104 results on '"Crump T"'
Search Results
2. Analysis of dynamic fracture and fragmentation of graphite bricks by combined XFEM and cohesive zone approach
- Author
-
Crump, T., Jivkov, A.P., Mummery, P., Ferté, G., and Tran, V.X.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Health and quality of life among a cohort of patients having lateral internal sphincterotomy for anal fissures
- Author
-
Sutherland, J. M., primary, Karimuddin, A., additional, Liu, G., additional, Crump, T., additional, Akbar, H., additional, Phang, T., additional, Redfern, K., additional, Manoharan, S., additional, Brown, C. J., additional, and Raval, M. J., additional
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. The effect of active surveillance on patient-reported erectile and urinary function. Results of the Movember Foundation’s GAP3 cohort
- Author
-
Crump, T., primary, Remmers, S., additional, Van Hemelrijck, M., additional, Helleman, J., additional, Nieboer, D., additional, Roobol, M.J., additional, and Venderbos, L.D.F., additional
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. A Catalyst for Transforming Health Systems and Person-Centred Care: Canadian National Position Statement on Patient-Reported Outcomes
- Author
-
Ahmed, S., primary, Barbera, L., additional, Bartlett, S.J., additional, Bebb, D.G., additional, Brundage, M., additional, Bryan, S., additional, Cheung, W.Y., additional, Coburn, N., additional, Crump, T., additional, Cuthbertson, L., additional, Howell, D., additional, Klassen, A.F., additional, Leduc, S., additional, Li, M., additional, Mayo, N.E., additional, McKinnon, G., additional, Olson, R., additional, Pink, J., additional, Robinson, J.W., additional, Santana, M.J., additional, Sawatzky, R., additional, Moxam, R.S., additional, Sinclair, S., additional, Servidio-Italiano, F., additional, and Temple, W., additional
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Predicting Biopsy Outcomes During Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: External Validation of the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study Risk Calculators in Five Large Active Surveillance Cohorts
- Author
-
Drost, FJH, Nieboer, D, Morgan, TM, Carroll, PR, Roobol, MJ, Trock, B, Ehdaie, B, Carroll, P, Filson, C, Kim, J, Logothetis, C, Morgan, T, Klotz, L, Pickles, T, Hyndman, E, Moore, CM, Gnanapragasam, V, Van Hemelrijck, M, Dasgupta, P, Bangma, C, Roobol, M, Villers, A, Rannikko, A, Valdagni, R, Perry, A, Hugosson, J, Rubio-Briones, J, Bjartell, A, Hefermehl, L, Shiong, LL, Frydenberg, M, Kakehi, Y, Chung, BH, van der Kwast, T, van der Linden, W, Hulsen, T, de Jonge, C, Kattan, M, Xinge, J, Muir, K, Lophatananon, A, Fahey, M, Steyerberg, E, Zhang, L, Beckmann, K, Denton, B, Hayen, A, Boutros, P, Guo, W, Benfante, N, Cowan, J, Patil, D, Tolosa, E, Kim, TK, Mamedov, A, Lapointe, V, Crump, T, Kimberly-Duffell, J, Santaolalla, A, Olivier, J, Rancati, T, Ahlgren, H, Mascarós, J, Löfgren, A, Lin, CH, Hirama, H, Lee, KS, Jenster, G, Auvinen, A, Haider, M, van Bochove, K, Carter, B, Gledhill, S, Buzza, M, Bruinsma, S, and Helleman, J
- Subjects
Urology & Nephrology - Abstract
© 2019 European Association of Urology Two active surveillance risk calculators to predict disease reclassification on prostate biopsy are externally validated by the Movember Foundation's Global Action Plan (GAP3) consortium. They proved to be clinically useful and could reduce unnecessary biopsies, but need recalibration to local settings.
- Published
- 2019
7. Consistent Biopsy Quality and Gleason Grading Within the Global Active Surveillance Global Action Plan 3 Initiative: A Prerequisite for Future Studies.
- Author
-
Rannikko A., Moore C.M., Gnanapragasam V., Van Hemelrijck M., Dasgupta P., Bangma C., Villers A., Valdagni R., Perry A., Hugosson J., Rubio-Briones J., Bjartell A., Hefermehl L., Shiong L.L., Frydenberg M., Kakehi Y., Chung B.H., Obbink H., van der Linden W., Hulsen T., de Jonge C., Kattan M., Xinge J., Muir K., Lophatananon A., Fahey M., Steyerberg E., Zhang L., Guo W., Benfante N., Cowan J., Patil D., Tolosa E., Kim T.-K., Mamedov A., Lapointe V., Crump T., Kimberly-Duffell J., Santaolalla A., Olivier J., Rancati T., Ahlgren H., Mascaros J., Lofgren A., Lehmann K., Lin C.H., Hirama H., Lee K.S., Jenster G., Auvinen A., Haider M., van Bochove K., Carter B., Gledhill S., Buzza M., van der Kwast T.H., Helleman J., Nieboer D., Bruinsma S.M., Roobol M.J., Trock B., Ehdaie B., Carroll P., Filson C., Kim J., Logothetis C., Morgan T., Klotz L., Pickles T., Hyndman E., Rannikko A., Moore C.M., Gnanapragasam V., Van Hemelrijck M., Dasgupta P., Bangma C., Villers A., Valdagni R., Perry A., Hugosson J., Rubio-Briones J., Bjartell A., Hefermehl L., Shiong L.L., Frydenberg M., Kakehi Y., Chung B.H., Obbink H., van der Linden W., Hulsen T., de Jonge C., Kattan M., Xinge J., Muir K., Lophatananon A., Fahey M., Steyerberg E., Zhang L., Guo W., Benfante N., Cowan J., Patil D., Tolosa E., Kim T.-K., Mamedov A., Lapointe V., Crump T., Kimberly-Duffell J., Santaolalla A., Olivier J., Rancati T., Ahlgren H., Mascaros J., Lofgren A., Lehmann K., Lin C.H., Hirama H., Lee K.S., Jenster G., Auvinen A., Haider M., van Bochove K., Carter B., Gledhill S., Buzza M., van der Kwast T.H., Helleman J., Nieboer D., Bruinsma S.M., Roobol M.J., Trock B., Ehdaie B., Carroll P., Filson C., Kim J., Logothetis C., Morgan T., Klotz L., Pickles T., and Hyndman E.
- Abstract
Within the Movember Foundation's Global Action Plan Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance (GAP3) initiative, 25 centers across the globe collaborate to standardize active surveillance (AS) protocols for men with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa). A centralized PCa AS database, comprising data of more than 15 000 patients worldwide, was created. Comparability of the histopathology between the different cohorts was assessed by a centralized pathology review of 445 biopsies from 15 GAP3 centers. Grade group 1 (Gleason score 6) in 85% and grade group >=2 (Gleason score >=7) in 15% showed 89% concordance at review with moderate agreement (kappa = 0.56). Average biopsy core length was similar among the analyzed cohorts. Recently established highly adverse pathologies, including cribriform and/or intraductal carcinoma, were observed in 3.6% of the reviewed biopsies. In conclusion, the centralized pathology review of 445 biopsies revealed comparable histopathology among the 15 GAP3 centers with a low frequency of high-risk features. This enables further data analyses-without correction-toward uniform global AS guidelines for men with low-risk PCa. Patient Summary: Movember Foundation's Global Action Plan Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance (GAP3) initiative combines data from 15 000 men with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) across the globe to standardize active surveillance protocols. Histopathology review confirmed that the histopathology was consistent with low-risk PCa in most men and comparable between different centers. A centralized pathological review showed consistent biopsy quality and Gleason grading within the global active surveillance Global Action Plan 3 initiative, a prerequisite for future studies toward uniform global guidelines for active surveillance of men with low-risk prostate cancer.Copyright © 2018
- Published
- 2019
8. Reasons for Discontinuing Active Surveillance: Assessment of 21 Centres in 12 Countries in the Movember GAP3 Consortium.
- Author
-
Perry A., Gledhill S., Morgan T., Klotz L., Pickles T., Hyndman E., Moore C.M., Dasgupta P., Villers A., Valdagni R., Carter B., Hugosson J., Rubio-Briones J., Bjartell A., Hefermehl L., Lui Shiong L., Kakehi Y., Ha Chung B., van der Kwast T., Obbink H., Hulsen T., de Jonge C., Xinge J., Muir K., Lophatananon A., Steyerberg E., Zhang L., Santa Olalla A., Beckmann K., Denton B., Hayen A., Boutros P., Guo W., Benfante N., Cowan J., Patil D., Tolosa E., Kim T.-K., Mamedov A., La Pointe V., Crump T., Kimberly-Duffell J., Santaolalla A., Olivier J., Rancati T., Ahlgren H., Mascaros J., Lofgren A., Lehmann K., Han Lin C., Hirama H., Suk Lee K., Jenster G., Auvinen A., Haider M., van Bochove K., Buzza M., Bangma C., Bruinsma S., Fahey M., Van Hemelrijck M., Ji X., Kattan M.W., Helleman J., Roobol M.J., Nieboer D., Bangma C.H., van der Linden W., Frydenberg M., Rannikko A., Lee L.S., Gnanapragasam V.J., Trock B., Ehdaie B., Carroll P., Filson C., Kim J., Logothetis C., Perry A., Gledhill S., Morgan T., Klotz L., Pickles T., Hyndman E., Moore C.M., Dasgupta P., Villers A., Valdagni R., Carter B., Hugosson J., Rubio-Briones J., Bjartell A., Hefermehl L., Lui Shiong L., Kakehi Y., Ha Chung B., van der Kwast T., Obbink H., Hulsen T., de Jonge C., Xinge J., Muir K., Lophatananon A., Steyerberg E., Zhang L., Santa Olalla A., Beckmann K., Denton B., Hayen A., Boutros P., Guo W., Benfante N., Cowan J., Patil D., Tolosa E., Kim T.-K., Mamedov A., La Pointe V., Crump T., Kimberly-Duffell J., Santaolalla A., Olivier J., Rancati T., Ahlgren H., Mascaros J., Lofgren A., Lehmann K., Han Lin C., Hirama H., Suk Lee K., Jenster G., Auvinen A., Haider M., van Bochove K., Buzza M., Bangma C., Bruinsma S., Fahey M., Van Hemelrijck M., Ji X., Kattan M.W., Helleman J., Roobol M.J., Nieboer D., Bangma C.H., van der Linden W., Frydenberg M., Rannikko A., Lee L.S., Gnanapragasam V.J., Trock B., Ehdaie B., Carroll P., Filson C., Kim J., and Logothetis C.
- Abstract
Background: Careful assessment of the reasons for discontinuation of active surveillance (AS) is required for men with prostate cancer (PCa). Objective(s): Using Movember's Global Action Plan Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance initiative (GAP3) database, we report on reasons for AS discontinuation. Design, setting, and participants: We compared data from 10 296 men on AS from 21 centres across 12 countries. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Cumulative incidence methods were used to estimate the cumulative incidence rates of AS discontinuation. Results and limitations: During 5-yr follow-up, 27.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 26.4-28.6%) men showed signs of disease progression, 12.8% (95% CI: 12.0-13.6%) converted to active treatment without evidence of progression, 1.7% (95% CI: 1.5-2.0%) continued to watchful waiting, and 1.7% (95% CI: 1.4-2.1%) died from other causes. Of the 7049 men who remained on AS, 2339 had follow-up for >5 yr, 4561 had follow-up for <5 yr, and 149 were lost to follow-up. Cumulative incidence of progression was 27.5% (95% CI: 26.4-28.6%) at 5 yr and 38.2% (95% CI: 36.7-39.9%) at 10 yr. A limitation is that not all centres were included due to limited information on the reason for discontinuation and limited follow-up. Conclusion(s): Our descriptive analyses of current AS practices worldwide showed that 43.6% of men drop out of AS during 5-yr follow-up, mainly due to signs of disease progression. Improvements in selection tools for AS are thus needed to correctly allocate men with PCa to AS, which will also reduce discontinuation due to conversion to active treatment without evidence of disease progression. Patient Summary: Our assessment of a worldwide database of men with prostate cancer (PCa) on active surveillance (AS) shows that 43.6% drop out of AS within 5 yr, mainly due to signs of disease progression. Better tools are needed to select and monitor men with PCa as part of AS. After about 5 yr, about 56% of men were still
- Published
- 2019
9. Predicting Biopsy Outcomes During Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: External Validation of the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study Risk Calculators in Five Large Active Surveillance Cohorts.
- Author
-
Santaolalla A., Gnanapragasam V., Van Hemelrijck M., Dasgupta P., Auvinen A., Haider M., van Bochove K., Carter B., Gledhill S., Buzza M., Bruinsma S., Helleman J., Drost F.-J.H., Nieboer D., Morgan T.M., Carroll P.R., Roobol M.J., Trock B., Ehdaie B., Carroll P., Filson C., Kim J., Logothetis C., Morgan T., Klotz L., Pickles T., Hyndman E., Bangma C., Roobol M., Villers A., Rannikko A., Valdagni R., Perry A., Hugosson J., Rubio-Briones J., Bjartell A., Hefermehl L., Shiong L.L., Frydenberg M., Kakehi Y., Chung B.H., van der Kwast T., van der Linden W., Hulsen T., de Jonge C., Kattan M., Xinge J., Muir K., Lophatananon A., Fahey M., Steyerberg E., Zhang L., Beckmann K., Denton B., Hayen A., Boutros P., Guo W., Benfante N., Cowan J., Patil D., Tolosa E., Kim T.-K., Mamedov A., Lapointe V., Crump T., Kimberly-Duffell J., Olivier J., Rancati T., Ahlgren H., Mascaros J., Lofgren A., Lin C.H., Hirama H., Lee K.S., Moore C.M., Jenster G., Santaolalla A., Gnanapragasam V., Van Hemelrijck M., Dasgupta P., Auvinen A., Haider M., van Bochove K., Carter B., Gledhill S., Buzza M., Bruinsma S., Helleman J., Drost F.-J.H., Nieboer D., Morgan T.M., Carroll P.R., Roobol M.J., Trock B., Ehdaie B., Carroll P., Filson C., Kim J., Logothetis C., Morgan T., Klotz L., Pickles T., Hyndman E., Bangma C., Roobol M., Villers A., Rannikko A., Valdagni R., Perry A., Hugosson J., Rubio-Briones J., Bjartell A., Hefermehl L., Shiong L.L., Frydenberg M., Kakehi Y., Chung B.H., van der Kwast T., van der Linden W., Hulsen T., de Jonge C., Kattan M., Xinge J., Muir K., Lophatananon A., Fahey M., Steyerberg E., Zhang L., Beckmann K., Denton B., Hayen A., Boutros P., Guo W., Benfante N., Cowan J., Patil D., Tolosa E., Kim T.-K., Mamedov A., Lapointe V., Crump T., Kimberly-Duffell J., Olivier J., Rancati T., Ahlgren H., Mascaros J., Lofgren A., Lin C.H., Hirama H., Lee K.S., Moore C.M., and Jenster G.
- Abstract
Two active surveillance risk calculators to predict disease reclassification on prostate biopsy are externally validated by the Movember Foundation's Global Action Plan (GAP3) consortium. They proved to be clinically useful and could reduce unnecessary biopsies, but need recalibration to local settings. Background: Men with prostate cancer (PCa) on active surveillance (AS) are followed through regular prostate biopsies, a burdensome and often unnecessary intervention, not without risks. Identifying men with at a low risk of disease reclassification may help reduce the number of biopsies. Objective(s): To assess the external validity of two Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study Risk Calculators (PASS-RCs), which estimate the probability of reclassification (Gleason grade >=7 with or without >34% of biopsy cores positive for PCa) on a surveillance biopsy, using a mix of months since last biopsy, age, body mass index, prostate-specific antigen, prostate volume, number of prior negative biopsies, and percentage (or ratio) of positive cores on last biopsy. Design, setting, and participants: We used data up to November 2017 from the Movember Foundation's Global Action Plan (GAP3) consortium, a global collaboration between AS studies. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: External validity of the PASS-RCs for estimating reclassification on biopsy was assessed by calibration, discrimination, and decision curve analyses. Results and limitations: Five validation cohorts (Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance, Johns Hopkins, Toronto, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and University of California San Francisco), comprising 5105 men on AS, were eligible for analysis. The individual cohorts comprised 429-2416 men, with a median follow-up between 36 and 84 mo, in both community and academic practices mainly from western countries. Abilities of the PASS-RCs to discriminate between men with and without reclassification on biopsy were reasonab
- Published
- 2019
10. Effects of locally-delivered human macrophage products and estrogen on murine inflammatory bone resorption
- Author
-
Crump, T. B., Wimmer, K. L., Reinhardt, A. L., Schmid, M. J., Meyer, C. R., Robinson, D. H., Marx, D. B., Bhattacharyya, I., and Reinhardt, R. A.
- Published
- 2002
11. Influence of three membrane types on healing of bone defects
- Author
-
Crump, T. Brad, Rivera-Hidalgo, Francisco, Harrison, John W., Williams, Fred E., and Guo, Ingrid Y.
- Published
- 1996
12. The Movember Foundation's GAP3 cohort
- Author
-
Bruinsma, S.M. (Sophie), Zhang, L. (Liying), Roobol-Bouts, M.J. (Monique), Bangma, C.H. (Chris), Steyerberg, E.W. (Ewout), Nieboer, D. (Daan), Van Hemelrijck, M. (Mieke), Trock, B.J. (Bruce), Ehdaie, B. (Behfar), Carroll, P.R. (Peter), Filson, C. (Christopher), Kim, J. (Jeri), Morgan, T. (Todd), Klotz, L. (Laurence), Pickles, T. (Tom), Hyndman, E. (Eric), Moore, C.M. (Caroline), Gnanapragasam, V. (Vincent), Dasgupta, P. (Prokar), Villers, A. (Arnoud), Rannikko, A.S. (Antti), Valdagni, R. (Riccardo), Perry, A. (Antoinette), Hugosson, J. (Jonas), Rubio-Briones, J. (Jose), Bjartell, A. (Anders), Hefermehl, L. (Lukas), Lui Shiong, L. (Lee), Frydenberg, M. (Mark), Kakehi, Y. (Yoshiyuki), Ha Chung, B. (Byung), Kwast, Th.H. (Theo) van der, Obbink, H. (Henk), van der Linden, W. (Wim), Hulsen, T. (Tim), de Jonge, C. (Cees), Kattan, M.W. (Michael), Xinge, J. (Ji), Muir, K. (Kenneth), Lophatananon, A. (Artitaya), Fahey, M. (Michael), Guo, W. (Wei), Milan, T. (Tanya), Benfante, N. (Nicole), Cowan, J. (Janet), Patil, D. (Dattatraya), Sanford, R. (Rachel), Kim, T.-K. (Tae-Kyung), Mamedov, A. (Alexandre), LaPointe, V. (Vincent), Crump, T. (Trafford), Hamoudi, R. (Rifat), Kimberly-Duffell, J. (Jenna), Santaolalla, A. (Aida), Olivier, J. (Jonathan), Janetti, E.B. (Emanuele Bianchi), Rancati, T. (Tiziana), Ahlgren, H. (Helén), Mascarós, J. (Juanma), Löfgren, A. (Annica), Lehmann, K. (Kurt), Han Lin, C. (Catherine), Hirama, H. (Hiromi), Jenster, G.W. (Guido), Auvinen, A. (Anssi), Haider, M. (Masoom), van Bochove, K. (Kees), Carter, B. (Ballentine), Kirk-Burnnand, R. (Rachelle), Gledhill, S. (Sam), Buzza, M. (Mark), Bruinsma, S.M. (Sophie), Zhang, L. (Liying), Roobol-Bouts, M.J. (Monique), Bangma, C.H. (Chris), Steyerberg, E.W. (Ewout), Nieboer, D. (Daan), Van Hemelrijck, M. (Mieke), Trock, B.J. (Bruce), Ehdaie, B. (Behfar), Carroll, P.R. (Peter), Filson, C. (Christopher), Kim, J. (Jeri), Morgan, T. (Todd), Klotz, L. (Laurence), Pickles, T. (Tom), Hyndman, E. (Eric), Moore, C.M. (Caroline), Gnanapragasam, V. (Vincent), Dasgupta, P. (Prokar), Villers, A. (Arnoud), Rannikko, A.S. (Antti), Valdagni, R. (Riccardo), Perry, A. (Antoinette), Hugosson, J. (Jonas), Rubio-Briones, J. (Jose), Bjartell, A. (Anders), Hefermehl, L. (Lukas), Lui Shiong, L. (Lee), Frydenberg, M. (Mark), Kakehi, Y. (Yoshiyuki), Ha Chung, B. (Byung), Kwast, Th.H. (Theo) van der, Obbink, H. (Henk), van der Linden, W. (Wim), Hulsen, T. (Tim), de Jonge, C. (Cees), Kattan, M.W. (Michael), Xinge, J. (Ji), Muir, K. (Kenneth), Lophatananon, A. (Artitaya), Fahey, M. (Michael), Guo, W. (Wei), Milan, T. (Tanya), Benfante, N. (Nicole), Cowan, J. (Janet), Patil, D. (Dattatraya), Sanford, R. (Rachel), Kim, T.-K. (Tae-Kyung), Mamedov, A. (Alexandre), LaPointe, V. (Vincent), Crump, T. (Trafford), Hamoudi, R. (Rifat), Kimberly-Duffell, J. (Jenna), Santaolalla, A. (Aida), Olivier, J. (Jonathan), Janetti, E.B. (Emanuele Bianchi), Rancati, T. (Tiziana), Ahlgren, H. (Helén), Mascarós, J. (Juanma), Löfgren, A. (Annica), Lehmann, K. (Kurt), Han Lin, C. (Catherine), Hirama, H. (Hiromi), Jenster, G.W. (Guido), Auvinen, A. (Anssi), Haider, M. (Masoom), van Bochove, K. (Kees), Carter, B. (Ballentine), Kirk-Burnnand, R. (Rachelle), Gledhill, S. (Sam), and Buzza, M. (Mark)
- Abstract
Objectives: The Movember Foundation launched the Global Action Plan Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance (GAP3) initiative to create a global consensus on the selection and monitoring of men with low-risk prostate cancer (PCa) on active surveillance (AS). The aim of this study is to present data on inclusion and follow-up for AS in this unique global AS database. Patients and Methods: Between 2014 and 2016, the database was created by combining patient data from 25 established AS cohorts worldwide (USA, Canada, Australasia, UK and Europe). Data on a total of 15 101 patients were included. Descriptive statistics were used to report patients' clinical and demographic characteristics at the time of PCa diagnosis, clinical follow-up, discontinuation of AS and subsequent treatment. Cumulative incidence curves were used to report discontinuation rates over time. Results: At diagnosis, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) patient age was 65 (60–70) years and the median prostate-specific antigen level was 5.4 (4.0–7.3) ng/mL. Most patients had clinical stage T1 disease (71.8%), a biopsy Gleason score of 6 (88.8%) and one tumour-positive biopsy core (60.3%). Patients on AS had a median follow-up time of 2.2 (1.0–5.0) years. After 5, 10 and 15 years of follow-up, respectively, 58%, 39% and 23% of patients were still on AS. The current version of GAP3 has limited data on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), quality of life and genomic testing. Conclusions: GAP3 is the largest worldwide collaboration integrating patient data from men with PCa on AS. The results will allow individual patients and clinicians to have greater confidence in the personalized decision to either delay or proceed with active treatment. Longer follow-up and the evaluation of MRI, new genomic markers and patient-related outcomes will result in even more valuable data and eventually in better patient outcomes.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Evaluating the psychometric properties of the EPIC-26
- Author
-
Crump, T., primary, Peterson, A., additional, Charbonneau, C., additional, Carlson, K., additional, Sutherland, J., additional, and Baverstock, R., additional
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Expert consensus document: Semantics in active surveillance for men with localized prostate cancer-results of a modified Delphi consensus procedure.
- Author
-
van der Linden W., Bruinsma S.M., Roobol M.J., Carroll P.R., Klotz L., Pickles T., Moore C.M., Gnanapragasam V.J., Villers A., Rannikko A., Valdagni R., Frydenberg M., Kakehi Y., Filson C.P., Bangma C.H., Trock B., Ehdaie B., Kim J., Morgan T., Hyndman E., Van Hemelrijck M., Dasgupta P., Perry A., Hugosson J., Rubio-Briones J., Bjartell A., Hefermehl L., Lui Shiong L., Ha Chung B., Suk Lee K., van der Kwast T., Obbink H., Hulsen T., de Jonge C., Kattan M., Xinge J., Muir K., Lophatananon A., Fahey M., Steyerberg E., Nieboer D., Zhang L., Guo W., Milan T., Benfante N., Cowan J., Patil D., Sanford R., Kim T.K., Mamedov A., LaPointe V., Crump T., Hamoudi R., Kimberly-Duffell J., Santaolalla A., Olivier J., Janetti E.B., Rancati T., Ahlgren H., Mascaros J., Lofgren A., Lehmann K., Han Lin C., Hirama H., Jenster G., Auvinen A., Haider M., van Bochove K., Carter B., Kirk-Burnnand R., Gledhill S., Buzza M., van der Linden W., Bruinsma S.M., Roobol M.J., Carroll P.R., Klotz L., Pickles T., Moore C.M., Gnanapragasam V.J., Villers A., Rannikko A., Valdagni R., Frydenberg M., Kakehi Y., Filson C.P., Bangma C.H., Trock B., Ehdaie B., Kim J., Morgan T., Hyndman E., Van Hemelrijck M., Dasgupta P., Perry A., Hugosson J., Rubio-Briones J., Bjartell A., Hefermehl L., Lui Shiong L., Ha Chung B., Suk Lee K., van der Kwast T., Obbink H., Hulsen T., de Jonge C., Kattan M., Xinge J., Muir K., Lophatananon A., Fahey M., Steyerberg E., Nieboer D., Zhang L., Guo W., Milan T., Benfante N., Cowan J., Patil D., Sanford R., Kim T.K., Mamedov A., LaPointe V., Crump T., Hamoudi R., Kimberly-Duffell J., Santaolalla A., Olivier J., Janetti E.B., Rancati T., Ahlgren H., Mascaros J., Lofgren A., Lehmann K., Han Lin C., Hirama H., Jenster G., Auvinen A., Haider M., van Bochove K., Carter B., Kirk-Burnnand R., Gledhill S., and Buzza M.
- Abstract
Active surveillance (AS) is broadly described as a management option for men with low-risk prostate cancer, but semantic heterogeneity exists in both the literature and in guidelines. To address this issue, a panel of leading prostate cancer specialists in the field of AS participated in a consensus-forming project using a modified Delphi method to reach international consensus on definitions of terms related to this management option. An iterative three-round sequence of online questionnaires designed to address 61 individual items was completed by each panel member. Consensus was considered to be reached if >=70% of the experts agreed on a definition. To facilitate a common understanding among all experts involved and resolve potential ambiguities, a face-to-face consensus meeting was held between Delphi survey rounds two and three. Convenience sampling was used to construct the panel of experts. In total, 12 experts from Australia, France, Finland, Italy, the Netherlands, Japan, the UK, Canada and the USA participated. By the end of the Delphi process, formal consensus was achieved for 100% (n = 61) of the terms and a glossary was then developed. Agreement between international experts has been reached on relevant terms and subsequent definitions regarding AS for patients with localized prostate cancer. This standard terminology could support multidisciplinary communication, reduce the extent of variations in clinical practice and optimize clinical decision making.Copyright © 2017 Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature. All rights reserved.
- Published
- 2017
15. PT076 - Evaluating the psychometric properties of the EPIC-26
- Author
-
Crump, T., Peterson, A., Charbonneau, C., Carlson, K., Sutherland, J., and Baverstock, R.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Britain, Southeast Asia and the Korean War
- Author
-
Crump, T.
- Abstract
Tarling, Nicholas. 2005. Britain, Southeast Asia and the Impact of the Korean War. Singapore: Singapore University Press. 538 pages, ISBN 9971 69 315 1
- Published
- 2007
17. Japanese Numbers Game
- Author
-
Crump, T, primary
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. A Comparative Study of Root Coverage Using Two Different Acellular Dermal Matrix Products
- Author
-
Barker, Thomas S., primary, Cueva, Marco A., additional, Rivera-Hidalgo, Francisco, additional, Beach, M. Miles, additional, Rossmann, Jeffrey A., additional, Kerns, David G., additional, Crump, T. Bradley, additional, and Shulman, Jay D., additional
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Influence of three membrane types on healing of bone defects
- Author
-
Peterson, Larry J., primary, Crump, T. Brad, additional, Rivera-Hidalgo, Francisco, additional, Harrison, John W., additional, Williams, Fred E., additional, and Guo, Ingrid Y., additional
- Published
- 1996
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. The BB diabetic rat. Profound T-cell lymphocytopenia.
- Author
-
Jackson, R, Rassi, N, Crump, T, Haynes, B, and Eisenbarth, G S
- Published
- 1981
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. Surveyors in Rebellion
- Author
-
Crump, T. N. H., primary
- Published
- 1967
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. Increasing the Efficiency of Röntgen Ray Tubes
- Author
-
CRUMP, T. G., primary
- Published
- 1896
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. Investigating the Influence of Patient Eligibility Characteristics on the Number of Deferrable Rheumatologist Visits: Planning for a Patient-Initiated Follow-Up Strategy.
- Author
-
Subdar S, Dhiman K, Hartfeld NMS, Hoens AM, White K, Manske SL, Hazlewood G, Lacaille D, Lopatina E, Barber MRW, Mosher DP, Fifi-Mah A, Twilt M, Luca N, Then KL, Crump T, Zafar S, Osinski K, and Barber CEH
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Male, Retrospective Studies, Middle Aged, Aged, Adult, Antirheumatic Agents therapeutic use, Office Visits statistics & numerical data, Follow-Up Studies, Rheumatology, Disease Management, Eligibility Determination, Arthritis, Rheumatoid drug therapy, Arthritis, Rheumatoid therapy, Rheumatologists
- Abstract
Objective: Patient-initiated follow-up (PIFU) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a model of care delivery wherein patients contact the clinic when needed instead of having regularly scheduled follow-up. Our objective was to investigate the influence of different patient eligibility characteristics on the number of potentially deferred visits to inform future implementation of a PIFU strategy., Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 7 rheumatologists' practices at 2 university-based clinics between March 1, 2021, and February 28, 2022. Data extracted included the type and frequency of visits, disease management, comorbidities, and care complexities. Stable disease was defined as remission or low disease activity with no medication changes at all visits. The influence of patient characteristics on the number of deferrable visits in patients with stable disease was explored in 4 criteria sets that were based on early disease duration, medication prescribed, presence of care complexity elements, and comorbidity burden., Results: Records from 770 visits were reviewed from 365 patients with RA (71.5% female, 70% seropositive). Among all criteria sets, the proportion of visits that could be redirected varied between 2.5% and 20.9%. The highest proportion of deferrable visits was achieved when eligibility criteria included only stable disease activity and patients with RA on conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs or no medications (n = 161, 20.9%)., Conclusion: PIFU may result in a more efficient use of specialist healthcare resources. However, the applicability of such models of care and the number of deferred visits is highly dependent on patient characteristics used to establish eligibility criteria for that model. These findings should be considered when planning implementation trials., (Copyright © 2024 by the Journal of Rheumatology.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. An Environmental Scan and Appraisal of Patient Online Resources for Managing Rheumatoid Arthritis Flares.
- Author
-
Subdar S, Hoens AM, White K, Hartfeld NMS, Dhiman K, Duffey K, Heath CE, Lamoureux G, Graveline C, Davidson E, Hazlewood G, Lacaille D, Lopatina E, Barber MRW, Then KL, Crump T, Zafar S, Manske SL, Charlton A, Osinski K, Fifi-Mah A, Mosher D, and Barber CEH
- Subjects
- Humans, Internet, Self-Management methods, Arthritis, Rheumatoid therapy, Patient Education as Topic methods, Symptom Flare Up
- Abstract
Objective: To conduct an environmental scan and appraisal of online patient resources to support rheumatoid arthritis (RA) flare self-management., Methods: We used the Google search engine (last search March 2023) using the terms "rheumatoid arthritis" and "flare management." Additional searches targeted major arthritis organizations, as well as regional, national, and international resources. Appraisal of the resources was conducted by 2 research team members and 1 patient partner to assess the understandability and actionability of the resource using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT). Resources rating ≥ 60% in both domains by either the research team or the patient partner were further considered for content review. During content review, resources were excluded if they contained product advertisements, inaccurate information, or use of noninclusive language. If content review criteria were met, resources were designated as "highly recommended" if both patient partners and researchers' PEMAT ratings were ≥ 60%. If PEMAT ratings were divergent and had a rating ≥ 60% from only 1 group of reviewers, the resource was designated "acceptable.", Results: We identified 44 resources; 12 were excluded as they did not pass the PEMAT assessment. Fourteen resources received ratings ≥ 60% on understandability and actionability from both researchers and patient partners; 10 of these were retained following content review as "highly recommended" flare resources. Of the 18 divergent PEMAT ratings, 8 resources were retained as "acceptable" following content review., Conclusion: There is high variability in the actionability and understandability of online RA flare materials; only 23% of resources were highly recommended by researchers and patient partners., (Copyright © 2024 by the Journal of Rheumatology.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
25. An examination of rectal prolapse surgery patients' quality of life and symptoms using patient-reported outcome instruments: A prospective cohort study.
- Author
-
Bola R, Guo M, Karimuddin A, Liu G, Phang PT, Crump T, and Sutherland JM
- Subjects
- Humans, Quality of Life, Prospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Pain, Rectal Prolapse surgery, Fecal Incontinence etiology
- Abstract
Background: We measured changes in self-reported health and symptoms attributable to rectal prolapse surgery using patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures., Methods: A prospectively recruited cohort of patients scheduled for rectal prolapse repair in Vancouver, Canada between 2013 and 2021 were surveyed before and 6-months after surgery using seven PROs: the EuroQol Five-Dimension Instrument (EQ-5D-5L), Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7), Pain Intensity, Interference with Enjoyment of Life and General Activity (PEG), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI), Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI), and the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQL)., Results: We included 46 participants who reported improvements in health status (EQ-5D-5L; p < 0.01), pain interference (PEG; p < 0.01), depressive symptoms (PHQ-9; p = 0.01), fecal incontinence severity (FISI; p < 0.01), gastrointestinal quality of life (GIQLI; p < 0.01), and fecal incontinence quality of life (FIQL) related to lifestyle (p = 0.02), coping and behaviour (p = 0.02) and depression and self-perception (p = 0.01)., Conclusion: Surgical repair of rectal prolapse improved patients' quality of life with meaningful improvements in fecal incontinence severity and pain, and symptom interference with daily activities., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. Preoperative depression and anxiety associated with younger age and receipt of immediate breast reconstruction.
- Author
-
Tang K, Sutherland JM, Liu G, Crump T, Bazzarelli A, Dingee C, Pao JS, Warburton R, and McKevitt E
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Mastectomy psychology, Quality of Life, Depression epidemiology, Depression etiology, Anxiety epidemiology, Anxiety etiology, Breast Neoplasms surgery, Mammaplasty
- Abstract
Background: As survivorship for breast cancer continues to improve, emphasis of care falls upon improving patients' quality of life. Understanding physical and mental health in the preoperative period is needed to aid surgical decision making and improve patient experience., Methods: Consecutive patients awaiting total mastectomy (TM), TM with immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) and breast conserving surgery (BCS) were prospectively recruited. Scores for PHQ-9, GAD-7, Breast-Q, EQ5D(5L), PEG were collected preoperatively. Association was measured with multivariate analyses., Results: 477 participants (374 BSC, 46 TM, 84 IBR) were included. Younger patients and those choosing IBR reported worse depression and anxiety symptoms. Clinical tumor features did not affect patient reported outcomes. Higher Breast-Q scores were seen with BCS and lower scores with TM., Conclusions: Patients scheduled for IBR and younger patients reported worse symptoms of depression and anxiety, regardless of clinical features. This will help with surgical decision making and identify patients in need for additional perioperative supports., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors of this manuscript declare no conflicts of interest for this publication., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
27. Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy for NSCLC: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
- Author
-
Sorin M, Prosty C, Ghaleb L, Nie K, Katergi K, Shahzad MH, Dubé LR, Atallah A, Swaby A, Dankner M, Crump T, Walsh LA, Fiset PO, Sepesi B, Forde PM, Cascone T, Provencio M, and Spicer JD
- Subjects
- Aged, Humans, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung therapy, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung pathology, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung mortality, Immunotherapy methods, Lung Neoplasms therapy, Lung Neoplasms pathology, Lung Neoplasms mortality, Lung Neoplasms drug therapy, Neoadjuvant Therapy adverse effects
- Abstract
Importance: To date, no meta-analyses have comprehensively assessed the association of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy with clinical outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in randomized and nonrandomized settings. In addition, there exists controversy concerning the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for patients with NSCLC with programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) levels less than 1%., Objective: To compare neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy with chemotherapy by adverse events and surgical, pathological, and efficacy outcomes using recently published randomized clinical trials and nonrandomized trials., Data Sources: MEDLINE and Embase were systematically searched from January 1, 2013, to October 25, 2023, for all clinical trials of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and chemotherapy that included at least 10 patients., Study Selection: Observational studies and trials reporting the use of neoadjuvant radiotherapy, including chemoradiotherapy, molecular targeted therapy, or immunotherapy monotherapy, were excluded., Main Outcomes and Measures: Surgical, pathological, and efficacy end points and adverse events were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis., Results: Among 43 eligible trials comprising 5431 patients (4020 males [74.0%]; median age range, 55-70 years), there were 8 randomized clinical trials with 3387 patients. For randomized clinical trials, pooled overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.54-0.79; I2 = 0%), event-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.52-0.67; I2 = 14.9%), major pathological response (risk ratio, 3.42; 95% CI, 2.83-4.15; I2 = 31.2%), and complete pathological response (risk ratio, 5.52; 95% CI, 4.25-7.15; I2 = 27.4%) favored neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy over neoadjuvant chemotherapy. For patients with baseline tumor PD-L1 levels less than 1%, there was a significant benefit in event-free survival for neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy compared with chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62-0.89; I2 = 0%)., Conclusion and Relevance: This study found that neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy was superior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy across surgical, pathological, and efficacy outcomes. These findings suggest that patients with resectable NSCLC with tumor PD-L1 levels less than 1% may have an event-free survival benefit with neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
28. A cost-utility study of elective haemorrhoidectomies in Canada.
- Author
-
Guo M, Karimuddin AA, Liu G, Crump T, Brown CJ, Raval MJ, Phang PT, Ghuman A, Mok J, and Sutherland JM
- Subjects
- Male, Humans, Female, Canada, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Health Status, Quality-Adjusted Life Years, Quality of Life, Hemorrhoidectomy
- Abstract
Aim: The aim was to estimate the 10-year cost-utility of haemorrhoidectomy surgery with preference-based measures of health using Canadian health utility measures and costs., Methods: Patients undergoing elective haemorrhoidectomies by general and colorectal surgeons in British Columbia, Vancouver, between September 2015 and November 2022, completed preoperatively and postoperatively the EuroQol five-dimension five-level health-related quality of life questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) attributable to surgery were calculated by discounting preoperative and postoperative health utility values derived from the EQ-5D-5L. Costs were measured from a health system perspective which incorporated costs of hospital stay and specialists' fees. Results are presented in 2021 Canadian dollars., Results: Of 94 (47%) patients who completed both the preoperative and postoperative questionnaires, the mean gain in QALYs 10 years after surgery was 1.0609, assuming a 3.5% annual discounting rate. The average cost of the surgery was $3166. The average cost per QALY was $2985 when benefits of the surgery were assumed to accrue for 10 years. The cost per QALY was higher for women ($3821) compared with men ($2485). Participants over the age of 70 had the highest cost per QALY ($8079/QALY)., Conclusions: Haemorrhoidectomies have been associated with significant gains in health status and are inexpensive relative to the associated gains in quality of life based on patients' perspectives of their improvement in health and well-being., (© 2024 The Authors. Colorectal Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
29. Shared Decision Making in Hallux Valgus Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study.
- Author
-
Bond M, Bicknell M, Crump T, Penner M, Veljkovic A, Wing K, Younger A, Liu G, and Sutherland JM
- Abstract
Patient-physician communication has the potential to improve outcomes and satisfaction through the shared decision-making process (SDM). This study aims to assess the relationship between perception of SDM and demographic, clinical, and patient-reported outcomes in patients undergoing Hallux Valgus (HV) correction. A prospective analysis of 306 patients scheduled for HV surgery was completed. The CollaboRATE score was used to measure SDM. Multivariable linear regression model was used to assess whether SDM scores were associated with preoperative characteristics or postoperative outcome scores. The mean CollaboRATE score was 2.9 (SD 0.9) and did not differ by age, socioeconomic status, or sex. Lower CollaboRATE scores were associated with more symptoms of depression, lower socioeconomic status, and lower general health scores (p-value < 0.05). There was no association between SDM scores and postoperative outcome scores. In this study, patients with depressive symptoms and lower socioeconomic status had worse perceptions of SDM. There was no difference in postoperative outcomes among participants based on SDM scores. Level of Evidence: Level III, prospective observational study., (© The Author(s) 2024.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
30. Content validity testing of the INTERMED Self-Assessment in a sample of adults with rheumatoid arthritis and rheumatology healthcare providers.
- Author
-
Dhiman K, Hall M, Crump T, Hoens AM, Lacaille D, Rankin JA, Then KL, Hazlewood G, Barnabe C, Katz S, Sutherland J, Dempsey E, and Barber CEH
- Subjects
- Adult, Humans, Self-Assessment, Health Personnel, Rheumatology, Arthritis, Rheumatoid psychology
- Abstract
Background: Care complexity can occur when patients experience health challenges simultaneously with social barriers including food and/or housing insecurity, lack of transportation or other factors that impact care and patient outcomes. People with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may experience care complexity due to the chronicity of their condition and other biopsychosocial factors. There are few standardised instruments that measure care complexity and none that measure care complexity specifically in people with RA., Objectives: We assessed the content validity of the INTERMEDS Self-Assessment (IMSA) instrument that measures care complexity with a sample of adults with RA and rheumatology healthcare providers (HCPs). Cognitive debriefing interviews utilising a reparative framework were conducted., Methods: Patient participants were recruited through two existing studies where participants agreed to be contacted about future studies. Study information was also shared through email blasts, posters and brochures at rheumatology clinic sites and trusted arthritis websites. Various rheumatology HCPs were recruited through email blasts, and divisional emails and announcements. Interviews were conducted with nine patients living with RA and five rheumatology HCPs., Results: Three main reparative themes were identified: (1) Lack of item clarity and standardisation including problems with item phrasing, inconsistency of the items and/or answer sets and noninclusive language; (2) item barrelling, where items asked about more than one issue, but only allowed a single answer choice; and (3) timeframes presented in the item or answer choices were either too long or too short, and did not fit the lived experiences of patients. Items predicting future healthcare needs were difficult to answer due to the episodic and fluctuating nature of RA., Conclusions: Despite international use of the IMSA to measure care complexity, patients with RA and rheumatology HCPs in our setting perceived that it did not have content validity for use in RA and that revision for use in this population under a reparative framework was unfeasible. Future instrument development requires an iterative cognitive debriefing and repair process with the population of interest in the early stages to ensure content validity and comprehension., Patient or Public Contribution: Patient and public contributions included both patient partners on the study team and people with RA who participated in the study. Patient partners were involved in study design, analysis and interpretation of the findings and manuscript preparation. Data analysis was structured according to emergent themes of the data that were grounded in patient perspectives and experiences., (© 2024 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
31. 2023 Canadian Surgery Forum: Sept. 20-23, 2023.
- Author
-
Brière R, Émond M, Benhamed A, Blanchard PG, Drolet S, Habashi R, Golbon B, Shellenberger J, Pasternak J, Merchant S, Shellenberger J, La J, Sawhney M, Brogly S, Cadili L, Horkoff M, Ainslie S, Demetrick J, Chai B, Wiseman K, Hwang H, Alhumoud Z, Salem A, Lau R, Aw K, Nessim C, Gawad N, Alibhai K, Towaij C, Doan D, Raîche I, Valji R, Turner S, Balmes PN, Hwang H, Hameed SM, Tan JGK, Wijesuriya R, Tan JGK, Hew NLC, Wijesuriya R, Lund M, Hawel J, Gregor J, Leslie K, Lenet T, McIsaac D, Hallet J, Jerath A, Lalu M, Nicholls S, Presseau J, Tinmouth A, Verret M, Wherrett C, Fergusson D, Martel G, Sharma S, McKechnie T, Talwar G, Patel J, Heimann L, Doumouras A, Hong D, Eskicioglu C, Wang C, Guo M, Huang L, Sun S, Davis N, Wang J, Skulsky S, Sikora L, Raîche I, Son HJ, Gee D, Gomez D, Jung J, Selvam R, Seguin N, Zhang L, Lacaille-Ranger A, Sikora L, McIsaac D, Moloo H, Follett A, Holly, Organ M, Pace D, Balvardi S, Kaneva P, Semsar-Kazerooni K, Mueller C, Vassiliou M, Al Mahroos M, Fiore JF Jr, Schwartzman K, Feldman L, Guo M, Karimuddin A, Liu GP, Crump T, Sutherland J, Hickey K, Bonisteel EM, Umali J, Dogar I, Warden G, Boone D, Mathieson A, Hogan M, Pace D, Seguin N, Moloo H, Li Y, Best G, Leong R, Wiseman S, Alaoui AA, Hajjar R, Wassef E, Metellus DS, Dagbert F, Loungnarath R, Ratelle R, Schwenter F, Debroux É, Wassef R, Gagnon-Konamna M, Pomp A, Richard CS, Sebajang H, Alaoui AA, Hajjar R, Dagbert F, Loungnarath R, Sebajang H, Ratelle R, Schwenter F, Debroux É, Wassef R, Gagnon-Konamna M, Pomp A, Santos MM, Richard CS, Shi G, Leung R, Lim C, Knowles S, Parmar S, Wang C, Debru E, Mohamed F, Anakin M, Lee Y, Samarasinghe Y, Khamar J, Petrisor B, McKechnie T, Eskicioglu C, Yang I, Mughal HN, Bhugio M, Gok MA, Khan UA, Fernandes AR, Spence R, Porter G, Hoogerboord CM, Neumann K, Pillar M, Guo M, Manhas N, Melck A, Kazi T, McKechnie T, Jessani G, Heimann L, Lee Y, Hong D, Eskicioglu C, McKechnie T, Tessier L, Archer V, Park L, Cohen D, Parpia S, Bhandari M, Dionne J, Eskicioglu C, Bolin S, Afford R, Armstrong M, Karimuddin A, Leung R, Shi G, Lim C, Grant A, Van Koughnett JA, Knowles S, Clement E, Lange C, Roshan A, Karimuddin A, Scott T, Nadeau K, Macmillan J, Wilson J, Deschenes M, Nurullah A, Cahill C, Chen VH, Patterson KM, Wiseman SM, Wen B, Bhudial J, Barton A, Lie J, Park CM, Yang L, Gouskova N, Kim DH, Afford R, Bolin S, Morris-Janzen D, McLellan A, Karimuddin A, Archer V, Cloutier Z, Berg A, McKechnie T, Wiercioch W, Eskicioglu C, Labonté J, Bisson P, Bégin A, Cheng-Oviedo SG, Collin Y, Fernandes AR, Hossain I, Ellsmere J, El-Kefraoui C, Do U, Miller A, Kouyoumdjian A, Cui D, Khorasani E, Landry T, Amar-Zifkin A, Lee L, Feldman L, Fiore J, Au TM, Oppenheimer M, Logsetty S, AlShammari R, AlAbri M, Karimuddin A, Brown C, Raval MJ, Phang PT, Bird S, Baig Z, Abu-Omar N, Gill D, Suresh S, Ginther N, Karpinski M, Ghuman A, Malik PRA, Alibhai K, Zabolotniuk T, Raîche I, Gawad N, Mashal S, Boulanger N, Watt L, Razek T, Fata P, Grushka J, Wong EG, Hossain I, Landry M, Mackey S, Fairbridge N, Greene A, Borgoankar M, Kim C, DeCarvalho D, Pace D, Wigen R, Walser E, Davidson J, Dorward M, Muszynski L, Dann C, Seemann N, Lam J, Harding K, Lowik AJ, Guinard C, Wiseman S, Ma O, Mocanu V, Lin A, Karmali S, Bigam D, Harding K, Greaves G, Parker B, Nguyen V, Ahmed A, Yee B, Perren J, Norman M, Grey M, Perini R, Jowhari F, Bak A, Drung J, Allen L, Wiseman D, Moffat B, Lee JKH, McGuire C, Raîche I, Tudorache M, Gawad N, Park LJ, Borges FK, Nenshi R, Jacka M, Heels-Ansdell D, Simunovic M, Bogach J, Serrano PE, Thabane L, Devereaux PJ, Farooq S, Lester E, Kung J, Bradley N, Best G, Ahn S, Zhang L, Prince N, Cheng-Boivin O, Seguin N, Wang H, Quartermain L, Tan S, Shamess J, Simard M, Vigil H, Raîche I, Hanna M, Moloo H, Azam R, Ko G, Zhu M, Raveendran Y, Lam C, Tang J, Bajwa A, Englesakis M, Reel E, Cleland J, Snell L, Lorello G, Cil T, Ahn HS, Dube C, McIsaac D, Smith D, Leclerc A, Shamess J, Rostom A, Calo N, Thavorn K, Moloo H, Laplante S, Liu L, Khan N, Okrainec A, Ma O, Lin A, Mocanu V, Karmali S, Bigam D, Bruyninx G, Georgescu I, Khokhotva V, Talwar G, Sharma S, McKechnie T, Yang S, Khamar J, Hong D, Doumouras A, Eskicioglu C, Spoyalo K, Rebello TA, Chhipi-Shrestha G, Mayson K, Sadiq R, Hewage K, MacNeill A, Muncner S, Li MY, Mihajlovic I, Dykstra M, Snelgrove R, Wang H, Schweitzer C, Wiseman SM, Garcha I, Jogiat U, Baracos V, Turner SR, Eurich D, Filafilo H, Rouhi A, Bédard A, Bédard ELR, Patel YS, Alaichi JA, Agzarian J, Hanna WC, Patel YS, Alaichi JA, Provost E, Shayegan B, Adili A, Hanna WC, Mistry N, Gatti AA, Patel YS, Farrokhyar F, Xie F, Hanna WC, Sullivan KA, Farrokhyar F, Patel YS, Liberman M, Turner SR, Gonzalez AV, Nayak R, Yasufuku K, Hanna WC, Mistry N, Gatti AA, Patel YS, Cross S, Farrokhyar F, Xie F, Hanna WC, Haché PL, Galvaing G, Simard S, Grégoire J, Bussières J, Lacasse Y, Sassi S, Champagne C, Laliberté AS, Jeong JY, Jogiat U, Wilson H, Bédard A, Blakely P, Dang J, Sun W, Karmali S, Bédard ELR, Wong C, Hakim SY, Azizi S, El-Menyar A, Rizoli S, Al-Thani H, Fernandes AR, French D, Li C, Ellsmere J, Gossen S, French D, Bailey J, Tibbo P, Crocker C, Bondzi-Simpson A, Ribeiro T, Kidane B, Ko M, Coburn N, Kulkarni G, Hallet J, Ramzee AF, Afifi I, Alani M, El-Menyar A, Rizoli S, Al-Thani H, Chughtai T, Huo B, Manos D, Xu Z, Kontouli KM, Chun S, Fris J, Wallace AMR, French DG, Giffin C, Liberman M, Dayan G, Laliberté AS, Yasufuku K, Farivar A, Kidane B, Weessies C, Robinson M, Bednarek L, Buduhan G, Liu R, Tan L, Srinathan SK, Kidane B, Nasralla A, Safieddine N, Gazala S, Simone C, Ahmadi N, Hilzenrat R, Blitz M, Deen S, Humer M, Jugnauth A, Buduhan G, Kerr L, Sun S, Browne I, Patel Y, Hanna W, Loshusan B, Shamsil A, Naish MD, Qiabi M, Nayak R, Patel R, Malthaner R, Pooja P, Roberto R, Greg H, Daniel F, Huynh C, Sharma S, Vieira A, Jain F, Lee Y, Mousa-Doust D, Costa J, Mezei M, Chapman K, Briemberg H, Jack K, Grant K, Choi J, Yee J, McGuire AL, Abdul SA, Khazoom F, Aw K, Lau R, Gilbert S, Sundaresan S, Jones D, Seely AJE, Villeneuve PJ, Maziak DE, Pigeon CA, Frigault J, Drolet S, Roy ÈM, Bujold-Pitre K, Courval V, Tessier L, McKechnie T, Lee Y, Park L, Gangam N, Eskicioglu C, Cloutier Z, McKechnie T (McMaster University), Archer V, Park L, Lee J, Patel A, Hong D, Eskicioglu C, Ichhpuniani S, McKechnie T, Elder G, Chen A, Logie K, Doumouras A, Hong D, Benko R, Eskicioglu C, Castelo M, Paszat L, Hansen B, Scheer A, Faught N, Nguyen L, Baxter N, Sharma S, McKechnie T, Khamar J, Wu K, Eskicioglu C, McKechnie T, Khamar J, Lee Y, Tessier L, Passos E, Doumouras A, Hong D, Eskicioglu C, McKechnie T, Khamar J, Sachdeva A, Lee Y, Hong D, Eskicioglu C, Fei LYN, Caycedo A, Patel S, Popa T, Boudreau L, Grin A, Wang T, Lie J, Karimuddin A, Brown C, Phang T, Raval M, Ghuman A, Candy S, Nanda K, Li C, Snelgrove R, Dykstra M, Kroeker K, Wang H, Roy H, Helewa RM, Johnson G, Singh H, Hyun E, Moffatt D, Vergis A, Balmes P, Phang T, Guo M, Liu J, Roy H, Webber S, Shariff F, Helewa RM, Hochman D, Park J, Johnson G, Hyun E, Robitaille S, Wang A, Maalouf M, Alali N, Elhaj H, Liberman S, Charlebois P, Stein B, Feldman L, Fiore JF Jr, Lee L, Hu R, Lacaille-Ranger A, Ahn S, Tudorache M, Moloo H, Williams L, Raîche I, Musselman R, Lemke M, Allen L, Samarasinghe N, Vogt K, Brackstone M, Zwiep T, Clement E, Lange C, Alam A, Ghuman A, Karimuddin A, Phang T, Raval M, Brown C, Clement E, Liu J, Ghuman A, Karimuddin A, Phang T, Raval M, Brown C, Mughal HN, Gok MA, Khan UA, Mughal HN, Gok MA, Khan UA, Mughal HN, Gok MA, Khan UA, Mughal HN, Gok MA, Khan UA, James N, Zwiep T, Van Koughnett JA, Laczko D, McKechnie T, Yang S, Wu K, Sharma S, Lee Y, Park L, Doumouras A, Hong D, Parpia S, Bhandari M, Eskicioglu C, McKechnie T, Tessier L, Lee S, Kazi T, Sritharan P, Lee Y, Doumouras A, Hong D, Eskicioglu C, McKechnie T, Lee Y, Hong D, Dionne J, Doumouras A, Parpia S, Bhandari M, Eskicioglu C, Hershorn O, Ghuman A, Karimuddin A, Brown C, Raval M, Phang PT, Chen A, Boutros M, Caminsky N, Dumitra T, Faris-Sabboobeh S, Demian M, Rigas G, Monton O, Smith A, Moon J, Demian M, Garfinkle R, Vasilevsky CA, Rajabiyazdi F, Boutros M, Courage E, LeBlanc D, Benesch M, Hickey K, Hartwig K, Armstrong C, Engelbrecht R, Fagan M, Borgaonkar M, Pace D, Shanahan J, Moon J, Salama E, Wang A, Arsenault M, Leon N, Loiselle C, Rajabiyazdi F, Boutros M, Brennan K, Rai M, Farooq A, McClintock C, Kong W, Patel S, Boukhili N, Caminsky N, Faris-Sabboobeh S, Demian M, Boutros M, Paradis T, Robitaille S, Dumitra T, Liberman AS, Charlebois P, Stein B, Fiore JF Jr, Feldman LS, Lee L, Zwiep T, Abner D, Alam T, Beyer E, Evans M, Hill M, Johnston D, Lohnes K, Menard S, Pitcher N, Sair K, Smith B, Yarjau B, LeBlanc K, Samarasinghe N, Karimuddin AA, Brown CJ, Phang PT, Raval MJ, MacDonell K, Ghuman A, Harvey A, Phang PT, Karimuddin A, Brown CJ, Raval MJ, Ghuman A, Hershorn O, Ghuman A, Karimuddin A, Raval M, Phang PT, Brown C, Logie K, Mckechnie T, Lee Y, Hong D, Eskicioglu C, Matta M, Baker L, Hopkins J, Rochon R, Buie D, MacLean A, Ghuman A, Park J, Karimuddin AA, Phang PT, Raval MJ, Brown CJ, Farooq A, Ghuman A, Patel S, Macdonald H, Karimuddin A, Raval M, Phang PT, Brown C, Wiseman V, Brennan K, Patel S, Farooq A, Merchant S, Kong W, McClintock C, Booth C, Hann T, Ricci A, Patel S, Brennan K, Wiseman V, McClintock C, Kong W, Farooq A, Kakkar R, Hershorn O, Raval M, Phang PT, Karimuddin A, Ghuman A, Brown C, Wiseman V, Farooq A, Patel S, Hajjar R, Gonzalez E, Fragoso G, Oliero M, Alaoui AA, Rendos HV, Djediai S, Cuisiniere T, Laplante P, Gerkins C, Ajayi AS, Diop K, Taleb N, Thérien S, Schampaert F, Alratrout H, Dagbert F, Loungnarath R, Sebajang H, Schwenter F, Wassef R, Ratelle R, Debroux É, Cailhier JF, Routy B, Annabi B, Brereton NJB, Richard C, Santos MM, Gimon T, MacRae H, de Buck van Overstraeten A, Brar M, Chadi S, Kennedy E, Baker L, Hopkins J, Rochon R, Buie D, MacLean A, Park LJ, Archer V, McKechnie T, Lee Y, McIsaac D, Rashanov P, Eskicioglu C, Moloo H, Devereaux PJ, Alsayari R, McKechnie T, Ichhpuniani S, Lee Y, Eskicioglu C, Hajjar R, Oliero M, Fragoso G, Ajayi AS, Alaoui AA, Rendos HV, Calvé A, Cuisinière T, Gerkins C, Thérien S, Taleb N, Dagbert F, Sebajang H, Loungnarath R, Schwenter F, Ratelle R, Wassef R, Debroux E, Richard C, Santos MM, Kennedy E, Simunovic M, Schmocker S, Brown C, MacLean A, Liberman S, Drolet S, Neumann K, Stotland P, Jhaveri K, Kirsch R, Alnajem H, Alibrahim H, Giundi C, Chen A, Rigas G, Munir H, Safar A, Sabboobeh S, Holland J, Boutros M, Kennedy E, Richard C, Simunovic M, Schmocker S, Brown C, MacLean A, Liberman S, Drolet S, Neumann K, Stotland P, Jhaveri K, Kirsch R, Bruyninx G, Gill D, Alsayari R, McKechnie T, Lee Y, Hong D, Eskicioglu C, Zhang L, Abtahi S, Chhor A, Best G, Raîche I, Musselman R, Williams L, Moloo H, Caminsky NG, Moon JJ, Marinescu D, Pang A, Vasilevsky CA, Boutros M, Al-Abri M, Gee E, Karimuddin A, Phang PT, Brown C, Raval M, Ghuman A, Morena N, Ben-Zvi L, Hayman V, Hou M (University of Calgary), Nguyen D, Rentschler CA, Meguerditchian AN, Mir Z, Fei L, McKeown S, Dinchong R, Cofie N, Dalgarno N, Cheifetz R, Merchant S, Jaffer A, Cullinane C, Feeney G, Jalali A, Merrigan A, Baban C, Buckley J, Tormey S, Benesch M, Wu R, Takabe K, Benesch M, O'Brien S, Kazazian K, Abdalaty AH, Brezden C, Burkes R, Chen E, Govindarajan A, Jang R, Kennedy E, Lukovic J, Mesci A, Quereshy F, Swallow C, Chadi S, Habashi R, Pasternak J, Marini W, Zheng W, Murakami K, Ohashi P, Reedijk M, Hu R, Ivankovic V, Han L, Gresham L, Mallick R, Auer R, Ribeiro T, Bondzi-Simpson A, Coburn N, Hallet J, Cil T, Fontebasso A, Lee A, Bernard-Bedard E, Wong B, Li H, Grose E, Brandts-Longtin O, Aw K, Lau R, Abed A, Stevenson J, Sheikh R, Chen R, Johnson-Obaseki S, Nessim C, Hennessey RL, Meneghetti AT, Bildersheim M, Bouchard-Fortier A, Nelson G, Mack L, Ghasemi F, Naeini MM, Parsyan A, Kaur Y, Covelli A, Quereshy F, Elimova E, Panov E, Lukovic J, Brierley J, Burnett B, Swallow C, Eom A, Kirkwood D, Hodgson N, Doumouras A, Bogach J, Whelan T, Levine M, Parvez E, Ng D, Kazazian K, Lee K, Lu YQ, Kim DK, Magalhaes M, Grigor E, Arnaout A, Zhang J, Yee EK, Hallet J, Look Hong NJ, Nguyen L, Coburn N, Wright FC, Gandhi S, Jerzak KJ, Eisen A, Roberts A, Ben Lustig D, Quan ML, Phan T, Bouchard-Fortier A, Cao J, Bayley C, Watanabe A, Yao S, Prisman E, Groot G, Mitmaker E, Walker R, Wu J, Pasternak J, Lai CK, Eskander A, Wasserman J, Mercier F, Roth K, Gill S, Villamil C, Goldstein D, Munro V, Pathak A (University of Manitoba), Lee D, Nguyen A, Wiseman S, Rajendran L, Claasen M, Ivanics T, Selzner N, McGilvray I, Cattral M, Ghanekar A, Moulton CA, Reichman T, Shwaartz C, Metser U, Burkes R, Winter E, Gallinger S, Sapisochin G, Glinka J, Waugh E, Leslie K, Skaro A, Tang E, Glinka J, Charbonneau J, Brind'Amour A, Turgeon AF, O'Connor S, Couture T, Wang Y, Yoshino O, Driedger M, Beckman M, Vrochides D, Martinie J, Alabduljabbar A, Aali M, Lightfoot C, Gala-Lopez B, Labelle M, D'Aragon F, Collin Y, Hirpara D, Irish J, Rashid M, Martin T, Zhu A, McKnight L, Hunter A, Jayaraman S, Wei A, Coburn N, Wright F, Mallette K, Elnahas A, Alkhamesi N, Schlachta C, Hawel J, Tang E, Punnen S, Zhong J, Yang Y, Streith L, Yu J, Chung S, Kim P, Chartier-Plante S, Segedi M, Bleszynski M, White M, Tsang ME, Jayaraman S, Lam-Tin-Cheung K, Jayaraman S, Tsang M, Greene B, Pouramin P, Allen S, Evan Nelson D, Walsh M, Côté J, Rebolledo R, Borie M, Menaouar A, Landry C, Plasse M, Létourneau R, Dagenais M, Rong Z, Roy A, Beaudry-Simoneau E, Vandenbroucke-Menu F, Lapointe R, Ferraro P, Sarkissian S, Noiseux N, Turcotte S, Haddad Y, Bernard A, Lafortune C, Brassard N, Roy A, Perreault C, Mayer G, Marcinkiewicz M, Mbikay M, Chrétien M, Turcotte S, Waugh E, Sinclair L, Glinka J, Shin E, Engelage C, Tang E, Skaro A, Muaddi H, Flemming J, Hansen B, Dawson L, O'Kane G, Feld J, Sapisochin G, Zhu A, Jayaraman S, Cleary S, Hamel A, Pigeon CA, Marcoux C, Ngo TP, Deshaies I, Mansouri S, Amhis N, Léveillé M, Lawson C, Achard C, Ilkow C, Collin Y, Tai LH, Park L, Griffiths C, D'Souza D, Rodriguez F, McKechnie T, Serrano PE, Hennessey RL, Yang Y, Meneghetti AT, Panton ONM, Chiu CJ, Henao O, Netto FS, Mainprize M, Hennessey RL, Chiu CJ, Hennessey RL, Chiu CJ, Jatana S, Verhoeff K, Mocanu V, Jogiat U, Birch D, Karmali S, Switzer N, Hetherington A, Verhoeff K, Mocanu V, Birch D, Karmali S, Switzer N, Safar A, Al-Ghaithi N, Vourtzoumis P, Demyttenaere S, Court O, Andalib A, Wilson H, Verhoeff K, Dang J, Kung J, Switzer N, Birch D, Madsen K, Karmali S, Mocanu V, Wu T, He W, Vergis A, Hardy K, Zmudzinski M, Daenick F, Linton J, Zmudzinski M, Fowler-Woods M, He W, Fowler-Woods A, Shingoose G, Vergis A, Hardy K, Lee Y, Doumouras A, Molnar A, Nguyen F, Hong D, Schneider R, Fecso AB, Sharma P, Maeda A, Jackson T, Okrainec A, McLean C, Mocanu V, Birch D, Karmali S, Switzer N, MacVicar S, Dang J, Mocanu V, Verhoeff K, Jogiat U, Karmali S, Birch D, Switzer N, McLennan S, Verhoeff K, Purich K, Dang J, Kung J, Mocanu V, McLennan S, Verhoeff K, Mocanu V, Jogiat U, Birch DW, Karmali S, Switzer NJ, Jeffery L, Hwang H, Ryley A, Schellenberg M, Owattanapanich N, Emigh B, Nichols C, Dilday J, Ugarte C, Onogawa A, Matsushima K, Martin MJ, Inaba K, Schellenberg M, Emigh B, Nichols C, Dilday J, Ugarte C, Onogawa A, Shapiro D, Im D, Inaba K, Schellenberg M, Owattanapanich N, Ugarte C, Lam L, Martin MJ, Inaba K, Rezende-Neto J, Patel S, Zhang L, Mir Z, Lemke M, Leeper W, Allen L, Walser E, Vogt K, Ribeiro T, Bateni S, Bondzi-Simpson A, Coburn N, Hallet J, Barabash V, Barr A, Chan W, Hakim SY, El-Menyar A, Rizoli S, Al-Thani H, Mughal HN, Bhugio M, Gok MA, Khan UA, Warraich A, Gillman L, Ziesmann M, Momic J, Yassin N, Kim M, Makish A, Walser E, Smith S, Ball I, Moffat B, Parry N, Vogt K, Lee A, Kroeker J, Evans D, Fansia N, Notik C, Wong EG, Coyle G, Seben D, Smith J, Tanenbaum B, Freedman C, Nathens A, Fowler R, Patel P, Elrick T, Ewing M, Di Marco S, Razek T, Grushka J, Wong EG, Park LJ, Borges FK, Nenshi R, Serrano PE, Engels P, Vogt K, Di Sante E, Vincent J, Tsiplova K, Devereaux PJ, Talwar G, Dionne J, McKechnie T, Lee Y, Kazi T, El-Sayes A, Bogach J, Hong D, Eskicioglu C, Connell M, Klooster A, Beck J, Verhoeff K, Strickland M, Anantha R, Groszman L, Caminsky NG, Watt L, Boulanger N, Razek T, Grushka J, Di Marco S, Wong EG, Livergant R, McDonald B, Binda C, Luthra S, Ebert N, Falk R, and Joos E
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
32. Associations between perceptions of shared decision making and health among hysterectomy patients: A prospective observational study.
- Author
-
Saleeb M, Mohtashami F, Gadermann A, Murphy R, Flexman A, Crump T, Liu G, and Sutherland JM
- Subjects
- Female, Humans, Prospective Studies, Canada, Pain, Decision Making, Shared, Hysterectomy
- Abstract
Objective: To investigate patient and clinical factors that are associated with perceptions of shared decision making between hysterectomy patients and surgeons and to evaluate associations between shared decision making and postoperative health., Methods: This study is based on a prospective cohort scheduled for hysterectomy for benign conditions in Vancouver, Canada. Validated patient-reported outcomes assessed shared decision making, pelvic health, depression, and pain. Regression analyses measured the association between perceptions of shared decision making with patient and clinical factors. Then, associations between shared decision making with postoperative pelvic health, pain and depression were evaluated using regression analysis and adjusted for patient and clinical factors., Results: In this study, 308 participants completed preoperative measures, and a subset of 146 participants also completed the postoperative measures. More than 50% of participants reported less than optimal shared decision making scores. No significant associations were identified between patients' perceptions of shared decision making with patients' age, comorbidities, socioeconomic factors, indication for surgery, or preoperative depression and pain. Regression analyses found that higher/better self-reported shared decision making scores were associated with fewer postoperative pelvic organ symptoms (P = 0.01)., Conclusion: Many patients' reporting lower than optimal scores on the shared decision making instrument highlight the opportunity to improve surgeon-patient communication in this surgical cohort. Strengthening shared decision making between surgeons and their patients may be associated with improved self-reported postoperative health., (© 2023 The Authors. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
33. A comparison of patient-reported outcomes among Canadian women having hysterectomies.
- Author
-
Saleeb M, Mohtashami F, Gadermann A, Murphy R, Flexman A, Crump T, Liu G, and Sutherland JM
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life psychology, Canada, Hysterectomy, Pain, Postoperative surgery, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Endometriosis
- Abstract
Purpose: Many indications for hysterectomy can negatively affect patients' quality of life. This study uses patient-reported outcomes to measure changes in self-reported health among hysterectomy patients., Method: A prospective cohort of 294 hysterectomy patients completed patient-reported outcomes preoperatively and six months postoperatively in Vancouver, Canada. Patient-reported outcomes measured pelvic health, sexual function, pain, and depression. Changes in health were compared with paired t-tests, and multi-variable regression analysis measured associations between patient and clinical factors with postoperative outcomes RESULTS: Many patients reported improvements in health. Unadjusted analysis found that 65% of participants reported less pelvic distress, 55% reported less pain, and 47% reported less depression symptoms postoperatively. Multivariable regression analysis found that poorer preoperative health was associated with poorer postoperative outcomes in all domains of health measured (p-value < 0.01). Postoperative pain scores were lower (less pain) by 0.78 among residents of the most affluent neighborhoods (p-value = 0.02) compared to those in less affluent neighborhoods. Postoperative depression scores were 1.58 points worse among participants with endometriosis (p-value = 0.03) and 1.02 points worse among participants having abdominal surgery (p-value = 0.02)., Conclusion: Many participants reported improvements in pelvic symptoms, pain, and depression after hysterectomy. Lower socioeconomic status patients may be at risk for reporting higher pain after surgery, and endometriosis patients may report higher depression. Further investigation is needed to determine effective interventions for the higher postoperative pain observed in this study for residents of less affluent neighborhoods., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
34. Differences in Preoperative Health-Related Quality of Life between Women Receiving Mastectomy or Breast Conserving Surgery in a Prospectively Recruited Cohort of Breast Cancer Patients.
- Author
-
McKevitt E, Saleeb M, Liu G, Warburton R, Pao JS, Dingee C, Bazzarelli A, Tang K, Crump T, and Sutherland JM
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Mastectomy, Segmental psychology, Quality of Life psychology, Cross-Sectional Studies, Mastectomy psychology, Breast Neoplasms complications
- Abstract
As rates of total mastectomy rise, the relationships between surgery modality with domains of health-related quality of life is not well understood. This study reports differences in depression, anxiety, pain, and health status among a cohort of women scheduled to receive total mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery. Patient-reported outcomes measured preoperative differences between patients receiving total mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery in a cross-sectional design. Regression analyses was used to model health outcomes and adjust for patient demographics on patient measures. Participants scheduled for total mastectomy were more likely to report more severe symptoms of depression and anxiety. This association was non-significant after adjusting for demographic differences. Younger participants were more likely to be scheduled for total mastectomy. Age was negatively associated with symptoms of depression and anxiety. Screening patients for mental health symptoms may be particularly important among younger patients who were more likely to report depression and anxiety before their surgery and were more likely to receive total mastectomy.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
35. A Qualitative Study of Patient and Healthcare Provider Perspectives on Building Multiphasic Exercise Prehabilitation into the Surgical Care Pathway for Head and Neck Cancer.
- Author
-
Daun JT, Twomey R, Dort JC, Capozzi LC, Crump T, Francis GJ, Matthews TW, Chandarana SP, Hart RD, Schrag C, Matthews J, McKenzie CD, Lau H, and Culos-Reed SN
- Subjects
- Critical Pathways, Health Personnel, Humans, Qualitative Research, Head and Neck Neoplasms surgery, Preoperative Exercise
- Abstract
Head and neck cancer (HNC) surgical patients experience a high symptom burden. Multiphasic exercise prehabilitation has the potential to improve patient outcomes, and to implement it into the care pathway, the perspectives of patients and healthcare providers (HCPs) must be considered. The purpose of this study was thus to gather feedback from HNC surgical patients and HCPs on building exercise into the standard HNC surgical care pathway. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients and HCPs as part of a feasibility study assessing patient-reported outcomes, physical function, and in-hospital mobilization. Interview questions included satisfaction with study recruitment, assessment completion, impact on clinical workflow (HCPs), and perceptions of a future multiphasic exercise prehabilitation program. This study followed an interpretive description methodology. Results: Ten patients and ten HCPs participated in this study. Four themes were identified: (1) acceptability and necessity of assessments, (2) the value of exercise, (3) the components of an ideal exercise program, and (4) factors to support implementation. Conclusion: These findings highlight the value of exercise across the HNC surgical timeline from both the patient and the HCP perspective. Results have informed the implementation of a multiphasic exercise prehabilitation trial in HNC surgical patients.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
36. The feasibility of patient-reported outcomes, physical function, and mobilization in the care pathway for head and neck cancer surgical patients.
- Author
-
Daun JT, Twomey R, Capozzi LC, Crump T, Francis GJ, Matthews TW, Chandarana S, Hart RD, Schrag C, Matthews J, McKenzie CD, Lau H, Dort JC, and Culos-Reed SN
- Abstract
Background: Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients are an understudied population whose treatment often includes surgery, causing a wide range of side effects. Exercise prehabilitation is a promising tool to optimize patient outcomes and may confer additional benefits as a prehabilitation tool. The primary objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of measuring patient-reported outcomes (PROs), physical function, and in-hospital mobilization across the HNC surgical timeline in advance of a future prehabilitation trial. The secondary objective was to examine potential changes in these outcomes across the surgical timeline., Methods: HNC patients scheduled to undergo oncologic resection with free-flap reconstruction completed assessments of PROs and physical function at three timepoints across the surgical timeline (baseline, in-hospital, and postsurgical/outpatient). Mobilization was measured during the in-hospital period. The feasibility of recruitment and measurement completion was tracked, as were changes in both PROs and physical function., Results: Of 48 eligible patients, 16 enrolled (recruitment rate of 33%). The baseline and in-hospital PROs were completed by 88% of participants, while the outpatient assessments were completed by 81% of participants. The baseline and in-hospital assessment of physical function were completed by 56% of participants, and 38% completed the outpatient assessment. Measuring in-hospital mobilization was completed for 63% of participants., Conclusion: Measuring PROs and in-hospital mobilization is feasible across the surgical timeline in HNC; however, the in-person assessment of physical function prior to surgery was not feasible. A multidisciplinary collaboration between exercise specialists and clinicians supported the development of new clinical workflows in HNC surgical care that will aid in the implementation of a future prehabilitation trial for this patient population., (© 2022. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
37. The relationship between perceptions of shared decision-making and patient-reported outcomes in a cross-sectional cohort of haemorrhoidectomy patients.
- Author
-
Merali K, Karimuddin A, Crump T, Brown C, Phang T, Raval M, Liu G, and Sutherland JM
- Subjects
- Cross-Sectional Studies, Decision Making, Shared, Humans, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Quality of Life, Hemorrhoidectomy
- Abstract
Aim: Shared decision-making between patients and clinicians is important to surgical practice and patients' perceptions of their healthcare experience. This study aims to measure associations between patients' perceptions of their shared decision-making (SDM) process and health-related quality of life among a cohort of patients choosing surgical management of an elective surgical procedure, haemorrhoidectomy., Methods: This study is a single-site study based in Vancouver, Canada. Consecutive patients of five colorectal surgeons registered for elective haemorrhoidectomy between September 2016 and June 2020 were eligible to participate. Participants completed the CollaboRATE instrument which measures patients' perceptions of their SDM after the surgical consultation, along with a number of other patient-reported outcomes., Results: The participation rate was 45.3%, with 157 patients scheduled for haemorrhoidectomy providing complete information. Unadjusted results found that participants having the most comorbidities reported better communication with their surgeon. The adjusted results show that socioeconomic status and depression were associated with lower CollaboRATE scores. There was no effect of sex, pain interference, anxiety or perceived health status on participants' CollaboRATE scores., Conclusion: This study found evidence that participants with lower economic status or those reporting depressive symptoms had worse perceptions of their SDM process with their surgeon. These findings suggest that special attention should be paid to the surgical decision-making process for these patient populations., (© 2021 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
38. Intravesical sequential gemcitabine and docetaxel versus bacillus calmette-guerin (BCG) plus interferon in patients with recurrent non-muscle invasive bladder cancer following a single induction course of BCG.
- Author
-
Steinberg RL, Packiam VT, Thomas LJ, Brooks N, Vitale A, Mott SL, Crump T, Wang J, DeWolf WC, Lamm DL, Kates M, Hyndman ME, Kamat AM, Bivalacqua TJ, Nepple KG, and O'Donnell MA
- Subjects
- Administration, Intravesical, Adult, Aged, Cohort Studies, Deoxycytidine administration & dosage, Female, Humans, Induction Chemotherapy, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Treatment Outcome, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms pathology, Gemcitabine, Adjuvants, Immunologic administration & dosage, Antineoplastic Agents administration & dosage, BCG Vaccine administration & dosage, Deoxycytidine analogs & derivatives, Docetaxel administration & dosage, Interferon alpha-2 administration & dosage, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local drug therapy, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms drug therapy
- Abstract
Introduction: Repeat BCG induction remains an option for select non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients who fail initial therapy. Alternative salvage intravesical regimens such as Gemcitabine and Docetaxel (Gem/Doce) have been investigated. We aimed to compare the efficacy BCG plus interferon a-2b (BCG/IFN) and Gem/Doce in patients with recurrent NMIBC after a single prior BCG course., Methods: The National Phase II BCG/IFN trial database and multi-institutional Gem/Doce database were queried for patients with recurrent NMIBC after one prior BCG induction course, excluding those with BCG unresponsive disease. Stabilized inverse probability treatment weighted survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared. Propensity scores were derived from a logistic regression model. The primary outcome was recurrence free survival (RFS); secondary outcomes were high-grade (HG) RFS and risk factors for treatment failure., Results: We identified 197 BCG/IFN and 93 Gem/Doce patients who met study criteria. Patients receiving Gem/Doce were older and more likely to have HG disease, CIS, and persistent disease following induction BCG (all P < 0.01). After propensity score-based weighting, the adjusted 1- and 2-year RFS was 61% and 53% after BCG/IFN versus 68% and 46% after Gem/Doce (P = 0.95). Adjusted 1- and 2-year HG-RFS was 60% and 51% after BCG/IFN versus 63% and 42% after Gem/Doce (P = 0.68). Multivariable Cox regression revealed that Gem/Doce treatment was not associated with an increased risk of failure (HR = 0.97, P = 0.89) as compared to BCG/IFN., Conclusion: Patients with recurrent NMIBC after a single induction BCG failure and not deemed BCG unresponsive had similar oncologic outcomes with Gem/Doce and BCG/IFN in a post-hoc analysis. Additional prospective studies are needed., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest AMK reports financial interest and/or other relationship with Merck, BMS, Arquer, MDxHealth, Photocure, Theralase, Medac, Asieris, Abbott Molecular and US Biotest. MAO reports financial interest and/or other relationship with Abbott Molecular, Photocure, UroGen, Tocogen, Cold Genesys, Medical Enterprises, Fidia Pharmaceuticals, Vaxiion Pharmaceuticals, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Sesen Bio, Urovant and Theralase. VTP reports financial interest and/or other relationship with Cold Genesys. MK reports being an advisory boards member for Genesis Biotech and Janssen; consultant for Pacific Edge, Fergene. All other authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
39. The minimally important difference of the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index for symptomatic gallstone surgery.
- Author
-
Sutherland JM, Albanese CM, Crump T, Liu G, and Karimuddin A
- Subjects
- Adult, Elective Surgical Procedures, Health Status, Humans, Retrospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Gallstones surgery, Quality of Life
- Abstract
Introduction: The Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GQLI) is used to measure domains of health and symptoms among people with gastrointestinal disorders. The objective of this study is to calculate the smallest change in the GQLI that is perceived by patients as meaningful among a sample of English-speaking adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of symptomatic gallbladder disease., Materials and Methods: The study is based on retrospective analyses of a sample of participants completing the GQLI and the EQ-5D(3L) preoperatively and six months postoperatively in Vancouver, Canada. Patients are excluded if they are less than 19 years of age, cannot communicate in English, or reside in a long-term care facility. The MID is calculated for the GQLI's domains using distribution and anchor-based methods., Results: Among eligible patients, the participation rate was 51%. The estimated MID for the overall GQLI value ranged between 4.32 and 11.44. There were no statistically significant differences in the GQLI's MID values between sexes or age subgroups. There were statistically significant differences in the GQLI's MID values by baseline health status., Discussion: This study should provide some comfort that the MID values used in discussing change in health and symptoms with elective cholecystectomy patients are robust to sex. Although the sample size may have been inadequate for age-based analyses, the study found large differences in MID values between age subgroups. Statistically significant differences in MID values based on preoperative health supports reporting MID values separately by baseline value. Further research should explore whether age-based differences in MID values exist using larger samples., (© 2021. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
40. Comparing patient-reported outcomes across countries: An assessment of methodological challenges.
- Author
-
Sutherland JM, Rajapakshe S, Crump T, Chartrand A, Liu G, and Karimuddin A
- Subjects
- Cohort Studies, Depression, Humans, Self Report, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, State Medicine
- Abstract
Objectives: There is little published literature on the comparison of patient-reported outcomes between countries. This study aimed to assess pre- and postoperative health among samples of patients undergoing elective groin hernia repair procedures in the National Health Service (NHS), England, and groin hernia patients in Vancouver, Canada., Methods: We used datasets from two different sources. For the English NHS we used published anonymized patient-level data files which include the EQ-5D(3L) patient-reported outcome measure and a number of demographic and clinical characteristics. For Vancouver, we used data from a sample of Vancouver patients who completed the same instrument during a similar time frame. English patients were matched with Vancouver participant's characteristics using propensity score methods. A linear regression model was used to measure differences in postoperative visual analogue scale values between countries, adjusting for patient characteristics., Results: Our study revealed a range of methodological issues concerning the comparability of patient-reported outcomes following hernia repair surgery in the two health systems. These related to differences in approaches to collecting patient-reported outcome measures and the nature of explanatory variables (self-report vs. administrative data), among other challenges. As a consequence, there were differences between the matched samples and the NHS data, indicating a healthy participant bias. Unadjusted results found that Vancouver patients (N = 280) reported more problems in domains of mobility, self care, usual activities and anxiety/depression than the matched cohort of NHS patients (N = 840). Interpreting differences is challenging given different sampling designs., Conclusions: There are significant hurdles facing comparisons of surgical patients' outcomes between countries, including adjusting for patient differences, health system factors and approaches to survey administration. While between-country comparisons of surgical outcomes using patient-reported outcomes shows significant promise, much work on standardizing sampling design, variables and analytic methods is needed.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
41. Measuring the impact of delayed access to elective cholecystectomy through patient's cost-utility: an observational cohort study.
- Author
-
Karimuddin A, Albanese CM, Crump T, Liu G, and Sutherland JM
- Subjects
- Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Canada epidemiology, Cholecystectomy statistics & numerical data, Comorbidity, Elective Surgical Procedures statistics & numerical data, Female, Health Expenditures, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Quality-Adjusted Life Years, Retrospective Studies, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 epidemiology, Cholecystectomy psychology, Elective Surgical Procedures psychology, Quality of Life psychology
- Abstract
Background: Deferral of surgeries due to COVID-19 has negatively affected access to elective surgery and may have deleterious consequences for patient's health. Delays in access to elective surgery are not uniform in their impact on patients with different attributes. The objective of this study is to measure the change in patient's cost utility due to delayed elective cholecystectomy., Methods: This study is based on retrospective analysis of a longitudinal sample of participants who have had elective cholecystectomy and completed the EQ-5D(3L) measuring health status preoperatively and postoperatively. Emergent cases were excluded. Patients younger than 19 years of age, unable to communicate in English or residing in a long-term care facility were ineligible. Quality-adjusted life years attributable to cholecystectomy were calculated by comparing health state utility values between the pre- and postoperative time points. The loss in quality-adjusted life years due to delayed access was calculated under four assumed scenarios regarding the length of the delay. The mean cost per quality-adjusted life years are shown for the overall sample and by sex and age categories., Results: Among the 646 eligible patients, 30.1% of participants (N = 195) completed their preoperative and postoperative EQ-5D(3L). A delay of 12 months resulted in a mean loss of 6.4%, or 0.117, of the quality-adjusted life years expected without the delay. Among patients older than 70 years of age, a 12-month delay in their surgery corresponded with a 25.1% increase in the cost per quality-adjusted life years, from $10 758 to $13 463., Conclusions: There is a need to focus on minimizing loss of quality of life for patients affected by delayed surgeries. Faced with equal delayed access to elective surgery, triage may need to prioritize older patients to maximize their health over their remaining life years., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Quality in Health Care. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
42. Incidence and predictors of early and late hospital readmission after transurethral resection of the prostate: a population-based cohort study.
- Author
-
Shamout S, Carlson K, Brotherhood HL, Crump T, and Baverstock R
- Subjects
- Aged, Canada epidemiology, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Incidence, Male, Patient Discharge trends, Prostatic Hyperplasia epidemiology, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Emergency Service, Hospital statistics & numerical data, Patient Readmission trends, Population Surveillance methods, Prostatic Hyperplasia surgery, Transurethral Resection of Prostate
- Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the incidence and predictors of hospital readmission and emergency department (ED) visits in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia treated by transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)., Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a linked administrative dataset from Calgary, Canada. Participants were men who underwent their first TURP procedure between 2015 and 2017. We examined patient demographics, and type of surgery (elective or urgent). Comorbidities were scored using the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). The primary outcomes were unplanned hospital readmissions and ED visits at 30, 60 and 90 days after TURP. The secondary aim was to identify potential predictors across these groups., Results: We identified 3059 men, most of whom underwent elective TURP (83%). The mean (sd) patient age was 71.0 (10.0) years. A total of 224 patients (7.4%) were readmitted to the hospital within 30 days, 290 (9.5%) within 60 days, and 339 (11.1%) within 90 days of discharge. The frequency of return visits within 30, 60 and 90 days of TURP were 21.4%, 26% and 28.6%, respectively. The most responsible diagnoses for ED visit within 90 days were haematuria (15.4%) and retention of urine (12.8%). Multivariable analysis showed that age (odds ratio [OR] 1.61, P < 0.001), surgery type (OR 2.20, P < 0.001), and CCI score (OR 2.03, P < 0.001) were independently associated with odds of readmission and ED visits at all time points., Conclusion: Older age, poorer health and urgent surgery predicted return to ED or readmission after TURP; efforts should be made to improve selection, counselling and preoperative optimization based on these risks., (© 2020 The Authors BJU International © 2020 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
43. Validating the Foot and Ankle Outcome score for measuring foot dysfunction among hallux valgus surgery patients using item response theory.
- Author
-
Yusuf F, Liu G, Wing K, Crump T, Penner M, Younger A, Veljkovic A, and Sutherland JM
- Subjects
- Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Ankle Joint physiopathology, Bunion complications, Bunion physiopathology, Canada, Female, Hallux Valgus complications, Hallux Valgus physiopathology, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Reproducibility of Results, Surveys and Questionnaires, Bunion surgery, Hallux Valgus surgery
- Abstract
Background: There is an absence of high quality research validating instruments that measure foot and ankle related quality of life among hallux valgus (bunion) patients' perspectives. The Foot and Ankle Outcome Scale is a patient-reported outcome instrument, that when administered to patients with symptomatic hallux valgus, provides a patient-centric perspective of their foot function. The aim of this study is to assess the psychometric properties of the instrument's five subscales among preoperative bunion surgery patients., Methods: The Foot and Ankle Outcome Scale instrument measures Pain, Symptoms, Activities of Daily Living, Sport and Recreational Activities and Foot/Ankle Related Quality of Life. Preoperative data is collected from a sample of patients scheduled for surgical treatment of their condition in Vancouver, Canada. Classical and item response theory methods are used to report on reliability, validity and differential item functioning among subgroups., Results: This study included 249 surveys, representing an overall response rate of 44.1% among 564 eligible patients. The instrument demonstrated high reliability for all subscales, though 18 items across subscales, exhibited poor discrimination between item levels. Four items score differently according to patients' sex and one item scored differently by age., Conclusions: The instrument measures five domains of health important to bunion patients. These findings suggest that the current instrument can be used with an understanding of its limitations, including redundant questions and sex-based differences. Future research should revise a number of items. The results highlight the importance of the psychometric analyses of instruments in specific patient populations., (Copyright © 2019 European Foot and Ankle Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
44. Addressing the mental health of Canadians waiting for elective surgery: a potential positive post-pandemic legacy.
- Author
-
Wiseman SM, Crump T, Cadesky E, and Sutherland JM
- Subjects
- Betacoronavirus pathogenicity, COVID-19, Canada epidemiology, Coronavirus Infections epidemiology, Coronavirus Infections transmission, Coronavirus Infections virology, Elective Surgical Procedures standards, Health Services Accessibility standards, Humans, Pneumonia, Viral epidemiology, Pneumonia, Viral transmission, Pneumonia, Viral virology, SARS-CoV-2, Time Factors, Time-to-Treatment, Waiting Lists, Coronavirus Infections prevention & control, Elective Surgical Procedures psychology, Infection Control standards, Mental Health, Pandemics prevention & control, Pneumonia, Viral prevention & control, Preoperative Care methods
- Abstract
Summary: The impact of waiting for surgery on the mental health of patients usually receives little attention. Because of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the waits for elective surgery have been lengthening, potentially inducing or exacerbating mental health burdens. Provinces' health systems need to provide better support to assess not only patients' physical health, but also their mental health, and provide them with timely access to care based on need. A stepped care approach is needed to mitigate negative mental health effects associated with prolonged waits for elective operations. To provide the best care possible, we need to recognize and address both the physical and mental health problems of our waiting patients.
- Published
- 2020
45. A Cost-Utility Study of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for the Treatment of Symptomatic Gallstones.
- Author
-
Sutherland JM, Mok J, Liu G, Karimuddin A, and Crump T
- Subjects
- Canada, Cholecystectomy, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Humans, Quality-Adjusted Life Years, Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic, Gallstones surgery
- Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a high-volume surgery that is an end-stage treatment for gallstones. There is little understanding of the surgery's effect on the gain in patients' health relative to its cost. The objective of this study is to measure health gain, cost and cost utility of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy., Methods: Participants completed the EQ-5D(3L) pre-operatively and post-operatively. Quality adjusted life years attributable to cholecystectomy were calculated by comparing health state utility values between the pre- and post-operative time points. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy cost was calculated from a health system perspective and included hospital and specialists' fees (in 2016 Canadian dollars). Cost per QALY was calculated for the entire sample and demographic sub-groups., Results: The cohort consisted of 135 participants who completed surveys between February 2013 and June 2017. The response rate among eligible patients was 50%. Assuming that health gain accrued to the participant for 25 years after cholecystectomy, the mean gain in QALYs was 1.7430, corresponding to an average cost per QALY of $2102. Older patients, on average, had less gain in QALYs than younger patients., Conclusion: Laparoscopic cholecystectomies are inexpensive relative to the gains in health they provide patients. The gains in health were not uniform across age categories. These results should provide health system planners confidence that incremental increases in surgical capacity for elective cholecystectomies is beneficial.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
46. Multi-Institution Evaluation of Sequential Gemcitabine and Docetaxel as Rescue Therapy for Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer.
- Author
-
Steinberg RL, Thomas LJ, Brooks N, Mott SL, Vitale A, Crump T, Rao MY, Daniels MJ, Wang J, Nagaraju S, DeWolf WC, Lamm DL, Kates M, Hyndman ME, Kamat AM, Bivalacqua TJ, Nepple KG, and O'Donnell MA
- Subjects
- Administration, Intravesical, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Agents administration & dosage, Biopsy, Canada epidemiology, Cystoscopy, Deoxycytidine administration & dosage, Disease-Free Survival, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents administration & dosage, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Retrospective Studies, Survival Rate trends, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, United States epidemiology, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms diagnosis, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms mortality, Gemcitabine, Deoxycytidine analogs & derivatives, Docetaxel administration & dosage, Urinary Bladder Neoplasms drug therapy
- Abstract
Purpose: Rescue intravesical therapies for patients with bacillus Calmette-Guérin failure nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer remain a critical focus of ongoing research. Sequential intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel therapy has shown safety and efficacy in 2 retrospective, single institution cohorts. This doublet has since been adopted as an intravesical salvage option at multiple institutions. We report the results of a multi-institutional evaluation of gemcitabine and docetaxel., Materials and Methods: Each institution retrospectively reviewed all records of patients treated with intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel for nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer between June 2009 and May 2018. Only patients with recurrent nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer and a history of bacillus Calmette-Guérin treatment were included in the analysis. If patients were disease-free after induction, maintenance was instituted at the treating physician's discretion. Posttreatment surveillance followed American Urological Association guidelines. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and risk factors for treatment failure were assessed with Cox regression models., Results: Overall 276 patients (median age 73 years, median followup 22.9 months) received treatment. Nine patients were unable to tolerate a full induction course. One and 2-year recurrence-free survival rates were 60% and 46%, and high grade recurrence-free survival rates were 65% and 52%, respectively. Ten patients (3.6%) had disease progression on transurethral resection. Forty-three patients (15.6%) went on to cystectomy (median 11.3 months from induction), of whom 11 (4.0%) had progression to muscle invasion. Analysis identified no patient, disease or prior treatment related factors associated with gemcitabine and docetaxel failure., Conclusions: Intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel therapy is well tolerated and effective, providing a durable response in patients with recurrent nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer after bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy. Further prospective study is warranted.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
47. Do preoperative patient-reported outcomes predict hospital length of stay for surgically-treated end-stage ankle osteoarthritis patients?
- Author
-
Sutherland JM, Rajapakshe S, Younger A, Crump T, Wing K, Liu G, and Veljkovic A
- Subjects
- Aged, Chronic Disease epidemiology, Cohort Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Preoperative Period, Social Class, Ankle Joint surgery, Arthrodesis, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle, Length of Stay, Osteoarthritis surgery, Patient Reported Outcome Measures
- Abstract
Background: End-stage ankle arthritis is often debilitating, associated with diminished mobility, pain, and reduced health related quality of life. Direct hospital costs of AA and TAA differ, with hospital length of stay being a major contributor. The objective of this study is to test the association between four patient-reported outcome measures with hospital length of stay, potentially important for preoperative planning and care., Methods: This study is based on a prospective cohort of patients scheduled for AA or TAA for end-stage ankle arthritis in the Vancouver Coastal Health authority, Canada. Participants completed a condition-specific instrument, the AOS, and three generic instruments, the PHQ-9, PEG and EQ-5D(3L) shortly after being scheduled for surgery. Multivariate mixed-effects Poisson regression models were used to measure the association between preoperative patient-reported outcome measures and length of stay., Results: Among the 183 patients eligible to participate, the participation rate was 48.5%. There were 89 participants. Participants reported a high level of preoperative ankle impairment and pain. The adjusted results found no relationship between the AOS, EQ-5D(3L) VAS or PHQ-9 values and participants' LOS. Participants with at least one chronic health condition and lowest SES category had longer LOS., Conclusions: This study found no evidence of an association between four PROs collected prior to AA or TAA with hospital LOS. This finding suggests collecting these PROs preoperatively may not help with discharge planning., (Copyright © 2019 European Foot and Ankle Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
48. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Surgery for End-Stage Ankle Arthritis.
- Author
-
Rajapakshe S, Sutherland JM, Wing K, Crump T, Liu G, Penner M, Younger A, Veljkovic A, and Redfern K
- Subjects
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Osteoarthritis psychology, Pain Measurement, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life psychology, Surveys and Questionnaires, Ankle Joint surgery, Arthrodesis, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle, Osteoarthritis surgery
- Abstract
Background: There is little research investigating which aspects of health-related quality of life change following ankle arthrodesis and total ankle replacement surgery. The objective of this study was to report on statistically and clinically relevant changes in multiple dimensions of health-related quality of life among patients undergoing ankle replacement or fusion surgery., Methods: This study was based on a prospective sample of ankle arthrodesis and total ankle replacement patients. Participants complete the Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale, EuroQoL's EQ-5D-3L, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and the pain intensity, interference with enjoyment of life, and general activity pain instrument. Instruments were completed preoperatively and postoperatively. Multivariate regression models were used to measure the change in health-related quality of life outcomes, adjusting for demographic, clinical, and health service utilization., Results: Participants achieved statistically significant improvements in health-related quality of life in each domain of measurement. The majority of participants reported clinically significant improvement in pain. Mild depressive symptoms were common, and clinically significant improvement in depression symptoms occurred in 22% of patients. Gains in health were more pronounced among participants reporting the worst preoperative health in all domains quality of life measured., Conclusions: Pain showed a clinically important improvement among 64% of participants whereas 22% reported a clinically meaningful improvement in their depression symptoms postoperatively. Clinically significant gains in health-related quality of life were not experienced by all participants in all dimensions. Further research is warranted to better understand the failure of some patients to improve in dimensions of health studied., Level of Evidence: Level III, comparative study.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
49. Minimally Important Difference in the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score Among Patients Undergoing Hallux Valgus Surgery.
- Author
-
Desai S, Peterson AC, Wing K, Younger A, Crump T, Liu G, Veljkovic A, Penner M, and Sutherland JM
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Cohort Studies, Confidence Intervals, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hallux Valgus diagnostic imaging, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Osteotomy adverse effects, Pain, Postoperative epidemiology, Pain, Postoperative physiopathology, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Visual Analog Scale, Activities of Daily Living, Hallux Valgus surgery, Osteotomy methods, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Patient Satisfaction statistics & numerical data
- Abstract
Background: Patient-reported outcomes are increasingly used as measures of effectiveness of interventions. To make the tools more useful, therapeutic thresholds known as minimally important differences have been developed. The objective of this study was to calculate minimally important differences for the domains of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score for hallux valgus surgery., Methods: The study was based on a retrospective analysis of patients newly scheduled for bunion correction surgery and completing patient-reported outcomes between October 2013 and January 2018. This study used anchor- and distribution-based approaches to calculate the minimally important difference for the instrument's 5 domains. Confidence intervals were calculated for each approach. There were 91 participants included in the study., Results: Using anchor- and distribution-based approaches, the minimally important difference for the pain domain ranged from 5.8 to 10.2, from 0.3 to 6.9 for the symptoms domain, 8.3 to 10.3 for the activities of daily living domain, 7.4 to 11.1 for the quality of life domain, and from 7.0 to 15.7 for the sports and recreation domain. Small differences in the activities of daily living domain may be more clinically important for patients with better function., Discussion: The range of minimally important difference values for each domain indicate how the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score corresponded to bunion correction surgery. The sports and recreation domain showed considerable variability in the range of values and may be associated with the domain's lack of responsiveness. Overall, most minimally important difference values for the domains of FAOS ranged from above 4 to below 16., Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative series.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
50. A Comparative Analysis of Physiotherapy for Stress Urinary Incontinence after Open or Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
- Author
-
Sehgal A, Baverstock R, Wright I, Frey C, Crump T, and Carlson K
- Abstract
Purpose: We determined whether the patient-reported benefits of physiotherapy for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) symptoms differ significantly between men who have had open prostatectomy and those who have had robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Method: We conducted a retrospective analysis of data collected from the Rapid Access Clinic 4 offered by the Prostate Cancer Centre in Calgary, Alberta. Baseline characteristics were measured at the pre-surgery appointment, including demographics, health factors, and potential risk factors for SUI. Patient-reported SUI symptoms were measured pre- and post-surgery using the global score of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence. Results: Data from 56 men were included in the analysis, evenly split between the open and robotic sub-groups. At 3 months post-surgery, no statistically significant differences were found in the factors associated with incontinence between the two sub-groups. There was a statistically significant improvement in self-reported incontinence symptom severity from 3-month to 2-year follow-up for both sub-groups. Physiotherapy did not differentially affect either sub-group in a significant way. Conclusions: The self-reported benefits of physiotherapy for SUI symptoms did not differ significantly between the two types of prostatectomy surgery at 2 years post-surgery., (© Canadian Physiotherapy Association.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.