Search

In clinical practice, the coronary artery disease (CAD) risk associated with high levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) or low levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) is assessed not by measuring LDL and HDL particles directly, but by measuring the amount of cholesterol carried by these lipoproteins. It is not generally appreciated how much the amount of cholesterol per particle varies from person to person, especially for LDL, because of differences in the relative amounts of cholesterol ester and triglycerides in the particle core as well as differences in particle diameter. As a consequence of the magnitude and prevalence of this lipid compositional variability, even the most accurate lipoprotein cholesterol measurements will, for many individuals, provide an inaccurate measure of the number of circulating lipoprotein particles and the CAD risk they confer. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy offers an efficient new means of measuring lipoprotein levels in plasma, with quantification based not on cholesterol content, but on the amplitudes of spectral signals emitted by lipoprotein subclasses of different size. Because the subclass signal amplitudes are not influenced by cholesterol compositional variability, they provide a direct measure of lipoprotein particle concentrations. NMR data from the Framingham Offspring Study demonstrate a significant "disconnect" between LDL cholesterol and LDL particle concentrations in patients with low levels of HDL cholesterol. The results imply that a substantial portion of the excess CAD risk of patients with low HDL stems from an unrecognized excess of LDL particles containing less cholesterol than normal. Patients with this abnormality would benefit from LDL-lowering therapy but are not identified as candidates for such treatment on the basis of traditional LDL cholesterol tests. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recent research has identified a unique population of 'Lean Mass Hyper-Responders' (LMHR) who exhibit increases in LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) in response to carbohydrate-restricted diets to levels ≥ 200 mg/dL, in association with HDL cholesterol ≥ 80 mg/dL and triglycerides ≤ 70 mg/dL. This triad of markers occurs primarily in lean metabolically healthy subjects, with the magnitude of increase in LDL-C inversely associated with body mass index. The lipid energy model has been proposed as one explanation for LMHR phenotype and posits that there is increased export and subsequent turnover of VLDL to LDL particles to meet systemic energy needs in the setting of hepatic glycogen depletion and low body fat. This single subject crossover experiment aimed to test the hypothesis that adding carbohydrates, in the form of Oreo cookies, to an LMHR subject on a ketogenic diet would reduce LDL-C levels by a similar, or greater, magnitude than high-intensity statin therapy. The study was designed as follows: after a 2-week run-in period on a standardized ketogenic diet, study arm 1 consisted of supplementation with 12 regular Oreo cookies, providing 100 g/d of additional carbohydrates for 16 days. Throughout this arm, ketosis was monitored and maintained at levels similar to the subject's standard ketogenic diet using supplemental exogenous d-β-hydroxybutyrate supplementation four times daily. Following the discontinuation of Oreo supplementation, the subject maintained a stable ketogenic diet for 3 months and documented a return to baseline weight and hypercholesterolemic status. During study arm 2, the subject received rosuvastatin 20 mg daily for 6 weeks. Lipid panels were drawn water-only fasted and weekly throughout the study. Baseline LDL-C was 384 mg/dL and reduced to 111 mg/dL (71% reduction) after Oreo supplementation. Following the washout period, LDL-C returned to 421 mg/dL, and was reduced to a nadir of 284 mg/dL with 20 mg rosuvastatin therapy (32.5% reduction). In conclusion, in this case study experiment, short-term Oreo supplementation lowered LDL-C more than 6 weeks of high-intensity statin therapy in an LMHR subject on a ketogenic diet. This dramatic metabolic demonstration, consistent with the lipid energy model, should provoke further research and not be seen as health advice.

Background: Cardiovascular outcomes for people with familial hypercholesterolaemia can be improved with diagnosis and medical management. However, 90% of individuals with familial hypercholesterolaemia remain undiagnosed in the USA. We aimed to accelerate early diagnosis and timely intervention for more than 1·3 million undiagnosed individuals with familial hypercholesterolaemia at high risk for early heart attacks and strokes by applying machine learning to large health-care encounter datasets., Methods: We trained the FIND FH machine learning model using deidentified health-care encounter data, including procedure and diagnostic codes, prescriptions, and laboratory findings, from 939 clinically diagnosed individuals with familial hypercholesterolaemia (395 of whom had a molecular diagnosis) and 83 136 individuals presumed free of familial hypercholesterolaemia, sampled from four US institutions. The model was then applied to a national health-care encounter database (170 million individuals) and an integrated health-care delivery system dataset (174 000 individuals). Individuals used in model training and those evaluated by the model were required to have at least one cardiovascular disease risk factor (eg, hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, or hyperlipidemia). A Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996-compliant programme was developed to allow providers to receive identification of individuals likely to have familial hypercholesterolaemia in their practice., Findings: Using a model with a measured precision (positive predictive value) of 0·85, recall (sensitivity) of 0·45, area under the precision-recall curve of 0·55, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0·89, we flagged 1 331 759 of 170 416 201 patients in the national database and 866 of 173 733 individuals in the health-care delivery system dataset as likely to have familial hypercholesterolaemia. Familial hypercholesterolaemia experts reviewed a sample of flagged individuals (45 from the national database and 103 from the health-care delivery system dataset) and applied clinical familial hypercholesterolaemia diagnostic criteria. Of those reviewed, 87% (95% Cl 73-100) in the national database and 77% (68-86) in the health-care delivery system dataset were categorised as having a high enough clinical suspicion of familial hypercholesterolaemia to warrant guideline-based clinical evaluation and treatment., Interpretation: The FIND FH model successfully scans large, diverse, and disparate health-care encounter databases to identify individuals with familial hypercholesterolaemia., Funding: The FH Foundation funded this study. Support was received from Amgen, Sanofi, and Regeneron., (Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Triglycerides are the conventional tool to measure VLDLs, whereas LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) is the conventional tool to measure LDLs. Multiple epidemiological studies, including a series of genetically based analyses, have demonstrated that cardiovascular risk is related to triglycerides independently of LDL-C, and this has led to a series of new therapeutic agents designed specifically to reduce plasma triglycerides. The triglyceride hypothesis posits that increased levels of triglycerides increase cardiovascular risk and decreasing plasma triglycerides decreases cardiovascular risk. In this work, we will examine the validity of the triglyceride hypothesis by detailing the biological complexities associated with hypertriglyceridemia, the genetic epidemiological evidence in favor of hypertriglyceridemia, the evidence from the fibrate randomized clinical trials relating triglycerides and clinical outcomes, and the completeness of the evidence from the initial studies of novel mutations and the therapeutic agents based on these mutations that lower triglycerides. Because of the multiple metabolic links between VLDL and LDL, we will try to demonstrate that measuring triglycerides and LDL-C alone are inadequate to document the lipoprotein profile. We will try to demonstrate that apoB must be measured, as well as triglycerides and cholesterol, to have an accurate estimate of lipoprotein status., (Copyright © 2018 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.)

A recent analysis of a commercially insured US population found fewer cardiovascular disease (CVD) events in high-risk patients attaining low levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL), as measured by LDL particle number (LDL-P) versus low LDL cholesterol (LDL-C). Here, we investigated the cost effectiveness of LDL-lowering therapy guided by LDL-P. Patients were selected from the HealthCore Integrated Research Database and followed for 12 to 36 months. Patients who achieved LDL-P <1,000 nmol/l were placed into the LDL-P cohort, whereas those without LDL-P tests, but who achieved LDL-C <100 mg/dl, were placed into the LDL-C cohort. CVD-related costs included all health plan paid amounts related to CVD events or lipid management. Cost effectiveness was assessed through incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, defined as difference in total costs across the cohorts divided by difference in CVD events, measured over follow-up. Each cohort included 2,094, 1,242, and 705 patients over 12-, 24-, and 36-month follow-up. Patients in the LDL-P cohort received more aggressive lipid-lowering therapy and had fewer CVD events during follow-up compared to patients in the LDL-C cohort. This led to greater pharmacy costs and lower medical costs over time. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio estimates ranged from $23,131 per CVD event avoided at 12 months to $3,439 and -$4,555 at 24- and 36-month follow-up, suggesting a high likelihood that achieving LDL-P <1,000 nmol/l is cost effective. In conclusion, LDL-lowering therapy guided by LDL-P was demonstrated to be cost effective, with greater clinical and economic benefit seen over longer time horizons and with the increased use of generic statins., (Copyright © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Because of variability in lipoprotein cholesterol content, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol frequently underrepresents or overrepresents the number of LDL particles. Mipomersen is an antisense oligonucleotide that reduces hepatic production of apolipoprotein B-100, the sole apolipoprotein of LDL., Objective: To characterize the effects of mipomersen on lipoprotein particle numbers as well as subclass distribution using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy., Methods: We compared the tertiary results for the direct measurement of LDL particle numbers by NMR among 4 placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies of mipomersen that had similar study designs but different patient populations: homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH), severe hypercholesterolemia, heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia with established coronary artery disease, or hypercholesterolemia with high risk for coronary heart disease (HC-CHD)., Results: HoFH patients had the highest median total LDL particles at baseline compared with HC-CHD patients, who had the lowest. At baseline, the HoFH population uniquely had a greater mean percentage of large LDL particles (placebo, 60.2%; mipomersen, 54.9%) compared with small LDL particles (placebo, 33.1%; mipomersen, 38.9%). In all 4 studies, mipomersen was associated with greater reductions from baseline in the concentrations of small LDL particles compared with those of large LDL particles, and both total LDL particles and small LDL particles were statistically significantly reduced., Conclusions: Mipomersen consistently reduced all LDL particle numbers and preferentially reduced the concentration of small LDL particles in all 4 phase 3 studies., (Copyright © 2015 National Lipid Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study sought to examine the efficacy and safety of mipomersen for reducing atherogenic lipids and lipoproteins in patients with hypercholesterolemia., Background: Many patients on lipid-lowering therapies remain unable to achieve target low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels. Mipomersen, an antisense oligonucleotide inhibitor of apolipoprotein B, reduces LDL cholesterol and atherogenic lipoproteins., Methods: This randomized, double-blind, multicenter study enrolled 158 patients with baseline LDL cholesterol levels ≥100 mg/dl with, or at high risk for, coronary heart disease who were receiving maximally tolerated lipid-lowering therapy. Patients received weekly subcutaneous mipomersen 200 mg (n = 105) or placebo (n = 52) for 26 weeks, with a 24-week follow-up period. Randomization was stratified by type 2 diabetes status., Results: Sixty mipomersen and 44 placebo patients completed treatment. Mean baseline LDL cholesterol levels were 122.7 and 122.6 mg/dl in the placebo and mipomersen patients, respectively. Mipomersen reduced LDL cholesterol by -36.9% compared with placebo at -4.5% (p < 0.001). Target LDL cholesterol <100 mg/dl was attained in 76% of mipomersen and 38% of placebo patients. Mipomersen also significantly reduced apolipoprotein B (-38%) and lipoprotein(a) (-24%) (p < 0.001). Common adverse events included injection site reactions (78% with mipomersen, 31% with placebo) and flu-like symptoms (34% with mipomersen, 21% with placebo). Elevations in transaminases and liver fat also occurred in some patients, and these levels returned toward baseline after treatment cessation., Conclusions: Mipomersen significantly reduced LDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, and lipoprotein(a) in patients with hypercholesterolemia with, or at risk for, coronary heart disease not controlled by existing therapies. (Safety and Efficacy of Mipomersen [ISIS 301012] as Add-On Therapy in High Risk Hypercholesterolemic Patients; NCT00770146)., (Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel guidelines have established low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) treatment goals, and secondary non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-C treatment goals for persons with hypertriglyceridemia. The use of lipid-lowering therapies, particularly statins, to achieve these goals has reduced cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality; however, significant residual risk for events remains. This, combined with the rising prevalence of obesity, which has shifted the risk profile of the population toward patients in whom LDL-C is less predictive of CVD events (metabolic syndrome, low HDL-C, elevated triglycerides), has increased interest in the clinical use of inflammatory and lipid biomarker assessments. Furthermore, the cost effectiveness of pharmacological intervention for both the initiation of therapy and the intensification of therapy has been enhanced by the availability of a variety of generic statins. This report describes the consensus view of an expert panel convened by the National Lipid Association to evaluate the use of selected biomarkers [C-reactive protein, lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2), apolipoprotein B, LDL particle concentration, lipoprotein(a), and LDL and HDL subfractions] to improve risk assessment, or to adjust therapy. These panel recommendations are intended to provide practical advice to clinicians who wrestle with the challenges of identifying the patients who are most likely to benefit from therapy, or intensification of therapy, to provide the optimum protection from CV risk., (Copyright © 2011 National Lipid Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The familial hypercholesterolemias (FH) are a group of genetic defects resulting in severe elevations of blood cholesterol levels and increased risk of premature coronary heart disease. FH is among the most commonly occurring congenital metabolic disorders. FH is a treatable disease. Aggressive lipid lowering is necessary to achieve the target LDL cholesterol reduction of at least 50% or more. Even greater target LDL cholesterol reductions may be necessary for FH patients who have other CHD risk factors. Despite the prevalence of this disease and the availability of effective treatment options, FH is both underdiagnosed and undertreated, particularly among children. Deficiencies in the diagnosis and treatment of FH indicate the need for greatly increased awareness and understanding of this disease, both on the part of the public and of healthcare practitioners. This document provides recommendations for the screening, diagnosis and treatment of FH in pediatric and adult patients developed by the National Lipid Association Expert Panel on Familial Hypercholesterolemia. This report goes beyond previously published guidelines by providing specific clinical guidance for the primary care clinician and lipid specialist with the goal of improving care of patients with FH and reducing their elevated risk for CHD., (Copyright © 2011 National Lipid Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia is a rare genetic disorder in which both LDL-receptor alleles are defective, resulting in very high concentrations of LDL cholesterol in plasma and premature coronary artery disease. This study investigated whether an antisense inhibitor of apolipoprotein B synthesis, mipomersen, is effective and safe as an adjunctive agent to lower LDL cholesterol concentrations in patients with this disease., Methods: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study was undertaken in nine lipid clinics in seven countries. Patients aged 12 years and older with clinical diagnosis or genetic confirmation of homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia, who were already receiving the maximum tolerated dose of a lipid-lowering drug, were randomly assigned to mipomersen 200 mg subcutaneously every week or placebo for 26 weeks. Randomisation was computer generated and stratified by weight (<50 kg vs >/=50 kg) in a centralised blocked randomisation, implemented with a computerised interactive voice response system. All clinical, medical, and pharmacy personnel, and patients were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was percentage change in LDL cholesterol concentration from baseline. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00607373., Findings: 34 patients were assigned to mipomersen and 17 to placebo; data for all patients were analysed. 45 patients completed the 26-week treatment period (28 mipomersen, 17 placebo). Mean concentrations of LDL cholesterol at baseline were 11.4 mmol/L (SD 3.6) in the mipomersen group and 10.4 mmol/L (3.7) in the placebo group. The mean percentage change in LDL cholesterol concentration was significantly greater with mipomersen (-24.7%, 95% CI -31.6 to -17.7) than with placebo (-3.3%, -12.1 to 5.5; p=0.0003). The most common adverse events were injection-site reactions (26 [76%] patients in mipomersen group vs four [24%] in placebo group). Four (12%) patients in the mipomersen group but none in the placebo group had increases in concentrations of alanine aminotransferase of three times or more the upper limit of normal., Interpretation: Inhibition of apolipoprotein B synthesis by mipomersen represents a novel, effective therapy to reduce LDL cholesterol concentrations in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia who are already receiving lipid-lowering drugs, including high-dose statins., Funding: ISIS Pharmaceuticals and Genzyme Corporation., (Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Managing low-density lipoprotein (LDL) is an integral part of clinical practice. What remains controversial is whether we are using the best measure of LDL quantity for this purpose. Historically, the cholesterol content of LDL particles (LDLC) has been used to express LDL quantity. However, because of variability in the cholesterol carried in LDL particles, frequent disagreement occurs between LDLC and particle measures of LDL quantity, including apolipoprotein B-100 (apo B) or nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) LDL particle number (LDL-P). Studies consistently demonstrate apo B and LDL-P are superior predictors of coronary heart disease (CHD) risk and superior indicators of low CHD risk on lipid-lowering therapy. Recent recommendations advocate that, in addition to LDLC and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apo B (or NMR LDL-P) be used as a target of therapy. This article reviews the rationale supporting these recommendations and provides a model for integrating LDL particle measures in clinical practice.

Background: The cholesterol content of LDL particles is variable, causing frequent discrepancies between concentrations of LDL cholesterol and LDL particle number. In managing patients at risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) to LDL target levels, it is unclear whether LDL cholesterol provides the optimum measure of residual risk and adequacy of LDL lowering treatment., Objective: To compare the ability of alternative measures of LDL to provide CVD risk discrimination at relatively low levels consistent with current therapeutic targets., Methods: Concentrations of LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) and non-HDL cholesterol (non-HDL-C) were measured chemically and LDL particle number (LDL-P) and VLDL particle number (VLDL-P) were measured by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) in 3066 middle-aged white participants (53% women) without CVD in the Framingham Offspring cohort. The main outcome measure was incidence of first CVD event., Results: At baseline, the cholesterol content per LDL particle was negatively associated with triglycerides and positively associated with LDL-C. On follow-up (median 14.8 yrs), 265 men and 266 women experienced a CVD event. In multivariable models adjusting for non-lipid CVD risk factors, LDL-P was related more strongly to future CVD in both sexes than LDL-C or non-HDL-C. Subjects with a low level of LDL-P (<25(th) percentile) had a lower CVD event rate (59 events per 1000 person-years) than those with an equivalently low level of LDL-C or non-HDL-C (81 and 74 events per 1000 person-years, respectively)., Conclusions: In a large community-based sample, LDL-P was a more sensitive indicator of low CVD risk than either LDL-C or non-HDL-C, suggesting a potential clinical role for LDL-P as a goal of LDL management.

The protective role played by high-density lipoprotein (HDL) in atherogenesis is well-accepted, as is the significant inverse association of HDL cholesterol (HDL-C) with coronary heart disease (CHD) risk. What remains controversial is whether we are using the best measure(s) of HDL to identify and manage HDL-related cardiovascular risk. Measuring particle number has been postulated to offer additional and possibly more specific information regarding risk. Although HDL-C is thought to indicate the quantity of circulating HDL particles, it is underappreciated that the amount of cholesterol carried inside lipoprotein particles is highly variable among individuals with the same HDL-C. Numerous trials have investigated the relations of CHD with various measures of HDL other than those based on cholesterol content of the particles present. Studies regarding the association of alternate measures of HDL with CHD risk have been mixed, possibly due to diversity in clinical characteristics accompanying low HDL-C states, variability in cholesterol content of HDL particles, and substantial inter-correlations of HDL with other lipoprotein particles. Additional research is needed to assess the clinical settings in which individual HDL tests, after multivariate adjustment for confounding factors, provide superior independent prediction of CHD events beyond HDL-C. Such studies show promise in defining measures of particle number that will prove useful in future strategies to enhance management of CHD risk and assess response to therapy at an individual patient level.

Laboratory measurements of plasma lipids (principally cholesterol and triglycerides) and lipoprotein lipids (principally low-density lipoprotein [LDL] and low-density lipoprotein [HDL] cholesterol) are the cornerstone of the clinical assessment and management of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. LDL particles, and to a lesser extent very-low-density lipoprotein [VLDL] particles, cause atherosclerosis, whereas HDL particles prevent or reverse this process through reverse cholesterol transport. The overall risk for CVD depends on the balance between the "bad" LDL (and VLDL) and "good" HDL particles. Direct assessment of lipoprotein particle numbers us now possible through nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopic analysis.

The key role played by low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles in the pathogenesis of coronary heart disease (CHD) is well accepted, as is the benefit of lowering LDL in high-risk patients. What remains controversial is whether we are using the best measure(s) of LDL to identify all individuals who would benefit from therapy. Many studies have shown that, at a given level of LDL cholesterol, individuals with predominantly small LDL particles (pattern B) experience greater CHD risk than those with larger-size LDL. However, it is not clear from this observation that small LDL particles are inherently more atherogenic than large ones because, at a given level of LDL cholesterol, individuals with small LDL have more LDL particles in total. The phenotype of small LDL particle size co-segregates with a cluster of metabolic factors, including elevated triglycerides and reduced HDL cholesterol, and in multivariate analyses has generally been found not to be independently associated with CHD risk. In contrast, LDL particle number measured by nuclear magnetic resonance has consistently been shown to be a strong, independent predictor of CHD.

The purpose of this study was to determine if long-term use of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin, or simvastatin) resulted in tachyphylaxis (a decreasing response to a physiologically active agent). To determine this, the charts of 254 patients treated with statins from the years 1996 to 1998 were retrospectively reviewed. During treatment, the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels of patients were followed for a minimum of 300 days. To characterize LDL cholesterol changes during statin therapy, linear and nonlinear kinetic models were generated. Tachyphylaxis, defined as a positive slope of LDL cholesterol over time, after maximum LDL cholesterol reduction, was identified in patients treated with atorvastatin at exposure doses of 10 or 20 mg/day. All other statins, at all doses reviewed, showed no [corrected] evidence of tachyphylaxis. LDL cholesterol tachyphylaxis appeared to be a unique response to prolonged use of long half-life atorvastatin therapy at exposure dosages.