Search

Background and Objectives: Sarcopenia, a condition characterized by muscle mass loss, is prevalent in up to 68% of rectal cancer patients and has been described as a negative prognostic factor, impacting overall survival and tumor response. While there are extensive data on rectal cancer globally, only a handful of studies have evaluated the role of sarcopenia in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Our study aimed to investigate the relationship between sarcopenia, overall response rate, and toxicity in patients who underwent total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) for LARC. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective study of patients with rectal cancer treated with TNT and surgery with curative intent between 2021 and 2023 at Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta Institute of Oncology, Cluj-Napoca. Sarcopenia was assessed on MRI images by measuring the psoas muscle area (PMA) at the level of the L4 vertebra before and after neoadjuvant therapy. The primary endpoints were the overall complete response rate (oCR) and acute toxicity. Results: This study included 50 patients with LARC. The oCR rate was 18% and was significantly associated with post-treatment sarcopenia (OR 0.08, p = 0.043). Patients who did not achieve a clinical or pathologic complete response had, on average, an 8% muscle loss during neoadjuvant therapy (p = 0.022). Cystitis and thrombocytopenia were significantly associated with post-treatment sarcopenia (p = 0.05 and p = 0.049). Conclusions: Sarcopenia and loss of psoas muscle during neoadjuvant therapy were negatively associated with tumor response in locally advanced rectal cancer. Thrombocytopenia and cystitis are more frequent in sarcopenic than non-sarcopenic patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: Rectal cancer accounts for approximately one-third of colorectal cancers, with over 340,000 deaths globally in 2022. Despite advancements in treatment, the five-year overall survival for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) remains at 74%, with significant morbidity. B7H3 (CD276), an immune checkpoint protein, plays a role in tumor progression and resistance to therapy, and correlates with poor prognosis in various cancers, including colorectal cancer. This study aims to evaluate the expression of B7H3 in LARC and its impact on overall complete response (oCR) rates to neoadjuvant therapy. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 60 patients with LARC who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). B7H3 expression was assessed using immunohistochemistry on surgical specimens. Expression levels were categorized as high or low based on a composite score, and their association with oCR rates was analyzed. Results: High B7H3 expression was observed in 60% of patients, with 73.5% showing expression in more than 50% of tumor cells. Patients who achieved oCR had significantly lower B7H3 expression compared to those with residual disease (p < 0.001). No nuclear expression of B7H3 was detected. No significant correlation was found between B7H3 expression and other clinicopathological variables, except for a higher likelihood of non-restorative surgery in patients with elevated B7H3 levels (p = 0.049). Mucinous adenocarcinoma had high expression of B7H3. Conclusions: Elevated B7H3 expression is associated with reduced oCR rates in LARC, highlighting its potential role as a prognostic biomarker. Further studies with larger cohorts are warranted to validate these findings and explore B7H3-targeted therapies as a treatment strategy for LARC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a crucial role in rectal cancer management, offering valuable information for staging, treatment response, and patient prognosis. MRI biomarkers, such as circumferential resection margin (CRM), extramural venous invasion (EMVI), tumour deposits, and MRI tumour regression grade (mrTRG) alongside functional imaging techniques such as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) are essential in clinical decision-making. Additionally, emerging technologies like radiomics and artificial intelligence (AI) are showing promise in improving the precision of rectal cancer care. As the focus increasingly shifts toward non-invasive management, such as 'watch-and-wait' approach, this review discusses the role of predictive and prognostic MRI biomarkers in rectal cancer and how they integrate into everyday clinical practice. The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in rectal cancer management has significantly increased over the last decade, in line with more personalized treatment approaches. Total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) plays a pivotal role in the shift from traditional surgical approach to non-surgical approaches such as 'watch-and-wait'. MRI plays a central role in this evolving landscape, providing essential morphological and functional data that support clinical decision-making. Key MRI-based biomarkers, including circumferential resection margin (CRM), extramural venous invasion (EMVI), tumour deposits, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and MRI tumour regression grade (mrTRG), have proven valuable for staging, response assessment, and patient prognosis. Functional imaging techniques, such as dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), alongside emerging biomarkers derived from radiomics and artificial intelligence (AI) have the potential to transform rectal cancer management offering data that enhance T and N staging, histopathological characterization, prediction of treatment response, recurrence detection, and identification of genomic features. This review outlines validated morphological and functional MRI-derived biomarkers with both prognostic and predictive significance, while also exploring the potential of radiomics and artificial intelligence in rectal cancer management. Furthermore, we discuss the role of rectal MRI in the 'watch-and-wait' approach, highlighting important practical aspects in selecting patients for non-surgical management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: MR fingerprinting (MRF) has the potential to quantify treatment response. This study evaluated the repeatability of MRF-derived T1 and T2 relaxation times in bone metastasis, bone, and muscle in patients with metastatic prostate cancer.This prospective single-centre study included same-day repeated MRF acquisitions from 20 patients (August 2019–October 2020). Phantom and human data were acquired on a 1.5-T MR scanner using a research MRF sequence outputting T1 and T2 maps. Regions of interest (ROIs) across three tissue types (bone metastasis, bone, muscle) were drawn on two separate acquisitions. Repeatability of T1 and T2 was assessed using Bland-Altman plots, together with repeatability (r) and intraclass correlation (ICC) coefficients. Mean T1 and T2 were reported per tissue type.Twenty patients with metastatic prostate cancer (mean age, 70 years ± 8 (standard deviation)) were evaluated and bone metastasis (n = 44), normal-appearing bone (n = 14), and muscle (n = 20) ROIs were delineated. Relative repeatability of T1 measurements was 6.9% (bone metastasis), 32.6% (bone), 5.8% (muscle) and 21.8%, 32.2%, 16.1% for T2 measurements. The ICC of T1 was 0.97 (bone metastasis), 0.94 (bone), 0.96 (muscle); ICC of T2 was 0.94 (bone metastasis), 0.94 (bone), 0.91 (muscle). T1 values in bone metastasis were higher than in bone (p < 0.001). T2 values showed no difference between bone metastasis and bone (p = 0.5), but could separate active versus treated metastasis (p < 0.001).MRF allows repeatable T1 and T2 measurements in bone metastasis, bone, and muscle in patients with primary prostate cancer. Such measurements may help quantify the treatment response of bone metastasis.QuestionMR fingerprinting has the potential to characterise bone metastasis and its response to treatment.FindingsRepeatability of MRF-basedT1measurements in bone metastasis and muscle was better than forT2.Clinical relevanceMR fingerprinting allows repeatableT1andT2quantitative measurements in bone metastasis, bone, and muscle in patients with primary prostate cancer, which makes it potentially applicable for disease characterisation and assessment of treatment response.Materials and methods: MR fingerprinting (MRF) has the potential to quantify treatment response. This study evaluated the repeatability of MRF-derived T1 and T2 relaxation times in bone metastasis, bone, and muscle in patients with metastatic prostate cancer.This prospective single-centre study included same-day repeated MRF acquisitions from 20 patients (August 2019–October 2020). Phantom and human data were acquired on a 1.5-T MR scanner using a research MRF sequence outputting T1 and T2 maps. Regions of interest (ROIs) across three tissue types (bone metastasis, bone, muscle) were drawn on two separate acquisitions. Repeatability of T1 and T2 was assessed using Bland-Altman plots, together with repeatability (r) and intraclass correlation (ICC) coefficients. Mean T1 and T2 were reported per tissue type.Twenty patients with metastatic prostate cancer (mean age, 70 years ± 8 (standard deviation)) were evaluated and bone metastasis (n = 44), normal-appearing bone (n = 14), and muscle (n = 20) ROIs were delineated. Relative repeatability of T1 measurements was 6.9% (bone metastasis), 32.6% (bone), 5.8% (muscle) and 21.8%, 32.2%, 16.1% for T2 measurements. The ICC of T1 was 0.97 (bone metastasis), 0.94 (bone), 0.96 (muscle); ICC of T2 was 0.94 (bone metastasis), 0.94 (bone), 0.91 (muscle). T1 values in bone metastasis were higher than in bone (p < 0.001). T2 values showed no difference between bone metastasis and bone (p = 0.5), but could separate active versus treated metastasis (p < 0.001).MRF allows repeatable T1 and T2 measurements in bone metastasis, bone, and muscle in patients with primary prostate cancer. Such measurements may help quantify the treatment response of bone metastasis.QuestionMR fingerprinting has the potential to characterise bone metastasis and its response to treatment.FindingsRepeatability of MRF-basedT1measurements in bone metastasis and muscle was better than forT2.Clinical relevanceMR fingerprinting allows repeatableT1andT2quantitative measurements in bone metastasis, bone, and muscle in patients with primary prostate cancer, which makes it potentially applicable for disease characterisation and assessment of treatment response.Results: MR fingerprinting (MRF) has the potential to quantify treatment response. This study evaluated the repeatability of MRF-derived T1 and T2 relaxation times in bone metastasis, bone, and muscle in patients with metastatic prostate cancer.This prospective single-centre study included same-day repeated MRF acquisitions from 20 patients (August 2019–October 2020). Phantom and human data were acquired on a 1.5-T MR scanner using a research MRF sequence outputting T1 and T2 maps. Regions of interest (ROIs) across three tissue types (bone metastasis, bone, muscle) were drawn on two separate acquisitions. Repeatability of T1 and T2 was assessed using Bland-Altman plots, together with repeatability (r) and intraclass correlation (ICC) coefficients. Mean T1 and T2 were reported per tissue type.Twenty patients with metastatic prostate cancer (mean age, 70 years ± 8 (standard deviation)) were evaluated and bone metastasis (n = 44), normal-appearing bone (n = 14), and muscle (n = 20) ROIs were delineated. Relative repeatability of T1 measurements was 6.9% (bone metastasis), 32.6% (bone), 5.8% (muscle) and 21.8%, 32.2%, 16.1% for T2 measurements. The ICC of T1 was 0.97 (bone metastasis), 0.94 (bone), 0.96 (muscle); ICC of T2 was 0.94 (bone metastasis), 0.94 (bone), 0.91 (muscle). T1 values in bone metastasis were higher than in bone (p < 0.001). T2 values showed no difference between bone metastasis and bone (p = 0.5), but could separate active versus treated metastasis (p < 0.001).MRF allows repeatable T1 and T2 measurements in bone metastasis, bone, and muscle in patients with primary prostate cancer. Such measurements may help quantify the treatment response of bone metastasis.QuestionMR fingerprinting has the potential to characterise bone metastasis and its response to treatment.FindingsRepeatability of MRF-basedT1measurements in bone metastasis and muscle was better than forT2.Clinical relevanceMR fingerprinting allows repeatableT1andT2quantitative measurements in bone metastasis, bone, and muscle in patients with primary prostate cancer, which makes it potentially applicable for disease characterisation and assessment of treatment response.Conclusion: MR fingerprinting (MRF) has the potential to quantify treatment response. This study evaluated the repeatability of MRF-derived T1 and T2 relaxation times in bone metastasis, bone, and muscle in patients with metastatic prostate cancer.This prospective single-centre study included same-day repeated MRF acquisitions from 20 patients (August 2019–October 2020). Phantom and human data were acquired on a 1.5-T MR scanner using a research MRF sequence outputting T1 and T2 maps. Regions of interest (ROIs) across three tissue types (bone metastasis, bone, muscle) were drawn on two separate acquisitions. Repeatability of T1 and T2 was assessed using Bland-Altman plots, together with repeatability (r) and intraclass correlation (ICC) coefficients. Mean T1 and T2 were reported per tissue type.Twenty patients with metastatic prostate cancer (mean age, 70 years ± 8 (standard deviation)) were evaluated and bone metastasis (n = 44), normal-appearing bone (n = 14), and muscle (n = 20) ROIs were delineated. Relative repeatability of T1 measurements was 6.9% (bone metastasis), 32.6% (bone), 5.8% (muscle) and 21.8%, 32.2%, 16.1% for T2 measurements. The ICC of T1 was 0.97 (bone metastasis), 0.94 (bone), 0.96 (muscle); ICC of T2 was 0.94 (bone metastasis), 0.94 (bone), 0.91 (muscle). T1 values in bone metastasis were higher than in bone (p < 0.001). T2 values showed no difference between bone metastasis and bone (p = 0.5), but could separate active versus treated metastasis (p < 0.001).MRF allows repeatable T1 and T2 measurements in bone metastasis, bone, and muscle in patients with primary prostate cancer. Such measurements may help quantify the treatment response of bone metastasis.QuestionMR fingerprinting has the potential to characterise bone metastasis and its response to treatment.FindingsRepeatability of MRF-basedT1measurements in bone metastasis and muscle was better than forT2.Clinical relevanceMR fingerprinting allows repeatableT1andT2quantitative measurements in bone metastasis, bone, and muscle in patients with primary prostate cancer, which makes it potentially applicable for disease characterisation and assessment of treatment response.Key Points: MR fingerprinting (MRF) has the potential to quantify treatment response. This study evaluated the repeatability of MRF-derived T1 and T2 relaxation times in bone metastasis, bone, and muscle in patients with metastatic prostate cancer.This prospective single-centre study included same-day repeated MRF acquisitions from 20 patients (August 2019–October 2020). Phantom and human data were acquired on a 1.5-T MR scanner using a research MRF sequence outputting T1 and T2 maps. Regions of interest (ROIs) across three tissue types (bone metastasis, bone, muscle) were drawn on two separate acquisitions. Repeatability of T1 and T2 was assessed using Bland-Altman plots, together with repeatability (r) and intraclass correlation (ICC) coefficients. Mean T1 and T2 were reported per tissue type.Twenty patients with metastatic prostate cancer (mean age, 70 years ± 8 (standard deviation)) were evaluated and bone metastasis (n = 44), normal-appearing bone (n = 14), and muscle (n = 20) ROIs were delineated. Relative repeatability of T1 measurements was 6.9% (bone metastasis), 32.6% (bone), 5.8% (muscle) and 21.8%, 32.2%, 16.1% for T2 measurements. The ICC of T1 was 0.97 (bone metastasis), 0.94 (bone), 0.96 (muscle); ICC of T2 was 0.94 (bone metastasis), 0.94 (bone), 0.91 (muscle). T1 values in bone metastasis were higher than in bone (p < 0.001). T2 values showed no difference between bone metastasis and bone (p = 0.5), but could separate active versus treated metastasis (p < 0.001).MRF allows repeatable T1 and T2 measurements in bone metastasis, bone, and muscle in patients with primary prostate cancer. Such measurements may help quantify the treatment response of bone metastasis.QuestionMR fingerprinting has the potential to characterise bone metastasis and its response to treatment.FindingsRepeatability of MRF-basedT1measurements in bone metastasis and muscle was better than forT2.Clinical relevanceMR fingerprinting allows repeatableT1andT2quantitative measurements in bone metastasis, bone, and muscle in patients with primary prostate cancer, which makes it potentially applicable for disease characterisation and assessment of treatment response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aim: Information in ultrasonography about reference values of nerves, particularly of those located in the neck is limited. The aim of the study is to demonstrate the feasibility of direct visualization of the vagus, hypoglossal and greater auricular nerves, testing the method on healthy volunteers and estimate the reference values for two perpendicular diameters and cross-sectional area (CSA)., Methods: A prospective study was carried out on 21 healthy volunteers (12 women and 9 men), recording their demographic characteristics. A 13 MHz transducer was used on a Hitachi EUB-8500 machine. The vagus nerve was measured at the bifurcation of common carotid artery (CCA) and at the intersection of the internal jugular vein with omohyoid muscle. The hypoglossal nerve was identified as it crosses the posterolateral border of the mylohyoid muscle in the submandibular space. The auricular nerve was identified on the superficial surface of the sternocleidomastoid muscle at 1 cm from its posterior margin. The mean CSA on axial scans, nerve width and thickness were determined. The side-to-side and gender differences of the estimated reference values and their correlations with the weight, height, and body mass index (BMI) were evaluated., Results: The mean ultrasound-estimated CSA was measured for the vagus nerve at CCA bifurcation (2.14 ± 0.79 on the left 2.86 ± 1.27 on the right), vagus nerve at the level of omohyoid muscle (2.10 ± 0.06 on the left and 2.43 ± 0.08 on the right), hypoglossal nerve (1.71 ± 0.08 on the left, 1.24 ± 0.06 on the right) and greater auricular nerve (0.90 ± 0.53 on the left and 0.79 ± 0.71 on the right). The vagus nerve was significantly larger on the right side compared to the left side. Larger hypoglossal nerve was observed in men compared to women. Significant correlations were observed between weight and CSA of the greater auricular nerve., Conclusion: Direct visualization of the vagus, greater auricular nerve and hypoglossal nerves is feasible. Reference values for the size of the studied nerves at specific anatomic landmarks were established. Side, gender and body weight differences of the nerves CSA were noted.