Search

The present study investigates stop signals and their effects on the pain and distress of patients undergoing a stressful medical procedure. Thirty-six chronic pain patients (17 men, 19 women) attending an out-patient operating theatre for diagnostic nerve blocks/local anaesthetic injections were allocated to one of two conditions (experimental and control). All patients received a standard information leaflet concerning the forthcoming injections. Additional information was given to those in the experimental group on four occasions (three orally, one written) before the injections which stated that they could halt the procedure at any time by saying 'stop'. Subjective measures of anxiety, pain, distress, sense of control over the procedure as well as observer ratings of patient distress and pain behaviour were obtained before, during and after the injections. After initial differences in pre-injection pain were controlled for the experimental group, patients rated themselves as less distressed during the injections and recorded lower state anxiety following treatment. In view of various methodological limitations of the present study its findings may only be accorded 'pilot study' status. These limitations are explored in the discussion along with their implications for a more robust replication study. Nevertheless the present findings provide tentative support for the hypothesis that the use of stop signals can reduce the stressful nature of diagnostic nerve blocks.

The clinical management of acute pain has been impeded by traditions and misconceptions which have resulted in suboptimal application to the patient of the currently available methods of pain control. The search for new drugs and exotic ways to deliver them has further obscured many of the basic principles which should guide management. Standard regimens fail because of the wide, unpredictable variability in pain intensity, patient characteristics, and pharmacological responses. Treatment needs to be individualized for each patient. Unrelieved acute pain produces psychological, physiological and socioeconomic consequences. Pre-emptive analgesia may damp down the development of both immediate and long-term pain following surgery and adequate psychological preparation can improve coping abilities. The delivery of opioid analgesics can be improved using patient controlled analgesia or spinal administration in some cases. Regional analgesia, often using simple techniques, can produce excellent pain relief. Overall management and staff education should be delegated to an acute pain service.

Access to pain relief is an integral part of peri-operative care jointly managed by clinicians and nursing staff. Simple regimens, relying on inexpensive drugs, are often not followed due to inadequate healthcare systems. This article describes some of the common challenges, and suggests practical approaches to overcoming them.

Patients with chronic pain often present with complex multidimensional problems. Satisfactory management requires attention to the various components of the pain as well as to the resulting disability and the psychosocial dimensions of the problem.

Surgical lumbar sympathectomy was commonly performed on patients with painful obliterative arterial disease. Percutaneous chemical sympathectomy is an alternative to surgery and was described by Mandl in 1926. His approach depended upon the needle contacting the transverse process to gauge depth before being inserted more deeply. Variations of this technique were subsequently described, but it was the introduction of radiographic techniques that allowed identification of landmarks and precise positioning of the needle.

In a double-blind trial carried out on patients in the first stage of labour, either fentanyl 80 micrograms (n = 35) or physiological saline (n = 33) was added to the test dose of bupivacaine and administered extradurally. Thereafter analgesia was maintained as necessary with 0.5% bupivacaine alone. Supplementary bupivacaine (a further dose within 1 h) was required to produce satisfactory analgesia in eight patients in the fentanyl group and in 26 patients in the control group. Analgesia was more rapid in onset and more complete in the fentanyl group, and the duration from first dose to first top-up was 2.36 h, compared with 1.66 h (supplements notwithstanding) in the control group. No serious side-effects were encountered in either group, although eight patients in the fentanyl group experienced mild itching, compared with one in the control group.

Summary A case of transient sympathetic block of the arm following percutaneous intercostal nerve injections is described and the possible aetiology discussed.

The spread of solution after a standardized paravertebral injection was studied to determine the precision and predictability of paravertebral spread. The spread of 5 ml of a solution of radiological contrast medium (sodium iothalamate) and local anesthetic mixture after 45 (34 thoracic, 11 lumbar) paravertebral injections was studied in 31 patients by radiography and computed tomography and correlated with the clinical effects. Spread confined to the paravertebral area occurred after only eight (18%) injections. Spread was epidural after 31 (70%) injections and exclusively so in 14 (31%) injections. Mean sensory loss was greater after epidural spread, but a wide range of sensation loss was observed with all patterns of spread. Intrapleural spread occurred after three injections, as did spread into the psoas muscle. In addition, measurements were made of 114 paravertebral spaces in 20 patients by means of computed tomography. Dimensional factors identified as possibly leading to complications of a paravertebral injection included narrow width of the thoracic transverse processes (mean, 3.18 cm; range, 2.1-4.2 cm) and the wide range in paravertebral dimensions. The distance from bony landmarks to pleura frequently fell outside the limits recommended by many standard texts. We conclude that the spread of a small volume of solution after paravertebral injection is imprecise and unpredictable. Neurolytic and diagnostic paravertebral injections performed without the aid of radiological imaging and contrast media should be regarded as hazardous and interpreted with extreme caution.

In a randomised double blind trial, 36 patients in the first stage of labour received either epidural or intramuscular fentanyl at the same time as the epidural test dose of bupivacaine. Analgesia was more rapid in onset and more complete in the epidural fentanyl group. Supplementary doses of bupivacaine were required within the first hour in 62% of the intramuscular fentanyl group compared with only 16% in the epidural group. Plasma fentanyl concentrations showed wide interindividual variation, but after epidural fentanyl the peak occurred earlier. There was no correlation between analgesia and plasma fentanyl concentration, and epidural fentanyl produced superior analgesia but a systemic contribution to this effect cannot be ruled out.