Search

The study was aimed to check the radiotherapy treatment accuracy and definition of action levels during implementation of in vivo dosimetry as a part of quality assurance program. The calibration and correction factors for in vivo entrance dose measurements for six n-type Isorad semiconductor diodes were determined as recommended by the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology Booklet No. 5. The patients for in vivo measurements have been divided in groups, according to the treatment site/techique, in order to investigate and detect the groups where the uncertainty was larger or where a systematic error occurred. The tolerance/action levels for all groups were also defined and checked. In this study, the entrance dose measurements were performed for total of 451 treatment fields, and 338 patients over one year period. The mean value and the standard deviation for different groups were: breast +1.0% ± 2.89%(1 SD), brain, and head and neck - +0.74% ± 2.04%(1 SD), and isocentric pelvis and abdomen - +0.1% ± 2.86%(1 SD). All measurements - +0.72% ± 2.64%(1 SD). In our experience, systematic in vivo dosimetry proved to be a very useful tool for quality assurance of patient's plan and treatment, both in detecting systematic errors and for estimating the accuracy of radiotherapy treatment delivery.

Abstract Background Independent external audits play an important role in quality assurance programme in radiation oncology. The audit supported by the IAEA in Serbia was designed to review the whole chain of activities in 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) workflow, from patient data acquisition to treatment planning and dose delivery. The audit was based on the IAEA recommendations and focused on dosimetry part of the treatment planning and delivery processes. Methods The audit was conducted in three radiotherapy departments of Serbia. An anthropomorphic phantom was scanned with a computed tomography unit (CT) and treatment plans for eight different test cases involving various beam configurations suggested by the IAEA were prepared on local treatment planning systems (TPSs). The phantom was irradiated following the treatment plans for these test cases and doses in specific points were measured with an ionization chamber. The differences between the measured and calculated doses were reported. Results The measurements were conducted for different photon beam energies and TPS calculation algorithms. The deviation between the measured and calculated values for all test cases made with advanced algorithms were within the agreement criteria, while the larger deviations were observed for simpler algorithms. The number of measurements with results outside the agreement criteria increased with the increase of the beam energy and decreased with TPS calculation algorithm sophistication. Also, a few errors in the basic dosimetry data in TPS were detected and corrected. Conclusions The audit helped the users to better understand the operational features and limitations of their TPSs and resulted in increased confidence in dose calculation accuracy using TPSs. The audit results indicated the shortcomings of simpler algorithms for the test cases performed and, therefore the transition to more advanced algorithms is highly desirable.