Search

Background: The first tooth to erupt is the first mandibular molar, which is the tooth with the highest number of retreatments. Several factors are responsible for the failure of the endodontic success and one of the most important being the particular pulp anatomy of each tooth. To aim was determine the prevalence of the middle mesial (MM) canal in first mandibular molars and to study if there are predisposing factors to the presence of this canal by retrospectively analyzing cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images in vivo., Material and Methods: CBCT images of 100 patients were selected. A total of 206 first mandibular molars were examined. The CBCTs were analysed using Careastream CS 3D imaging software. Findings of MM canals were recorded along the variables sex and left/right side. Prevalence was compared using the Chi-square test ( P < 0.05) and Cramer's V was used to indicate the effect size between the variables., Results: Of the 206 teeth analysed, the prevalence of MM canals was 33.11% (49 teeth). There was no statistically significant difference between sex and prevalence of the MM canal. There was a significant difference between sex and the distance between the mesial canals was found, being the most common range in women was 1-2 mm (35.8%) and 2-3 mm (51%) in men. The most common range of distance between the mesial canals where the MM canal was localized was 3-4 mm (50%), being statistically significant ( p <0,05)., Conclusions: This cross-sectional study showed a high prevalence of MM canals (33.11%) in first mandibular molars. The prevalence of the MM canal was significantly higher when the distance between mesiobucal and mesiolingual canals was 3-4mm. This knowledge let direct the clinicians in locating MM canal for improving endodontic prognosis. Key words: Cone-beam computed tomography, middle mesial canal, prevalence., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not- for- profit sectors., (Copyright: © 2024 Medicina Oral S.L.)

Aim: To investigate the outcome of elective full pulpotomy, using calcium silicate-based cements (CSBC), after 2 years, in symptomatic mature permanent teeth with carious lesions, diagnosed as irreversible pulpitis, and analyse the capacity of Wolters et al. (2017) classification to predict the likelihood of treatment failure., Methods: The treatment records of 56 patients with symptomatic mature teeth with carious lesions, diagnosed as irreversible pulpitis and treated by elective full pulpotomy, using CSBCs as pulp capping materials, were reviewed. Thirteen teeth were excluded. The remaining 43 teeth were evaluated retrospectively at 24 months. Fisher`s exact test with the Lancaster's mid-P adjustment was used to assess different outcomes amongst the diagnostic categories., Results: Four of the cases failed before 24 months and required root canal treatment (RCT). Overall success rate at 2 years was 90.7% (39 of 43). An inverse, but non-significant, correlation was observed between the severity of pulpitis according to the Wolters classification and the treatment success rate (p > 0.05). The type of CSBC used was associated to the success rate (OR = 10.5; 95% C.I. = 0.5 - 207.4; p = 0.027), being 82% with Endosequence and 100% with Biodentine. Postoperative pain associated significantly to lower success rate (66.7%) (Odds ratio = 8.0; 95% C.I. = 0.7 - 95.9; p = 0.047)., Conclusions: Elective full pulpotomy using a CSBC was a successful choice for the treatment of mature permanent teeth with symptoms indicative of irreversible pulpitis. There were no significant differences between the success rate of mild, moderate and severe pulpitis. Postoperative pain could be considered a risk marker for failure of full pulpotomy. The term "irreversible pulpitis" should be re-signified to indicate the need for access to the pulp chamber, rather than an indication for extraction or RCT., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The indicated treatment in cases of apical periodontitis (AP), a disease very prevalent in diabetic patients, is root canal treatment (RCT). This study aims to conduct a systematic review with meta-analysis to answer the following PICO question: In adult patients, does the absence or presence of diabetes affect the prevalence of root filled teeth (RFT)"?, Material and Methods: PRISMA Guidelines have been followed to carry out this systematic review. A literature search was undertaken in PubMed-MEDLINE, Embase and Scielo. All studies reporting the prevalence of RFT in diabetic patients and control subjects using radiographic examination were included. Study characteristics and risk ratios with 95% CIs were extracted. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed., Results: Five studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Prevalence of RFT were estimated with 701 people and 15,882 teeth. Among diabetic patients, 6.1% of teeth had undergone RCT, while in controls this percentage was 3% (OR = 1.7; 95% CI = 1.0 - 2.9; p = 0.065). Among diabetic patients, 65% had at least one RFT, while in controls this percentage dropped to 55% (OR = 1.4; 95% CI = 0.5 - 3.7; p > 0.05). The certainty of evidence was low., Conclusions: The prevalence of RFT in diabetic patients is almost double that in the control population, however this result is only marginally significant. Dentists must take into account the high prevalence of RFT in diabetic patients, investigating the presence of diabetes in those patients in whom a high frequency of RCT is observed. Key words: Diabetes, endodontics, epidemiology, root canal treatment, root filled teeth, prevalence, survey, population-based study., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency., (Copyright: © 2023 Medicina Oral S.L.)

Background: Odontogenic infections, and especially endodontic infections, are polymicrobial, involving a combination of Gram-positive and Gram-negative facultative anaerobes and strictly anaerobic bacteria. Therefore, antibiotics can be used as an adjunct to endodontic treatment. However, most chronic and even acute endodontic infections can be successfully managed by disinfection of the root-canal system, which eliminates the source of infection, followed by abscess drainage or tooth extraction, without the need for antibiotics. The literature provides evidence of inadequate prescribing practices by dentists. The aim of this concise review was to analyse the worldwide pattern of antibiotic prescription in endodontic infections., Methods: Comprehensive searches were conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed, Wiley Online Database, Web of Science and Scopus. The databases were searched up to 13 March 2016 for studies in which dentists used systemic antibiotics to treat endodontic lesions and which reported data on the type of antibiotic prescribed and on the diagnosis of the endodontic disease treated., Results: The electronic and hand searches identified 69 titles, of which 25 were included in the final analysis. Amoxicillin was reported as the drug of choice for endodontic infections in most countries, and clindamycin and erythromycin were the choice for patients allergic to penicillin. Dentists worldwide prescribe antibiotics for non-indicated conditions, such as pulpitis., Conclusion: Antibiotics are overprescribed for the management of endodontic infections. It is necessary to improve antibiotic-prescribing habits in the treatment of endodontic infections, as well as to introduce educational initiatives to encourage the coherent and proper use of antibiotics in such conditions., (© 2017 FDI World Dental Federation.)