Search

Your search keyword '"Cremata, Edward J"' showing total 11 results
Start Over Author "Cremata, Edward J"
11 results on '"Cremata, Edward J"'

1. How Would Test Opt-Out Impact Accountability Measures? Evidence from the CORE Districts and the PACE/USC Rossier Poll

Author

Stanford University, Policy Analysis for California Education (PACE) and Cremata, Edward J.

Abstract

The number of students opting out of standardized tests has grown in recent years. This phenomenon poses a potential threat to our ability to accurately measure student achievement in schools and districts. This brief documents the extent to which opting out is observed in the CORE districts and models how higher opt-out levels could affect various accountability measures. More students opting out could significantly impact some accountability measures in use in California, but the CORE districts' growth measure is largely unaffected, as it reports the impact of schools on individual students' achievement. In contrast, accountability metrics that track student achievement by cohort are at risk of becoming biased even with relatively low absolute levels of opting out. This brief suggests that districts should consider explicitly adjusting for the characteristics of the students who actually sit for tests when designing school accountability systems.

Published
2019

5. Response to Comment on 'Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science'

Author

Anderson, Christopher J, Bahník, Štěpán, Barnett-Cowan, Michael, Bosco, Frank A, Chandler, Jesse, Chartier, Christopher R, Cheung, Felix, Christopherson, Cody D, Cordes, Andreas, Cremata, Edward J, Della Penna, Nicolas, Estel, Vivien, Fedor, Anna, Fitneva, Stanka A, Frank, Michael C, Grange, James A, Hartshorne, Joshua K, Hasselman, Fred, Henninger, Felix, van der Hulst, Marije, Jonas, Kai J, Lai, Calvin K, Levitan, Carmel A, Miller, Jeremy K, Moore, Katherine S, Meixner, Johannes M, Munafò, Marcus R, Neijenhuijs, Koen I, Nilsonne, Gustav, Nosek, Brian A, Plessow, Franziska, Prenoveau, Jason M, Ricker, Ashley A, Schmidt, Kathleen, Spies, Jeffrey R, Stieger, Stefan, Strohminger, Nina, Sullivan, Gavin B, van Aert, Robbie C M, van Assen, Marcel A L M, Vanpaemel, Wolf, Vianello, Michelangelo, Voracek, Martin, Zuni, Kellylynn, Anderson, Christopher J, Bahník, Štěpán, Barnett-Cowan, Michael, Bosco, Frank A, Chandler, Jesse, Chartier, Christopher R, Cheung, Felix, Christopherson, Cody D, Cordes, Andreas, Cremata, Edward J, Della Penna, Nicolas, Estel, Vivien, Fedor, Anna, Fitneva, Stanka A, Frank, Michael C, Grange, James A, Hartshorne, Joshua K, Hasselman, Fred, Henninger, Felix, van der Hulst, Marije, Jonas, Kai J, Lai, Calvin K, Levitan, Carmel A, Miller, Jeremy K, Moore, Katherine S, Meixner, Johannes M, Munafò, Marcus R, Neijenhuijs, Koen I, Nilsonne, Gustav, Nosek, Brian A, Plessow, Franziska, Prenoveau, Jason M, Ricker, Ashley A, Schmidt, Kathleen, Spies, Jeffrey R, Stieger, Stefan, Strohminger, Nina, Sullivan, Gavin B, van Aert, Robbie C M, van Assen, Marcel A L M, Vanpaemel, Wolf, Vianello, Michelangelo, Voracek, Martin, and Zuni, Kellylynn

Abstract

Gilbert et al. conclude that evidence from the Open Science Collaboration's Reproducibility Project: Psychology indicates high reproducibility, given the study methodology. Their very optimistic assessment is limited by statistical misconceptions and by causal inferences from selectively interpreted, correlational data. Using the Reproducibility Project: Psychology data, both optimistic and pessimistic conclusions about reproducibility are possible, and neither are yet warranted.

Published
2016

6. Response to Comment on 'Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science'

Author

Anderson, Christopher J., Bahník, Štěpán, Barnett-Cowan, Michael, Bosco, Frank A., Chandler, Jesse, Chartier, Christopher R., Cheung, Felix, Christopherson, Cody D., Cordes, Andreas, Cremata, Edward J., Della Penna, Nicolas, Estel, Vivien, Fedor, Anna, Fitneva, Stanka A., Frank, Michael C., Grange, James A., Hartshorne, Joshua K., Hasselman, Fred, Henninger, Felix, van der Hulst, Marije, Jonas, Kai J., Lai, Calvin K., Levitan, Carmel A., Miller, Jeremy K., Moore, Katherine S., Meixner, Johannes M., Munafò, Marcus R., Neijenhuijs, Koen I., Nilsonne, Gustav, Nosek, Brian A., Plessow, Franziska, Prenoveau, Jason M., Ricker, Ashley A., Schmidt, Kathleen, Spies, Jeffrey R., Stieger, Stefan, Strohminger, Nina, Sullivan, Gavin B., van Aert, Robbie C. M., van Assen, Marcel A. L. M., Vanpaemel, Wolf, Vianello, Michelangelo, Voracek, Martin, Zuni, Kellylynn, Anderson, Christopher J., Bahník, Štěpán, Barnett-Cowan, Michael, Bosco, Frank A., Chandler, Jesse, Chartier, Christopher R., Cheung, Felix, Christopherson, Cody D., Cordes, Andreas, Cremata, Edward J., Della Penna, Nicolas, Estel, Vivien, Fedor, Anna, Fitneva, Stanka A., Frank, Michael C., Grange, James A., Hartshorne, Joshua K., Hasselman, Fred, Henninger, Felix, van der Hulst, Marije, Jonas, Kai J., Lai, Calvin K., Levitan, Carmel A., Miller, Jeremy K., Moore, Katherine S., Meixner, Johannes M., Munafò, Marcus R., Neijenhuijs, Koen I., Nilsonne, Gustav, Nosek, Brian A., Plessow, Franziska, Prenoveau, Jason M., Ricker, Ashley A., Schmidt, Kathleen, Spies, Jeffrey R., Stieger, Stefan, Strohminger, Nina, Sullivan, Gavin B., van Aert, Robbie C. M., van Assen, Marcel A. L. M., Vanpaemel, Wolf, Vianello, Michelangelo, Voracek, Martin, and Zuni, Kellylynn

Abstract

Gilbert et al. conclude that evidence from the Open Science Collaboration's Reproducibility Project: Psychology indicates high reproducibility, given the study methodology. Their very optimistic assessment is limited by statistical misconceptions and by causal inferences from selectively interpreted, correlational data. Using the Reproducibility Project: Psychology data, both optimistic and pessimistic conclusions about reproducibility are possible, and neither are yet warranted.

Published
2016
Full Text
View/download PDF

7. Response to Comment on 'Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science'

Author

Social Networks, Solidarity and Inequality, Leerstoel Buskens, Anderson, Christopher J, Bahník, Štěpán, Barnett-Cowan, Michael, Bosco, Frank A, Chandler, Jesse, Chartier, Christopher R, Cheung, Felix, Christopherson, Cody D, Cordes, Andreas, Cremata, Edward J, Della Penna, Nicolas, Estel, Vivien, Fedor, Anna, Fitneva, Stanka A, Frank, Michael C, Grange, James A, Hartshorne, Joshua K, Hasselman, Fred, Henninger, Felix, van der Hulst, Marije, Jonas, Kai J, Lai, Calvin K, Levitan, Carmel A, Miller, Jeremy K, Moore, Katherine S, Meixner, Johannes M, Munafò, Marcus R, Neijenhuijs, Koen I, Nilsonne, Gustav, Nosek, Brian A, Plessow, Franziska, Prenoveau, Jason M, Ricker, Ashley A, Schmidt, Kathleen, Spies, Jeffrey R, Stieger, Stefan, Strohminger, Nina, Sullivan, Gavin B, van Aert, Robbie C M, van Assen, Marcel A L M, Vanpaemel, Wolf, Vianello, Michelangelo, Voracek, Martin, Zuni, Kellylynn, Social Networks, Solidarity and Inequality, Leerstoel Buskens, Anderson, Christopher J, Bahník, Štěpán, Barnett-Cowan, Michael, Bosco, Frank A, Chandler, Jesse, Chartier, Christopher R, Cheung, Felix, Christopherson, Cody D, Cordes, Andreas, Cremata, Edward J, Della Penna, Nicolas, Estel, Vivien, Fedor, Anna, Fitneva, Stanka A, Frank, Michael C, Grange, James A, Hartshorne, Joshua K, Hasselman, Fred, Henninger, Felix, van der Hulst, Marije, Jonas, Kai J, Lai, Calvin K, Levitan, Carmel A, Miller, Jeremy K, Moore, Katherine S, Meixner, Johannes M, Munafò, Marcus R, Neijenhuijs, Koen I, Nilsonne, Gustav, Nosek, Brian A, Plessow, Franziska, Prenoveau, Jason M, Ricker, Ashley A, Schmidt, Kathleen, Spies, Jeffrey R, Stieger, Stefan, Strohminger, Nina, Sullivan, Gavin B, van Aert, Robbie C M, van Assen, Marcel A L M, Vanpaemel, Wolf, Vianello, Michelangelo, Voracek, Martin, and Zuni, Kellylynn

Published
2016

8. Response to Comment on “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science”

Author

Anderson, Christopher J., primary, Bahník, Štěpán, additional, Barnett-Cowan, Michael, additional, Bosco, Frank A., additional, Chandler, Jesse, additional, Chartier, Christopher R., additional, Cheung, Felix, additional, Christopherson, Cody D., additional, Cordes, Andreas, additional, Cremata, Edward J., additional, Della Penna, Nicolas, additional, Estel, Vivien, additional, Fedor, Anna, additional, Fitneva, Stanka A., additional, Frank, Michael C., additional, Grange, James A., additional, Hartshorne, Joshua K., additional, Hasselman, Fred, additional, Henninger, Felix, additional, van der Hulst, Marije, additional, Jonas, Kai J., additional, Lai, Calvin K., additional, Levitan, Carmel A., additional, Miller, Jeremy K., additional, Moore, Katherine S., additional, Meixner, Johannes M., additional, Munafò, Marcus R., additional, Neijenhuijs, Koen I., additional, Nilsonne, Gustav, additional, Nosek, Brian A., additional, Plessow, Franziska, additional, Prenoveau, Jason M., additional, Ricker, Ashley A., additional, Schmidt, Kathleen, additional, Spies, Jeffrey R., additional, Stieger, Stefan, additional, Strohminger, Nina, additional, Sullivan, Gavin B., additional, van Aert, Robbie C. M., additional, van Assen, Marcel A. L. M., additional, Vanpaemel, Wolf, additional, Vianello, Michelangelo, additional, Voracek, Martin, additional, and Zuni, Kellylynn, additional

Published
2016
Full Text
View/download PDF

10. TO THE EDITOR:.

Author

Cremata, Edward J.

Subjects
*TREATMENT of backaches, *BACK diseases, *THERAPEUTICS
Abstract

A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Do Manual Therapies Help Low Back Pain? A Comparative Effectiveness Metaanalysis."

Published
2015
Full Text
View/download PDF

11. Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science".

Author

Gilbert, Daniel T., King, Gary, Pettigrew, Stephen, Wilson, Timothy D., Anderson, Christopher J., Bahník, Štĕpán, Barnett-Cowan, Michael, Bosco, Frank A., Chandler, Jesse, Chartier, Christopher R., Cheung, Felix, Christopherson, Cody D., Cordes, Andreas, Cremata, Edward J., Penna, Nicolas Della, Estel, Vivien, Fedor, Anna, Fitneva, Stanka A., Frank, Michael C., and Grange, James A.

Subjects
*PSYCHOLOGY, *STATISTICAL errors
Abstract

Several abstracts are presented on comment on the article related to estimating the reproducibility of psychological science and abstract on response on the comment.

Published
2016
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results