Search

We report a prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label 2-year trial of 81 postmenopausal women aged 53-79 years with at least one minimal-trauma vertebral fracture (VF) and low (T-score below - 2) lumbar bone mineral density (BMD). Group HRT received piperazine estrone sulfate (PES) 0.625 - 1.25 mg/d +/- medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) 2.5 - 5 mg/d; group HRT/D received HRT plus calcitriol 0.25 microg bd. All with a baseline dietary calcium (Ca) of1 g/ d received Ca carbonate 0.6 g nocte. Final data were on 66 - 70 patients. On HRT/D, significant (P0.001) BMD increases from baseline by DXA were at total body - head, trochanter, Ward's, total hip, intertrochanter and femoral shaft (% group mean delta 4.2, 6.1, 9.3, 3.7, 3.3 and 3.3%, respectively). On HRT, at these 6 sites, significant deltaS were restricted to the trochanter and Wards. Significant advantages of HRT/D over HRT were in BMD of total body (- head), total hip and trochanter (all P = 0.01). The differences in mean delta at these sites were 1.3, 2.6 and 3.9%. At the following, both groups improved significantly -lumbar spine (AP and lateral), forearm shaft and ultradistal tibia/fibula. The weightbearing, site - specific benefits of the combination associated with significant suppression of parathyroid hormone-suggest a beneficial effect on cortical bone. Suppression of bone turnover was significantly greater on HRT/D (serum osteocalcin P = 0.024 and urinary hydroxyproline/creatinine ratio P = 0.035). There was no significant difference in the number of patients who developed fresh VFs during the trial (HRT 8/36, 22%; HRT/D 4/34, 12% - intention to treat); likewise in the number who developed incident nonvertebral fractures. This is the first study comparing the 2 treatments in a fracture population. The results indicate a significant benefit of calcitriol combined with HRT on total body BMD and on BMD at the hip, the major site of osteoporotic fracture.

Twenty-five years after the first paper on etidronate in Paget's disease, there are few published papers that address bisphosphonate resistance as a specific clinical phenomenon. We report our data from two studies. Study 1 is a retrospective study of 20 patients with moderate to severe disease who were treated with intravenous (iv) pamidronate (221 +/- 18 mg [SEM]; range 60-360 mg), and after biochemical remission and relapse were retreated with generally larger iv dosage (293 +/- 28 mg; range 180-600 mg). The nadir bone turnover values were similar: plasma alkaline phosphatase (pAP) in 20 patients was 243 +/- 40 IU/l (mean +/- SEM) after the first course, and 267 +/- 44 IU/l after the second (reference range [RR] 35-135 IU/l). Likewise, fasting urinary hydroxyproline excretion (HypE) in 14 of the 20 patients was 4.5 +/- 1.1 micromol/LGF and 4.1 +/- 0.9 micromol/LGF, respectively (RR 0.40-1.92 micromol/LGF). However the minimum duration of biochemical remission was significantly shorter after the second course-10.9 +/- 1.7 months (first) and 5.6 +/- 0.9 months (second) (p0.03; Friedman's ANOVA n = 17). A subgroup of 10 patients who were followed for three courses showed a significantly higher pAP nadir in the third course. Study 2 is a prospective study of 40 patients, 23 previously untreated (NILPREV) and 17 previously treated with iv pamidronate (PAMPREV) and in biochemical relapse, who were randomly allocated to either oral alendronate 40 mg daily in 3 month units, or iv pamidronate 60 mg every 3 months. Treatment was continued until pAP and fasting urinary deoxypyridinoline/creatinine (Dpy/Cr) ratios (RR 5-27 micromol/mol) were both in the reference range, or a clear plateau in each marker developed. At baseline, there were no significant differences in either marker between the two NILPREV groups and between the two PAMPREV groups. Using log-transformed data, in NILPREV the pAP reductions were significant and similar over the first 6 months. However, although each Dpy/Cr reduction was also significant, the difference in responses favored alendronate (p0.015). In PAMPREV both markers showed no significant response to pamidronate; comparison showed a significantly greater response to alendronate (pAP p0.02; Dpy/Cr p0.002). Using two-way ANOVA, the pAP responses to alendronate in NILPREV and PAMPREV were similar and those to pamidronate were different (p = 0.034). The percentage of patients with both markers in the RR at 6 months or earlier were identical in NILPREV patients: alendronate 87% and pamidronate 87%. However in PAMPREV they were different: alendronate 83% and pamidronate 0% (p = 0.003). These data indicate: 1) patients treated with the same aminobisphosphonates for two courses show similar nadir values of bone turnover markers but a shorter remission time after the second course. In a third course the nadirs are significantly higher; and 2) in the alendronate/pamidronate comparison, NILPREV and PAMPREV patients showed similar pAP responses to alendronate, but significantly different responses to pamidronate. Thus, patients showing acquired partial resistance to one aminobisphosphonate (usually after two or more previous courses) are still capable of remission after exposure to another compound of the same class.

Atactic polystyrene, isotactic polystyrene, and intermediate polyblend films of the homopolymers were cast from solutions of 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene (mesitylene) or o-chlorotoluene. Residual solvent content, glass transition temperatures, and densities of the polyblends were determined. Consequent to these preliminary characterizations, n-hexane absorption kinetics and equilibria in unannealed blends were determined; maxima in the plots of weight change versus time were apparent for all compositions. The maximum is a consequence of the ‘unlocking’ of previously trapped residual casting solvent consequent to plasticizing invasion by the n-hexane in the unannealed film specimens. Neutron activation analysis for chlorine confirmed that the o-chlorotoluene content in the films was reduced dramatically consequent to n-hexane absorption. Residual solvent content was also reduced by thermally annealing the films at 110°C for 48 h under a vacuum and, therefore, no maximum in the sorption/time behaviour was observed in thermally annealed samples nor in films previously contacted with n-hexane vapour and subsequently vacuum stripped. Both the rate of sorption and the apparent sorption equilibrium are greatly reduced as the isotactic polystyrene content is increased. Predominantly Case II or relaxation controlled absorption kinetics were observed in the polyblends consequent to thermal annealing and/or ‘solvent’ annealing. Although the form of the sorption kinetics was quite similar for absorption of n-hexane in thermally annealed or ‘solvent-annealed’ films, the sorption rate and amount of penetrant sorbed at apparent equilibrium were both larger for the thermally annealed films. These results suggest that the history dependence, which so frequently affects polymeric glasses, appears to confound a simple interpretation of the sorption experiments reported here. Consistent with observations in related systems, Super Case II kinetics were observed for the more slowly sorbing films which, in this case, contained isotactic polystyrene. Moreover, film whitening related to micro-voiding accompanied n-hexane sorption in blends containing atactic polymer; however, the whitening in the isotactic polymer was less pronounced and densification, presumably related to solvent induced crystallization, occurred consequent to long term exposure of the isotactic polymer to n-hexane.