Search

Abstract Background Cervical cancer patients in Colombia have a lower likelihood of survival compared to breast cancer patients. In 1993, Colombia enrolled citizens in one of two health insurance regimes (contributory-private insurance and subsidized- public insurance) with fewer benefits in the subsidized regime. In 2008, the Constitutional Court required the Colombian government to unify services of both regimes by 2012. This study evaluated the impact of this insurance change on cervical cancer mortality before and after 2012. Methods We accessed 24,491 cervical cancer mortality records for 2006–2020 from the vital statistics of Colombia’s National Administrative Department of Statistics (DANE). We calculated crude mortality rates by health insurance type and departments (geopolitical division). Changes by department were analyzed by rate differences between 2006 and 2012 and 2013–2020, for each health insurance type. We analyzed trends using join-point regressions by health insurance and the two time-periods. Results The contributory regime (private insurance) exhibited a significant decline in cervical cancer mortality from 2006 to 2012, characterized by a noteworthy average annual percentage change (AAPC) of -3.27% (P = 0.02; 95% CI [-5.81, -0.65]), followed by a marginal non-significant increase from 2013 to 2020 (AAPC 0.08%; P = 0.92; 95% CI [-1.63, 1.82]). In the subsidized regime (public insurance), there is a non-significant decrease in mortality between 2006 and 2012 (AAPC − 0.29%; P = 0.76; 95% CI [-2.17, 1.62]), followed by a significant increase from 2013 to 2020 (AAPC of 2.28%; P

Background: Cervical cancer patients in Colombia have a lower likelihood of survival compared to breast cancer patients. In 1993, Colombia enrolled citizens in one of two health insurance regimes (contributory-private insurance and subsidized- public insurance) with fewer benefits in the subsidized regime. In 2008, the Constitutional Court required the Colombian government to unify services of both regimes by 2012. This study evaluated the impact of this insurance change on cervical cancer mortality before and after 2012. Methods: We accessed 24,491 cervical cancer mortality records for 2006–2020 from the vital statistics of Colombia's National Administrative Department of Statistics (DANE). We calculated crude mortality rates by health insurance type and departments (geopolitical division). Changes by department were analyzed by rate differences between 2006 and 2012 and 2013–2020, for each health insurance type. We analyzed trends using join-point regressions by health insurance and the two time-periods. Results: The contributory regime (private insurance) exhibited a significant decline in cervical cancer mortality from 2006 to 2012, characterized by a noteworthy average annual percentage change (AAPC) of -3.27% (P = 0.02; 95% CI [-5.81, -0.65]), followed by a marginal non-significant increase from 2013 to 2020 (AAPC 0.08%; P = 0.92; 95% CI [-1.63, 1.82]). In the subsidized regime (public insurance), there is a non-significant decrease in mortality between 2006 and 2012 (AAPC − 0.29%; P = 0.76; 95% CI [-2.17, 1.62]), followed by a significant increase from 2013 to 2020 (AAPC of 2.28%; P < 0.001; 95% CI [1.21, 3.36]). Examining departments from 2013 to 2020 versus 2006 to 2012, the subsidized regime showed fewer cervical cancer-related deaths in 5 out of 32 departments, while 6 departments had higher mortality. In 21 departments, mortality rates remained similar between both regimes. Conclusion: Improvement of health benefits of the subsidized regime did not show a positive impact on cervical cancer mortality in women enrolled in this health insurance scheme, possibly due to unresolved administrative and socioeconomic barriers that hinder access to quality cancer screening and treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The objective of our study is to explore Nepali women's beliefs about access to mammography screening, and motivations to get screened or not. This work was intended to be hypothesis generating for subsequent quantitative analysis and to inform policy and decision-making to improve access., Methods: We conducted structured qualitative interviews among nine Nepali women in the Northeast of the United States receiving care at a local community health center and among nine white women receiving mammography care at a large academic medical center in the Northeast. We analyzed the transcripts using a mixed deductive (content analysis) and inductive (grounded theory) approach. Deductive codes were generated from the Health Belief Model which states that a person's belief in the real threat of a disease with their belief in the effectiveness of the recommended health service or behavior or action will predict the likelihood the person will adopt the behavior. We compared and contrasted qualitative results from both groups., Results: We found that eligible Nepali women who had not received mammography screening had no knowledge of its availability and its importance. Primary care physicians emerged as a critical link in addressing this disparity: trust was found to be high among Nepali women with their established primary care provider., Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that the role of primary care practitioners in conversations around the importance and eligibility for mammography screening is of critical importance, especially for underserved groups with limited health knowledge of screening opportunities and potential health benefits. Follow-up research should focus on primary care practices., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

This study examined factors associated with the use of personal care services (PCS) and the amount of authorized hours in California in 2004–2005. Of those Medicaid-eligible individuals with developmental disabilities living at home, 31% received PCS. When we controlled for client need, gender, and age, individuals who were Asian/Pacific Islanders, African Americans, Hispanics, and other races had higher odds of receiving PCS than Whites but were authorized between 16 and 39 hours fewer than Whites. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study investigated interstate substance abuse treatment needs and access in the USA. After assessing the validity of recently developed survey and indicator measures, the study analysed the geographic distribution and nature of state substance abuse treatment needs. Substance abuse treatment utilization index scores were regressed on the need measurements to identify differences among state populations in treatment access. The interstate substance abuse treatment need measures had evidence of reliability and construct validity. Treatment needs clustered in stable, distinct geographic patterns. The most severe problems, primarily reflecting alcoholism, were in the west. Drug and alcohol substance use disorders and related problems were not significantly correlated at this level of aggregation. There was evidence of regionalization of the drug-of-choice mix in treatment admissions. Only 21% of the variations in state treatment utilization rates stemmed from the prevalence of substance use disorders and related problems. The biggest treatment gaps were in the south and south-west, regions with large minority populations. Development of interstate survey and indicator measures of treatment needs has created new opportunities to broaden our understanding of substance abuse epidemiology and treatment access in the USA. The nature and severity of drug and alcohol problems vary from state to state, but the interstate disparities in treatment services remain even after variations in treatment need have been discounted. Further research is needed to understand the causes of these differences in treatment access. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Investigating concerns about uneven utilization of health services, especially affecting disadvantaged high-risk populations, the authors constructed composite indexes for identifying substance abuse treatment gaps in Rhode Island towns and multi-town planning areas. The Drug, Alcohol, and Substance Abuse Need Indexes combined multiple-year rates of substance-related deaths, hospital discharges, and arrests. These indicators were reliable and possessed convergent validity; the composite indexes were also reliable and had construct validity. Regression of treatment admissions rates on town Substance Abuse Need Index scores revealed that some areas had relative gaps in treatment services. Having an objective and validated method for identifying treatment gaps could help treatment planners ensure equal access to services throughout the state. Reducing travel to treatment facilities can increase treatment utilization and treatment retention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a drug regimen recommended for anyone at high risk of getting HIV to prevent them from being infected. Little research exists on how state-level policies might be related to differential PrEP uptake across the United States. To better understand the associations between state-level policies and PrEP uptake, we examined HIV criminalization, nondiscrimination laws for sexual and gender minorities, Medicaid expansion, Ryan White funding, and sociodemographic characteristics in relation to the PrEP-to-need ratio, a measure of PrEP uptake. Using a cross-sectional design, we analyzed data from all fifty states; Washington, D.C.; and Puerto Rico (all of which we categorize as states here) regarding policy, socioeconomic factors, and PrEP-to-need ratio in 2018. States with HIV criminalization laws had lower PrEP-to-need ratio, and states with more nondiscrimination laws for sexual and gender minorities had higher PrEP-to-need ratio. We found no association between Medicaid expansion, Ryan White funding, percentage Hispanic, percentage uninsured, median household income, percentage with high school education, or state population and PrEP uptake. Legislators should consider how laws concerning HIV and sexual and gender minorities might protect against discrimination and subvert fear and stigma, given the potential impact of these policies on HIV prevention.

Virtual strategies for health care visits during a pandemic must not exclude marginalized patients.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has highlighted the importance of intensive care unit (ICU) beds in preventing death from the severe respiratory illness associated with COVID-19. However, the availability of ICU beds is highly variable across the US, and health care resources are generally more plentiful in wealthier communities. We examined disparities in community ICU beds by US communities' median household income. We found a large gap in access by income: 49 percent of the lowest-income communities had no ICU beds in their communities, whereas only 3 percent of the highest-income communities had no ICU beds. Income disparities in the availability of community ICU beds were more acute in rural areas than in urban areas. Policies that facilitate hospital coordination are urgently needed to address shortages in ICU hospital bed supply to mitigate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on mortality rates in low-income communities.

Background: Compared to non-Hispanic white individuals, assistive technology (AT) utilization is lower among Hispanic individuals. 1-7 In the US, Spanish is the 2nd most frequently spoken language. Greater than one-fifth of Spanish-speaking households are limited English proficiencty (LEP) households (i.e., all individuals over age 14 in the household speak English less than "very well"). 8 Availability of AT materials in Spanish is one factor influencing knowledge about and utilization of AT among Spanish-speakers., Objective: To examine the availability of Spanish-language AT information on state AT program websites and to assess the relationship between availability and state demographic and linguistic characteristics., Methods: In 2018, we evaluated 56 state and territory AT program websites for the availability of AT information in Spanish. We calculated 4 measures (US Hispanic population in the state/territory; Hispanic individuals as a proportion of state population; overall Spanish-speaking households, and Spanish-speaking, limited English proficient households) from the 2016 American Community Survey and created ranked lists for each measure. Point biserial (r pb ) correlations were calculated to test associations between each measure and availability of AT information in Spanish on each program's website., Results: Sixteen program websites (15 states, 1 territory) provided access to Spanish-language AT information. None of the 4 measures were strongly associated with this outcome (r pb ranged from 0.30 to 0.42). For any of the 4 measures, no more than half of states in the top 10 ranks offered online access to AT information in Spanish., Conclusions: Improving the online availability of AT information in Spanish is necessary to increase equity in AT utilization among Spanish-speaking people with disabilities., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Recent national and state legislation has called attention to stark racial/ethnic disparities in maternal mortality and severe maternal morbidity (SMM), the latter of which is defined as having a life-threatening condition or life-saving procedure during childbirth. Using linked New York City birth and hospitalization data for 2012-14, we examined whether racial and economic spatial polarization is associated with SMM rates, and whether the delivery hospital partially explains the association. Women in ZIP codes with the highest concentration of poor blacks relative to wealthy whites experienced 4.0 cases of SMM per 100 deliveries, compared with 1.7 cases per 100 deliveries among women in the neighborhoods with the lowest concentration (risk difference = 2.4 cases per 100). Thirty-five percent of this difference was attributable to the delivery hospital. Women in highly polarized neighborhoods were most likely to deliver in hospitals located in similarly polarized neighborhoods. Housing policy that targets racial and economic spatial polarization may address a root cause of SMM, while hospital quality improvement may mitigate the impact of such polarization.