1. Performance and Safety of a Sodium Hyaluronate Tear Substitute with Polyethylene Glycol in Dry Eye Disease: A Multicenter, Investigator-Masked, Randomized, Noninferiority Trial.
- Author
-
Labetoulle, Marc, Mortemousque, Bruno, Allali, Jérôme, Blanc, Philippe, Bonne, Maxence, Bosc, Jean-Michel, Bury, Thierry, Chrétien-Malinconi, Anne, Cozon-Devred, Virginie, Gabisson, Pierre, Hoa, Didier, Muselier-Mathieu, Aurore, Partouche, Philippe, Rocher, Nicolas, Sabadel, Anne, Nyst, Benjamin, Schepens, Gauthier, Yeh, Ru-Yin, and CBL-101 Study Group
- Subjects
RESEARCH ,DRY eye syndromes ,RESEARCH methodology ,EVALUATION research ,HYALURONIC acid ,OPHTHALMIC drugs ,TEARS (Body fluid) ,COMPARATIVE studies ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,POLYETHYLENE glycol - Abstract
Purpose: To compare the performance and safety of 2 tear substitutes containing sodium hyaluronate (SH); one containing 0.15% SH and polyethylene glycol (PEG) 8000, and the other containing 0.18% SH. Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, investigator-masked, noninferiority trial, 83 patients with moderate or severe dry eye disease underwent a 2-week washout, and were then randomly assigned (1:1) to receive SH plus PEG tear substitute (n = 45) or comparator SH tear substitute (n = 38) 3-6 times daily for 3 months. The primary performance endpoint was the change from baseline in the ocular surface fluorescein staining (OSFS) score on day 28 in the per-protocol (PP) population, according to the 15-point Oxford Scheme, with a noninferiority margin of 2. Results: Both groups improved significantly in terms of signs and symptoms. Among the 78 patients without major protocol deviations (the PP population), the OSFS score decreased by 2.9 ± 2.0 on day 28 from 5.4 ± 1.3 at baseline in the SH plus PEG group and by 2.3 ± 2.2 from 5.2 ± 1.4 in the comparator group (95% confidence interval of the difference: -1.2 to 0.3), demonstrating noninferiority. On day 90, the improvement in OSFS scores was significantly greater in the SH plus PEG group (P = 0.0002). The safety profiles were satisfactory in both groups. Conclusion: SH plus PEG tear substitute was noninferior to SH tear substitute in the studied population and may provide additional benefits in the long term. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02975102. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF