Search

Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic and resulting high number of individuals requiring hospitalization has caused health care systems worldwide to alter hospital policies and procedures. This study examined how changes in hospital operations between March 2020 and March 2021 affected physiotherapists’ roles and responsibilities in Ontario, Canada. Method: Between February and March 2021, we conducted a cross-sectional study using an online survey of physiotherapists employed in acute care and rehabilitation hospitals. Results: Among 230 respondents, 82 (35.7%) reported being redeployed at some point during the study period to new settings or areas of practice. Physiotherapists typically working in outpatient settings were the most likely to be redeployed (63.3%), with 62.9% of respondents reporting caring for COVID-19 patients. Among 37.1% of respondents reporting undertaking new responsibilities (e.g., personal support work, nursing, infection control), 72.0% reported being confident in their abilities; however, only 49.4% felt adequately trained. Conclusions: Hospital-based physiotherapists in Ontario, Canada took on a variety of traditional and non-traditional responsibilities during the first year of the pandemic. Although confident in their abilities, feelings of being inadequately trained highlight the need for improved processes when taking on new responsibilities to support delivery of patient care and physiotherapists’ well-being.

People with physical disabilities are at risk for social isolation, which has been shown to negatively influence health and well-being.The purpose of this study was to examine the association of social disconnectedness and perceived social isolation (PSI) on health-related quality of life (HrQoL) and life satisfaction in adults with dysvascular lower extremity amputation (LEA).Cross-sectional survey.Data were collected from community-dwelling adults with dysvascular major LEA (N = 231). The main outcome measures were the Short-Form 36 and the Life Satisfaction-11. Other measures were used to quantify comorbidities/secondary health conditions, PSI, social disconnectedness, self-efficacy, social support, and social engagement. Three hierarchical regression models were conducted to predict (1) physical HrQoL, (2) mental HrQoL, and (3) life satisfaction.Approximately one-third of the sample had high levels of social disconnectedness and PSI. The regression model predicting physical HrQoL accounted for 47% of the variance and only found that higher levels of mobility, lower perceived impact of comorbidities/conditions, and higher levels of social engagement and self-efficacy were associated with better physical HrQoL. A model predicting mental HrQoL accounted for 36% of the variance, with older age, lower PSI, and higher levels of self-efficacy being significant predictors. Finally, the model predicting life satisfaction accounted for 56% of the variance, with older age, lower perceived impact of comorbidities/conditions, and higher self-efficacy remaining as significant predictors.These findings highlight that one-third of our sample were at risk for being socially isolated and that PSI was influential on mental HrQoL and life satisfaction. There is a need for approaches to address social isolation for people with dysvascular LEA living in the community to optimize their long-term health and well-being.

PURPOSE There is a lack of high-quality evidence about the effects of exercise or physical activity interventions for adults with lower limb amputations (LLAs). A planning meeting involving stakeholders (i.e., people with LLA, community advocates, health care providers, researchers) was organized to identify key research priorities related to exercise and physical activity for people with LLAs. METHODS We used a collaborative prioritized planning process with a pre-meeting survey and 2-day virtual meeting that included: identification and prioritization of challenges or gaps; identification and consolidation of solutions; and action planning. This process integrated a modified Delphi approach, including anonymous feedback in two surveys. RESULTS Thirty-five stakeholders participated. Six challenges related to exercise and physical activity for people with LLA were prioritized. One solution was prioritized for each challenge. After consolidation of solutions, participants developed five research action plans for research including: developing an on-line interface; developing and evaluating peer-support programs to support physical activity; examining integration of people with LLA into cardiac rehabilitation; development and evaluation of health provider education; and determining priority outcomes related to physical activity and exercise. CONCLUSIONS This collaborative process resulted in an action plan for amputation research and fostered collaborations to move identified priorities into action.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONLower limb amputations impact mobility leading to lower levels of physical activity.There are research gaps in our understanding of the effects of exercise or physical activity interventions for adults with lower limb amputations.Through a collaborative planning process, participants prioritized research directions on physical activity and exercise for people with LLA to advance research in the field.Action plans for research focused on developing online resources, peer support, cardiac rehabilitation for people with LLA, health provider education and determining priority outcomes related to physical activity and exercise.

Purpose:This study determines barriers and facilitators to including people with lower limb amputation (LLA) in cardiovascular rehabilitation programmes (CRPs).Method:Canadian CRP managers and exercise therapists were invited to complete a questionnaire.Results:There were 87 respondents. Of the 32 CRP managers, 65.6% reported that people with LLA were eligible for referral but of these, 61.9% only accepted LLA with cardiac disease, and 38.1% only accepted them with ≥ 1 cardiovascular risk factor. CRP eligibility progressively decreased as mobility severity increased, with 94% of programmes accepting those with mild mobility deficits but only 48% accepting those with severe deficits. Among therapists in CRPs that accepted LLAs, 54.3% reported not having an LLA participant within the past three years. Among all responding therapists and managers who were also therapists ( n = 58), 43% lacked confidence in managing safety concerns, and 45%, 16%, and 7% lacked confidence in prescribing aerobic exercise to LLA with severe, moderate, and no mobility deficits respectively. There was a similar finding with prescribing resistance training. LLA-specific education had not been provided to any respondent within the past three years. The top barriers were lack of referrals (52.6%; n = 30) and lack of knowledge of the contraindications to exercise specific for LLA (43.1%; n = 31). Facilitators included the provision of a resistance-training tool kit (63.4%; n = 45), education on exercise safety (63.4%; n = 45), and indications for physician intervention/inspection (63.6%; n = 42).Conclusion:Most of the CRPs surveyed only accept people with LLA if they have co-existing cardiac disease or cardiovascular risk factors. Few people with LLA participate. Education on CRP delivery for LLAs is needed to improve therapists’ confidence and exercise safety.

ObjectivesType 2 diabetes (T2DM) and knee osteoarthritis (OA) commonly co-occur and epidemiologic studies suggest concomitant symptomatic knee OA increases the risk of T2DM complications. We sought to explore the experiences and perspectives of individuals’ living with both symptomatic knee OA and T2DM, with a focus on the impact of OA on T2DM management and daily life.DesignWe conducted qualitative semistructured telephone interviews with persons living with T2DM and knee OA. We inductively coded and analysed interview transcripts, informed by interpretative description.SettingWe recruited participants from a community arthritis self-management programme and an academic hospital’s family medicine clinic in Ontario, Canada.ParticipantsWe included 18 participants who had a physician diagnosis of both T2DM and knee OA, with variation age, gender, and duration of T2DM and knee OA.ResultsParticipants with T2DM described how concomitant painful and disabling knee OA made it difficult to engage in physical activity, negatively impacting blood glucose control. Joint pain itself, associated sleep disturbance and emotional distress were also seen to affect blood glucose control. Beyond diabetes management, the impact of OA-related pain and functional limitations on nearly all aspects of daily life led participants to view their OA as important. Despite this, many participants described that their health professionals paid little attention to their OA, which left them to self-manage. Balancing both conditions also required navigating a medical system that provided piecemeal care.ConclusionsIndividuals with T2DM view symptomatic knee OA as an important barrier to both T2DM management and overall well-being, yet are frequently met with insufficient support from health professionals. Greater recognition and management of knee OA in persons with T2DM could help improve patient-centred care and potentially disease outcomes.

PURPOSE To understand what is known about sex and gender differences in quality of life (QoL) and related domains for individuals with an adult acquired lower limb amputation (LLA). METHODS A computer-assisted literature search of four online databases was completed. Articles were included if they incorporated sex or gender as part of their data analysis with a focus on QoL-related domains. Data were analyzed using descriptive numerical analysis and thematic analysis. RESULTS One hundred and eleven articles were included in this review. Women were under-represented across studies, with most of the participants being men. No articles described the inclusion of trans or non-binary persons. Differences by sex or gender were reported by 66 articles. Articles reporting on gender seldom provided descriptions of how gender was defined. Overall, women/females seemed to have worse outcomes in terms of prosthesis-related outcomes, mental health, and return to occupations. CONCLUSION Articles included in this review were not clear with how gender was defined. In order for more targeted interventions that account for sex and gender differences, studies need to be more forthcoming about how they use and define gender. Future research should seek to include gender non-conforming participants to identify additional needs.Implications for rehabilitationSex and gender are important constructs that influence outcomes following lower limb amputation.Rehabilitation professionals should consider sex and gender-specific outcomes when tailoring programs to ensure ethical clinical care.

ObjectiveDelivering person-centered care in individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA) necessitates consideration of other chronic conditions that frequently co-occur. We sought to understand the extent to which arthritis therapists consider type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) when treating persons with knee OA and concomitant T2DM, and barriers to doing so.MethodsWe conducted 18 semistructured telephone interviews with arthritis therapists working within a provincially funded arthritis care program (Arthritis Society Canada) in Ontario, Canada. We first analyzed interviews deductively using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to comprehensively identify barriers and enablers to health behaviors. Then, within TDF domains, we inductively developed themes.ResultsWe identified 5 TDF domains as prominently influencing the behavior of arthritis therapists considering concomitant T2DM when developing a knee OA management plan. These were as follows: therapists’ perceived lack of specific knowledge around comorbidities including diabetes; the lack of breadth in skills in behavioral change techniques to help patients set and reach their goals, particularly when it came to physical activity; variable intention to factor a patient’s comorbidity profile to influence their treatment recommendations; the perception of their professional role and identity as joint focused; and the environmental context with lack of formalized follow-up structure of the current Arthritis Society Canada program that limited sufficient patient monitoring and follow-up.ConclusionWithin the context of a Canadian arthritis program, we identified several barriers to arthritis therapists considering T2DM in their management plan for persons with knee OA and T2DM. These results can help inform strategies to improve person-centered OA care and overall health outcomes.

Purpose:\ud \ud Peers are uniquely able to draw on their lived experiences to support trauma survivors’ recovery. By understanding the functions and outcomes of peer support and the factors that impact implementation, evidence can be mobilized to enhance its application and uptake into standard practice. As such, we aimed to review the literature on peer support for trauma survivors to: examine the role of peer support in recovery; describe the nature and extent of peer support; Examine the influence of peer support on health and well-being; and identify the barriers and facilitators to developing and implementing peer support.\ud \ud Methods:\ud \ud Scoping review methodology as outlined by Arksey and O’Malley.\ud \ud Results:\ud \ud Ninety-three articles were reviewed. Peer support was highlighted as an important component of care for trauma survivors and provided hope and guidance for the future post-injury. Most peer support programs were offered in the community and provided one-on-one support from peer mentors using various modalities. Interventions were successful when they involved knowledgeable peer mentors and maintained participant engagement. Prior negative experiences and stigma/privacy concerns deterred trauma survivors from participating.\ud \ud Conclusions:\ud \ud Peer support fulfills several functions throughout trauma survivors’ recovery that may not otherwise be met within existing health care systems.\ud \ud Implications for rehabilitation:\ud \ud By understanding the functions and outcomes and the factors that impact implementation of peer support, evidence can be mobilized to enhance its application and uptake into standard practice.\ud \ud Peers provide trauma survivors with socioemotional support as well as assistance in daily management and life navigation post-injury.\ud \ud Peer support provided hope and guidance for the future after injury and improved self-efficacy amongst trauma survivors.\ud \ud Peer support programs are most likely to be successful when they involve knowledgeable peer mentors, are flexibly delivered, align with organizations’ values and priorities, and have adequate resources and funding to support their implementation.

The purpose of this study was to explore the barriers and facilitators to physical activity from multiple stakeholder perspectives including individuals with LLA and health professionals.A qualitative descriptive study situated within an interpretive research paradigm was conducted. Semi-structured interviews were held with individuals with LLA recruited from rehabilitation hospitals in a metropolitan city in Canada. Health professionals with experience in amputation care were recruited from across Canada. Data were analysed using codebook thematic analysis.Thirty-three individuals with LLA and eighteen health professionals participated. Six themes were generated which represent the perceived barriers and facilitators to physical activity. Themes including Informal and Formal Supports, Availability of and Access to Community Resources, and Fit and Function of the Prosthesis were perceived by many individuals as facilitators, while acting as a barrier for others depending on an individual's circumstances.These findings provide us with a basis of understanding from which we can begin addressing barriers to physical activity for individuals with LLA, in support of developing patient-centred interventions and physical activity programs for this population. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONIrrespective of amputation etiology, individuals who have lower limb amputation experience several barriers to engaging in physical activity.Many system-level barriers to physical activity exist for people with lower limb amputation, which include lack of availability and access to community resources and specialised prostheses conducive to physical activity participation.A participatory approach engaging both patients and rehabilitation professionals can address the patient-provider discordance with respect to a patient's motivation and attitude towards physical activity participation by creating a supportive environment conducive to behaviour change.The development of future, patient-centered interventions, and physical activity programs for individuals with lower limb amputation must consider fear of falling as a prominent barrier to physical activity and devise potential strategies to address this barrier, by setting realistic and actionable goals.

A systematic review was conducted to provide an overview of the current state of research regarding sexuality and sexual health in adults with limb loss. Five databases (Medline, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science and PsycINFO) were searched between January 1, 2000 and April 14, 2019. Two reviewers independently screened all titles and abstracts for primary inclusion and full texts for secondary inclusion. The inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed journal articles that were published in English, that addressed at least one aspect of sexuality or sexual health and included adults (18 years and older) who acquired a major limb amputation. A modified Sackett Scale was used to assign levels of evidence to each study. A total of 29 articles met the inclusion criteria. With regard to sexuality, the most common topics investigated were body image (n = 21), sexual desire (n = 6) and sexual activity (n = 4). The Amputee Body Image Scale was the most commonly used outcome measure to assess body image (n = 10). In terms of sexual health, the most frequently studied issues were sexual functioning (n = 5) and sexual counselling (n = 2). Sexuality and sexual health issues affect the health and wellbeing of adults with limb loss. The majority of studies were low in evidence; indicating that more robust intervention studies are needed to help people cope with limb loss as it relates to their sexual health and sexuality. In particular, more targeted efforts for women and individuals with upper limb loss are needed.

Compared to other patient population groups, the field of amputation research in Canada lacks cohesion largely due to limited funding sources, lack of connection among research scientists, and loose ties among geographically dispersed healthcare centres, research institutes and advocacy groups. As a result, advances in clinical care are hampered and ultimately negatively influence outcomes of persons living with limb loss.To stimulate a national strategy on advancing amputation research in Canada, a consensus-workshop was organized with an expert panel of stakeholders to identify key research priorities and potential strategies to build researcher and funding capacity in the field.A modified Delphi approach was used to gain consensus on identifying and selecting an initial set of priorities for building research capacity in the field of amputation. This included an anonymous pre-meeting survey (The top three identified research priorities were: (1) developing a national dataset; (2) obtaining health economic data to illustrate the burden of amputation to the healthcare system and to patients; and (3) improving strategies related to outcome measurement in patients with limb loss (e.g. identifying, validating, and/or developing outcome measures). Strategies for moving these priorities into action were also developed.The consensus-workshop provided an initial roadmap for limb loss research in Canada, and the event served as an important catalyst for stakeholders to initiate collaborations for moving identified priorities into action. Given the increasing number of people undergoing an amputation, there needs to be a stronger Canadian collaborative approach to generate the necessary research to enhance evidence-based clinical care and policy decision-making.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONLimb loss is a growing concern across North America, with lower-extremity amputations occurring due to complications arising from diabetes being a major cause.To advance knowledge about limb loss and to improve clinical care for this population, stronger connections are needed across the continuum of care (acute, rehabilitation, community) and across sectors (clinical, advocacy, industry and research).There are new surgical techniques, technologies, and rehabilitation approaches being explored to improve the health, mobility and community participation of people with limb loss, but further research evidence is needed to demonstrate efficacy and to better integrate them into standard clinical care.

Summary Objective To systematically review the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) estimates in pain and function measured using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) in patients who underwent primary total knee replacement (TKR) and primary total hip replacement (THR). Design The study was carried out following PRISMA recommendations. We searched five electronic databases. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts and full-text papers using a priori inclusion/exclusion criteria. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers. Data were synthesized, with WOMAC values converted to 0–100 scores (0 = best, 100 = worst). Results Thirteen studies were included. Research methods used to calculate MCIDs and PASS varied across studies (e.g., using anchor-based or distribution methods, wording of anchor questions within anchor-based methods). Baseline WOMAC scores also varied across studies. Across studies and methods, MCIDs for the WOMAC in patients undergoing TKR ranged from 13.3 to 36.0 for pain and 1.8–33.0 for function; values for WOMAC in THR ranged from 8.3 to 41.0 for pain and from 9.7 to 34.0 for function. PASS cut-offs for TKR ranged from 25.0 to 28.6 for pain and 32.3–36.7 for function, and cut-offs for THR from 15.0 to 30.6 for pain and 28.0–42.0 for function. Conclusion Although the WOMAC is a commonly used measure for a single condition, the variability in methods used to calculate MCID and PASS estimates results in a range of values across studies making it unclear whether values reported in the literature can be applied with confidence. Future research is needed to refine methods used to calculate MCIDs and PASS.

Summary Objective Consistent evidence-practice gaps in osteoarthritis (OA) care are observed in primary care settings globally. Building workforce capacity to deliver high-value care requires a contemporary understanding of barriers to care delivery. We aimed to explore barriers to OA care delivery among clinicians and students. Design A cross-sectional, multinational study sampling clinicians (physiotherapists, primary care nurses, general practitioners (GPs), GP registrars; total possible denominator: n = 119,735) and final-year physiotherapy and medical students (denominator: n = 2,215) across Australia, New Zealand and Canada. Respondents answered a survey, aligned to contemporary implementation science domains, which measured barriers to OA care using categorical and free-text responses. Results 1886 clinicians and 1611 students responded. Items within the domains ‘health system' and ‘patient-related factors' represented the most applicable barriers experienced by clinicians (25–42% and 20–36%, respectively), whereas for students, ‘knowledge and skills' and ‘patient-related factors' (16–24% and 19–28%, respectively) were the most applicable domains. Meta-synthesis of qualitative data highlighted skills gaps in specific components of OA care (tailoring exercise, nutritional/overweight management and supporting positive behaviour change); assessment, measurement and monitoring; tailoring care; managing case complexity; and translating knowledge to practice (especially among students). Other barriers included general infrastructure limitations (particularly related to community facilities); patient-related factors (e.g., beliefs and compliance); workforce-related factors such as inconsistent care and a general knowledge gap in high-value care; and system and service-level factors relating to financing and time pressures, respectively. Conclusions Clinicians and students encounter barriers to delivery of high-value OA care in clinical practice/training (micro-level); within service environments (meso-level); and within the health system (macro-level).

Individuals with dysvascular lower limb amputations (LLA) secondary to complications of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and/or diabetes have high rates of co-morbidities.To describe self-reported health condition severity and their association with sociodemographic factors and ambulations status among individuals with major dysvascular LLA.Cross sectional telephone and in person survey with adults with major dysvascular LLA living in the community setting in Ontario, Canada.Survey by phone/in person, and completion of the Dysvascular Conditions Scale and Special Interest in Amputee Medicine Mobility (SIGAM) Grade by each participant.Two hundred thirty-one individuals with major dysvascular LLAs participated in the study. Most of them were male individuals (80.5%) and had undergone a transtibial amputation (74%). On average, participants were 3.4 years postlimb loss and had five identified Dysvascular Conditions Scale health conditions. The top five reported health conditions were diabetes, hypertension, phantom limb pain, musculoskeletal pain, and back pain. With the exclusion of hypertension, these conditions were also perceived by respondents to be quite severe for their impact. Vision impairment was also rated as being severe in nature. Lower mobility Special Interest Group in Amputee Medicine grades were associated with higher health condition severity scores.Individuals with dysvascular limb loss experience high multimorbidity with perceived negative impact on their overall wellness and function. Rehabilitation and self-management strategies to help patients with dysvascular LLAs to manage chronic health conditions may improve outcomes.

To understand how people with major limb amputation experience the transition in care from inpatient rehabilitation to the community.A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews. Individuals were eligible if they had undergone a major lower limb amputation and had been discharged from inpatient rehabilitation to the community within one to twelve months. Interviews explored participants' experiences and factors associated with the transition in care. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed.Nine individuals with major lower limb amputation participated. Five themes were identified to describe the transition in care experience: (a) Preparedness: differing experiences during inpatient rehabilitation; (b) Challenges with everyday tasks: "everything has to be thought out"; (c) Importance of coping strategies; "gradually you accept it more and more" (d) Importance of support and feeling connected; "if I needed anything, they're right there" and (e) Not everyone has access to the same resources: "left to your own devices".The identified themes concurrently influenced the transition from inpatient rehabilitation to the community. Common challenges during the initial transition were identified. Areas of improvement within inpatient rehabilitation included individualized care, discussions surrounding expectations, and better access to ongoing community support.Implication for rehabilitationTransition in care are difficult and vulnerable times for people with major lower limb amputation, especially when transitioning home following inpatient rehabilitation.Rehabilitation should prepare individuals for completing meaningful tasks in the home and community.Access to ongoing support in the community in the form of practical and emotional support can ease the challenges of transitioning home.

BACKGROUND Lower limb amputation (LLA) is a life-changing event that affects functional mobility and participation in everyday life. Prostheses provide individuals with LLA the opportunity to improve mobility and quality of life; however, existing literature suggests that there is underuse of prostheses. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study is to describe how individuals with major LLA use their prosthesis in everyday life and describe barriers and facilitators that influence prosthesis use. STUDY DESIGN A qualitative descriptive methodology was used. METHODS Ten community dwelling adults (>18 years) with unilateral major LLAs (transtibial, transfemoral, and knee disarticulation) attending outpatient follow-up at a specialized rehabilitation center were recruited. Participants were purposively sampled for variation in prosthesis use and level of amputation. One-on-one semistructured in-depth interviews were conducted in person or by telephone. The interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed inductively using thematic analysis. RESULTS The experiences of individuals with major LLA were organized into three overarching themes: everyday experiences using a prosthesis, extrinsic factors influencing prosthesis use, and intrinsic factors influencing prosthesis use. These themes, and their associated subthemes, highlight how individuals use their prosthesis and the various factors perceived to act as barriers and facilitators to prosthesis use in everyday life. CONCLUSIONS These findings provide valuable insight into the everyday experiences of individuals with LLA and can be used to implement strategies to optimize prosthesis use.

The majority of lower extremity amputations (LEAs) are the result of diabetes or peripheral vascular disease. There is a paucity of literature on individuals' experiences living with dysvascular LEAs in the community, particularly in Canada. The purpose of this study was to explore the perceptions and experiences of community-dwelling adults living with dysvascular LEA.Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with individuals with a dysvascular LEA recruited from three rehabilitation hospitals. Participants were included if they were English-speaking adults at least three months post-amputation and no longer receiving inpatient rehabilitation. Sampling was purposive to ensure variation by gender, level of amputation, and geographic location. Data were analyzed using an inductive content-analysis approach.Thirty-five interviews were completed with individuals with dysvascular LEA. Study participants portrayed LEA as having an impact on many aspects of their lives, resulting in changes in their mobility, social activities and roles, and psychological wellbeing. Three main factors shaped individuals' experiences with dysvascular LEA including social support, accessibility, and socioeconomic factors.Our findings highlight the impacts of dysvascular LEA in peoples' lives. Future research is warranted to explore how community-based interventions and strategies can address the ongoing needs of individuals with dysvascular LEA.Implications for rehabilitationOur findings highlight the long-term impacts of dysvascular lower extremity amputations, which resulted in changes in mobility, social activities and roles, and psychological wellbeing.Participants identified issues in access to community services and resources, including rehabilitation.Mechanisms to identify people at risk for social isolation need to be developed and implemented in rehabilitation centers.Access to ongoing rehabilitation services in the community are needed to optimize mobility outcomes and address ongoing psychological needs.

Objective: To measure confidence and attitudes of the current and emerging interprofessional workforce concerning osteoarthritis (OA) care. Methods: Study design is a multinational (Australia, New Zealand, Canada) cross-sectional survey of clinicians (general practitioners [GPs], GP registrars, primary care nurses, and physiotherapists) and final-year medical and physiotherapy students. GPs and GP registrars were only sampled in Australia/New Zealand and Australia, respectively. The study outcomes are as follows: confidence in OA knowledge and skills (customized instrument), biomedical attitudes to care (Pain Attitudes Beliefs Scale [PABS]), attitudes toward high- and low-value care (customized items), attitudes toward exercise/physical activity (free-text responses). Results: A total of 1886 clinicians and 1161 students responded. Although a number of interprofessional differences were identified, confidence in OA knowledge and skills was consistently greatest among physiotherapists and lowest among nurses (eg, the mean difference [95% confidence interval (CI)] for physiotherapist-nurse analyses were 9.3 [7.7-10.9] for knowledge [scale: 11-55] and 14.6 [12.3-17.0] for skills [scale: 16-80]). Similarly, biomedical attitudes were stronger in nurses compared with physiotherapists (6.9 [5.3-8.4]; scale 10-60) and in medical students compared with physiotherapy students (2.0 [1.3-2.7]). Some clinicians and students agreed that people with OA will ultimately require total joint replacement (7%-19% and 19%-22%, respectively), that arthroscopy is an appropriate intervention for knee OA (18%-36% and 35%-44%), and that magnetic resonance imaging is informative for diagnosis and clinical management of hip/knee OA (8%-61% and 21%-52%). Most agreed (90%-98% and 92%-97%) that exercise is indicated and strongly supported by qualitative data. Conclusion: Workforce capacity building that de-emphasizes biomedical management and promotes high-value first-line care options is needed. Knowledge and skills among physiotherapists support leadership roles in OA care for this discipline.

Objective While osteoarthritis (OA) has mainly been viewed as a disease affecting older people, its prevalence in younger adults is substantial. However, there is limited research on how younger adults understand knee symptoms. This article explores the meaning of knee symptoms to adults ages 35–65 years. Methods This qualitative study comprised 6 focus groups and 10 one-on-one interviews with 51 participants (median age 49, 61% female), who self-reported knee OA or reported knee symptoms (i.e., pain, aching, or stiffness) on most days of the past month. Constructivist grounded theory guided the sampling, data collection, and analysis. Data were analyzed using a constant comparative method. Results Central to participants’ understanding of knee symptoms was the perception that symptoms were preventable, meaning that there was the potential to prevent the onset of symptoms and to alter the course of symptoms. This understanding was demonstrated in participants’ explanation of symptoms. Participants commented on the cause, prevention, and course of symptoms. Moreover, participants reflected on their experience with symptoms, indicating that symptoms made them feel older than their current age. However, they did not perceive their symptoms as normal or acceptable. Conclusion Participants interpreted knee symptoms as potentially preventable, suggesting that they may be open to primary and secondary prevention strategies.

ObjectivesIncreasingly, there is emphasis on identifying and initiating treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) in the early phases of the disease. This study aimed to identify the perceived barriers and facilitators to managing clients with early knee OA and the contextual factors affecting implementation of care by physical therapists (PTs).DesignQualitative study using in-depth semistructured interviews with 33 PTs. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed inductively using thematic analysis.SettingCanada.ParticipantsA purposive sample of PTs who managed clients with knee symptoms and/or diagnosed knee OA in community/outpatient settings in three provinces in Canada (Ontario, Alberta, British Columbia).ResultsFactors that affected physical therapy management of early knee OA were identified at four levels: the community, healthcare system, healthcare provider and client level. Some healthcare provider factors acted primarily as enablers of management, such as PTs’ confidence in their ability to manage perceived early knee OA, PTs’ beliefs about consequences of OA and the PT scope of practice. However, the study illuminated a range of modifiable factors that can act as barriers to management. These factors included access to services in the community and healthcare system; healthcare provider factors such as time, access to evidence and physician’s role in referrals and messaging; and client factors related to client characteristics (eg, general health, socioeconomic status), engagement in management and beliefs about OA.ConclusionThese findings provide us with a basis to begin to address specific barriers and to optimise care for early knee OA.

Objectives: Studies show limited improvement in the frequency of engaging in life activities after joint replacement. However, there is a paucity of research that has examined factors, including other life events, which influence engagement following total hip replacement (THR). This research sought to identify factors associated with engaging in life activities following THR. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted with 376 people who had a THR for osteoarthritis (OA). Data were collected pre-surgery and 1 year post-surgery. The primary outcome was change in frequency in engagement in life activities (Late Life Disability Index (LLDI): higher scores indicate higher frequency of engagement (range 0e80)). Analyses included multivariable regression. Factors considered included: positive/negative life events, a new comorbidity, another joint replacement and complications post-surgery. Results: Participants' mean age was 64 years; 46% were male. 68% of participants had at least one comorbidity pre-surgery; 36% reported at least one new comorbidity after surgery. The mean change in LLDI frequency was an increase of 6.29 (+/- 8.10). 36% reported one or more positive impact life events in the year following surgery; 63% reported one or more negative life events. The number of positive life events (beta=1.24; 95% CI: 0.49, 1.99) was significantly associated with change in LLDI frequency after adjusting for age, sex, education, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities pre-surgery, number of symptomatic joints and pre-surgery pain and function, LLDI limitations and depression. Conclusions: These findings highlight the significant influence of social factors and life circumstances on engagement in life activities following THR. (C) 2017 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Objective While the prevalence of osteoarthritis (OA) increases with age, the first signs begin in the fourth or fifth decade. Little is known about how younger adults respond to OA. This study explores how people ages 35–65 years manage knee symptoms. Methods Six focus groups were conducted with 41 participants (mean age 50.9 years, 63% women) who self-reported a diagnosis of OA or reported knee symptoms (i.e., pain, aching, or stiffness) on most days of the past month. Purposive sampling was used, seeking variation in age and sex. The principles of constructivist grounded theory guided data collection and analysis. Data were analyzed using a constant comparative method. Results Participants engaged in a process of proactively trying to find ways to control knee symptoms and disease progression. Their approach to management was not linear, but rather a process that moved back and forth between searching for “solutions” and active management (ongoing use of strategies). During the process, participants consulted health care providers, but often perceived that medical care offered limited options and guidance. Management was constructed as a “never-ending” process that entailed effort and personal resources. Conclusion Participants were proactive in seeking ways to manage knee OA symptoms. There is a mismatch between participants' proactive approach and the reactive approach of the health care system that has focused on late-stage disease. Programs and supports within the formal and informal health care system are required to enable people to successfully manage knee symptoms across their lifespan.

Objective To describe the exercise/physical activity and weight management efforts of Canadians with self-reported arthritis, to examine factors associated with their engagement in these strategies to help manage their arthritis, and to explore reasons for lack of engagement. Methods Data were from the arthritis component of the 2009 Survey on Living with Chronic Diseases in Canada. The responses (78% response rate; n = 4,565) were weighted to be representative of Canadians (ages ≥20 years) with arthritis. Logistic regression analyses were used to examine factors associated with engaging in exercise/physical activity and weight control/loss (among overweight/obese respondents) for arthritis management purposes. Results Individuals with arthritis were mostly women (63%), ages ≥45 years (89%), overweight/obese (67%), married (68%), and white (87%), with postsecondary education (69%). Sixty-three percent were exercising and of those who were overweight or obese, 68% were trying to control/lose weight; only 46% were engaged in both. Having received a clinical recommendation was the factor most strongly associated with engaging in exercise/physical activity and/or controlling/losing weight. The most common reason for not exercising was a coexisting health condition/problem (22%), while the most common reason for not controlling/losing weight among those who were overweight/obese was that it was felt not to be necessary (51%). Conclusion The provision of clinical recommendations from a health professional, providing advice on safe and suitable exercises/physical activities, as well as addressing misperceptions of the need to lose weight among the overweight/obese, may facilitate engagement in these health behaviors and ultimately reduce the consequences of arthritis.

Summary Purpose This review highlights seminal publications of rehabilitation interventions for osteoarthritis (OA) since April 2012. Methods Medline in process, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane databases were searched from April 2012 through February 2013 for English language publications using key words osteoarthritis, rehabilitation, physiotherapy, physical therapy, and exercise. Rehabilitation intervention studies included randomized trials or systematic reviews/meta-analyses or pre–post studies. Pilot randomized trials, feasibility studies and studies of surgical interventions unless they included evaluation of a rehabilitation intervention were excluded. Results Twenty-five studies were identified for inclusion and grouped thematically. The short-term benefits (i.e., to 3 months) of variable types and dosages of exercise were demonstrated for a number of outcomes including pain, stiffness, function, balance, biomarkers, and executive function and dual task performance (related to falling) in people with knee OA. Modalities such as 890-nm radiation, interferential current, short wave diathermy, ultrasound and neuromuscular functional electrical stimulation did not demonstrate benefit over sham controls in those with knee OA. Spa therapy improved pain over the period of treatment in those with knee and hand OA. Supervised self-management based on cognitive therapy principles resulted in improved outcomes for people with knee OA. Shock absorbing insoles compared to normal footwear minimally improved knee pain and but not function and did not decrease knee load. Neuromuscular and motor training improved function in those with total hip replacement. Accelerated weight-bearing and rehabilitation (8 versus 11 weeks) was demonstrated to be safe and effective at 5 years following matrix autologous chondrocyte implantation for cartilage defects in the knee. Conclusions Exercise remains a mainstay of conservative management although most studies report only short-term outcomes. Self-management strategies also are beneficial in knee OA. There seems to be a placebo effect with most trials of physical modalities although spa therapy demonstrated very short-term effects.

Background Timely access to effective treatments for arthritis is a priority at national, provincial and regional levels in Canada due to population aging coupled with limited health human resources. Models of care for arthritis are being implemented across the country but mainly in local contexts, not from an evidence-informed policy or framework. The purpose of this study is to examine existing models of care for arthritis in Canada at the local level in order to identify commonalities and differences in their implementation that could point to important considerations for health policy and service delivery. Methods Semi-structured key informant interviews were conducted with 70 program managers and/or care providers in three Canadian provinces identified through purposive and snowball sampling followed by more detailed examination of 6 models of care (two per province). Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically using a qualitative descriptive approach. Results Two broad models of care were identified for Total Joint Replacement and Inflammatory Arthritis. Commonalities included lack of complete and appropriate referrals from primary care physicians and lack of health human resources to meet local demands. Strategies included standardized referrals and centralized intake and triage using non-specialist health care professionals. Differences included the nature of the care and follow-up, the role of the specialist, and location of service delivery. Conclusions Current models of care are mainly focused on Total Joint Replacement and Inflammatory Arthritis. Given the increasing prevalence of arthritis and that published data report only a small proportion of current service delivery is specialist care; provision of timely, appropriate care requires development, implementation and evaluation of models of care across the continuum of care. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1634-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Objective To estimate the prevalence of overweight and obese Canadians with arthritis and to describe their use of arthritis self-management strategies, as well as explore the factors associated with not engaging in any self-management strategies. Methods Respondents to the 2009 Survey on Living with Chronic Diseases in Canada, a nationally representative sample of 4,565 Canadians age ≥20 years reporting health professional–diagnosed arthritis (including more than 100 rheumatic diseases and conditions), were asked about the impact of their arthritis and how it was managed. Among the overweight (body mass index [BMI] 25–29.9 kg/m2) and obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) individuals with arthritis (n = 2,869), the use of arthritis self-management strategies (i.e., exercise, weight control/loss, classes, and community-based programs) were analyzed. Log binomial regression analyses were used to examine factors associated with engaging in none versus any (≥1) of the 4 strategies. Results More than one-quarter (27.4%) of Canadians with arthritis were obese and an additional 39.9% were overweight. The overweight and obese individuals with arthritis were mostly female (59.5%), age ≥45 years (89.7%), and reported postsecondary education (69.0%). While most reported engagement in at least 1 self-management strategy (84.9%), less than half (45.6%) engaged in both weight control/loss and exercise. Factors independently associated with not engaging in any self-management strategies included lower education, not taking medications for arthritis, and no clinical recommendations from a health professional. Conclusion Fewer than half of the overweight and obese Canadians with arthritis engaged in both weight control/loss and exercise. The provision of targeted clinical recommendations (particularly low in individuals that did not engage in any self-management strategies) may help to facilitate participation.

Purpose: We compared practice of extended role practitioners and experienced therapists without extended practice training to determine differences in assessment and management of clients with inflammatory arthritis, in preparation for a randomized controlled trial. Methods: Retrospective review of randomly selected charts of extended-role trained occupational therapists or physiotherapists and from experienced therapists matched on therapist discipline, geographical location, and time of referral. Three trained reviewers used standardized forms to extract data independently. Results: We reviewed 58 charts of adult clients with inflammatory arthritis. Compared with experienced therapists, extended-role practitioners were more likely to receive referrals specifically for assessments (52% vs. 14%); to treat clients with undifferentiated arthritis (48% vs. 10%); to document comorbidities (90% vs. 66%); to advocate on behalf of the client with the client's family, physician, or specialist (52% vs. 21%); to recommend or provide exercise or physical activity (86% vs. 62%); to educate clients about pain management (41% vs. 28%), energy conservation (24% vs. 14%), and posture (21% vs. 7%); to recommend splints (41% vs. 31%); and to refer for or recommend radiologic or laboratory assessments (14% vs. 3%). Experienced therapists were more likely to provide education about joint protection (41% vs. 31%), community resources (31% vs. 7%), and assistive devices (45% vs. 21%). Conclusions: We identified possible differences in practice between extended-role practitioners and experienced therapists without training for extended practice. Capturing these details in future studies evaluating the efficacy of extended role practitioner interventions will be important.

Purpose: To identify the educational needs of adults who undergo total hip and total knee replacement surgery. Methods: A qualitative research design using a semi-standardized interviewing method was employed. A purposive sampling technique was used to recruit participants, who were eligible if they were scheduled to undergo total hip or total knee replacement or had undergone total hip or total knee replacement in the previous 3 to 6 months. A comparative contrast method of analysis was used. Results: Of 22 potential participants who were approached, 15 participated. Five were booked for upcoming total hip or total knee replacement and 10 had undergone at least one total hip or total knee replacement in the previous 3 to 6 months. Several themes related to specific educational needs and factors affecting educational needs, including access, preoperative phase, surgery and medical recovery, rehabilitation process and functional recovery, fears, and expectations counterbalanced with responsibility, emerged from the interviews. Conclusions: Educational needs of adults who undergo total hip and knee replacement surgery encompass a broad range of topics, confirming the importance of offering an all-inclusive information package regarding total hip and total knee replacement.

Rationale, aims and objectives Innovative service delivery models are emerging using physiotherapists in the assessment and management of patients referred for orthopaedic consultation. The primary objective of this study was to compare the clinical recommendations of specially trained physiotherapists with those of an orthopaedic surgeon on: (1) appropriateness to be seen by an orthopaedic surgeon; and (2) candidacy and willingness to undergo total joint replacement (TJR) for patients with hip or knee problems. A secondary objective was to examine their recommendations for non-surgical management and agreement on clinical diagnosis. Methods Physiotherapists and orthopaedic surgeons independently assessed patients with hip and knee problems referred for consideration for TJR and completed a standardized form on treatment recommendations. Agreement between providers was determined using the kappa coefficient and per cent agreement. Results Two physiotherapists and three orthopaedic surgeons participated in the study that included 45 and 17 patients with knee and hip problems respectively. In 91.8% (56/61) of cases, physiotherapists and orthopaedic surgeons agreed on the recommendation of appropriateness for the patient to see a surgeon (kappa 0.69). In discordant cases, the physiotherapists tended to refer for consultation. There was 85.5% (53/62) agreement on whether a patient was a candidate and willing to have TJR (kappa 0.70). The physiotherapists commonly recommended exercise and education for non-surgical patients. Orthopaedic surgeons most commonly referred patients to rehabilitation services. Conclusions Patients with hip or knee pain referred to orthopaedic surgeons can be appropriately referred for orthopaedic consultation by physiotherapists working in extended roles. Further research is required to evaluate the value-added and the most appropriate use of extended role physiotherapists.