Search

Background:Chondral and osteochondral lesions are being detected with increasing frequency. For large-diameter lesions, cell-based treatment modalities are speculated to result in the best possible outcome.Purpose:To prospectively evaluate the 2-year clinical and radiological results after the treatment of chondral and osteochondral knee joint lesions by a single-step autologous minced cartilage procedure.Study Design:Case series; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:From February 2015 to June 2016, a total of 27 consecutive patients suffering from chondral or osteochondral lesions of the knee joint were treated using a single-step autologous minced cartilage procedure. All patients underwent preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging for the collection of AMADEUS (Area Measurement and Depth and Underlying Structures) and MOCART (magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue) scores. Clinical analysis was conducted by a numeric analog scale (NAS) for pain and knee function before the intervention and at 12 and 24 months postoperatively.Results:A total of 12 female and 15 male patients (mean age, 28.7 years) were evaluated for a mean of 28.2 ± 3.8 months. The mean cartilage defect size encountered intraoperatively was 3.1 ± 1.6 cm2. There was a significant decrease in pain from 7.2 ± 1.9 preoperatively to 1.8 ± 1.6 ( P < .001) at 2-year follow-up. Knee function improved from a mean of 7.2 ± 2.0 preoperatively to 2.1 ± 2.3 ( P < .001) at 2 years after surgery. The mean preoperative AMADEUS score was 57.4 ± 21.4. Postoperatively, the mean MOCART score was 40.6 ± 21.1 at 6-month follow-up. No correlation was observed between the clinical data and the MOCART or AMADEUS scores.Conclusion:Overall, the findings of this study demonstrated that patients undergoing a single-step autologous minced cartilage procedure had a satisfactory outcome at 2-year follow-up. As a result, the single-step autologous minced cartilage procedure does represent a possible alternative to standard autologous chondrocyte implantation. Longer follow-up and larger cohorts are required to define the benefits of this procedure.