Search

Background Chromosomal rearrangements involving RET, which are found in about 1% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), define a unique molecular subset. We performed this study to examine the efficacy and safety of vandetanib 300 mg daily in this patient population. Patients and methods This study was a multi-center, open-label, phase II clinical trial. Patients were enrolled if they had metastatic or recurrent NSCLC with a RET rearrangement, which was confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization, had progressive disease against platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, and had a performance status of 0–2. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate. Results A total of 18 patients were enrolled in this study between July 2013 and October 2015. Patients were aged 35–71 years; three had a performance status of 2, and the majority were a heavily pretreated population (≥ two different previous chemotherapy regimens in 72% of the patients). Among the 17 evaluable patients, three had a partial response (objective response rate = 18%) and eight had a stable disease (disease control rate = 65%). Among these patients, the partial response or disease stabilization was durable for more than 6 months in eight patients. Vandetanib also showed a progression-free survival of 4.5 months, and an overall survival of 11.6 months during a median follow-up duration of 14 months. The safety profile was comparable with previous studies of vandetanib. Most vandetanib-related adverse events were mild with prevalent hypertension and rash (in >70% of patients). Grade 3 toxicity included hypertension (n = 3), QT prolongation (2), and elevation of aminotransferases (1), and as a consequence the dose was reduced in four patients. There were no adverse events associated with grade 4 or 5 toxicity. Conclusion Vandetanib is moderately active in pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC-harboring RET rearrangements.

Background Osimertinib is an oral, potent, irreversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) selective for sensitizing EGFR and EGFRT790M mutations and approved for the first-line treatment of patients with sensitizing EGFR-mutant NSCLC. EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations account for up to 4% of all EGFR mutations and are generally resistant to EGFR TKIs. Although osimertinib is active against in vitro models of EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation, its efficacy has not been prospectively studied. This phase II study has been performed to evaluate the efficacy of osimertinib in NSCLC patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation who failed to standard chemotherapy (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03414814). Methods Patients received osimertinib 80mg orally once daily until disease progression, unacceptable toxicities, withdrawal, or no clinical benefits. Primary end point was investigator-assessed, confirmed objective response rate (ORR) as defined by RECIST version 1.1. Secondary end points were safety profiles, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and duration of response. Results Between Jan 2018 and Feb 2019, 15 patients received osimertinib as second-line (20%, n = 3) and ≥ third-line (n = 12) at stage 1 according to Simon’s minimax two-stage design (P0=0.10, P1=0.30; α = 0.05, β = 0.20). Median age was 61 years and female were 66.7%. ORR was 0% with mostly disease stabilization (stable disease, 46.7%, n = 7). Three patients who had EGFR exon 20 insertions at M766, A767, and unknown sites were still receiving osimertinib at the cut-off date (disease stabilization, 12, 7, and 7 months, respectively). Median PFS and OS were 3.5 months (95% CI 1.6-not reached) and not reached (1-year OS rate, 56.3%), respectively. Disease control rate at 6 months was 31.1%. The most frequently observed adverse events (AEs, all grades, %) were nausea (20%, n = 3), vomiting (20%, n = 3), anemia (13.3%, n = 2), and fever (13.3%, n = 2). Conclusions Osimertinib is well tolerated, but has limited clinical activity in NSCLC patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation who failed to standard chemotherapy. Clinical trial identification NCT03414814. Legal entity responsible for the study Tae Min Kim. Funding AstraZeneca. Disclosure T.M. Kim: Advisory / Consultancy, without any compensation: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy, without any compensation: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy, without any compensation: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy, without any compensation: Bayer; Research grant / Funding (self), outside this work: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy, without any compensation: Takeda. B. Keam: Research grant / Funding (self), outside this work: AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (self), outside this work: MSD; Research grant / Funding (self), outside this work: ONO; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Genexine. D. Kim: Advisory / Consultancy, without any compensation: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy, without any compensation: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy, without any compensation: Takeda. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest. Linguistic correction

Background: ABCB1 polymorphisms could predict treatment results of taxane therapy in several malignancies. FCGR2A and FCGR3A polymorphisms were associated with clinical outcomes in several diseases after treatment with monoclonal antibody drugs which had antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity activity. These polymorphisms could be possible predictive markers after taxane plus trastuzumab (TH) chemotherapy in patients with HER-2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: Fifty-seven patients with HER-2 FISH positive MBC who received TH chemotherapy as the 1st-line treatment were enrolled. We analyzed 5 polymorphisms using DNA from peripheral blood mononuclear cells: ABCB1 1236C>T (rs1128503), ABCB1 2677G>T/A (rs2032582), ABCB1 3435C>T (rs1045642), FCGR2A 131H/R (rs1801274), and FCGR3A 158V/F (rs396991), then correlated them to treatment results of patients. Results: Among 57 patients, 22 patients (38.6%) received weekly paclitaxel plus trastuzumab, 26 patients (45.6%) tri-weekly paclitaxel plus trastuzumab, and 9 patients (15.8%) tri-weekly docetaxel plus trastuzumab. After a median follow-up of 30.6 (range, 0.6-75.9) months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 15.1 (95% confidence interval (CI), 10.3-19.8) months. ABCB1 2677T allele carriers had longer PFS than the others (42.1 (95% CI, 12.7-71.4) months vs. 13.0 (95% CI, 10.6-15.4) months; p=0.037) along with a tendency toward higher response rate (RR) (86.4% vs. 76.0%; p=0.470) and longer overall survival (OS) (54.7 (95% CI, 43.0-66.4) months vs. 38.9 (95% CI, 18.1-59.7) months; p=0.057). In addition, ABCB1 3435CC genotype carriers had shorter PFS than the others (13.0 (95% CI, 10.8-15.2) months vs. 19.1 (95% CI, 0.0-38.5) months; p=0.039) along with a tendency toward lower RR (78.6% vs. 100%; p=0.567) and shorter OS (38.9 (95% CI, 19.7-58.1) months vs. 54.7 (95% CI, 43.0-66.4) months; p=0.093). ABCB1 1236C>T, FCGR2A 131H/R, and FCGR3A 158V/F were not significantly associated with RR, PFS, and OS. None of these polymorphisms were associated with any grades of hematologic or cardiac toxicities. Conclusions: Our results support that ABCB1 2677G>T/A and 3435C>T may have predictive roles after the 1st-line TH chemotherapy in patients with HER-2-positive MBC. In contrast, ABCB1 1236C>T, FCGR2A 131H/R, and FCGR3A 158V/F could not predict response after TH treatment. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-09-36.

Background Recent researches revealed that class III β-tubulin (TUBB3) is a prognostic marker in various tumors and role of TUBB3 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is not defined yet. We analyzed the significance of TUBB3 expression along with p53 and ERCC1 in locally advanced HNSCC patients receiving cisplatin-based induction chemotherapy. Materials and methods Retrospective review of medical records at Seoul National University Hospital between 1998 and 2007 was carried out. Immunohistochemical stain of TUBB3, p53, and ERCC1 was done in paraffin-embedded tumor tissue. We assessed response to treatment, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Results Eighty-five patients with oropharyngeal, hypopharyngeal, and laryngeal cancers received induction chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin (n = 55), or 5-FU, cisplatin, and docetaxel (Taxotere) (n = 30). Eighty-three received definitive treatment after induction chemotherapy, where 62 received radiotherapy and 21 received surgery. TUBB3-positive patients showed lower response rate than TUBB3-negative patients (69% versus 88%, P = 0.039). Shorter median PFS was observed in TUBB3-positive group (12 versus 47 months, P = 0.001). Shorter median OS was observed in TUBB-positive group not reaching statistical significance (30 versus 59 months, P = 0.072). TUBB3 status significantly influenced CSS (35 months versus not reached, P = 0.017). Positive p53 status was related to poorer OS and CSS. ERCC1 showed no influence on chemotherapy response, PFS, OS, and CSS. Conclusion TUBB3 is a predictive and prognostic marker along with well-known p53 in HNSCC patients receiving cisplatin-based induction chemotherapy. Clinical impact of ERCC1 is not evident in this setting.

Background Belotecan (Camtobell®, Chong Keun Dang Corp, Seoul, Korea; CKD602) is a new camptothecin analogue. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of single-agent belotecan for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Patients and methods Twenty-seven patients with chemotherapy-naive or chemosensitive SCLC were treated with belotecan 0.5 mg/m2/day on days 1–5 of a 3-week cycle. All 27 patients were assessable for toxicity, and 21 patients assessable for response. Results Nine patients (42.9%) showed objective tumor responses including one complete response; seven (63.6%) in 11 chemotherapy-naive patients; and two (20.0%) in 10 chemosensitive patients. With a median follow-up of 5 years, median progression-free and survival time for chemotherapy-naive patients were 4.8 months and 11.9 months, respectively, while the corresponding values for chemosensitive patients were 3.3 months and 10.5 months, respectively. The most common toxicity was neutropenia. Conclusion Belotecan was active in SCLC patients as a single agent, warranting further investigations of belotecan in combination with platinum or other active agents.

Background: This study was undertaken to identify predictors of the prescription of strong opioids, which are important for the management of severe cancer pain, by Korean physicians. Methods: A questionnaire based on a hypothetical case designed to assess the prescription of morphine by physicians was administered to 800 specialists in the Korea Cancer Association, of whom 147 (18.4%) responded, and to 2200 specialists in the Korean Academy of Family Medicine, of whom 388 (17.6%) responded. We used a multidimensional approach to identify the predictors of prescription of morphine by physicians. Results: In the hypothetical case scenario, only 16.5% of the respondents stated that they would prescribe morphine for severe cancer pain. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that physicians with a positive attitude regarding opioid addiction [odds ratio (OR) 2.62; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.54 ‐ 4.46], experience of pain assessment (OR 2.09; 95% CI 1.13 ‐ 3.87), recent residency training (OR 2.27; 95% CI 1.30‐ 4.0) and positive self-evaluation as an oncology specialist (OR 2.60; 95% CI 1.41 ‐4.78) were more likely to prescribe morphine. None of the 13 variables in the knowledge dimension significantly predicted prescription of morphine for severe cancer pain. Conclusions: The results of the survey suggest that we need to develop strategies to develop a positive attitude toward opioids, to increase experience in pain assessment and to improve cancer pain

Background: This national survey was undertaken to propose the classification of extranodal natural killer (NK)/T-cell lymphoma (NTCL) subtypes and to clarify a clinical heterogeneity. Patients and methods: Two hundred and eighty patients newly diagnosed as NTCL were enrolled from 22 Korean medical centers. Two subsets were compared: one involving the upper aerodigestive tract (UAT) and another involving the non-upper aerodigestive tract (NUAT) region, which comprises the skin, gastrointestinal tract, and liver or soft tissues. Clinical prognostic factors, survival outcomes, and independent predictors for survival were compared between each subset. Results: NUAT-NTCL (59 patients) had significantly higher proportions of disseminated disease, aggressive biologic features, and unfavorable host reactions compared with UAT-NTCL (221 patients). NUAT-NTCL had shortened 5-year overall survival (OS) (22% versus 41%, P = 0.001). Ann Arbor staging, the International Prognostic Index, and the NTCL prognostic index failed to predict the OS of NUAT-NTCL, but did predict the OS in UAT-NTCL. Independent predictors for OS by multivariate analyses differed between each subset. In the NUAT subset, extranodal sites and regional nodes predicted the OS, while Ann Arbor staging, age, performance status, and lactate dehydrogenase level predicted the OS in the UAT subset. Conclusion: NUAT-NTCL may represent a distinctive disease entity in terms of clinical factors, independent predictors, and survival outcomes.

Objective To investigate differences in the understanding of terminal cancer and determine the relationship between this understanding and attitudes toward end-of-life issues. Design A questionnaire survey was performed between 2008 and 2009. Participants: A total of 1242 cancer patients, 1289 family caregivers, 303 physicians from 17 university hospitals, and 1006 participants from the general population responded (response rates: 90.1%, 95.1%, 81.0%, and 75.9%, respectively). Main outcome measures Individual understanding of terminal cancer and its relationship with preference for disclosure of terminal prognosis and critical end-of-life interventions. Results A “six-month life expectancy” was the most common understanding of terminal cancer (45.6%), followed by “treatment refractoriness” (21.1%), “metastatic/recurred disease” (19.4%), “survival of a few days/weeks” (11.4%), and “locally advanced disease” (2.5%). The combined proportion of “treatment refractoriness” and “six-month life expectancy” differed significantly between physicians and the other groups combined (76.0% vs 65.9%, P = 0.0003). Multivariate analyses showed that patients and caregivers who understood terminal cancer as “survival of a few days/weeks” showed more negative attitudes toward disclosure of terminal status compared with participants who chose “treatment refractoriness” (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.39, 95% CI 1.26 to 4.54 for patients; aOR 2.94, 95% CI 1.58 to 5.47 for caregivers). Caregivers who understood terminal cancer as “metastatic/recurred” or “six-month survival” tended to disagree with withdrawing futile life-sustaining treatments (aOR 2.57, 95% CI 1.39 to 4.75 for “metastatic/recurred,” aOR 1.86, 95% CI 1.06 to 3.28 for “six-month survival”) and active pain control (aOR 2.29, 95% CI 1.13 to 4.64 for “metastatic/recurred”, aOR 1.86, 95% CI 0.97 to 3.54 for “six-month survival”), compared with caregivers who selected “treatment refractoriness.” Conclusion The understanding of terminal cancer varies among the four participant groups. It was associated with different preferences regarding end-of-life issues. Standardizing this terminology is needed to better understand end-of-life care. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Purpose Although surrogate decision-making in cancer patients is well-known, few studies investigating the prevalence of surrogate decision-making over time have been reported. The objectives of this study were to investigate the level of surrogate decision-making in advanced cancer patients over time and the impact of demographic and clinical variables on surrogate decision-making. Methods The level of surrogate decision-making was measured in 572 consecutive cancer patients who died between January 1 and December 31, 2009. We reviewed 8,639 informed consent forms of these patients, calculated the proportion of decisions made by a surrogate (PDS) for each patient, and analyzed the association of PDS with demographic and clinical variables. Results Surrogates completed 40.3% of all consent forms. The prevalence of surrogate decision-making was higher in the end-of-life period (death 365 days). Surrogates signed consent forms more frequently for do-not-resuscitate directives, intensive care unit admission, emergency hemodialysis, surgery and invasive interventions compared with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and diagnostic tests (OR = 3.88, P Conclusions Surrogate decision-making was frequently observed among Korean cancer patients in this study, especially when the patient's death was imminent, and for decisions related to end-of-life care. Surrogates were also frequently involved in decisions for elderly or rapidly deteriorating patients. Healthcare professionals should consider the significant role of familial surrogates in the end-of-life period; comprehensive approaches are needed to preserve the best interest of the patients. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Background Everolimus prolonged survival in advanced RCC patients who failed to VEGF inhibitors. However, nearly 13.5 to 30% of patients experienced NIP. Although a lower incidence of NIP was observed in Japanese patients from RECORD-1, the actual incidence of everolimus-associated NIP was unknown in Asian patients. Therefore, this study was undertaken to evaluate everolimus-associated NIP in Korean RCC patients treated with everolimus. Patients and methods Total 36 patients were enrolled at Seoul National University Hospital including advanced RCC patients who participated in REACT (N = 20) and in a trial for non-clear cell RCC (N = 16). NIP associated with everolimus was diagnosed using sequential computed tomography (CT) of the chest or bronchoscopy after an infectious origin and other causes of radiographic infiltrates were excluded. Clinico-pathologic findings were compared between NIP and non-NIP groups. Factors associated with NIP were identified using a binary logistic regression analysis. Results Overall, 10 (27.8%) of 36 RCC patients treated with everolimus developed NIP that was radiologically proven: ≥ grade 3, 6 (16.7%) patients; and grade 1, 4 (11.1%). Two patients died within 1 week after NIP diagnosis, while 8 recovered from NIP after cessation of everolimus (N = 4) and steroid use with drug interruption (N = 4). The mean cumulative dose of everolimus was 1,293 mg (range, 590-2420mg) at NIP diagnosis. There were no differences in NIP occurrence according to age, performance status, subtype (clear vs. non-clear), and underlying lung disease (Ps > .05). However, patients who experienced NIP had a better response (9 of 10 patients) than those without NIP (17 of 26) (P = .015). The response to everolimus remained predictive of NIP occurrence in multivariate analysis (P = .018). Conclusion NIP is relatively common (27.8%) in Korean patients with RCC who receive everolimus. Response to everolimus is an independent predictor for NIP development in advanced RCC patients. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Background Study results demonstrated that IFN augments BEV activity and improves median PFS in pts with mRCC. Thus, combination BEV + IFN is a standard first-line treatment option for mRCC. Combining BEV with the mTOR inhibitor EVE may be an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment option. The open-label, phase II RECORD-2 trial compared first-line EVE + BEV and IFN + BEV in mRCC. Patients and methods: Therapy-naive pts with clear cell mRCC and prior nephrectomy were randomized 1:1 to BEV 10 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks with either EVE 10 mg oral daily or IFN (9 MIU SC 3 times/week, if tolerated). Tumour assessments were every 12 weeks. Primary objective was treatment effect on progression-free survival (PFS) per central review based on an estimate of the chance of a subsequent phase III trial success (50% threshold for phase II success). Results In EVE + BEV (n = 182) and IFN + BEV (n = 183) arms, median age was 60/60 years, 76/72% of pts were men, MSKCC risk was favourable/intermediate/poor in 36/57/7% and 36/57/7% of pts, and 43/46% of pts had >2 organs involved, respectively. For EVE + BEV and IFN + BEV, median treatment duration was 8.5/8.3 months, respectively; 23/26% of pts discontinued due to AEs. In EVE + BEV and IFN + BEV arms, median PFS by central review was 9.3/10.0 months (HRIFN/EVE, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.69-1.19; P =0.485), respectively; probability of subsequent phase III success was 5.1%. Results of central and local PFS analysis were consistent. Objective response rate was 27/28% in EVE + BEV and IFN + BEV arms, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached in the EVE + BEV arm and was 25.9 months (95% CI: 21.1, 30.2) in the IFN + BEV arm. Most frequent AEs (%) were stomatitis (63), proteinuria (49), diarrhoea (39), hypertension (38), and epistaxis (35) in EVE + BEV arm and decreased appetite (45), fatigue (41), proteinuria (37), and pyrexia (35) in IFN + BEV arm. Conclusions In RECORD-2, PFS and tolerability were similar for first-line EVE + BEV and IFN + BEV. Final OS analysis will occur after 2-year follow-up. Disclosure A. Ravaud: Alain Ravaud is a member of global, European, and/or French boards on urological tumors for Pfizer, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Bayer-Schering, and Dendreon, and has received institutional grant support from Pfizer, Novartis, and Roche. O. Anak: Ozlem Anak is an employee of Novartis Pharma AG. D. Pelov: Diana Pelov is an employee of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. A. Louveau: Anne-Laure Louveau is an employee of Novartis Pharma S.A.S. T. M-H: Tay M-H is a speaker for an advisory board for Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. B. Melichar: Bohuslav Melichar has received honoraria from Novartis and Roche and served on an advisory board for Roche. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

e20650 Background: Oral mucositis (OM) induced by chemotherapy is a troublesome and debilitating adverse effect in solid tumor patients. OM might influence the complicated aspects such as the poor oral intake and malnutrition over just oral symptom. Therefore we prospectively evaluated the actual incidence of OM and its clinical significance in solid tumor patients. Methods: From October 16, 2007 to September 3, 2008, we consecutively enrolled 344 patients with solid tumor who initiated new chemotherapy. Each patient was prospectively evaluated for two cycles. The data were collected from physician-to-patient interview. And patients’ diary for OM symptom was used as patient-reported measurement. The visual analog scale (VAS) was used to quantify the degree of adverse effects (VAS: 0 point = no symptoms, 4 point = the worst symptom) and FACT-G was used for assessment of the quality of life (QOL). Results: Finally, 322 patients were analyzed. The median age was 51. Breast cancer was the most common (51%). And, stage IV was 137 (43%). OM was 28% per each cycle and 45% per patient during two cycles. Patient-reported OM symptom had peak in one week and was recovered in 9.14±6.77 days. Oral dryness was the most prevalent symptom out of symptoms related with OM such as oral pain, poor oral intake, dysphagia, oral bleeding, scalloping of tongue and ulceration (VAS score 1≤; 47%, 27%, 39%, 15%, 7%, 14%, 13%, respectively). In QOL measured by FACT-G, physical well-being and emotional well-being were significantly dropped in OM-occurred group than in no-OM group (19.09±6.48 vs 22.47±5.95, p No significant financial relationships to disclose.

21088 Background: Studies have suggested that TNBC, defined by estrogen receptor-negative, progesterone receptor-negative, and HER2-negative, may represent the subset of breast cancer(BC) with different biologic behavior. Here we investigated the clinicopathologic characteristics of TNBC and its prognostic significance in Korean BC patients. Methods: Patients diagnosed as invasive BC and underwent curative surgery at Seoul National University Hospital between Jan. 2000 and Jun. 2003, were reviewed, retrospectively. We excluded the patients whose immunohistochemistry for hormone receptor nor HER2 status had not been evaluated, and who had been treated with adjuvant trastuzumab or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT). Clinicopathologic variables (age, T and N stage, endovascular or lymphatic tumor emboli, nuclear and histologic grade, p53, bcl2, Ki67) and 3 year relapse free survival (3YRFS) rate of TNBC were compared with those of non- TNBC. Results: 1,136 patients were eligible for analysis. The median follow-up was 48.7 months. 341 patients underwent breast conserving surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy. 249 patients were TNBC and 62.1% of those were node negative. 86.4% of node negative TNBC, 88.3% of node positive TNBC, 53.9% of node negative non-TNBC, and 90.2% of node positive non-TNBC received adjuvant CT. Compared with non-TNBC, TNBC was correlated with younger age (age No significant financial relationships to disclose.

6103 Background: The objective of this study were to observe the markers of aggressive care in cancer patients including appropriateness of chemotherapy and to evaluate the trends in cancer-care and to assess their association with the availability of related health care resources. Methods: We designed restrospective cohort composed of patients who diagnosed as metastatic cancer and received palliative chemotherapy at Seoul National University Hospital in 2002. Hematologic malignancy and hepatocellular carcinoma with local treatment alone were excluded. Two hundreds ninety eight patients who died of cancer were finally evaluated the appropriateness of cancer-care including chemotherapy. Results: The median duration of chemotherapy was 6.02 months (mo) compared to 8.67 mo of median overall survival. Median periods between last chemotherapy and death were 2.02 mo. Among the 298 patients, 50.3% of the patients received chemotherapy in the last two months of life. Furthermore, 17 patients (5.7%) died within 2 weeks after receiving chemotherapy. It seemed that the patients had not enough time to prepare the death with dignity. The mean number of regimens and cycles the patients had received were 1.83 and 5.52, respectively. However, timing of discontinuance chemotherapy did not affect use of chemotherapy that there was no difference in numbers of regimens and cycles according to months between last chemotherapy and death. The proportion with >1 ER visit in the last months of life were 33.6% and average numbers of ER visits after cancer diagnosed were 1.72. Only 9.1% of patients referred to hospice center and 11.7% of patients agreed with written DNR. The lack of hospice centers and harmony with referring system in Korea might affect to this results. Conclusions: Among the patients who died of cancer, significant portion of patients received chemotherapy till the end of life as well as ER visiting. Relatively, hospice referral and discussions about DNR did not conducted well in end of life care. Not to interfere the dignity of life, the physicians should be concerned whether the patients dying of cancer are overtreated with chemotherapy and receiving the appropriate cancer-care. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Involvement of the anus by a malignant lymphoma is rare, but occurs with a high incidence in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome patients, with most cases having a B-cell phenotype. Although NK/T cell lymphomas; the nasal type, often present with skin or gastrointestinal tract involvement, there has been no reported cases of anal involvement in Korea. Herein, we desc ribe the case of a 23-year-old man who presented with fever, weight loss and a perianal abscess. A biopsy specimen of the anus revealed an extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma of the nasal type. In-situ hybridization for the Epstein-Barr Virus proved positive. Despite the use of combination chemotherapy, the patient died due to the disease 2 months after diagnosis. In patients presenting with a perianal lesion, other involved sites, as well as B symptoms, lymphoma involvement of the anus should be considered, with a biopsy of the anus performed. (Korean