Search

This article presents a letter to the editor about the release of bisphosphonates in children who receive long-term treatment.

Bisphosphonates are chemically stable structural analogs of inorganic pyrophosphate. Owing to their ability to inhibit osteoclast activity, bisphosphonates have become the primary agents to treat conditions marked by excessive osteoclast-mediated bone resorption, such as osteoporosis, Paget's disease of bone, and cancer-associated bone disease. At the molecular level, bisphosphonates exert their anti-resorptive effects by inhibiting farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase activity within osteoclasts. Bisphosphonates are generally well tolerated, with many patients now having been treated for more than ten years. Widespread bisphosphonate use, however, has revealed both short-term and long-term side effects in some patients. Here, we review our current understanding of the mechanisms by which bisphosphonates inhibit osteoclast function, the current roles for these medications in clinical practice, and areas of concern that have emerged with widespread bisphosphonate use.

Unlabelled: Bisphosphonate pharmacokinetics may affect individual responses. Skeletal retention of pamidronate infused monthly to patients with bone metastases was highly variable (12-98%) and did not diminish with time, showing the capacity of the skeleton to retain large amounts of bisphosphonate. Relationships between skeletal retention of pamidronate and rate of bone resorption are complex and depend on previous treatment and the total amount of retained bisphosphonate., Introduction: Bisphosphonates (BPs) given intravenously every 3-4 weeks are effective in the management of metastatic bone disease from breast cancer, but responses among patients vary, and it is not known whether current dose and dose intervals are appropriate for an individual patient. An influence of pharmacokinetics of BPs on antiresorptive action may contribute to this variation in response. To test this hypothesis, we determined the skeletal retention of intravenous pamidronate and its association to the rate of bone resorption in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer., Materials and Methods: In a cross-sectional study, 24-h urinary excretion of pamidronate and the biochemical marker of bone resorption N-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen and serum alkaline phosphatase were measured in 40 patients with bone metastases from breast cancer at the beginning, after 3-6 months, and after 1 year of treatment with intravenous pamidronate 90 mg every 3-4 weeks., Results and Conclusions: Skeletal retention (dose--amount excreted into urine) 2 days after infusion varied between 12% and 98% (mean, 62%) of the administered dose, but there were no differences in retention between patients receiving pamidronate for the first time or after 3-6 months or after 1 year of treatment. Retention of pamidronate was related to the prevalent rate of bone turnover in previously untreated patients, whereas no such relationship was found in previously treated patients. Rate of bone resorption after treatment seemed to be related to the amount of pamidronate retained. During 1 year of treatment, retention of pamidronate remained constant, indicating no saturation of skeletal binding sites with treatment. The variability in retention among individual patients can be attributed to the number of available binding sites. This is related, however, to bone turnover only before the start of treatment. The apparent relationships between skeletal retention and antiresorptive effect could have implications for the design of optimal therapeutic regimens with BPs in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer.

Background: Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic window, and bioavailability is known to vary considerably between renal transplant recipients. Most centers still rely on measurement of trough levels, but there are conflicting reports on the correlation between tacrolimus trough levels and systemic exposure, as measured by the area-under-the-concentration-over-time curve (AUC((0-12h)))., Methods: We developed and validated a two-compartmental population-based pharmacokinetic model with Bayesian estimation of tacrolimus systemic exposure. Subsequently, we used this model to apply prospectively AUC-guided dosing of tacrolimus in 15 consecutive renal transplant recipients. The main objective was to study intrapatient variability in the course of time., Results: Bayesian forecasting with a two-point sampling strategy, a trough level, and a second sample obtained between two and four hours post-dose significantly improved the squared correlation with the AUC((0-12h)) (r(2)= 0.94). Compared with trough level monitoring only, this approach reduced the 95%-prediction interval by 50%. The Bayesian approach proved to be feasible in clinical practice, and provided accurate information about systemic tacrolimus exposure in individual patients. In the AUC-guided dosing cohort the apparent clearance of tacrolimus decreased gradually over time, which was not reflected in corresponding trough levels., Conclusion: This simple, flexible method provides the opportunity to tailor immunosuppression, and should help minimize tacrolimus-related toxicity, such as nephrotoxicity and post-transplant diabetes mellitus.

Objective: Bisphosphonates (BP) inhibit osteoclast-mediated bone resorption, and have been reported to decrease the rate of cartilage degradation. The anti-resorptive effect of BP is determined by the amount of BP retained by the skeleton. In rheumatoid arthritis (RA) the uptake is not confined only to the skeleton, but BP is also retained in joints, which could have implications for dose regimens. We investigated the whole body retention (WBR) of pamidronate and its relationship to bone resorption and cartilage degradation in patients with active RA., Methods: Twenty-six patients received placebo, 45 mg, or 90 mg intravenous pamidronate. Serum and urine samples were collected before and for 12 days after drug administration. Rate of bone resorption was assessed by the biochemical markers: serum carboxy terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen, urinary carboxy terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen normalized to creatinine and urinary amino-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen normalized to creatinine; and rate of cartilage degradation by urinary carboxy terminal telopeptide of type II collagen normalized to creatinine. WBR was derived from urinary excretion of pamidronate data., Results: Pamidronate induced a rapid and sustained decrease in the level of biochemical markers of bone resorption and cartilage degradation. The mean WBR of pamidronate was 69% of the administered dose, and showed a remarkably wide range (41-96%). The decrease in rate of bone resorption, but also rate of cartilage degradation appeared to be related to the WBR of pamidronate., Conclusion: This is the first study in which the effect of BP treatment has been studied in relation to the amount of BP retained by the body in patients with active RA. The total amount of BP retained by the body shows a remarkably wide range and is comparable with literature on patients with osteoporosis. The apparent relationships between the amount of BP retained by the body and the effect could have implications for therapeutic regimens in patients with RA.

After orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) many patients use emulsified cyclosporine. Recent data showed that blood levels 2 hours after dosing (C-2) better reflect systemic exposure to the drug (area under the blood concentration time curve) than trough levels (C-0) do. We investigated difference in dosage, creatinine clearance (CrCl), blood pressure (BP), freedom from rejection, and relation of C-2, C-0, and AUC while switching 31 stable patients more than 6 months after OLT from C-0 to C-2 monitoring. With C-0 between 90 and 150 ng/mL we collected 24-hour urine, while blood samples were taken at t = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 hours after dosing to measure cyclosporine, creatinine, liver tests, and blood pressure and calculated AUC and CrCl. Target AUC was calculated based on C-0. Then the dose was adjusted to two subsequent C-2 values of 600 ng/mL +/- 15%, the above was repeated, and the differences were assessed. Cyclosporine dose was reduced in 21/31 patients (68%) and remained unchanged in 10/31 patients (32%) after conversion. Mean lowering was 69 mg daily (26.9 %, P < 0.0001). After dose reduction the mean increase of CrCl was 7.93 ml/min (11.6%, P = 0.016). Only systolic and mean morning BP decreased slightly but significantly. C-2 correlated better with AUC0-12 (r2 = 0.75) than C-0 (r2 = 0.64). However, 13/21 patients had a second AUC below target AUC and 2 of these 13 patients developed rejection after conversion to C-2 levels. In conclusion, while C-0 monitoring frequently results in overdosing and more renal dysfunction, C-2 monitoring may lead to episodes of underdosing and rejection. Therefore better ways of monitoring cyclosporine dosing need to be devised.

Bisphosphonates are the treatment of choice of Paget's disease of bone. For optimal patient care determinants of the induction and duration of remission of the disease after bisphosphonate therapy must be defined. We addressed these issues in a longitudinal study of 157 patients with biochemically active disease (serum alkaline phosphatase activity >120 U/L) treated with the bisphosphonate olpadronate and followed for a median period of 37 months (range 3-162, mean 46 +/- 30). Two different total doses of olpadronate were used: an effective dose (40 mg intravenously given over 5 or 10 consecutive days) and a high dose consisting of the effective dose followed by oral olpadronate 200 mg/day for 15 days. Treatment induced biochemical remission, defined as normalization of serum alkaline phosphatase activity, in 89.2% of the patients. There were no differences between the two treatment regimens. The only independent determinants of induction of remission were baseline serum alkaline phosphatase activity and number of affected bones. In contrast, duration of remission depended on the dose of olpadronate given (high versus effective dose, RR of relapse 0.49, 95% CI 0.27-0.89). Additional independent determinants of relapse were nadir value of serum alkaline phosphatase activity after treatment, number of previous therapies, and number of affected bones. Pain scores decreased with therapy in 88% of patients with pain complaints. Pain scores were significantly related to the probability of relapse (RR1.54, 95% CI 1.04-2.27). In this long-term study of a large cohort of patients with Paget's disease we confirmed the efficacy of olpadronate therapy. In addition, we identified and quantified determinants of the response to bisphosphonate that can help in improving the management of patients with Paget's disease with bisphosphonates.

Bisphosphonates are the treatment of choice of Paget's disease, but variable responses have been reported, and despite the availability of potent bisphosphonates, biochemical remission is not achieved in a substantial number of patients. This may, in part at least, be because of the influence of pharmacokinetics of bisphosphonates on their pharmacodynamics. That is the response of bone turnover to treatment. To address this issue, we examined the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the bisphosphonate olpadronate given intravenously to 75 patients with Paget's disease, using a specific assay for olpadronate concentrations in serum and urine. The skeletal uptake of olpadronate varied greatly among patients and ranged between 10% and 90% of the administered dose. The two major determinants of skeletal uptake were renal function and prevalent rate of bone turnover. Serum and urinary data were well described by a physiology-based four-compartment pharmacokinetic model that takes into account the distribution of the bisphosphonate in the bone and its subsequent elimination. Bone turnover was suppressed to well within the normal range in virtually all patients. This, together with the absence of resolution of effect during 1 year, does not allow the construction of an adequate integrated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model. However, the pharmacokinetic model, described for the first time in Paget's disease, can accurately simulate the amount of bisphosphonate delivered to the skeleton with different dose regimens as well as the amount still present in bone after 1 year. Such approaches can lead to improved patient care and individualization of treatment of Paget's disease with bisphosphonates.