Search

Little is known about if and how circular RNAs (circRNAs) are involved in skeletal muscle atrophy. Here a conserved circular RNA Damage‐specific DNA binding protein 1 (circDdb1), derived from the host gene encoding Damage‐specific DNA binding protein 1 (DDB1), as a mechanism of muscle atrophy is identified. circDdb1 expression is markedly increased in a variety of muscle atrophy types in vivo and in vitro, and human aging muscle. Both in vivo and in vitro, ectopic expression of circDdb1 causes muscle atrophy. In contrast, multiple forms of muscle atrophy caused by dexamethasone, tumor necrosis factor‐alpha (TNF‐α), or angiotensin II (Ang II) in myotube cells, as well as by denervation, angiotensin II, and immobility in mice, are prevented by circDdb1 inhibition. Eukaryotic initiation factor 4A3 (EIF4A3) is identified as a regulator of circDdb1 expression in muscle atrophy, whereas circDdb1 encodes a novel protein, circDdb1‐867aa. circDdb1‐867aa binds with and increases the phosphorylation level of eukaryotic elongation factor 2 (eEF2) at Thr56 to reduce protein translation and promote muscle atrophy. In summary, these findings establish circDdb1 as a shared regulator of muscle atrophy across multiple diseases and a potential therapeutic target. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: TRPS1 (trichorhinophalangeal syndrome type 1) is a protein that has become an important marker for diagnosing breast cancer, especially in difficult-to-diagnose cases like triple-negative breast cancer. This review explores the expression of TRPS1 in various cancers beyond breast tissue, such as prostate, lung, and ovarian cancers, and discusses its role as a diagnostic tool. While TRPS1 is a highly sensitive marker for breast cancer, its presence in other tumor types poses challenges for pathologists. Our review aims to raise awareness of these diagnostic pitfalls and emphasizes the importance of using multiple markers to improve accuracy. Understanding the broader expression of TRPS1 can help to improve cancer diagnosis and treatment strategies. Background/Objectives: Immunohistochemical expression of TRPS1 (trichorhinophalangeal syndrome type 1) protein is usually used by pathologists to confirm breast origin for triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) or metastatic carcinomas of unknown primary. However, recent studies have reported TRPS1 expression in a variety of non-breast lesions. This review aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of TRPS1 expression across various tumor types, highlighting both its diagnostic utility and potential pitfalls that may arise in clinical practice. Methods: A thorough search of the PubMed database on TRPS1 immunoexpression in tumor pathology was conducted. While the gene itself has been known for several decades, most studies regarding its use in immunohistochemistry emerged in the late 2010s. Particular emphasis was placed on case reports and cohort studies that examined the implications of TRPS1 expression in non-breast tissues, as well as variations in the results between commercially available TRPS1 clones, which may influence the staining intensity and specificity. Results: TRPS1 demonstrated a strong diagnostic utility in identifying primary breast lesions, particularly in TNBC cases. However, its expression in a growing number of non-breast cancers, such as lung adenocarcinoma, prostate adenocarcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma, and endometrial adenocarcinoma, as well as up to 96% of synovial sarcomas with SS18-SSX fusion, emphasizes the need for caution when interpreting TRPS1 positivity and suggests a multi-marker approach in order to increase the diagnostic accuracy. Conclusions: While TRPS1 remains a highly sensible immunohistochemical marker for confirming breast primary lesions, pathologists should be aware of its low specificity and incorporate complementary diagnostic methods in order to ensure accurate clinical management. Further research should focus on elucidating the molecular pathways regulating TRPS1 expression in various tumor types, which may better define its clinical utility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]