Search

In 2022, UNCITRAL Working Group IV was mandated to develop the Rules on data provision contracts as an answer to the needs of rapidly growing data market. It was expressly noted then, that the Working Group IV should be mindful of similar legislative initiatives. In October of 2023, the working version of the Rules was distributed. Among the other provisions, the Rules define a data provision contract as a contract under which one party provides data to other party. Given definition shows a great resemblance with the contracts on the supply of digital content regulated by Directive (EU) 2019/770 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2019 on certain aspects concerning contracts for the supply of digital content and digital services. This paper analyzes and compares some of the key provisions of the aforementioned legal instruments. Special focus is attached to the scopes of application of both instruments and exclusions from their application, legal nature and general characteristics of both data provision contracts and contracts for the supply of digital content, obligations of the contractual parties. The main objective is to establish clear boundaries regarding the objects and scopes of application of both legal instruments in order to determine their potential overlaps. Finally, the paper investigates the reach and the meaning of personal data provision as a sui generis reimbursement in the context of both instruments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: A novel type of a disposable circumcision suture device (DCSD) has been proved to be effective and safe; however, a few cases of severe bleeding took place after circumcisions. Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of a modified double-layer pressure dressing to avoid severe bleeding after circumcision with the DCSD, in our department in a prospective randomized controlled study, and discuss the mechanism of bleeding with DCSD. Methods: Patients with redundant foreskin or phimosis were included between September 2018 and November 2019 and divided into 2 groups: In group A, the conventional pressure dressing was performed; in group B, an modified double-layer pressure dressing was performed. Main Outcome Measure: The main outcomes and complications (surgical time, incidence of glans ischemia, severe bleeding rate, infection rate, pain level, total cost, and overall satisfaction) were collected and analyzed. Results: A total of 624 patients were recruited for this study. There was no difference in the average age and body mass index between 2 groups. No patient suffered obvious glans ischemia. In group B, lower pain level, lower incidences of severe bleeding, and better satisfaction were recorded. Conclusion: The mechanism of bleeding with the DCSD was discussed in this study, and the modified pressure dressing was proved effective, safe, and easy to perform.W Jiang, J-li Fu, W-l Guo, et al. A Modified Pressure Dressing to Avoid Severe Bleeding After Circumcision With a Disposable Circumcision Suture Device and a Discussion on the Mechanism of Bleeding With the Disposable Circumcision Suture Device. Sex Med 2021;9:100288.