Search

Your search keyword '"D. Janknegt"' showing total 5 results
Start Over Author "D. Janknegt"
5 results on '"D. Janknegt"'

1. Is Recormon less painful than Eprex after subcutaneous administration?

Author

M. W. G. Hendriks, D. Janknegt, J. J. H. M. Lohman, R. Janknegt, T. W. M. Van de Wiel, F. P. J. Peters, and P. M. Hooymans

Subjects
Pharmacology, Adult, Male, medicine.medical_specialty, Pain score, business.industry, Injections, Subcutaneous, Pain, Middle Aged, Surgery, Subcutaneous injection, McNemar's test, Anesthesia, medicine, Humans, Pharmacology (medical), Female, business, Injections subcutaneous, Erythropoietin, Aged
Abstract

In this study, we examined the differences in pain score after subcutaneous injection of the epoetin preparations Eprex and Recormon. Patients (n = 30) received 5 injections Eprex and 5 injections Recormon in a randomized double-blind sequence. 10 Min after receiving the injection the patient was asked to complete a visual and a verbal analogue scale and two descriptive scales. The results of 25 patients were used for statistical evaluation. The overall results indicate that there are significantly more patients reporting pain after subcutaneous injection of Eprex than after Recormon (11 versus 2 patients, p less than 0.05; McNemar test). 12 Patients reported no differences in pain. 43 Out of 123 injections Eprex and 69 out of 125 injections Recormon caused no pain (p less than 0.01; chi 2 9.455). For 4 patients Recormon was significantly (p less than 0.05) less painful than Eprex. It can be concluded that Recormon may be a less painful alternative for individual patients reporting pain after subcutaneous injection of Eprex.

Published
1992

2. Abstracts of papers

Author

W. E. Roorda, M. A. de Vries, C. Kosho, J. A. Bouwstra, H. E. Junginger, H. E. Boddé, C. Kleinjan, W. C. de Bruyn, W. T. Daems, T. Kranenburg, L. M. J. van Driel, R. Roosjen, H. F. L. Gulot, T. de Vringer, J. G. H. Joosten, H. Jousma, J. Bouwstra, G. Gooris, G. S. Gooris, H. L. G. M. Tiemessen, H. E. Junsinger, J. Verhoeven, J. J. H. U. de Groot, R. J. Schaeffer, L. J. C. Peschier, G. S. M. J. E. Duchateau, J. Zuldema, F. W. H. M. Merkus, F. A. J. M. Pieters, D. Dekker, L. van Blools, D. J. A. Crommelin, W. Jiskoot, J. C. A. Offringa, R. Plekkenpol, P. A. M. Peeters, A. C. M. Claessens, P. W. J. T. Leufkens, W. M. C. Eling, F. G. J. Poelma, J. J. Tukker, D. J. A. Cromnelin, G. Storm, L. van Bloois, M. Brouwer, H. Talsma, M. A. Blankenstein, J. W. R. Nortier, A. Bakri, J. Wilting, L. H. H. Janssen, P. J. A. Crommelin, A. M. Mathieu, M. van Ooteghem, A. Ludwig, D. D. Breimer, A. G. de Boer, C. H. Kleinbloesem, P. van Brummelen, M. Danhof, J. Urquhart, G. K. Bolhuis, H. V. van Kamp, J. H. Proost, C. F. Lerk, A. H. de Boer, H. Vromans, P. de Haan, A. J. M. Schoonen, G. W. de Vries-Nijboer, E. H. Bosch, K. D. Kussendrager, H. K. F. van Saene, H. F. Mahieu, J. J. M. van Saene, L. Baaijens, E. Middelbeek, R. van Rooy, M. J. C. Vissers, L. Baaljens, A. P. Sam, Y. Boer, D. Janknegt, H. L. M. Cox, P. J. J. de Meijer, P. H. A. M. Kloeg, C. K. Mensink, F. J. van de Vaart, W. Roggen, F. A. Boom, A. C. A. Paalman, Th. Vos, J. J. de Gier, A. Takken-Hillebrecht, J. A. L. van Lakwijk-Najoan, H. G. M. Leufkens, and A. H. P. Paes

Subjects
Pharmacology, Pharmacology (medical)
Published
1986

3. [A quantitative study of migration]

Author

D, Janknegt

Subjects
Europe, Developed Countries, Population, Population Dynamics, Emigration and Immigration, Demography, Netherlands
Published
1976

4. Is Recormon less painful than Eprex after subcutaneous administration?

Author

Hendriks MW, Peters FP, Hooymans PM, Van de Wiel TW, Janknegt D, Janknegt R, and Lohman JJ

Subjects
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Injections, Subcutaneous adverse effects, Male, Middle Aged, Erythropoietin administration & dosage, Pain etiology
Abstract

In this study, we examined the differences in pain score after subcutaneous injection of the epoetin preparations Eprex and Recormon. Patients (n = 30) received 5 injections Eprex and 5 injections Recormon in a randomized double-blind sequence. 10 Min after receiving the injection the patient was asked to complete a visual and a verbal analogue scale and two descriptive scales. The results of 25 patients were used for statistical evaluation. The overall results indicate that there are significantly more patients reporting pain after subcutaneous injection of Eprex than after Recormon (11 versus 2 patients, p less than 0.05; McNemar test). 12 Patients reported no differences in pain. 43 Out of 123 injections Eprex and 69 out of 125 injections Recormon caused no pain (p less than 0.01; chi 2 9.455). For 4 patients Recormon was significantly (p less than 0.05) less painful than Eprex. It can be concluded that Recormon may be a less painful alternative for individual patients reporting pain after subcutaneous injection of Eprex.

Published
1992
Full Text
View/download PDF

5. [A quantitative study of migration].

Author

Janknegt D

Subjects
Demography, Developed Countries, Emigration and Immigration, Europe, Netherlands, Population, Population Dynamics
Published
1976

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results