Search

Simple Summary: CD59 prevents the formation of membrane attack complex, enabling tumor cells to escape complement-mediated cytotoxicity. It appears that the expression of CD59 significantly impacts survival outcomes due to its interaction with immune cells. The associations between CD59 and immune suppressive cells such as T-regulatory cells, myeloid derived suppressor cells, and macrophage create an immune suppressive environment in cervical, brain, head and neck, and stomach cancers. However, kidney cancer has less or no association, leading to better survival outcomes. Thus, assessing the levels of CD59 and its immune cell associations is crucial as it plays a predictive role in deciding prognostic outcomes. Background: CD59, a GPI-anchored membrane protein, protects cancer cells from complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) by inhibiting the formation of the membrane attack complex (MAC). It has been demonstrated to be overexpressed in most solid tumors, where it facilitates tumor cell escape from complement surveillance. The role of CD59 in cancer growth and interactions between CD59 and immune cells that modulate immune evasion has not been well explored. Methods: Using cancer patient database from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and other public databases, we analyzed CD59 expression, its prognostic significance, and its association with immune cell infiltration in the tumor microenvironment, identifying associated genomic and functional networks and validating findings with invitro cell-line experimental data. Results: This article describes the abundant expression of CD59 in multiple tumors such as cervical squamous cell carcinoma (CESC), kidney renal cell carcinoma (KIRC), glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSC), and stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD), as well as in pan-cancer, using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and confirmed using multiple cancer cell lines. The expression of CD59 significantly alters the overall survival (OS) of patients with multiple malignancies such as CESC, GBM, HNSC, and STAD. Further, the correlation between CD59 and Treg and/or MDSC in the tumor microenvironment (TME) has shown to be strongly associated with poor outcomes in CESC, GBM, HNSC, and STAD as these tumors express high FOXP3 compared to KIRC. Moreover, unfavorable outcomes were strongly associated with the expression of CD59 and M2 tumor-associated macrophage infiltration in the TME via the IL10/pSTAT3 pathway in CESC and GBM but not in KIRC. In addition, TGFβ1-dominant cancers such as CESC, GBM, and HNSC showed a high correlation between CD59 and TGFβ1, leading to suppression of cytotoxic T cell activity. Conclusion: Overall, the correlation between CD59 and immune cells predicts its prognosis as unfavorable in CESC, GBM, HNSC, and STAD while being favorable in KIRC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]