Search

INTRODUCTION: Sexual health is an important component of primary care, and optimal sexually transmitted infection (STI) and HIV testing by doctors could help improve sexual health outcomes for men. Currently, little is known about general practitioners' (GPs') assessment of STI and HIV risk, particularly in relation to male patients, and the degree to which current advice can be translated into consistent testing protocols. The aim of the study was to explore STI and HIV testing strategies for men in general practice and opportunities and barriers to more optimal testing. METHODS: This study used a qualitative, multiple-case methodology, incorporating 17 distinct GP cases, drawing on in-depth, semi-structured interviews, and using thematic analysis. FINDINGS: The following themes were identified: sexual health consultations by men in general practice are usually initiated by the patient; GPs appear to have a consistent rationale for their risk assessments in terms of STI testing; the nature of the doctor's interaction with men influences the quality of sexual health services utilisation; optimal sexual health consultations require sufficient time and a recognition of the 'delicacy' of the consultation content for both patient and health practitioner. CONCLUSION: The stratified testing strategies undertaken by GPs appeared appropriate given the risk profiles of their patients. Constraints to optimal sexual health consultations were identified, including inadequate consultation time, male utilisation of GP consultations, and challenges in discussing sexual health topics within the consultation. Prioritising men's sexual health as atopic in CME may be helpful. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

INTRODUCTION: Sexual health is an important component of primary care, and optimal sexually transmitted infection (STI) and HIV testing by doctors could help improve sexual health outcomes for men. Currently, little is known about general practitioners' (GPs') assessment of STI and HIV risk, particularly in relation to male patients, and the degree to which current advice can be translated into consistent testing protocols. The aim of the study was to explore STI and HIV testing strategies for men in general practice and opportunities and barriers to more optimal testing. METHODS: This study used a qualitative, multiple-case methodology, incorporating 17 distinct GP cases, drawing on in-depth, semi-structured interviews, and using thematic analysis. FINDINGS: The following themes were identified: sexual health consultations by men in general practice are usually initiated by the patient; GPs appear to have a consistent rationale for their risk assessments in terms of STI testing; the nature of the doctor's interaction with men influences the quality of sexual health services utilisation; optimal sexual health consultations require sufficient time and a recognition of the 'delicacy' of the consultation content for both patient and health practitioner. CONCLUSION: The stratified testing strategies undertaken by GPs appeared appropriate given the risk profiles of their patients. Constraints to optimal sexual health consultations were identified, including inadequate consultation time, male utilisation of GP consultations, and challenges in discussing sexual health topics within the consultation. Prioritising men's sexual health as atopic in CME may be helpful. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

INTRODUCTION: Internationally, a number of studies have investigated general practitioner (GP) opinion of weight management interventions. To date there have been no similar studies carried out in New Zealand. This study aimed to explore GP opinion of weight management interventions in one region of New Zealand. Understanding GP opinion is important, as rates of obesity are increasing and GPs are front-line health care service providers. The data collected could be used to guide health service development in New Zealand, and to inform training and support of GPs in obesity management. METHODS: A qualitative study using inductive thematic analysis of a series of 12 semi-structured interviews with GPs in the Wellington region of New Zealand. FINDINGS: Five key themes were identified: 1) GP perceptions of what the GP can do; 2) the roots of the obesity problem; 3) why the GP doesn't succeed; 4) current primary care interventions; and 5) bariatric surgery. CONCLUSION: The GPs interviewed felt responsible fortreatment of obesity in their patients. They expressed a sense of disempowerment regarding their ability to carry this out, identifying multiple barriers. These included: a society where overweight is seen as normal; complex situations in which weight management is rooted in personal issues; stigma associated with overweight and its management; lack of efficacious interventions; and low resource availability. Bariatric surgery was viewed cautiously in general, though some examples of positive results were reported, as well as a desire for increased access to this treatment option. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]