1. Factors controlling scaling laws for buoyancy controlled combustion of spherical gas clouds
- Author
-
A. Campbell, N. Slaven, F.G. Roper, H.C. Jaggers, and D.P. Franklin
- Subjects
Physics ,Buoyancy ,Meteorology ,Turbulence ,Mechanics ,engineering.material ,Combustion ,law.invention ,Ignition system ,Orders of magnitude (time) ,Fuel gas ,law ,Range (aeronautics) ,engineering ,Entrainment (chronobiology) - Abstract
The combustion of spherical gas clouds may fall into two regimes, controlled either by buoyancy or by the intial velocity of the fuel gas. Dimensional analysis (confirmed by experiment) shows that the burning time is proportional to fuel mass to the power of one sixth for buoyancy control, or one third for velocity control, for fireballs large enough to be fully turbulent. The paper discusses the variation of diameter and rise height with time for buoyancy controlled fireballs. Experiments were performed using soap bubbles with up to 14g of fuel gas giving a quiescent release in wind-free conditions. Fuel masses covered a range of three orders of magnitude. Combustion was recorded on colour video, and analysed for burning time and for diameter and rise height versus time. Fireballs formed from over 0.5g of fuel resembled those observed in incidents with several tonnes of fuel. Initially, they formed a flattened sphere, with a turbulent vortex ring becoming visible in the later part of their life. The measurements of diameter and rise height versus time could be correlated in the way predicted from dimensional analysis. The rate of growth of fireball diameter was greatest just after ignition, when the rise velocity was smallest. This implies that the initial mixing of fuel with air occurred by gravitational instability rather than by shear-induced entrainment. Analysis of the motion of these fireballs showed that only a small proportion of the entrained air reacted with the fuel. Viscous effects could not be neglected for fireballs with less than about 0.5g of fuel. These differed in appearance from the larger fireballs, and did not obey the same correlations for burning time, rise height or diameter.
- Published
- 1988
- Full Text
- View/download PDF