1. Strength training for prepubescent males: Is it safe?
- Author
-
Clark B. Rians, Carol A. Janney, Steven R. Tippett, Frank I. Katch, Bernard R. Cahill, and Arthur Weltman
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Weight Lifting ,Strength training ,Movement ,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation ,Growth ,Injury surveillance ,Injury rate ,Affect (psychology) ,Bone and Bones ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Heart rate monitoring ,Creatine phosphokinase measurement ,Humans ,Medicine ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Child ,Radionuclide Imaging ,Physical Education and Training ,business.industry ,Attendance rate ,Muscles ,Puberty ,030229 sport sciences ,Blood pressure ,Athletic Injuries ,Physical therapy ,business ,Muscle Contraction ,Sports - Abstract
This study examined the safety of one type of strength training for prepubescent males. Eighteen males (av erage age, 8.3 ± 1.2 years) participated in a 45 min/ session, three session/week, 14 week supervised strength training program with an attendance rate of 91.5%. Concentric work was done almost exclusively. KinCom analysis showed significant strength gain in this group (P < 0.05), while an age, sex, and activity matched control group did not gain strength.Safety was evaluated by injury surveillance, blood pressure and heart rate monitoring, scintigraphy, and creatine phosphokinase measurement. Effects on growth and development, flexibility, and motor perform ance were also investigated, as these are factors with an impact on sports injury occurrence.Results showed that in the short term, supervised concentric strength training results in a low injury rate and does not adversely affect bone, muscle, or epi physes ; nor does it adversely affect growth, develop ment, flexibility, or motor performance. As the safety question is multifaceted, this should not lead to the conclusion that strength training for prepubescents is uniformly safe. Further research is needed.
- Published
- 1987