Search

Formation of radical–radical cocrystals is an important step towards the design of organic ferrimagnets. We describe a simple approach to generate radical–radical cocrystals through the identification and implementation of well‐defined supramolecular synthons which favor cocrystallization over phase separation. In the current paper we implement the structure‐directing interactions of the E−E bond (E=S, Se) of dithiadiazolyl (DTDA) and diselenadiazolyl (DSDA) radicals to form close contacts to electronegative groups. This is exemplified through the preparation and structural characterization of three sets of radical cocrystals; the 2:2 cocrystal [PhCNSSN]2[MBDTA]2 (4) [MBDTA=methyl benzodithiazolyl] and the 2:1 cocrystals [C6F5CNEEN]2[TEMPO] (E=S, 5; E=Se, 6). In 4 the two types of radical are linked via bifurcated inter‐dimer δ+S⋅⋅⋅Nδ− interactions whereas 5 and 6 exhibit a set of five‐centre δ+E⋅⋅⋅Oδ− contacts (E=S, Se). SOMO wrestling: Cocrystallization of radicals requires different open‐shell molecules to interact with each other rather than themselves. This process can be driven by careful selection of favorable electrostatic interactions between molecules. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

SOMO Wrestling Molecules of C6F5CNSSN and TEMPO radicals tangle on the Dohyō. In their Communication on page 1371, J. M. Rawson and co‐workers implement favorable electrostatic contacts to drive cocrystal formation between different radicals. The concept is exemplified through the preparation and structural characterization of three sets of radical cocrystals: the 2:2 cocrystal [PhCNSSN]2[MBDTA]2 and the 2:1 cocrystals [C6F5CNEEN]2[TEMPO] (E=S, Se). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Angewandte Chemie is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Formation of radical-radical cocrystals is an important step towards the design of organic ferrimagnets. We describe a simple approach to generate radical-radical cocrystals through the identification and implementation of well-defined supramolecular synthons which favor cocrystallization over phase separation. In the current paper we implement the structure-directing interactions of the E-E bond (E=S, Se) of dithiadiazolyl (DTDA) and diselenadiazolyl (DSDA) radicals to form close contacts to electronegative groups. This is exemplified through the preparation and structural characterization of three sets of radical cocrystals; the 2:2 cocrystal [PhCNSSN] 2 [MBDTA] 2 (4) [MBDTA=methyl benzodithiazolyl] and the 2:1 cocrystals [C 6 F 5 CNEEN] 2 [TEMPO] (E=S, 5; E=Se, 6). In 4 the two types of radical are linked via bifurcated inter-dimer δ+ S⋅⋅⋅N δ- interactions whereas 5 and 6 exhibit a set of five-centre δ+ E⋅⋅⋅O δ- contacts (E=S, Se)., (© 2019 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.)

Attempts to coordinate neutral ligands to low oxidation state indium centers are often hindered by disproportionation pathways that produce elemental indium and higher oxidation state species. In contrast, we find that reactions of the salt, InOTf (OTf=trifluoromethanesulfonate), with α-diimine ligands yielded intensely colored compounds with no evidence of decomposition. X-ray structural analysis of InOTf⋅(Mes) DAB(Me) ((Mes) DAB(Me) =N,N-dimesityl-2,3-dimethyl-diazabutadiene; 1) reveals a discrete molecular compound with a pyramidal coordination environment at the indium center, consistent with the presence of a stereochemically active lone pair of electrons on indium and a neutral diazabutadiene chelate ligand. The use of the less-electron-rich (Mes) DAB(H) ligand ((Mes) DAB(H) =N,N-dimesityl-diazabutadiene) engenders dramatically different reactivity and produces a metallopolymer (InOTf⋅(Mes) DAB(H) )∞ (2) linked via CC and InIn bonds. The difference in reactivity is rationalized by cyclic voltammetry and DFT studies that suggest more facile electron transfer from In(I) to the (Mes) DAB(H) and bis(aryl)acenaphthenequinonediimine (BIAN) ligands. Solution EPR spectroscopy indicates the presence of non-interacting ligand-based radicals in solution, whereas solid-state EPR studies reflect the presence of a thermally accessible spin triplet consistent with reversible CC bond cleavage., (Copyright © 2013 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.)