Search

Objective The aim of the study is to evaluate whether pathologic severity of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) is correlated with the incidence of small for gestational age (SGA) and neonatal birthweight. Study Design This was a multicenter cohort study of viable, non-anomalous, singleton gestations delivered with histology-proven PAS. Data including maternal history, neonatal birthweight, and placental pathology were collected and deidentified. Pathology was defined as accreta, increta, or percreta. The primary outcome was rate of SGA defined by birth weight less than the 10th percentile. The secondary outcomes included incidence of large for gestational age (LGA) babies as defined by birth weight greater than the 90th percentile as well as incidence of SGA and LGA in preterm and term gestations. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-square, Kruskal–Wallis, and log-binomial regression. Increta and percreta patients were each compared with accreta patients. Results Among the cohort of 1,008 women from seven United States centers, 865 subjects were included in the analysis. The relative risk (RR) of SGA for increta and percreta did not differ from accreta after adjusting for confounders (adjusted RR = 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36–1.10 for increta and aRR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.45–1.16 for percreta). The results were stratified by placenta previa status, which did not affect results. There was no difference in incidence of LGA (p = 1.0) by PAS pathologic severity. The incidence of SGA for all PAS patients was 9.2% for those delivered preterm and 18.7% for those delivered at term (p = 0.004). The incidence of LGA for all PAS patients was 12.6% for those delivered preterm and 13.2% for those delivered at term (p = 0.8203). Conclusion There was no difference in incidence of SGA or LGA when comparing accreta to increta or percreta patients regardless of previa status. Although we cannot suggest causation, our results suggest that PAS, regardless of pathologic severity, is not associated with pathologic fetal growth in the preterm period. Key Points PAS severity is not associated with SGA in the preterm period. PAS severity is not associated with LGA. Placenta previa does not affect the incidence of SGA in women with PAS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives  The aim of the study is to evaluate how current management of Category II fetal heart rate tracings compares with that suggested by a published algorithm and whether these differences lead to disparate neonatal outcomes. Study Design  This is a retrospective observational study from the resident service at an academic-community tertiary care center from 2013 to 2018. We reviewed archived fetal heart rate tracings from patients with cesarean delivery performed for nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing and interpreted tracings against the algorithm. We assigned tracings to one of three categories: Group A—consistent; Group B—inconsistent too early (algorithm permits the patient to labor longer); Group C—inconsistent too late (algorithm suggests performing the cesarean delivery sooner). Maternal demographics, features of labor, and neonatal outcomes were compared. Results  Of the 110 cases, 27 (24.5%) had a cesarean delivery performed in group A, 49 (44.5%) in group B, and 34 (30.9%) in group C. Baseline characteristics were similar. Of the 49 in group B, 46 (93.9%) violated the algorithm at the same branchpoint. In group C, cesarean deliveries would have been performed on average 244 minutes earlier had the algorithm been used. Neonatal outcomes were not significantly different among the groups, including 5-minute Apgar <7, pH <7.1, and NICU admit. Conclusion  Our retrospective application of the algorithm showed that 44.5% of patients who have cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing may be able to labor longer and that violation at a common decision point on the algorithm (moderate variability or accelerations, but a lack of recurrent decelerations) is responsible for nearly all such cesarean deliveries. More studies are needed to evaluate if cesarean delivery rates for nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing can be reduced without impacting neonatal outcomes using the algorithm. Key Points There is a potential to further standardize management of Category II fetal heart rate tracings. In our practice, 25% of cesareans performed for fetal distress were consistent with the algorithm. A subset of patients (45%) with cesarean for fetal distress may have been able to labor longer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]