the assemblages of native coccinellids. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Modelling of empirical data on the abundance of host-specific, tree-dwelling aphids indicates that their abundance is determined by the effect of the abundance of their host plants on the realised annual population growth rate ( I R i ) of the aphids (Dixon & Kindlmann, [7]). Viewed in this way it is not just the abundance of the host plant of aphids that determines the abundance of aphids (Dixon & Kindlmann, [7]) but also their potential annual population growth rate ( I r i SB p sb ) and subsequently their realised population growth rate ( I R i ). The most striking and consistent feature of rare aphid species is that the period suitable for their development and reproduction is shorter than for the common species and, consequently, the potential yearly rate of increase of these rare species is lower. [Extracted from the article]