1. Quantum Errors and Disturbances: Response to Busch, Lahti and Werner
- Author
-
D. M. Appleby
- Subjects
error disturbance principle ,General Physics and Astronomy ,quantum measurement ,FOS: Physical sciences ,lcsh:Astrophysics ,01 natural sciences ,Operator (computer programming) ,uncertainty principle ,Argument ,0103 physical sciences ,lcsh:QB460-466 ,Meaning (existential) ,010306 general physics ,Relation (history of concept) ,lcsh:Science ,Quantum ,Quantum Physics ,010308 nuclear & particles physics ,Heisenberg ,Philosophy ,Interpretation (philosophy) ,lcsh:QC1-999 ,Epistemology ,lcsh:Q ,Quantum Physics (quant-ph) ,lcsh:Physics - Abstract
Busch, Lahti and Werner (BLW) have recently criticized the operator approach to the description of quantum errors and disturbances. Their criticisms are justified to the extent that the physical meaning of the operator definitions has not hitherto been adequately explained. We rectify that omission. We then examine BLW's criticisms in the light of our analysis. We argue that, although the approach BLW favour (based on the Wasserstein 2-deviation) has its uses, there are important physical situations where an operator approach is preferable. We also discuss the reason why the error-disturbance relation is still giving rise to controversies almost a century after Heisenberg first stated his microscope argument. We argue that the source of the difficulties is the problem of interpretation, which is not so wholly disconnected from experimental practicalities as is sometimes supposed., Comment: AMS latex, 29 pages
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF