1. Remote monitoring of patients with COPD disease using a tablet system: a randomised crossover study of quality-of-life measurements.
- Author
-
Frerichs M, Li H, Andersson A, Andelid K, Crona M, and Vanfleteren LEGW
- Abstract
Background: Remote patient monitoring (RPM) has been evaluated in COPD, but with varying results. We aimed to evaluate whether a tablet system that monitors disease-related parameters in patients with COPD could influence physical and mental health-related quality of life, compared with usual care (UC)., Methods: 70 patients with Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) group D COPD (61% women, aged 71±8 years, forced expiratory volume in 1 s % predicted 41±13%, COPD Assessment Test (CAT) 19±7 points) were recruited at the COPD centre in Gothenburg, Sweden, and randomised to a tablet-based RPM system or UC for a 26-week period, after which they crossed over to the alternative management for another 26 weeks. The Short Form-12 (SF-12) (primary outcome), CAT, modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Dyspnoea Scale, EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were evaluated at four visits. Exacerbations were continuously reported, as was adherence to RPM., Results: 59 patients completed the study: 28 patients randomised to start with UC and 31 randomised to start with RPM. The changes in the SF-12 Physical Component Summary (PCS) (UC: -1.17±6.90 versus RPM: -1.06±8.15) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) (UC: 0.63±11.14 versus RPM: -0.63±8.15), as well as in CAT, the mMRC scale, the EQ-5D, HADS anxiety, HADS depression and number of exacerbations, were similar in both intervention periods. Neither the 26-week UC period nor the intervention significantly affected the measured outcomes. There was a 95% adherence rate during RPM., Conclusions: A 26-week tablet-based RPM system that monitors CAT, oxygen saturation, blood pressure, pulse, weight and physical activity, connected to a case manager, is feasible and safe, but did not influence health-related quality of life in patients with COPD GOLD D., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: A. Andersson reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, and Teva for lectures in pulmonary medicine and for the production of educational materials in pulmonary medicine outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: L.E.G.W. Vanfleteren reports support for the present study from the Västra Götaland region in Sweden related to healthcare transformation and digitalisation (Budget för 2018 års genomförande av omställningen av hälso- och sjukvården, Diarienummer HS 2018-00460) and from the Swedish government and country council ALF grant (ALFGBG-824371); grants from the Swedish Heart Lung Foundation, Kamprad Stiftelse and AstraZeneca; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, manuscript writing or educational events from AstraZeneca, GSK, Chiesi, Pulmonx, Grifols and Novartis; support for attending meetings from the Menarini Foundation; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board with AstraZeneca. L.E.G.W. Vanfleteren was an associate editor of this journal at the time the article was accepted. Conflict of interest: The remaining authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright ©The authors 2025.)
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF