Search

Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (pMCS) is increasingly used in patients with poor left-ventricular (LV) function undergoing elective high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (HR-PCIs). These patients are often in critical condition and not suitable candidates for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. For the definition of HR-PCI, there is a growing consensus that multiple factors must be considered to define the complexity of PCI. These include haemodynamic status, left-ventricular ejection fraction, clinical characteristics, and concomitant diseases, as well as the complexity of the coronary anatomy/lesions. Although haemodynamic support by percutaneous LV assist devices is commonly adopted in HR-PCI (protected PCI), there are no clear guideline recommendations for indication due to limited published data. Therefore, decisions to use a nonsurgical, minimally invasive procedure in HR-PCI patients should be based on a risk–benefit assessment by a multidisciplinary team. Here, the current evidence and indications for protected PCI will be discussed.

Coronary vasomotor abnormalities are important causes of myocardial ischemia in patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease (NOCAD). However, the role of air pollution in determining coronary vasomotor disorders has never been investigated.We aimed to evaluate the association between long-term exposure to particulate matter 2.5 (PM2.5) and 10 (PM10), and coronary vasomotor disorders in NOCAD patients.Patients with myocardial ischemia and NOCAD undergoing coronary angiography and intracoronary provocation test with acetylcholine were prospectively studied. Both patients with chronic myocardial ischemia and nonobstructive coronary arteries and myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) were enrolled. Based on each case's home address, exposure to PM2.5 and PM10 was assessed.We included 287 patients (median age, 62.0 years [IQR: 52.0-70.0 years], 149 [51.9%] males); there were 161 (56.1%) myocardial ischemia and nonobstructive coronary arteries and 126 (43.9%) MINOCA cases. One hundred seventy-six patients (61.3%) had positive provocation test. Exposure to PM2.5 and PM10 was higher in patients with a positive provocation test (P 0.001). At multivariate logistic regression analysis, PM2.5 and PM10 were independent predictors of a positive provocation test (P = 0.001 and P = 0.029, respectively). Interestingly, among these patients, PM2.5 and PM10 were both independent predictors of MINOCA (P 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively) as clinical presentation, whereas PM2.5 was independently associated with the occurrence of epicardial spasm as opposed to microvascular spasm (P = 0.001).Higher exposure to PM2.5 and PM10 in patients with myocardial ischemia and NOCAD is associated with coronary vasomotor abnormalities. In particular, PM2.5 is an independent risk factor for the occurrence of epicardial spasm and MINOCA as clinical presentation.

Few data are available on the prevalence of right ventricle (RV) systolic dysfunction, assessed including RV strain, and RV to pulmonary artery (PA) coupling in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) submitted to TAVI and the early effect of the procedure. We performed standard and speckle tracking echocardiography in 80 patients with severe AS the day before TAVI and within 48 h after TAVI. In all patients we measured TAPSE/PASP (cut-off for RV-PA uncoupling 0.31) and in 60/80 we were able to analyze RV global longitudinal strain (RV-GLS) and RV free wall strain (RV-FWS). RVFAC and TAPSE were impaired in 8.3% while RV-GLS and RV-FWS in 45% and 33.3% respectively before TAVI. TAPSE/PASP 0.31 was documented in 7/80 patients (8.7%) before TAVI. These subjects differed from patients with TAPSE/PASP ≥ 0.31 for: enlarged left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes (p 0.001), worst LV ejection fraction (p 0.001) and RVFAC (p 0.001), worst RV-GLS and RV-FWS (p = 0.01 and p = 0.03) and bigger right atrium (RA) area (p 0.001). After TAVI, RV systolic function did not improve while PASP significantly decreased (p = 0.005) driving the improvement of TAPSE/PASP (p = 0.01). Patients with TAPSE/PASP improvement (51%) differed from the others for worst pre-TAVI diastolic function (E/e' p = 0.045), RVFAC (p = 0.042), RV-GLS (p = 0.049) and RA area (p = 0.02). RV-GLS unveils RV systolic dysfunction in as much as 45% of patients with AS vs only 8.3% revealed by conventional echocardiography. RV systolic function does not significantly improve early after TAVI while RV-PA coupling does. Patients with lower TAPSE/PASP at baseline have worst LV and RV systolic function as well as larger RA. Patients who improve TAPSE/PASP after TAVI are those with worst diastolic function, RV systolic function and larger RA at baseline.

Background In the acute management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPIs) bolus not followed by intravenous infusion is potentially advantageous given their fast onset and offset of action, but clinical evidence in a contemporary setting is limited. Methods We collected data from consecutive STEMI patients admitted to the cardiac catheterization laboratory of the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli from October 2017 to September 2019. Results Out of 423 consecutive STEMI patients, 297 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in the study. Of them, 107/297 (36%) received an intracoronary GPI bolus-only during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) not followed by intravenous infusion and 190/297 (64%) received standard antithrombotic therapy. Of the 107 GPI-treated, 22/107 (21%) had P2Y12 inhibitor pre-treatment (adjunctive strategy) and 85/107 (79%) did not (bridging strategy). During hospital staying, there was no difference in the primary safety endpoint of TIMI major+minor bleeding (p=0.283), TIMI major (p=0.267) or TIMI minor (p=0.685) bleeding between groups. No stroke event occurred in the GPI group. Despite patients receiving GPI having a significantly higher intraprocedural ischemic burden, no significant differences were found in the efficacy outcomes between groups. Consistent findings were observed for patients receiving GPIs bolus before (bridging strategy) or after (adjunctive strategy) P2Y12 inhibitors, compared to those receiving standard therapy. Multivariate logistic regression analyses did not find any independent predictors significantly associated to the primary and secondary composite endpoints. Conclusions In a contemporary real-world population of STEMI patients undergoing PPCI, the use of intracoronary GPIs bolus-only in selected patients at high ischemic risk is safe and could represent a useful antithrombotic strategy both in those pre-treated and in those naive to P2Y12 inhibitors.

Wall shear stress (WSS) is involved in coronary artery plaque pathological mechanisms and modulation of gene expression. This study aims to provide a comprehensive haemodynamic and biological description of unstable (intact-fibrous-cap, IFC, and ruptured-fibrous-cap, RFC) and stable (chronic coronary syndrome, CCS) plaques and investigate any correlation between WSS and molecular pathways.We enrolled 24 CCS and 25 Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction-ACS patients with IFC (n = 11) and RFC (n = 14) culprit lesions according to optical coherence tomography analysis. A real-time PCR primer array was performed on peripheral blood mononuclear cells for 17 different molecules whose expression is linked to WSS. Computational fluid dynamics simulations were performed in high-fidelity 3D-coronary artery anatomical models for three patients per group. A total of nine genes were significantly overexpressed in the unstable patients as compared to CCS patients, with no differences between IFC and RFC groups (GPX1, MMP1, MMP9, NOS3, PLA2G7, PI16, SOD1, TIMP1, and TFRC) while four displayed different levels between IFC and RFC groups (TNFα, ADAMTS13, EDN1, and LGALS8). A significantly higher WSS was observed in the RFC group (p 0.001) compared to the two other groups. A significant correlation was observed between TNFα (p 0.001), EDN1 (p = 0.036), and MMP9 (p = 0.005) and WSS values in the RFC group.Our data demonstrate that IFC and RFC plaques are subject to different WSS conditions and gene expressions, suggesting that WSS profiling may play an essential role in the plaque instability characterization with relevant diagnostic and therapeutic implications in the era of precision medicine.

Aims Adenosine has been tested in several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to minimize the incidence of coronary microvascular obstruction (CMVO). The aim of this study was to pool all the RCTs comparing intracoronary or intravenous adenosine versus placebo in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing myocardial revascularization. Methods and results PubMed and Scopus electronic databases were scanned for eligible studies up to 5th June 2022. A total of 26 RCTs with 5843 patients were included. Efficacy endpoints were major adverse cardiac events (MACE), all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and heart failure. Atrioventricular blocks and ventricular fibrillation/sustained ventricular tachycardia (VF/SVT) were the safety endpoints. Myocardial blush grade, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), infarct size, and ST-segment resolution were also assessed. Adenosine administration was not associated with any clinical benefit in terms of MACE, all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and heart failure. However, adenosine was associated with an increased rate of advanced atrioventricular blocks and of VF/SVT in studies with total mean ischaemic time >3 h, compared to placebo. Remarkably, among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, adenosine was associated with reduced myocardial blush grade 0–1 and TIMI flow grade 0–2, compared to placebo. Furthermore, adenosine did not show favourable effects on LVEF and infarct size. Conclusion Adenosine infusion, as adjunctive therapy in ACS, was associated with an increased risk of advanced atrioventricular blocks and increased rates of adenosine-triggered ventricular arrhythmias in patients with long ischaemic time, without providing any clinical benefit compared to placebo.

Background Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the milestone of treatment for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, a considerable number of patients do not achieve a complete myocardial reperfusion since coronary microvascular obstruction (CMVO) might occur. Adenosine is one of the pharmacological strategies tested in several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to minimize the incidence of CMVO. However, conflicting results have been reported so far. The aim of the present study was to evaluate all the RCTs comparing intracoronary or intravenous adenosine versus placebo as adjunctive therapy in patients with ACS undergoing PCI or thrombolysis. Methods PubMed and Scopus electronic databases were scanned for eligible studies up to June 5th, 2022. Our meta-analysis included 26 randomized RCTs with a total of 5843 patients involved. Primary endpoints were the rate of clinical events, defined as major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), heart failure (HF), all-cause-death and non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI). The rate of advanced atrioventricular (AV) blocks and ventricular fibrillation/sustained ventricular tachycardia (VF/SVT) were considered as safety endpoints. Further subgroup analyses and meta regressions were conducted to evaluate the role of different procedural and non-procedural factors influencing the results. Finally, a secondary analysis was conducted only including RCTs enrolling patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Results Adenosine administration did not confer any significant clinical benefit in terms of reduction of MACE (RR 0.91 CI 0.79-1.05, p 0.16), all-cause-death (RR 0.90 CI0.74-1.09, p 0.28), non-fatal MI (RR 1 CI 0.74 - 1.35, p 0.44) and HF (RR 0.94 CI 0.77-1.16, p 0.59). Remarkably, adenosine was associated with a significant reduction of post-procedural CMVO parameters such as Myocardial Blush Grade (MBG) 0-1 (RR 0.69 CI 0.53-0.90, p 0.01) and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade 0-2 (RR 0.67 CI 0.53-0.85, p 3 hours (RR 1.67 CI 1.14-2.42) Conclusions This is the most up-to-date meta-analysis summarizing the available evidence on adenosine safety and efficacy in the prevention or treatment of CMVO in ACS patients. Although adenosine improves surrogate parameters of myocardial perfusion, its use does not provide any clinical benefits. Additionally, adenosine infusion increases the risk of advanced AV blocks. Moreover, a longer ischemic time seems to be associated with a higher rate of adenosine-triggered ventricular arrhythmias, suggesting that higher myocardial ischemic damage may represent a substrate for adenosine arrhythmogenic effects.

Introduction Atherosclerotic plaque healing is a dynamic process that promotes plaque repair after destabilization. Previous studies showed that healed plaques are more common in patients with chronic coronary syndrome than in those with acute coronary syndrome, suggesting that they might be a marker of clinical stability. The mechanisms underlying plaque healing are not completely understood. The aim of the present study was to evaluate sex-based differences in plaque phenotype and healing of non-culprit coronary lesions by optical coherence tomography. Methods In this observational, single-center cohort study, we enrolled patients from the OCT Registry of the Fondazione Policlinico A Gemelli IRCCS. A total of 205 patients with both acute coronary syndromes or chronic coronary syndromes undergoing coronary angiography and intravascular OCT imaging of non-culprit vessels were included in the analysis and divided into two groups according to gender. Results Of 205 patients, 153 were male (75%) and 52 (25%) female. Compared with male patients, female patients had lower prevalence of lipid-rich plaque (40.4% vs. 57.7%; p=0.030), plaque rupture (7.7% vs. 21.2%; p=0.028) and cholesterol crystal (13.5% vs. 29.5%; p=0.022). Mean lipid arc and calcium depht were significantly lower in female patients than in male ones (118.0° ± 79.9° vs. 135.5° ± 77.9°; p=0.011; and 52.7 µm ± 79.2 µm vs. 72.3 µm ± 93.5 µm; p=0.007) while fibrous cap tended to be thicker (108.2 µm ± 70.4 µm vs. 96.2 µm ± 72.9 µm; p=0.055). Healed plaques were significantly more frequent in female patients than in male patients (51.9% vs 34.6%; p = 0.027). The prevalence of fibrous plaque, thrombi, neovascularization, diffuse calcifications and spotty calcification was not different between the two groups. Conclusion Females have a distinct atherosclerotic phenotype and healing capacity compared with male patients, including lower prevalence of lipid-rich plaque, cholesterol crystals and plaque ruptures and higher prevalence of healed plaques in non-culprit coronary lesions.

Background Several therapeutic strategies are available for cancer patients, leading to a longer life expectancy; however, each drug might have different side effects, which increase morbidity and mortality. Cardiovascular diseases are one of the most frequent and dramatic of these side effects, leading to interruption of a potentially lifesaving treatment or hesitating into heart failure. Clinical Case A 50 year-old female with recent diagnosis of breast cancer presented to our Emergency Department (ED) for asthenia, vomiting and dyspnea. A first dose of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) was administered three days before the onset of symptoms. Screening echocardiogram performed before starting the CT showed normal systolic ejection fraction, normal diastolic function and no valvular disease. At ED admission, the patient presented hypotension, tachycardia, sweating and mental confusion. The ECG showed sinus tachycardia with diffuse ST segment elevation and diffuse low QRS voltages. Echocardiogram proved severe left dysfunction (LVEF 15%) with low cardiac output (LVOT VTI 6 mm) and elevated ventricular filling pressure (E/e’ 26). EAB showed severe hyperlactacidemia. The diagnosis of cardiogenic shock was done and high doses of dobutamine and noradrenaline were started. Laboratory values confirmed multiorgan involvement, in absence of any signs of inflammation and infection. The coronary angiography performed revealed normal coronary arteries and elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP 29 mmHg). Despite pharmacological therapy, the patient's condition worsened so we proceeded to IMPELLA CP implantation and started methylprednisolone 10 mg/kg for three days with subsequent tapering doses. After 24 hours, we obtained hemodynamic stability and hyperlactacidemia clearance. Unfortunately, myelotoxicity and marked piastrinopenia (until 16 000*10 9/L) complicated the clinical course; for this reason, we stopped unfractionated Heparin (UHF) and no anticoagulant therapy, other the one in purge solution, was performed. CMR revealed diffuse signal enhancement during the T2w sequences associated with a global enhancement of T2 Mapping values due to general edema, a global intramyocardial strengthening, a significant enhancement of the T1 mapping values and extracellular volume were described at the delayed enhancement sequences. The hemodynamic conditions progressively improved during the hospitalization and the IMPELLA pump was removed. Serial echocardiograms documented an improvement of the ejection fraction and further mild reduction of ventricular filling pressure (E/e’ 8) normal right ejection fraction and initial inferior vena cava collapsibility. All the inotropic supports were suspended; we introduced beta-blocker, ACE-inhibitors, subsequently replaced with sacubitril/valsartan, well tolerated. Conclusion Acute cardiotoxicity with possible life-threatening conditions regardless of the basal cardiovascular risk class is a rare clinical condition, but needs further investigation. Future researches are warranted to determine the molecular mechanisms underlying cardiotoxicity to contain the side effects, maximize the benefit of the oncological therapy and, when necessary, select the best therapeutic option.

Introduction Pathological studies have shown that many atherosclerotic plaques destabilize without resulting in a clinical manifestation. Recent in vivo studies showed that healed plaques are more common in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) than in those with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), suggesting that they might be a marker of clinical stability. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical impact of healed coronary plaques detected by optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging. Methods A total of 208 patients with CCS or ACS who underwent OCT imaging of non-target/non-culprit vessels were enrolled. Only non-culprit segments were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of healed plaques detected by OCT. The incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at follow-up was assessed, defined as the composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization (TVR). Results Healed coronary plaques were observed in 39.7% of patients, and the prevalence was higher in those presenting with chronic coronary syndrome. Median follow-up time was 4 years, and was not different between the two groups. Patients with healed plaques had a significantly lower incidence of MACE at follow-up (13.6% vs 22%, p=0.019), mainly driven by a lower rate of non-fatal myocardial infarctions (4.9% vs 10.2%, p=0.05). The incidence of cardiac death and TVR was not significantly different between the two groups (1.2% vs. 3.1%, p=0.288; and 13.6% vs. 15.0%, p= 0.187, respectively). At multivariate Cox regression analysis, the presence of plaque disruption was an independent predictor of MACE (odds ratio [OR] 3.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.39-7.98, p=0.007), while the presence of healed plaque was an independent protective factor (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.22-0.89, p=0.022). Conclusions Healed coronary plaques detected by OCT imaging are associated with a favorable clinical outcome at long-term follow-up.

Background: Multiple valvular heart disease is a very prevalent condition and represents a challenge in terms of diagnosis and treatment. In patients undergoing cardiac surgery, multiple valvular lesions are often treated during the same procedure. In older high-risk patients, the treatment of choice for VHD is usually percutaneous: transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been widely developed in the past years and percutaneous interventions on other valvular lesions are rapidly evolving. In patients undergoing TAVR, concomitant severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is frequent and it's a marker of advanced disease. After TAVR, secondary TR can regress to a lower grade; persistent TR is associated with higher incidence of heart failure and mortality, so an additional intervention for TR is reasonable. The aim of this case report is to highlight the role of staged percutaneous treatment of multiple VHD as a new paradigm, with reassessment of other valvular lesion severity after the first endovascular valvular treatment Case description: We describe a case of successful staged percutaneous treatment for severe low flow – low gradient aortic stenosis in a 71 years old patient, with previous mitral valve replacement with mechanical valve and tricuspid annuloplasty, atrial fibrillation and COPD (STS score 9.5%). Four years after cardiac surgery she experienced worsening dyspnea and two hospitalizations for pulmonary edema; the echocardiography showed significant biventricular dysfunction, severe aortic stenosis (low-flow low-gradient, with contractile reserve at dobutamine stress echocardiography) and normal function of mitral prosthesis. The case was evaluated by a multidisciplinary ‘’Heart Team’’ and a decision was made to undergo TAVR and then reassess TR severity and patient symptoms. She underwent TAVR (Evolut Pro 26 mm direct implantation) using a ‘’less-invasive totally-endovascular’’ technique, without complications. Two month later the echocardiogram showed a little improvement in left ventricular systolic function and persistent severe tricuspid regurgitations; the patient was still symptomatic for leg swelling and fatigue. After a second evaluation from the ‘’Heart Team’’, she underwent successful transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-ring implantation (Edwards Sapien3 29) via right transgiugular approach, with no complications. 19 months after she was alive, with no more hospitalization, NYHA class II, on heart failure therapy; at an echocardiogram tricuspid regurgitation was mild-to-moderate. Discussion: Multivalular heart disease patients more often have several comorbidities, greater cardiac damage, that leads to higher incidence of heart failure and death than single VHD. In particular right ventricular dysfunction and tricuspid regurgitation, mostly secondary to pressure overload, are associated with adverse outcomes in severe aortic stenosis, especially in the ‘’low flow- low gradient’’ group. After treatment of a severe valvular disease, hemodynamic changes in pression and volume loads may improve the function of other valves, so previous valvulopaties can regress to a lower stage of severity, with a better prognosis and the possibility to avoid a second valvular treatment and all the procedural risks. Conclusion There is lack of data in the literature concerning the management of multiple VDH, which does not allow for evidence-based recommendations in current guidelines. Transcatherer interventions offer the option of a staged approach and a tailored treatment, after accurate evaluation by the Heart Team.

Background It is unclear which diagnostic strategy for detecting coronary artery disease (CAD) yields better outcomes. We aimed to compare the clinical accuracy and efficacy of non-invasive and invasive diagnostic strategies for the initial assessment of patients with suspected stable CAD. Methods On March 16, 2022, we searched PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL databases for randomised controlled trials comparing diagnostic strategies for CAD detection among patients with symptoms suggestive of stable CAD. Diagnostic modalities included coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA), cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), exercise electrocardiography, invasive coronary angiography (ICA), single photon emission computed tomography-myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT-MPI), and stress echocardiography. Functional tests were grouped into a single node for the primary analyses, while being analysed as separate nodes for the secondary analyses. Frequentist random-effect network meta-analyses were conducted to summarise the evidence. GRADE frameworks were applied to rate the certainty of findings. The primary efficacy outcome was trial-defined major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and the primary accuracy outcome was the rate of unnecessary angiography. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022329635). Results Twenty trials (n=27753 participants) were included. Compared with direct-ICA referral, CCTA and functional testing provided no significant difference in the risk of MACE (incidence rate ratios [IRRs] 0·87 [95% CI 0·65-1·17] and 1·19 [95% CI 0·87-1·62], respectively; moderate certainty) and a large reduction in the rate of unnecessary angiography (odds ratios 0·04 [95% CI 0·02-0·09] and 0·08 [95% CI 0·03-0·18], respectively; high certainty). Among non-invasive diagnostic strategies, CCTA significantly reduced the risk of MACE compared with functional testing (IRR 0·73, 95% CI 0·57-0·95; high certainty). The worse prognostic performance of functional testing was mainly driven by the poor efficacy of exercise electrocardiography (high certainty) and stress echocardiography (moderate to low certainty), whose risk of MACE was significantly reduced by CCTA (IRRs 0·56 [95% CI 0·42-0·75] and 0·59 [95% CI 0·42-0·81], respectively), SPECT-MPI (IRRs 0·56 [95% CI 0·41-0·77] and 0·59 [95% CI 0·43-0·81], respectively), and direct-ICA referral (IRRs 0·64 [95% CI 0·45-0·91] and 0·67 [95% CI 0·48-0·92], respectively), while non-significantly reduced by CMR (IRRs 0·71 [95% CI 0·47-1·06] and 0·74 [95% CI 0·53-1·04], respectively). Conclusion In patients with suspected stable CAD, an initial assessment with non-invasive diagnostic strategies is safe and addresses the low diagnostic yield of direct-ICA referral. CCTA is among the most effective strategies in terms of both clinical accuracy and efficacy. Among functional non-invasive tests, exercise electrocardiography and stress echocardiography may not be deemed effective diagnostic alternatives, while SPECT-MPI and CMR are valuable and feasible options, respectively.

Background and aims The use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for the treatment of cardiogenic shock (CS) may result in left ventricle overload and distension. Percutaneous microaxial flow pump Impella in addition to VA-ECMO (ECPELLA) is an emerging option to overcome these collateral effects. Aim of this study is to assess whether the addition of Impella to VA-ECMO is an effective and safe unloading strategy. Methods and results We performed a systematic literature review of studies comparing ECPELLA vs. ECMO alone in patients with CS. The primary endpoint was early mortality (in-hospital or 30-day mortality). The secondary endpoints were bleeding, need for kidney replacement therapy, haemolysis, infections, and limb ischaemia. A total of 3469 potentially relevant articles were screened and eight retrospective studies including 11.137 patients were selected. There was no significant difference in early mortality (Risk Ratio, RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.78–1.03) between ECPELLA and ECMO. Nevertheless, there was a borderline significant reduction in early mortality with ECPELLA (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.55–1.00) at sensitivity analysis selectively including studies reporting propensity matched analysis. ECPELLA was associated with increased bleeding (RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.20–1.75), need for kidney replacement therapy (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.19–1.99), haemolysis (RR 1.71, 95% CI 1.41–2.07) and limb ischaemia (RR 1.43, 95% CI 1.17–1.75) and with a non-significant increase in severe infections (RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.84–1.89), compared with ECMO alone. Conclusion Among patients with cardiogenic shock, ECPELLA is associated with increased complications compared with ECMO. Whether reducing ventricular overload with Impella among patients treated with ECMO reduces early mortality needs to be confirmed by further investigations.

Coronary artery obstruction (CAO) during transcatheter-aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) represents a main concern for TAVR safety in patients with low coronary take-off. To date, "snorkel" (also called chimney) technique, consisting of stent implantation from the coronary ostium to the aorta within the space between the valve frame and the aortic wall, is the most adopted strategy to prevent CAO. This technique is associated with the creation of complex valve/stent configuration that can hinder repeat coronary interventions. Due to this concern, we set up an original sequence for coronary protection aiming to ensure a more physiological TAVR frame/stent configuration. According to this technique, TAVR prosthesis is released with a "protection" system consisting of guiding catheter (GC), wire and stent inside the coronary artery with high CAO risk. In the case of CAO occurrence, the stent is released according to the snorkel technique. In the absence of complete CAO, a new GC is advanced inside the implanted TAVR prosthesis and the stent is deployed from the coronary artery up to the prosthesis. We herein report two cases of very high CAO risk where this technique was successfully used during last-generation self-expandable prostheses implantation (in a native aortic valve and in one prosthetic aortic valve). In conclusion, this "orthotopic snorkel-stenting in TAVR" (OST) technique represents a novel option for treating impeding CAO during TAVR. As compared with the "classic" snorkel technique, it allows avoiding stent implantation in some patients (who do not experience CAO) and may provide a more predictable and physiologic TAVR prosthesis/stent configuration in the case of stent implantation need.

Valvular heart disease (VHD) requires optimized outpatient management that is generally considered to be best delivered by a dedicated, multidisciplinary team (Heart Valve Clinic, HVC). Although HVC is promoted by clinical guidelines and organized in many centers, real world outcome assessments are limited. Thus, we evaluated the performance, clinical and management outcomes during a 6-year experience with an original HVC model.By interrogating the local database, 1047 consecutive patients admitted to the HVC from January 2015 to October 2020 were found. Management and mortality were checked for all patients. After 3 years of HVC activity, in order to improve appropriateness and efficiency, access priority criteria were introduced. Thus, the study population was divided in two Period subgroups (before and after access criteria introduction) that were compared.A total of 1047 consecutive patients admitted to the HVC constituted the study population; 346 patients (33%) were recommended for invasive treatment. After a mean follow up of 25.7 ± 3.1 months, 37 patients (3.5%) died. When comparing study periods, statistically-significant increase inpatients' complexity and VHD severity was noticed in Period 2, also translating into higher rate of referral to intervention (39.0% vs. 29.4% in Period 1; p = 0.001). Finally, despite higher rate of elderly and frail patients, operative mortality was not jeopardized.The present study reports a comprehensive assessment of the characteristics and outcomes achieved through an original HVC model. Standardization of access criteria supports the HVC improvement.

Background Transaxillary route for structural and coronary percutaneous interventions represents a valid alternative access in patients with obstructive peripheral disease. Nevertheless, its widespread use is limited by a less manageable haemostasis procedure. Case summary In this case, we describe a minimalistic high-risk transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedure (TAVI Score 6.42%) conducted with a double arm approach (radial and axillary accesses) in an 88-year-old patient with severe aortic stenosis and multiple co-morbidities preventing both surgical (Society of Thoracic Surgeons mortality 7.9%) and percutaneous transfemoral approach (extensive peripheral artery disease). We also described the successful management of a complicated transaxillary haemostasis with this technique. Discussion In our cases, a minimalist double-arm approach was successfully used for TAVI procedure as an alternative to transfemoral approach assuring effective and safe management of vascular access haemostasis.

Complete revascularization (CR) in patients with multi-vessel disease improves outcomes. The use of percutaneous left-ventricular assist devices, such as the Impella heart pump, is useful to minimize the risk of haemodynamic compromise in complex higher risk and clinically indicated patients. The recently published data from the PROTECT III trial suggest more CR during Impella-protected percutaneous coronary intervention with more extensive lesion preparation and treatment, resulting in the reduced need for repeat revascularization. To achieve CR and improve survival, procedural guidance by intravascular imaging, extensive lesion preparation, debulking with atherectomy devices, advanced chronic total occlusion revascularization techniques, and post-interventional treatment with modern anti-platelet medication are essential.

The use of pre-closure suture-based devices represents a widely access-site hemostasis technique in percutaneous transfemoral transcatheter-aortic-valve-replacement (TF-TAVR); yet this technique is associated with the risk of a device failure that may result in clinically relevant residual bleeding. Thus, a bailout intervention is needed. So far, the best management of pre-closure device failure has not been recognized.To report the first clinical results obtained using a novel bailout hemostasis technique for patients with double suture-based vascular closure device failure in the setting of TF-TAVR.We developed a "pledget-assisted hemostasis" technique to manage residual access-site bleeding. This consists of the insertion of a surgical, non-absorbable, polytetrafluoroethylene pledget over the sutures of the two ProGlide (Abbott Vascular, CA, United States). The ProGlide's knot-pushers are used to push down the pledget and the hand-made slipknot to seal the femoral artery leak. This technique was used as a bailout strategy in patients undergoing TF-TAVR with a systematic double pre-closure technique. Post-procedural access-site angiography was systematically performed. In-hospital complications were systematically detected and classified according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria.Out of 136 consecutive patients who underwent TF-TAVR, 15 patients (mean age 80.0 ± 7.2 years, 66.7% female) with access-site bleeding after double pre-closure technique failure were treated by pledget-assisted hemostasis. In the majority of patients, 16F sheath was used (The "pledget assisted hemostasis" might be considered as a possible bailout technique to treat patients with residual access site bleeding. Further studies are needed to compare this approach with other bail-out techniques.

The objective of this study is to compare hemodynamic and echocardiographic findings between valve-in-valve (VIV) and native-valve (NV) patients submitted to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) due to pure aortic regurgitation (AR).Patients with severe AR are surgically treated with variable postinterventional left-ventricular (LV) "reverse remodeling." TAVI might be considered in selected AR patients.Twenty-eight patients with pure severe AR caused by either degenerated bioprosthesis or NV disease were successfully treated by TAVI at our institution. LV catheterization before and after TAVI and echocardiography before, after (24-72 h), and at follow-up (3-12 months) were performed.Baseline clinical, hemodynamic, and echocardiographic characteristics were comparable between the two study groups, except for a younger age, higher proto-diastolic LV pressure, and higher LV end-systolic diameter in the NV group. At catheterization, an immediate hemodynamic impact of TAVI in both groups was noticed, with a trend toward better postprocedural residual regurgitation index and significantly lower LV dP/dT values (666.0 ± 177.9 vs. 883.5 ± 259.7 mmHg/s, p = 0.04) in VIV. At echocardiography, both NV and VIV patients showed favorable (early and sustained) post-TAVI echocardiographically detectable reverse remodeling. VIV patients also showed more pronounced early reduction in indexed LV end-diastolic volume (68.1 ± 27.4 vs. 86.5 ± 28.9 ml/mSuccessful TAVI induces a striking hemodynamic impact with major structural (reverse remodeling) consequences in patients with pure AR caused by both bioprosthesis degeneration or NV disease. In the immediate postrelease phase, VIV patients might exhibit a more pronounced early LV contractile and structural benefit.

Severe calcific aortic stenosis (AS) and coronary artery disease (CAD) have common risk factors and are frequently encountered in the same patient in clinical practice. CAD has been reported in ≥ 50% of AS patients undergoing both surgical treatment and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). In the last two decades, TAVI has been established as a less invasive alternative to surgery. Recently, more and more young and low surgical risk patients undergo TAVI. Despite the high prevalence of CAD in patients treated with TAVI, the management strategy of concomitant CAD in these patients remains an area of considerable uncertainty. This review provides an updated overview of the current knowledge about this topic and offers points for reflection about the best approach to use.