Search

Objectives: Mycobacterium abscessus complex is responsible for 2.6-13.0% of all non-tuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary infections and these are notoriously difficult to treat due to the complex regimens required, drug resistance and adverse effects. Hence, bacteriophages have been considered in clinical practice as an additional treatment option. Here, we evaluated antibiotic and phage susceptibility profiles of M. abscessus clinical isolates. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) revealed the phylogenetic relationships, dominant circulating clones (DCCs), the likelihood of patient-to-patient transmission and the presence of prophages., Methods: Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed using CLSI breakpoints (n = 95), and plaque assays were used for phage susceptibility testing (subset of n = 88, 35 rough and 53 smooth morphology). WGS was completed using the Illumina platform and analysed using Snippy/snp-dists and Discovery and Extraction of Phages Tool (DEPhT)., Results: Amikacin and Tigecycline were the most active drugs (with 2 strains resistant to amikacin, and one strain with Tigecycline MIC of 4 μg/mL). Most strains were resistant to all other drugs tested, with Linezolid and Imipenem showing the least resistance, at 38% (36/95) and 55% (52/95), respectively. Rough colony morphotype strains were more phage-susceptible than smooth strains (77%-27/35 versus 48%-25/53 in the plaque assays, but smooth strains are not killed efficiently by those phages in liquid infection assay). We have also identified 100 resident prophages, some of which were propagated lytically. DCC1 (20%-18/90) and DCC4 (22%-20/90) were observed to be the major clones and WGS identified 6 events of possible patient-to-patient transmission., Discussion: Many strains of M. abscessus complex are intrinsically resistant to available antibiotics and bacteriophages represent an alternative therapeutic option, but only for strains with rough morphology. Further studies are needed to elucidate the role of hospital-borne M. abscessus transmission., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Mycobacteriophages show promise as therapeutic agents for non-tuberculous mycobacterium infections. However, little is known about phage recognition of Mycobacterium cell surfaces or mechanisms of phage resistance. We show here that trehalose polyphleates (TPPs)-high-molecular-weight, surface-exposed glycolipids found in some mycobacterial species-are required for infection of Mycobacterium abscessus and Mycobacterium smegmatis by clinically useful phages BPs and Muddy. TPP loss leads to defects in adsorption and infection and confers resistance. Transposon mutagenesis shows that TPP disruption is the primary mechanism for phage resistance. Spontaneous phage resistance occurs through TPP loss by mutation, and some M. abscessus clinical isolates are naturally phage-insensitive due to TPP synthesis gene mutations. Both BPs and Muddy become TPP-independent through single amino acid substitutions in their tail spike proteins, and M. abscessus mutants resistant to TPP-independent phages reveal additional resistance mechanisms. Clinical use of BPs and Muddy TPP-independent mutants should preempt phage resistance caused by TPP loss., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Nontuberculous Mycobacterium infections, particularly Mycobacterium abscessus, are increasingly common among patients with cystic fibrosis and chronic bronchiectatic lung diseases. Treatment is challenging due to intrinsic antibiotic resistance. Bacteriophage therapy represents a potentially novel approach. Relatively few active lytic phages are available and there is great variation in phage susceptibilities among M. abscessus isolates, requiring personalized phage identification., Methods: Mycobacterium isolates from 200 culture-positive patients with symptomatic disease were screened for phage susceptibilities. One or more lytic phages were identified for 55 isolates. Phages were administered intravenously, by aerosolization, or both to 20 patients on a compassionate use basis and patients were monitored for adverse reactions, clinical and microbiologic responses, the emergence of phage resistance, and phage neutralization in serum, sputum, or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid., Results: No adverse reactions attributed to therapy were seen in any patient regardless of the pathogen, phages administered, or the route of delivery. Favorable clinical or microbiological responses were observed in 11 patients. Neutralizing antibodies were identified in serum after initiation of phage delivery intravenously in 8 patients, potentially contributing to lack of treatment response in 4 cases, but were not consistently associated with unfavorable responses in others. Eleven patients were treated with only a single phage, and no phage resistance was observed in any of these., Conclusions: Phage treatment of Mycobacterium infections is challenging due to the limited repertoire of therapeutically useful phages, but favorable clinical outcomes in patients lacking any other treatment options support continued development of adjunctive phage therapy for some mycobacterial infections., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. G. F. H. is a consultant for and receives grant support not directly related to this work from Janssen Pharmaceuticals (Collaborative Research Agreement); reports consulting fees from Janssen Inc and Tessera Inc; and reports presentation honoraria from the Pittsburgh Foundation and a leadership or fiduciary role with the Charles E. Kaufman Foundation scientific advisory board. R. M. De. and G. F. H. are co-inventors on patent applications related to the use of phages for treating nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) infections filed by the University of Pittsburgh of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education. D. v. D. is a consultant for Actavis, Tetraphase, Sanofi Pasteur, MedImmune, Astellas, Merck, Allergan, T2Biosystems, Roche, Achaogen, Neumedicine, Shionogi, Pfizer, Entasis, QPex, Wellspring, Karius, Melinta, and Utility; receives an editor’s stipend from British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy; has received funding for unrelated projects from NIH, Merck, and Shionogi; reports payments for lectures, presentations, speaker’s bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Pfizer and Entasis; reports paid participation on a data and safety monitoring board (DSMB) or advisory board for Utility, Union, Entasis, and Merck; and reports a paid leadership or fiduciary role with the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. K. A. C. has received consulting fees from Insmed (clinical trial site), Hillrom (clinical trial site), Paratek, Microbion, and AN2, and reports honoraria for a presentation from Insmed. G. H. receives grant support unrelated to this study from Karius, Allovir, and AstraZeneca, and reports participation on a DSMB or advisory board with Karius. R. T. S. is a paid consultant to Vir Biotechnology and to LysNtech; holds stock options in Antiva Biosciences and CytoDyn and stock or stock options with NoniGenex and Arcturus; previously served as an uncompensated member of the AmpliPhi scientific advisory board; reports grants or contracts paid to institution from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; reports consulting fees from Pfizer, Sempra Energy, and Nurix; has patents planned, issued, or pending for orally bioavailable anti-coronavirus compounds; reports paid participation on DSMBs or advisory boards for Merck, VIr Biosciences, SNIPR Biome, and Pardes Biosciences; and holds leadership or fiduciary roles with the International Antiviral Society (IAS)–USA and Specialists in Global Health. C. A. B. reports contracts to institution for clinical trials from Gilead and DNAe; payment to author for educational lectures from IAS-USA, Practice Point Communications (Optimal Management of HIV Disease and Hepatitis Clinical Conference [OPMAN] conference), and University of Arizona; has received payment for travel to the OPMAN conference from Practice Point Communications; served on a DSMB for ViiV/GlaxoSmith Kline; has held unpaid volunteer roles with IAS-USA and the Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections Foundation Board; and has served as Deputy Editor/Associate Editor for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. A. K. reports the following grants or contracts unrelated to this work: National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC, Australia) Investigator Grant at Emerging Leadership 1 level, Conquer CF, Innovation Grant from Cystic Fibrosis Australia, Research Establishment Fellowship from the Royal Australasian College of Physicians and Research Award from the Australasian Society for Infectious Diseases (all paid to institution); payment to institution for grant application review for the Italian Cystic Fibrosis Research Foundation; unpaid role as member of DSMB for FluBubs (Safety and Immunogenicity of Early Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine); unpaid leadership or fiduciary roles as Deputy Director (Clinical) of Phage Australia, pediatric infectious diseases research representative on the Australian Society for Infectious Diseases Clinical Research Network Steering Committee and the Australia and New Zealand Paediatric Infectious Diseases Group Executive Committee, member of the Sydney Children’s Hospitals Network Human Research Ethics Committee Scientific Advisory Committee, and member of the Sydney Children’s Hospitals Network Advanced Therapeutics Steering Committee. A. W. B. reports a role as a part-time employee of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation, which provides some grant support to G. F. H.’s laboratory and, for the purposes of this manuscript, is the treating physician of one of the NTM patients in the cystic fibrosis clinic at Inova Fairfax Hospital. C. B. G. reports consulting fees from Advisory Janssen. B. J. M. reports an NHMRC Investigator Grant and philanthropic grant from the Curing Homesickness Foundation, both paid to institution and unrelated to this work; unpaid participation as member of the DSMB for the PATRIC trial; and unpaid position as board director of the Australasian Society for Infectious Diseases. M. G. T. O. reports a Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Adult Center Award and Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Therapeutic Development Center Award, unrelated to this work; support for attending meetings and/or travel, paid to University of Miami, from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Adult Center Award for attending North American Cystic Fibrosis Conference and a Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Therapeutic Development Center Award for attending the Therapeutics Development Network spring meeting; and an unpaid position as Cystic Fibrosis Lifestyle Foundation board member. J. I. reports an Investigator Grant (personal support) unrelated to this work from NHMRC. A. M. reports consulting fees paid to author as a member of the Air Liquide Advisory Board. J. A. N. reports contracts or grants unrelated to this work from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. M. S. reports funding on a project to set up a phage therapy laboratory in Finland, unrelated to this work, from the Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation. P. W. reports consulting fees from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Sanofi Regeneron, and Vertex; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker’s bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Vertex; and a leadership or fiduciary role with the Cystic Fibrosis Australia National Asthma Council of Australia. D. E. M. reports stock or stock options (no payments) with Moderna (1 share) and Pfizer (5 shares). R. M. Da. reports grants from the NIH unrelated to this work (grant number K01-AI125726 [principal investigator]). All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Background: COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease 2019) refers to a mainly respiratory disease, caused by a new SARS-CoV-2 virus predominantly transmitted through direct or indirect contact with mucous membranes of eyes, mouth, or nose. The main control measures are physical distancing, use of specific protective devices, hand hygiene and disinfection of environments and tools. During this health emergency, telemedicine and telerehabilitation guaranteed patients to receive continuity of care through a virtual support while maintaining physical distance., Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of telerehabilitation on gross motor skills in children with cerebral palsy (CP) during COVID-19 lockdown., Design: This is an observational study., Setting: Pediatric Outpatient Neurorehabilitation Service., Population: Fifty-three children with cerebral palsy aged between 6 months and 12 years classified according to the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS)., Methods: Variation on the Gross Motor Function Measure-66 (GMFM-66) Score calculated before and after the telerehabilitation period was analyzed., Results: After telerehabilitation there was a statistically significant increase in the median value of GMFM scores both on the total sample (from 54.82% to 63.18%, P=0.000005) and in the subgroups. Specifically, in children classified as level I and II at the GMFCS, this value increased more after the telerehabilitation period. Only the GMFCS level V group did not show statistically significant changes and only in two cases a decrease in the GMFM Score after the telerehabilitation phase occurred., Conclusions: Telerehabilitation can be considered an efficient tool that can temporarily replace the in-person therapy. It can allow the patient or caregiver to acquire skills in performing home exercises and to integrate and implement activity carried out at the Rehabilitation Center., Clinical Rehabilitation Impact: This study shows a positive effect of telerehabilitation on gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy.

Mycobacterium chelonae is a rare cause of chronic disseminated cutaneous infections in immunocompromised patients. Multidrug-resistant M. chelonae infections present a challenge for treatment, and prolonged antimicrobial courses lead to significant toxicities and further antimicrobial resistance. We report a case of refractory cutaneous disseminated M. chelonae infection in a patient with seronegative arthritis on immunotherapy with tofacitinib that was treated with combination antimicrobial, surgical, and single bacteriophage therapy with excellent clinical response. The patient developed neutralizing antibodies against the bacteriophage but continues to have stable improvement of disease with negative biopsies and no evidence of bacterial resistance to the phage., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

An elderly man with refractory Mycobacterium abscessus lung disease previously developed anti-phage neutralizing antibodies while receiving intravenous phage therapy. Subsequent phage nebulization resulted in transient weight gain, decreased C-reactive protein, and reduced Mycobacterium burden. Weak sputum neutralization may have limited the outcomes, but phage resistance was not a contributing factor., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.)

Contact with environmental microbes are arguably the most common species interaction in which any animal participates. Studies have noted diverse relationships between hosts and resident microbes, which can have strong consequences for host development, physiology, and behavior. Many of these studies focus specifically on pathogens or beneficial microbes, while the benign microbes, of which the majority of bacteria could be described, are often ignored. Here, we explore the nature of the relationships between the grass spider Agelenopsis pennsylvanica and bacteria collected from their cuticles in situ . First, using culture-based methods, we identified a portion of the cuticular bacterial communities that are naturally associated with these spiders. Then, we topically exposed spiders to a subset of these bacterial monocultures to estimate how bacterial exposure may alter 3 host behavioral traits: boldness, aggressiveness, and activity level. We conducted these behavioral assays 3 times before and 3 times after topical application, and compared the changes observed in each trait with spiders that were exposed to a sterile control treatment. We identified 9 species of bacteria from the cuticles of 36 spiders and exposed groups of 20 spiders to 1 of 4 species of cuticular bacteria. We found that exposure to Dermacoccus nishinomiyaensis and Staphylococcus saprophyticus was associated with a 10-fold decrease in the foraging aggressiveness of spiders toward prey in their web. Since bacterial exposure did not have survival consequences for hosts, these data suggest that interactions with cuticular bacteria, even non-pathogenic bacteria, could alter host behavior.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1093/cz/zox064.]