Search

Introduction: Haemorrhoids are a very common disease, with a great economic burden. Many treatments have been developed for trying to solve the problem, being the standard not yet found. In 1995, Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation was introduced, aiming to reduce postoperative pain and complications. In this work, an evolu-tion of the aforementioned surgical technique was described., Materials and Methods: 183 patients treated with standard Doppler-Guided Haemorrhoidal Artery Ligation were statistically compared with 225 patients dealt with Colour Doppler-Guided Haemorrhoidal Artery Ligation. The procedures were performed under local anaes-thesia with patients in lithotomy position. A special proctoscope and a dedicated Colourdoppler US probe were employed in the second group. Superior haemorrhoidal artery terminal branches were con-secutively ligated according to provided technique in the first group and under vision in the second. In all cases, each ligation was followed by mucopexy., Results: No significant differences between the two groups, in terms of post-operative pain, early complications (bleeding, urinary retention, incontinence) or patient satisfaction, were demonstrated. Recurrence rate was significantly higher in patients treated with stan-dard DG-HAL. No late complications (after one-year follow-up) were registered in both groups., Conclusions: Colour Doppler-Guided Haemorrhoidal Artery Li-gation represents an ideal management for 1-day surgery, and fulfils the requirements of minimally invasive surgery in patients with III-IV grade haemorrhoids. The absence of complications and the evidence of significant wellness of patients are the best advantages. Colour Doppler-Guided Haemorrhoidal Artery Ligation is a safe and easy procedure with good results and a very short-time training. It could be considered an easy and reliable method to treat symptomatic haemorrhoids.

Conclusion: High suspicion of scar endometriosis are painful no-dule in the abdominal scar. Wide surgical excision is the treatment of choice., Introduction: Endometriosis has been described as the presence of endometrial tissue outside uterine cavity. Scar endometriosis (SE) is a rare disease reported in 0.03-1.08% of women following gynaecologic surgery. In our retrospective observational cohort study we studied anamnesis, symptoms, surgical procedures and outcomes linked to scar endometriosis in our medical experience from 2004 to 2018., Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 46 patients with a histopathological diagnosis of SE. All patients had a history of at least one previous caesarean section (n=46, 100%). Forty-two patients (91,3%) complained gradually growing nodular abdominal mass near or adjacent to caesarean incision scar, while only 4 patients (8,6%) complained aspecific abdominal pain. Ultrasound scan was performed in all patients (n=46, 100%) and mean size of the nodules at US was 26,8 ± 13,8 mm., Results: All patients underwent surgery. Seven patients (15,2%) needed mesh implantation, while 39 patients (84,8%) underwent local resection with reconstruction of muscle fascia. Mean follow-up was 31,6 ± 14 months and no patients reported local recurrence of disease.

Patients undergoing surgery for recurrent pilonidal disease are at high risk of developing re-recurrence. The present prospective analysis was performed to evaluate the outcome for recurrent pilonidal disease treatment with a technique that provides a minimal subcutaneous excision of fistula and of the skin above the cyst, with secondary healing of wounds., Methods: 48 consecutive patients with previous surgical excision and recurrent pilonidal disease underwent surgery from January 2009 to December 2016, under local anaesthesia. The age of the patients (42 males and 6 females) at the time of our observation was 28.5 ± 10.2 years, the BMI of 26.3 ± 6.8. The average number of interventions prior to our was 2.02 ± 1.14., Results: The mean operative time was 18.2 ± 5.5 minutes. All patients were discharged 2 to 4 hours after surgery, with an average healing time of 22.8 ± 15.3 days. We recorded, in the follow-up period, only 4 relapses (8.32%), all retreated with the same surgical procedure and brought to complete healing. The results of the cosmetic questionnaire, which assessed patient satisfaction and contentment, showed that 96% of patients were completely satisfied and all patients recommended surgery to others. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that in 7 years of follow-up, 85% of patients healed without recurrence., Conclusions: Our simple procedure appears to be safe and easily reproducible, allowing a high surgical success in the treatment of recurrent pilonidal disease., Key Eords: Excision, Healing, Recurrent sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease.

Background: Pancoast's syndrome is caused by malignant neoplasm of superior sulcus of the lung which produces destructive lesions of thoracic inlet and comes along with the involvement of brachial plexus and stellate ganglion. Computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans can detect early lesions otherwise missed by routine radiographs and can also define the local extent or metastatic progression of the disease. Protocols involving combinations of irradiation, chemotherapy, and surgery are currently being under investigation to determine the best management., Aims: This work reviewed the current diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to Pancoast's tumors., Discussion: Patients with lung superior sulcus carcinoma should be considered for surgery only after an appropriate diagnostic assessment. The perfect candidate for surgery should have a confined to the chest disease with T3N0M0 staging. Inoperable patient with severe pain after irradiation therapy may benefit from palliative surgical resection. Medical therapy plays only a secondary role in lung cancers, patients with disseminated lung cancer might require palliative treatment and medical management of paraneoplastic syndrome symptoms. Following surgery, radiation and chemotherapy may improve local and systemic control by addressing individual adverse findings., Conclusions: The cooperation of surgeons, clinicians and radiologists represents the gold standard today and a multidisciplinary approach is essential to achieve the best outcome possible. Further studies are advisable in order to define the best surgical approach and the real advantage of mini-invasive surgery by comparison with open surgery.