Search

Bone nonunion following a fracture represents a significant global healthcare challenge, with an overall incidence ranging between 2 and 10% of all fractures. The management of nonunion is not only financially prohibitive but often necessitates invasive surgical interventions. This comprehensive manuscript aims to provide an extensive review of the published literature involving growth factors, stem cells, and novel delivery mechanisms for the treatment of fracture nonunion. Key growth factors involved in bone healing have been extensively studied, including bone morphogenic protein (BMP), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and platelet-derived growth factor. This review includes both preclinical and clinical studies that evaluated the role of growth factors in acute and chronic nonunion. Overall, these studies revealed promising bridging and fracture union rates but also elucidated complications such as heterotopic ossification and inferior mechanical properties associated with chronic nonunion. Stem cells, particularly mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), are an extensively studied topic in the treatment of nonunion. A literature search identified articles that demonstrated improved healing responses, osteogenic capacity, and vascularization of fractures due to the presence of MSCs. Furthermore, this review addresses novel mechanisms and materials being researched to deliver these growth factors and stem cells to nonunion sites, including natural/synthetic polymers and bioceramics. The specific mechanisms explored in this review include BMP-induced osteoblast differentiation, VEGF-mediated angiogenesis, and the role of MSCs in multilineage differentiation and paracrine signaling. While these therapeutic modalities exhibit substantial preclinical promise in treating fracture nonunion, there remains a need for further research, particularly in chronic nonunion and large animal models. This paper seeks to identify such translational hurdles which must be addressed in order to progress the aforementioned treatments from the lab to the clinical setting.

Background: Robotic-assisted arthroplasty is a growing alternative to conventionally instrumented arthroplasty; however, the incidence of adverse events (AEs) associated with this technology reported to the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) remains poorly quantified. The objective of this study was to categorize AEs associated with robotic-assisted arthroplasty and calculate their annual incidence as reported to the FDA., Methods: The FDA's Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database was queried for AEs from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2021 associated with the most prevalent robotic-arthroplasty system. The AEs were calculated using national surgical numbers provided by the manufacturer and grouped by total hip arthroplasty (THA), total knee arthroplasty (TKA), or partial knee arthroplasty (PKA)., Results: There were 1,710 unique AEs across the study period, with 436 THA, 1,005 TKA, and 269 PKA, representing incidence rates of 0.37, 0.30, and 0.40%, respectively. All procedures demonstrated lower rates of AEs in the final year of the study, compared to the first year. Most complications were related to mechanical problems, not software issues. Surgical delays due to AEs occurred in THA (0.13% cumulative incidence, 14.0 minutes average delay), TKA (0.13%, 20.6 minutes), and PKA (0.22%, 19.4 minutes). No cases were canceled due to AEs in THA, though a few TKA (0.003%) and PKA (0.02%) cases were not performed. Patient injuries occurred in 0.05, 0.05, and 0.08% of THA, TKA, and PKA, respectively. Surgical reintervention was necessary in 0.004, 0.003, and 0.01% of THA, TKA, and PKA, respectively., Conclusions: Robotic-assisted arthroplasty has a small number and relatively low rate of AEs reported to the FDA as measured through the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database, with rates steadily decreasing over the study period. Patient injury, case delay, and reoperation represent only a small fraction of the already rare AEs in the database., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) presents a challenge in management due to its invasive nature and propensity for local recurrence. While either bone grafting (BG) or bone cement (BC) can be utilized to fill defects after intralesional curettage, the optimal treatment remains contested. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of defect filling with BC compared with BG on recurrence rates in patients with GCTB following intralesional curettage., Methods: A random-effects model binary outcome meta-analysis was performed utilizing recurrence rate for the BC and BG groups to evaluate the risk ratio (p < 0.05 considered significant). There were 1,454 patients included., Results: Intralesional curettage with BG had a recurrence risk ratio of 1.68 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-2.31, p = 0.001) when compared with BC. The overall rate of recurrence for GCTB after intralesional curettage with BC was 20.05% vs. 29.74% with BG (95% CI, 0.17-0.23 vs. 0.26-0.33, p < 0.001)., Conclusion: Intralesional curettage with BC for the treatment of GCTB demonstrated lower recurrence rates than intralesional curettage with BG. However, the rates of recurrence remain substantial for both groups, necessitating careful consideration of the benefits and potential pitfalls associated with BC vs. BG when considering salvage options after recurrences., Level of Evidence: Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSREV/B140)., (Copyright © 2024 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)

Non-union during healing of bone fractures affects up to ~5% of patients worldwide. Given the success of recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-B chain homodimer (rhPDGF-BB) in promoting angiogenesis and bone fusion in the hindfoot and ankle, rhPDGF-BB combined with bovine type I collagen/β-TCP matrix (AIBG) could serve as a viable alternative to autografts in the treatment of non-unions. Defects (~2 mm gaps) were surgically induced in tibiae of skeletally mature New Zealand white rabbits. Animals were allocated to one of four groups-(1) negative control (empty defect, healing for 8 weeks), (2 and 3) acute treatment with AIBG (healing for 4 or 8 weeks), and (4) chronic treatment with AIBG (injection 4 weeks post defect creation and then healing for 8 weeks). Bone formation was analyzed qualitatively and semi-quantitatively through histology. Samples were imaged using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and computed tomography for defect visualization and volumetric reconstruction, respectively. Delayed healing or non-healing was observed in the negative control group, whereas defects treated with AIBG in an acute setting yielded bone formation as early as 4 weeks with bone growth appearing discontinuous. At 8 weeks (acute setting), substantial remodeling was observed with higher degrees of bone organization characterized by appositional bone growth. The chronic healing, experimental, group yielded bone formation and remodeling, with no indication of non-union after treatment with AIBG. Furthermore, bone growth in the chronic healing group was accompanied by an increased presence of osteons, osteonal canals, and interstitial lamellae. Qualitatively and semiquantitatively, chronic application of AI facilitated complete bridging of the induced non-union defects, while untreated defects or defects treated acutely with AIBG demonstrated a lack of complete bridging at 8 weeks., (© 2024 Orthopaedic Research Society.)

Background: Tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) is a procedure that can be used as an alternative to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or to address patellar instability in patients experiencing dislocation events. The purpose of this paper is to systematically evaluate the most cited articles pertaining to TTO through bibliometric analysis., Methods: A search using the Web of Science database with keywords pertaining to TTO was conducted in April 2024. Articles with the most citations that met all inclusion criteria were analyzed to determine information such as level of evidence (LoE), article topic, journal of publication, year published, country of origin, and institution of origin., Results: The average number of citations was 79 (range of 42-334). The decade with the most publications was from 2010 to 2019 (n = 26; 52%). Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research was the journal with the largest number of published articles (n = 9, 18%). The United States (US) (n = 25; 50%) and France (n = 4; 8%) were the two countries with the most publications. Mayo Clinic (n = 3, 6 %), Ohio State University (n = 3, 6%), and Rush University (n = 3, 6%) were the institutions contributing the most articles. The LoE most reported was level 4 (n = 22; 44%). Topics were primarily related to clinical outcomes (n = 38; 76%)., Conclusion: This analysis revealed that most articles were related to clinical outcomes and have been published since 2000. By analyzing the characteristics of the most cited articles, an understanding of current research and identification of areas for further exploration can be determined for TTO., Study Design: Cross-sectional study., Level of Evidence: III., Competing Interests: The authors, their immediate families, and any research foundation with which they are affiliated did not receive any financial payments or other benefits from any commercial entity related to the subject of this article. M.G.B discloses Arthrex: other financial or material support, paid consultant and LifeNet Health: paid consultant. The Manuscript submitted does not contain information about medical device(s) and/or drug(s). All authors significantly contributed to the document and have reviewed the final manuscript., (© 2024 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

The use of porcine-derived collagen membranes (PDCM) to improve intraoral soft tissue rehabilitation remains under investigation. Different degrees of crosslinking have yielded differences in resorption time and inflammation surrounding collagen membranes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vivo performance of bilayered PDCMs with varying degrees of crosslinking for the regeneration of oral soft tissue defects. Bilateral split-thickness oral mucosa defects were created in mandibles of beagles (n=17) and assigned to one of the following: bilayer PDCM (high crosslinking porcine dermis in sheet form-H-xlink) and (low crosslinking porcine dermis in sheet form-L-xlink), bilayer PDCM (non-crosslinked predicate collagen membrane in spongy form-Ctrl), or negative control (Sham) and compared with positive control (unoperated). Animals were euthanized after 4-, 8-, or 12-weeks of healing to evaluate soft tissue regeneration and remodeling through histomorphometric analyses. H-xlink membranes presented delayed healing with a poorly developed epithelial layer (analogous to the sham group) across time points. Relative to Ctrl at 8 and 12 weeks, defects treated with H-xlink presented no difference in semiquantitative scores ( P > 0.05), while L-xlink exhibited greater healing ( P = 0.042, P = 0.043, at 8 and 12 weeks, respectively). Relative to positive control, L-xlink exhibited similar healing at 8 weeks and greater healing at 12 weeks ( P = 0.037) with a well-developed epithelial layer. Overall, groups treated with L-xlink presented with greater healing relative to the positive control after 12 weeks of healing and may serve as an alternative to autologous grafts for intraoral soft tissue regeneration., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.)

Background: The use of technology allows surgeons increased precision in component positioning in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The objective of this study was to compare (1) perioperative complications and (2) resource utilizations between robotic-assisted (RA) and computer-navigated (CN) versus conventional instrumenttaion (CI) THA., Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed using a large national database to identify patients undergoing unilateral, primary elective THA from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2019 using RA, CN, or CI. There were 1,372,300 total patients identified and included RA (29,735), CN (28,480), and CI (1,314,085) THA. Demographics, complications, lengths of stay, dispositions, and costs were compared between the cohorts. Binary logistic regression analyses were performed., Results: The use of RA THA led to lower rates of intraoperative fracture (0.22% versus 0.39%), delirium (0.1% versus 0.2%), postoperative anemia (14.4% versus 16.7%), higher myocardial infarction (0.13% versus 0.08%), renal failure (1.7% versus 1.6%), blood transfusion (2.0% versus 1.9%), and wound dehiscence (0.02% versus 0.01%) compared to CI THA. The use of CN led to lower rates of respiratory complication (0.5% versus 0.8%), renal failure (1.1% versus 1.6%), blood transfusion (1.3% versus 1.9%), and pulmonary embolism (0.02% versus 0.1%) compared to CI THA. Total costs were increased in RA ($17,729 versus $15,977) and CN ($22,529 versus $15,977). Lengths of hospital stay were decreased in RA (1.8 versus 1.9 days) and CN (1.7 versus 1.9 days)., Conclusions: Perioperative complication rates vary in technology-assisted THA, with higher rates in RA THA and lower rates in CN THA, relative to CI THA. Both RA THA and CN THA were associated with more costs, shorter postoperative hospital stays, and higher rates of discharge home compared to CI THA., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The use of technology allows increased precision in component positioning in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The objectives of this study were to compare (1) perioperative complications and (2) resource utilization between robotic-assisted (RA) and computer-navigated (CN) versus conventional (CI) TKA., Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed using a national database to identify patients undergoing unilateral, primary elective TKA from January 2016 to December 2019. A total of 2,174,685 patients were identified and included RA (69,445), CN (112,225), or CI (1,993,015) TKA. Demographics, complications, lengths of stay, dispositions, and costs were compared between the cohorts. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed., Results: The RA TKA cohort had lower rates of intraoperative fracture (0.05 versus 0.08%, P < .05), respiratory complications (0.6 versus 1.1%, P < .05), renal failure (1.3 versus 1.7%, P < .05), delirium (0.1 versus 0.2%, P < .05), gastrointestinal complications (0.04 versus 0.09%, P < .05), postoperative anemia (8.9 versus 13.9%, P < .05), blood transfusion (0.4 versus 0.9%, P < .05), pulmonary embolism, and deep vein thrombosis (0.1 versus 0.2%, P < .05), and mortality (0.01 versus 0.02%, P < .05) compared to conventional TKA, though the cohort did have higher rates of myocardial infarction (0.09 versus 0.07%, P < .05). The CN cohort had lower rates of myocardial infarction (0.02 versus 0.07%, P < .05), respiratory complications (0.8 versus 1.1%, P < .05), renal failure (1.5 versus 1.7%, P < .05), blood transfusion (0.8 versus 0.9%, P < .05), pulmonary embolism (0.08 versus 0.2%, P < .05), and deep vein thrombosis (0.2 versus 0.2%, P < .05) over CI TKA. Total cost was increased in RA (16,190 versus $15,133, P < .05) and CN (17,448 versus $15,133, P < .05). However, the length of hospital stay was decreased in both RA (1.8 versus 2.2 days, P < .05) and CN (2.1 versus 2.2 days, P < .05)., Conclusions: Technology-assisted TKA was associated with lower perioperative complication rates and faster recovery., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Abstract: Cohen, JL, Cade, WH, Harrah, TC, Costello II, JP, and Kaplan, LD. The surgical management of NCAA Division 1 college football injuries post COVID-19: A single institution retrospective review. J Strength Cond Res 38(5): 906-911, 2024-The unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on college football operations, including athletes' training regimens. As a result of these changes, concern for increased injury susceptibility post COVID-19 regulations has become a point of discussion. The current study sought to evaluate the incidence of surgical injury among NCAA Division 1 college football players at the authors' institution during the first full season after start of the COVID-19 pandemic compared with previous years. Retrospective chart review was performed for all players who sustained injuries requiring surgery while a member of the NCAA Division 1 football program during the 2009-2021 seasons. A p -value of ≤0.05 was used to determine significance. A total of 23 surgical injuries occurred in 22 players during the 2021 season compared with 121 in 118 players in the 12 previous seasons combined ( p = 0.0178; RR = 1.47). There was a significant increase in shoulder injuries ( n = 13 vs. n = 31; p = <0.0001; RR = 3.05) and specifically a significant increase in labral tears ( n = 10 vs. n = 30; p = 0.0003; RR = 2.74). No difference was seen in knee injuries ( n = 10 vs. n = 77; p = 0.27; RR = 1.35) and specifically no difference in anterior cruciate ligament injuries ( n = 3 vs. n = 31; p = 0.77; RR = 1.17). This phenomenon is multifactorial in nature, but alterations to players' training and preparations because of the COVID-19 pandemic likely resulted in suboptimal conditioning, leading to the increased incidence of surgical injuries emphasizing the importance of adequate strength training and conditioning., (Copyright © 2023 National Strength and Conditioning Association.)

Abstract: Costello II, JP, Wagner, JD, Dahl, VA, Cohen, JL, Reuter, AM, and Kaplan, LD. Effects of COVID-19 on rate of injury and position-specific injury during the 2020 National Football League season. J Strength Cond Res 38(1): 97-104, 2024-Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the National Football League (NFL) made changes to its operations for the 2020 season. We hypothesize an increase in the rate of injuries during the 2020 season. Publicly available data were reviewed to identify NFL injuries from the 2015-2020 seasons. Player position, description of injury, date of injury, and injury setting were recorded. p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. For the 2020 season, compared with the 2015-2019 seasons, there was an increased risk of injury during the regular season overall relative risk (RR) = 1.308 ( p < 0.05), week (W)1 RR = 7.33 ( p < 0.05), W1-6 RR = 1.964 ( p < 0.05), W7-12 RR = 1.8909 ( p < 0.05), and during the postseason overall RR = 1.1444 ( p < 0.05), calculated using analysis of variance. There was an overall increased risk of abdominal or core injuries RR = 1.248 ( p < 0.05), groin or hip injuries RR = 2.534 ( p < 0.05), and hamstring injuries RR = 3.644 ( p < 0.05). There was an increased risk of hamstring injuries in cornerbacks RR = 3.219 ( p < 0.05) and running backs RR = 1.1394 ( p < 0.05), hip or groin injuries in guards RR = 1.105 ( p < 0.05), Achilles tendon injuries in safeties RR = 1.6976 ( p < 0.05), quadriceps injuries in running backs RR = 1.6191 ( p < 0.05), and arm injuries in defensive tackles RR = 1.221 ( p < 0.05). There was an increase in the overall rate of injuries in the 2020 NFL season, both in the regular season and postseason, compared with the 2015-2019 seasons. The overall rate of abdominal or core, groin or hip, and hamstring injuries increased. Specific player positions saw unique increases in rates of injuries. These findings may be due to numerous operational changes implemented, such as reduced in-person training and the elimination of the preseason, leading to suboptimal, sports-specific conditioning and increased risk of musculoskeletal injury., (Copyright © 2023 National Strength and Conditioning Association.)

The field of craniomaxillofacial (CMF) surgery is rich in pathological diversity and broad in the ages that it treats. Moreover, the CMF skeleton is a complex confluence of sensory organs and hard and soft tissue with load-bearing demands that can change within millimeters. Computer-aided design (CAD) and additive manufacturing (AM) create extraordinary opportunities to repair the infinite array of craniomaxillofacial defects that exist because of the aforementioned circumstances. 3D printed scaffolds have the potential to serve as a comparable if not superior alternative to the " gold standard " autologous graft. In vitro and in vivo studies continue to investigate the optimal 3D printed scaffold design and composition to foster bone regeneration that is suited to the unique biological and mechanical environment of each CMF defect. Furthermore, 3D printed fixation devices serve as a patient-specific alternative to those that are available off-the-shelf with an opportunity to reduce operative time and optimize fit. Similar benefits have been found to apply to 3D printed anatomical models and surgical guides for preoperative or intraoperative use. Creation and implementation of these devices requires extensive preclinical and clinical research, novel manufacturing capabilities, and strict regulatory oversight. Researchers, manufacturers, CMF surgeons, and the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are working in tandem to further the development of such technology within their respective domains, all with a mutual goal to deliver safe, effective, cost-efficient, and patient-specific CMF care. This manuscript reviews FDA regulatory status, 3D printing techniques, biomaterials, and sterilization procedures suitable for 3D printed devices of the craniomaxillofacial skeleton. It also seeks to discuss recent clinical applications, economic feasibility, and future directions of this novel technology. By reviewing the current state of 3D printing in CMF surgery, we hope to gain a better understanding of its impact and in turn identify opportunities to further the development of patient-specific surgical care.

Background Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, many professional sports leagues such as the National Hockey League (NHL) made significant changes to their schedules and operating procedures. Changes included a modified 2019-2020 playoff format, the removal of the 2020-2021 preseason, and condensed game schedules. Though these modifications were made in an effort to protect players from COVID-19, they resulted in decreased training time and preparation. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of these changes on the rate of player injuries in the NHL both after the resumption of the midseason stoppage and during the subsequent seasons. Hypothesis/purpose Changes to the NHL schedule amid the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a significant increase in player injury rates. Methods NHL injuries were obtained from an NHL injury database for the 2018-2019 through the 2021-2022 seasons. The date of injury, date of return, injury description, player age, and player position were recorded. Injury rates were calculated as the number of total athlete injuries per 1000 game exposures (GEs). The primary outcome was the injury proportion ratio (IPR) when comparing the injury rates of the post-COVID-19 season with baseline seasons. Secondary measures analyzed injuries based on age, anatomic location, month in the season, position, length of injury, season-ending injuries, and recurring injuries. Results A total of 4604 injuries were recorded between 2018 and 2022. The modified 2019-2020 playoffs had significantly higher rates of injury (IPR = 1.84, 95% confidence interval {CI} = 1.36-2.49) with more game exposures per week. The 2020-2021 season had significantly higher rates of overall player injury compared to baseline seasons (IPR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.09-1.30) and also had a higher rate of season-ending injuries (IPR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.38-2.11). Most injuries occurred in the first few months of the 2020-2021 season. There was no significant difference in injury rate based on age group and no significant difference in the average length of injury between seasons. Conclusion Increases in injury rates could be due to decreased offseason training between seasons, the elimination of preseason games, and increased game density. Decreasing typical training timelines and eliminating the preseason to rapidly return to normal competition after unexpected events (pandemics, lockdowns, etc.) may pose a risk to player safety in the NHL. These findings should be considered before future schedule changes in professional hockey., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2023, Ehlen et al.)

Importance: Both augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) have had increasing applications in medicine, including medical training, psychology, physical medicine, rehabilitation, and surgical specialties, such as neurosurgery and orthopedic surgery. There are little data on AR's effect on patients' anxiety and experiences., Objective: To determine whether the use of an AR walkthrough effects patient perioperative anxiety., Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial was conducted at an outpatient surgery center in 2021 to 2022. All patients undergoing elective orthopedic surgery with the senior author were randomized to the treatment or control group. Analyses were conducted per protocol. Data analysis was performed in November 2022., Intervention: AR experience explaining to patients what to expect on their day of surgery and walking them through the surgery space. The control group received the standard educational packet., Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was change in State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) from the screening survey to the preoperative survey., Results: A total of 140 patients were eligible, and 45 patients either declined or were excluded. Therefore, 95 patients (63 [66.3%] male; mean [SD] age, 38 [16] years) were recruited for the study and included in the final analysis; 46 patients received the AR intervention, and 49 patients received standard instructions. The AR group experienced a decrease in anxiety from the screening to preoperative survey (mean score change, -2.4 [95% CI, -4.6 to -0.3]), while the standard care group experienced an increase (mean score change, 2.6 [95% CI, 0.2 to 4.9]; P = .01). All patients postoperatively experienced a mean decrease in anxiety score compared with both the screening survey (mean change: AR, -5.4 [95% CI, -7.9 to -2.9]; standard care, -6.9 [95% CI, -11.5 to -2.2]; P = .32) and preoperative survey (mean change: AR, -8.0 [95% CI, -10.3 to -5.7]; standard care, -4.2 [95% CI, -8.6 to 0.2]; P = .19). Of 42 patients in the AR group who completed the postoperative follow-up survey, 30 (71.4%) agreed or strongly agreed that they enjoyed the experience, 29 (69.0%) agreed or strongly agreed that they would recommend the experience, and 28 (66.7%) agreed or strongly agreed that they would use the experience again. No differences were observed in postoperative pain levels or narcotic use., Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, the use of AR decreased preoperative anxiety compared with traditional perioperative education and handouts, but there was no significant effect on postoperative anxiety, pain levels, or narcotic use. These findings suggest that AR may serve as an effective means of decreasing preoperative patient anxiety., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04727697.

Purpose: To determine the practice patterns and complication rates in medial ulnar collateral ligament (MUCL) repair versus reconstruction procedures performed by early-career orthopaedic surgeons each year between 2010 and 2020, stratified by fellowship training and concomitant procedures performed, during their 6-month American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) Case List collection period., Methods: The ABOS database was queried for MUCL reconstruction and MUCL repair procedures reported by ABOS Part II Oral Examination examinees from 2010 to 2020. Surgeon fellowship training background, patient demographics, procedural diagnosis codes, complications, and concomitant procedures were recorded for each case. Differences between overall procedure rates and the associated complications reported were examined. Data regarding the specific injury pathology and other patient-specific characteristics for each case were not available., Results: In total, 187 primary procedures performed to address isolated MUCL injuries were reported. Of those, 83% (n = 155) were reconstructions and 17% (n = 32) were repairs. The annual percentage of MUCL repair increased from 10% (1/10) in 2010 to 38% (8/21) in 2020 (linear regression; R 2  = 0.56, P < .05). The cumulative complication rate for MUCL reconstruction (11.6%) was significantly lower than for MUCL repair (25%) from 2010 to 2020 ( P < .05). This remained true among subsets of cases from Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Shoulder & Elbow, and or Hand Surgery fellowship-trained examinees, although only statistically significant in the Hand Surgery subset. Reported complication rates were not significantly different among cases in which concurrent ulnar nerve neuroplasty and/or transposition or concurrent elbow arthroscopy were performed., Conclusions: Among cases reported by ABOS Part II Oral Examination examinees from 2010 to 2020, there was an increasing rate of MUCL repair whereas MUCL reconstruction remained more common overall. Interestingly, the overall complication rates were significantly lower for MUCL reconstruction than for MUCL repair both in isolation and when concurrent procedures were performed., Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Background: Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) has been suggested to reduce improper component positioning, though the effectiveness of PSI in total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains inconclusive. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiographic parameters and clinical outcomes comparing PSI and standard instrumentation (SI)., Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the 2020 PRISMA statement and was registered on PROSPERO. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for relevant studies pertaining to the use of PSI in THA. Inclusion criteria included PSI used in THA, PSI was directly compared to SI, and publication in English. Exclusion criteria included non-primary THA, review articles, abstracts, book chapters, and animal models., Results: 2,458 studies were initially identified, with 13 studies (677 THAs: 338 controls, 339 PSI) meeting all criteria. PSI was favored for the deviation from the preoperative plan for acetabular cup position for anteversion (p = 0.04) and inclination (p = 0.0002); risk of acetabular cup positioning outside the Lewinnek safe zone for anteversion (p = 0.005) and inclination (p < 0.0001); and postoperative Harris Hip Score (p = 0.0002). No significant differences were found for the deviation from the preoperative plan for femoral stem position for anteversion (p = 0.74) or varus/valgus (p = 0.15); intraoperative time (p = 0.55); or intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.62)., Conclusion: The use of PSI in THA is effective in improving acetabular component positioning and postoperative functional outcomes, without increasing intraoperative time or blood loss, compared to SI., Competing Interests: None., (© 2022 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (JBJS) is one of most influential orthopaedic journals, with Total Joint Replacements (TJR) being a frequent topic. The importance of TJR research parallels it's high prevalence in American society., Objective: To compile and analyze the top 50 most frequently cited articles published in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery regarding total joint reconstruction or arthroplasty., Methods: Guidelines set by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews were used as the foundation for data collection and analysis. Scopus database was used to acquire the metric analyzed in the study. Data was then exported to an excel sheet for analysis., Results: The top 50 TJR publications analyzed for this study were cited a total of 35,850 times (including self-citations), with an average number of citations per article of 717. Kurtz and Neer II were the only authors contributing more than one. 38 of 50 articles analyzed met the criteria for Level II or III in terms of Level of Evidence (LOE). The United States contributed the most publications with a total of 34. Harvard University and Massachusetts General Hospital, with eight publications each, were the highest contributing institutions., Conclusion: The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery has published very influential research papers as noted by the number of citations amassed by its most popular articles. JBJS's top cited publications hail largely from major institutions in the United States and are composed of high-quality reports of mostly Level 2 and Level 3 evidence classifications., Level of Evidence: 3., Competing Interests: The authors, their immediate family, and any research foundation with which they are affiliated did not receive any financial payments or other benefits from any commercial entity related to the subject of this article. There are no relevant disclosures. We have no conflicts of interest. All authors significantly contributed to the document and have reviewed the final manuscript.

Introduction: Septic arthritis is an orthopaedic emergency, with permanent cartilage damage possible within hours of the onset of symptoms. Diagnostic criteria for septic arthritis in immunocompetent patients are well established, however, there is a paucity of literature evaluating diagnostic criteria in immunocompromised patients. The purpose of this retrospective case-control study was to evaluate the laboratory and clinical information of immunocompromised patients with septic arthritis and compare them to immunocompetent patients with septic arthritis to enable physicians to diagnose septic arthritis more accurately in this population., Methods: All patients at our institution, a level I trauma center, with a clinical diagnosis of septic arthritis between January 1, 2006 and November 1, 2021 were identified and reviewed retrospectively. Patients 18 years old or older were screened for immunocompromised status and those meeting criteria were included for review. The control cohort was matched by the joint affected and age. Data were analyzed using the Shapiro-Wilk test, Turkey's test, Mann-Whitney U test, independent sample t -test, and chi-square analysis. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant., Results: A total of 36 patients with positive joint aspirate cultures were compared (18 immunocompetent and 18 immunocompromised). The immunocompromised group had a significantly longer length of hospital stay than the immunocompetent group (p = 0.044). There was no significant difference in erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (p = 0.852), peripheral white blood cell count (pWBC) (p = 0.696), joint aspirate white blood cell count (aWBC) (p = 0.901), polymorphonuclear cell percentage (PMN%) (p = 0.325), or total operations performed per patient (p = 0.365)., Conclusion: At our institution, immunocompromised patients with septic arthritis did not have significantly different diagnostic laboratory values when compared to immunocompetent patients. This suggests that immunocompromised patients with suspicion of septic arthritis can be assessed with similar diagnostic criteria as immunocompetent individuals; however, a larger cohort study is needed to assess the difference more precisely in laboratory values., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (© 2022 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)