Search

Background: The aim of this study was to report the results of a single-centre experience with a new generation balloon expandable stent-graft (Viabahn VBX; W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ, USA) as bridging stent in branched endovascular aortic repair (B-EVAR)., Methods: This is a retrospective single institution analysis of a prospectively maintained database. All patients undergone implantation of at least one VBX as bridging stent in B-EVAR over the last 5 years (from July 1, 2018, to November 31, 2023) were included. Primary outcomes were technical success, primary and secondary stent patency rate, branch-related reinterventions, and branch instability. Secondary outcomes were clinical success, mortality, and rate of aortic-related reinterventions., Results: This study involved 40 patients for a total of 147 VBX stent-grafts implanted in 141 target vessels as bridging stents in B-EVAR (62.5% off-the-shelf and 37.5% custom made devices; 65% with outer branches and 35% with inner branches) for the treatment of 38 (95%) degenerative and 2 (5%) postdissection aneurysms. In 28 cases (70%) a total transfemoral approach was used to deliver the bridging stents. Technical success was 100%. No target vessel was lost intraoperatively. Over a median follow-up of 26.5 months (range 0-74), primary and secondary patency, branch-related reintervention, and branch instability were 98.5% (139/141), 99.3% (140/141), 15% (6/40), and 4.9% (7/141), respectively. Four of the 7 cases of branch instability, all requiring an endovascular correction, were secondary to type Ic endoleak. Clinical success was 97.5% as effect of 1 perioperative death. During the follow-up other 6 patients died, contributing to an overall survival rate of 82.5%. The overall rate of aortic-related reinterventions was 20%., Conclusions: Despite further evaluation is mandatory to determine durability of the VBX in the long-term after B-EVAR, in our experience VBX demonstrated a high flexibility and trackability, excellent stent retention, and outstanding patency over time. A generous distal landing of the bridging stent into the target vessel should be always achieved, whereas possible, to reduce the risk of type Ic endoleak, which seems to be the main cause of branch instability.

Background: Aortitis is a rare inflammation of the aorta. It can be classified as infective, non-infective, or idiopathic. Infective aortitis can debut as an acute aortic syndrome that needs urgent or emergent treatment. Historically, these kinds of patients have been preferably treated by open surgery, with subsequent lack of information about the endovascular repair. The aim of the present study is to report the results of our experience with the urgent or emergent endovascular repair of infective aortitis with acute presentation. Methods: All consecutive urgent or emergent endovascular repairs, performed between January 2019 and January 2024 for the treatment of infective aortitis, were included. The inclusion criteria were clinical, laboratory, and radiological findings recognized as aortitis risk factors. Patients with graft or endograft infection, aortic fistulae, and mycotic aneurysm were excluded. Primary endpoints were technical success and 30-day and follow-up survival. Early and late major adverse events, any changes in lesion morphology over time, and need for re-intervention were also assessed. Results: A total of 15 patients (14 males and 1 female) with a mean age of 74.2 ± 8.3 were included. All the subjects were treated by endovascular means in an urgent or emergent setting because of a rapidly growing aneurysm, symptomatic lesion, or contained or free aortic rupture. The diagnosis of infective aortitis was confirmed postoperatively by positive blood cultures in all the patients. A rapidly growing or symptomatic lesion was noted in all 15 subjects. Among these there were six (40%) contained and two (13%) free aneurysm ruptures. The endovascular techniques performed were as follows: four thoracic-EVAR (TEVAR), three off-the-shelf branched-EVAR (BEVAR), one Chimney-EVAR (Ch-EVAR), six EVAR with bifurcated graft, and one EVAR with straight tube graft. Technical success was achieved in 100% of the patients. Two patients (13%) died within 30 days after the index procedure. No case of early aortic-related mortality was registered. During a mean follow-up of 31.6 ± 23.1 months (range 1-71), no further death or major adverse event was registered among the remaining 13 alive patients. Re-interventions were performed in three cases (20%). Aneurysm's shrinkage > 5 mm or stability was noted in 10 of the 13 patients who survived the early period after repair. Conclusions: Despite the relative reluctance to use an endograft in an infected area, in our experience the endovascular approach resulted to be feasible, safe, and effective in the treatment of infective aortitis with acute presentation, with acceptable peri-operative and mid-term follow-up outcomes. Further studies are needed to confirm our results.

Objective: To assess the complex management of arterial anomalies in Vascular Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (vEDS)., Methods: We report the case of a 34-year-old male, diagnosed with vEDS, who presented with acute intraperitoneal hemorrhage caused by the rupture of a splenic artery aneurysm, treated in emergency with coil embolization and splenectomy. Computed Tomography (CT) scan showed the concomitant presence of right renal artery (RRA) and common hepatic artery (CHA) aneurysms., Results: Both aneurysms were conservatively managed and the patient went through serial CT imaging. After 3 months, rapid regression of the vascular abnormalities led to complete disappearing of RRA and CHA aneurysms, confirmed at 24-month imaging follow-up. In the same time span, two pseudoaneurysms developed in other sites used for transarterial access, requiring two secondary interventions. The present case emphasizes the unpredictability of disease's evolution and arterial complications in vEDS. Conservative management of complex lesions such as visceral artery aneurysms, which in this case resulted to be the best strategy, avoided the risks associated with surgical intervention in such fragile tissues. The reported complications underline that operative indications should be carefully weighed in these patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Introduction: The complexity of the peripheral recanalization comes from the difficulty to cross the lesion or get into the subintimal space and its re-entry afterward, with a high risk of complications like artery dissection and/or rupture, which are life-threatening complications. To our knowledge, we report the first case of the use of a homemade steerable sheath for the successful revascularization of a heavy chronic total occlusion in a patient with unsuitable upper vascular access., Technique: By contralateral vascular access and the use of a 6Fr 55-cm Cook Flexor sheath and a pre-looped 0.014" choice guidewire, a steerable homemade sheath was used to achieve the support, pushability, and steer needed to access the subintimal space at the origin of a heavy occluded common iliac artery, thus giving us the ability to cross the lesion., Conclusions: The homemade steerable sheath is feasible, quick, cheap, and easy to use, sparing the use of re-entry systems and catheters for the attempts of subintimal navigation. In addition, this technique gives the advantage to steer the catheters and wires as needed, avoiding non-desired re-entry points with secondary collaterals lumen compromise or extensive dissections.

Objectives: To assess the outcomes of Cook t-Branch off-the-shelf multibranched stent graft in the treatment of complex aortic aneurysms with narrow internal aortic lumen., Methods: Between 2016 and 2020, 48 patients (mean age, 73 years) underwent elective or urgent or emergent Cook t-Branch implantation for thoracoabdominal or para/juxtarenal aortic aneurysms in two Italian vascular centers. Among these, 20 patients presented a paravisceral or pararenal luminal diameter of less than 25 mm. Major clinical and radiologic outcomes of patients with narrow aortic lumen were compared with patients with a larger lumen in a multicenter, nonrandomized, retrospective fashion., Results: The in-hospital mortality was 10% (5% in the elective setting). Spinal cord ischemia occurred in 6% of the cases. During a mean follow-up of 18 months (range, 1-63 months), late t-Branch procedure-related mortality and the need for reintervention was 0% and 12%, respectively. Comparing the outcomes of patients with large internal aortic lumen (group 1) with patients with small lumen (group 2), no significant difference was found regarding fluoroscopy time (P = .3); technical success (P = 1); early (P = .4) and late (P = 1) mortality; spinal cord ischemia (P = .2); bowel ischemia (P = .5); renal (P = .7), cardiac (P = 1), and respiratory complications (P = 1); reintervention rate (P = 1); and primary patency rate of stented target vessels (P = 1)., Conclusions: The use of the Cook t-Branch in our experience was safe and effective in the treatment of complex aortic aneurysms regardless the caliber of the aortic lumen. With all the limitations of a small sample size, this approach has demonstrated to be feasible when maneuverability is decreased, with low mortality and morbidity, and acceptable reintervention rates. Perioperative mortality remains closely related to clinical presentation. Large-scale studies are needed to confirm these results., (Copyright © 2022 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To report the results of a single-centre in the treatment of extensive aorto-iliac occlusive disease (AIOD) by the covered endovascular reconstruction of aortic bifurcation (CERAB) technique., Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on data obtained from the review of medical charts of all consecutive patients treated with CERAB technique for AIOD between January 2016 and December 2019 in San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital (Rome, Italy). Clinical examination, duplex ultrasound with ankle-brachial index measurement and contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography were performed preoperatively. A clinical and ultrasound follow-up was carried out at one month and then half yearly after the intervention to evaluate patients' clinical status, limb salvage, target lesion revascularization rate, primary and secondary patency rate., Results: During the study period, 24 patients (14 men, 58.3%; 10 women, 41.7%; median age 59 years, range 37-79 years) underwent CERAB for AIOD (TASC II C 29.2%, TASC II D 70.8%). Indications for treatment were: intermittent claudication in 18 patients (75%) and critical limb ischemia in 6 (25%). Technical success was achieved in all cases. Perioperative minor complications occurred in three cases (12.5%). One patient reported an intraoperative iliac rupture requiring adjunctive covered stenting. Median hospital length of stay was two days (range 1-9). No patient died perioperatively nor at the last follow-up. At a median follow-up of 18 months (range 6-48 months), mean ankle-brachial index increased significantly (from 0.62 ± 0.15 before the procedure to 0.84 ± 0.18) ( P  < 0.001) and target lesion revascularization rate was 12.5%. At two years, the limb salvage rate was 100%, and primary and secondary patency rates were 87.5% and 100%, respectively., Conclusion: CERAB technique demonstrated to be effective at the mid-term follow-up with low rate of complications and short length of stay. Long-term results and more robust data are needed to affirm this technique as the first-line treatment for extensive AIOD. However, it could become the preferred option especially in fragile patients and during contemporary COVID-19 pandemic due to the current limitations in vascular and critical care bed capacity.

Background: The aim of this study was to report the results of a multicenter experience on the use of adjunctive stents deployed inside abdominal aortic endografts with the purpose to prevent or treat limb occlusion after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR)., Methods: Between 2010 and 2018, there were 35 patients with aorto-iliac aneurysm presenting one or more risk factors for endograft limb occlusion (narrow aortic bifurcation and/or stenotic, highly angulated or occluded iliac arteries), who were treated with standard bifurcated stent graft reinforced by the means of a single model of balloon-expandable platinum/iridium bare stent (CP Stent; NuMED, Inc., Hopkinton, NY, USA). Technical success, mortality, limb patency and reintervention rate during follow-up were the main endpoints assessed., Results: Technical success was 100%. No patients died perioperatively and no major complication was registered. During a mean follow-up of 48 months (range 1-87), neither aortic-related death nor secondary intervention was registered. At a mean follow-up imaging of 39.4 months (range 1-81) no endograft limb lost its patency., Conclusions: The use of high-radial force balloon-expandable stents deployed inside bifurcated endografts to prevent or treat limb occlusion is a safe and effective adjunctive procedure, with outstanding long-term outcomes in terms of patency and reinterventions.

Purpose: To report early and mid-term results of post-aortic dissection thoracoabdominal aneurysms (pD-TAAA) treated by complex endografting in three tertiary referral hospitals., Materials and Methods: A review of all patients with pD-TAAA unfit for open surgery treated with complex endovascular repair from 2012 to 2018 was performed. Simple thoracic endografts (TEVAR) were excluded. Staged procedures in case of extensive aortic coverage were always planned., Results: In total, 21 patients (16 males, mean age 63 ± 10 years) with pD-TAAA underwent aortic repair by fenestrated or branched thoracoabdominal endografts for visceral vessels. Mean TAAA diameter was 61 ± 6.2 mm. Spinal cord drainage was performed in all patients. A staged approach was used in 12 (57%) cases. Technical success was achieved in 18 (86%) patients. No in-hospital deaths occurred. Two patients experienced transient post-procedural spinal cord ischemia. At 30 days, six type II endoleaks (29%), two type Ic endoleak (9.5%) and one type IIIc endoleak (5%) were reported. At a mean follow-up of 23 ± 13 months, no late aortic-related deaths occurred. Three patients underwent reintervention for type Ic and IIIc endoleaks. No visceral vessel occlusion was observed. Estimated freedom from reintervention at 12 and 24 months was 85.7 ± 0.7%. In 13 cases, TAAA diameter decreased at least 5 mm, while increased > 5 mm in only one case. Complete false lumen thrombosis was achieved in 18 patients (86%)., Conclusion: Complex endografting for pD-TAAA showed favorable mid-term results. Staged and carefully planned endovascular procedures may represent a safe and effective therapeutic option in patients deemed at high risk of open repair.

Secondary aorto-enteric fistulae (SAEF) are rare life-threatening complications that occur after abdominal aortic graft implant to treat aortic aneurysm or occlusive disease. Conventional treatments such as extra-anatomic bypass grafting with aortic ligation and subsequent graft removal with bowel repair are associated with a 25% to 90% operative mortality rate. In the emergency setting, patients unsuitable for major arterial surgery may benefit from a staged, less invasive approach. We present a case of SAEF treated with endoluminal deployment of a stent graft followed by duodenojejunal resection and anastomosis without further aortic reconstruction and graft removal.

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess early and midterm results after endovascular aortic arch repair using a double inner branch stent graft (DIBSG) in patients with aortic arch aneurysm or dissection unfit for open surgery., Methods: Between 2012 and 2018, there were 24 patients with aortic arch disease who were treated with a single model of a DIBSG (Terumo Aortic, Glasgow, United Kingdom) in nine Italian cardiovascular centers. We investigated technical success, mortality, occurrence of major complications, and need for reintervention in a multicenter, nonrandomized, retrospective fashion., Results: The in-hospital mortality rate was 16.7%. Cerebrovascular events occurred in 25% of patients and major strokes in 12.5%. Two patients experienced a retrograde dissection (8.3%), whereas none reported any type I or type III endoleak. During a mean follow-up of 18 months (range, 1-60 months), one patient died of a nonaortic cause and one reported a nonarch-related major stroke. No late secondary intervention was needed during the follow-up. Excluding from the analysis the first six patients treated until 2014 as part of the learning curve, in-hospital mortality, major stroke, and retrograde dissection rates were 11.1%, 11.1%, and 5.6%, respectively., Conclusions: Endovascular aortic arch repair using this model of DIBSG is feasible, and results are acceptable for a new technique in a high-risk subset of patients. Operative mortality suffers the effect of a learning curve, whereas midterm aorta-related survival is promising. Endovascular repair of aortic arch disease with a DIBSG should always be considered to give high-risk patients a chance of repair. Large-scale studies are needed to assess the long-term durability of this technique., (Copyright © 2019 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to present a single-centre experience with EndoAnchors in patients who underwent endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms with challenging proximal neck, both in the prevention and treatment of endograft migration and type Ia endoleaks., Methods: We retrospectively analysed 17 consecutive patients treated with EndoAnchors between June 2015 and May 2018 at our institution. EndoAnchors were applied during the initial endovascular aneurysm repair procedure (primary implant) to prevent proximal neck complications in difficult anatomies (nine patients), and in the follow-up after aneurysm exclusion (secondary implant) to correct type Ia endoleak and/or stent-graft migration (eight patients)., Results: Mean time for anchors implant was 23 min (range 12-41), with a mean of 5 EndoAnchors deployed per patient. Six patients in the secondary implant group required a proximal cuff due to stent-graft migration ≥10 mm. Technical success was achieved in all cases, with no complications related to deployment of the anchors. At a median follow-up of 13 months (range 4-39, interquartile range 9-20), there were no aneurysm-related deaths or aneurysm ruptures, and all patients were free from reinterventions. CT-scan surveillance showed no evidence of type Ia endoleak, anchors dislodgement or stent-graft migration, with a mean reduction of aneurysm diameter of 0.4 mm (range 0-19); there was no sac growth or aortic neck enlargement in any case., Conclusions: EndoAnchors can be safely used in the prevention and treatment of type Ia endoleaks in patients with challenging aortic necks, with good results in terms of sac exclusion and diameter reduction in the mid-term follow-up.

Background: In the light of current evidence, endovascular repair of aortic arch pathologies with custom-made devices should be considered a valid alternative to decrease operative mortality and morbidity associated with open or hybrid repair. Today, two double inner branch devices are available on market. We report our single-center experience with Bolton double branch stent graft in the treatment of aortic arch disease., Methods: Between 2013 and 2016, 15 high-risk patients with arch pathology were treated in our center with a custom-made branched device. Six of these received a Cook arch branched stent graft. Nine were treated with Bolton device. Among these, 2 with single branch model were excluded leaving a subgroup of 7 patients object of this study., Results: Out of the 7 male patients (mean age 76, range 70-85) included in the study, 2 died in-hospital after stroke and retrograde dissection, respectively. No other death, major complication or secondary intervention was recorded at a mean follow-up of 24 (min-max 6-53) months, neither any aneurysmal diameter evolution nor branch related complications., Conclusions: Despite the small sample size, our results are in line with the early-published experiences about this technique. Endovascular repair of aortic arch disease with custom-made branched devices should always be considered to give high-risk patients a chance of repair.

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate outcomes of patients treated with endovascular repair (ER) with the use of fenestrated and branched stent grafts or open surgery (OS) for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) in a current series of patients., Methods: All TAAA patients undergoing repair at three centers between January 2007 and December 2014 were included in a prospective database. Patients were stratified according to treatment by ER or OS, and outcomes were compared using propensity score matching (1:1). Covariates included age, sex, aneurysm extent, hypertension, coronary disease, chronic pulmonary disease, diabetes, and renal function. The primary end points were mortality and paraplegia. Secondary end points included any spinal cord ischemia (SCI), renal and respiratory insufficiency, and a composite of these complications or death at 30 days. All-cause survival and freedom from reintervention were compared in the two groups., Results: Of 341 patients, 84 (25%) underwent ER and 257 underwent OS (75%). After propensity score matching (65 patients per group), no significant differences were observed in rates of 30-day mortality (7.7% in ER and 6.2% in OS; P = 1) and paraplegia (9.2% and 10.8%; P = 1). Any SCI, renal insufficiency, and respiratory insufficiency were 12.3% and 20% (P = .34), 9.2% and 12.3% (P = .78), and 0% and 12.3% (P = .006) in ER and OS, respectively. The incidence of the composite end point was significantly lower in ER patients (18.5% in ER vs 36.0% in OS; P =.03). According to Kaplan-Meier estimates, all-cause survival at 24 months was 82.8% in ER and 84.9% in OS, with rates unchanged at 42 months (P = .9). Rates of freedom from reintervention were 91.0% vs 89.7% at 24 months and 80.0% vs 79.9% at 42 months in ER vs OS, respectively (P = .3)., Conclusions: A propensity score analysis in patients with TAAA undergoing repair suggests an early benefit from ER compared with OS with regard to the composite end point because of reduced 30-day respiratory complications. No significant differences were found in SCI and renal insufficiency at 30 days and in survival and reintervention rates at midterm., (Copyright © 2016 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study analyzed total aortic arch reconstruction in a contemporary comparison of current open and endovascular repair., Methods: Endovascular (group 1) and open arch procedures (group 2) performed during 2007 to 2013 were entered in a prospective database and retrospectively analyzed. Endovascular repair (proximal landing zones 0-1), with or without a hybrid adjunct, was selected for patients with a high comorbidity profile and fit anatomy. Operations involving coverage of left subclavian artery only (zone 2 proximal landing: n = 41) and open hemiarch replacement (n = 434) were excluded. Early and midterm mortality and major complications were assessed., Results: Overall, 100 (78 men; mean age, 68 years) consecutive procedures were analyzed: 29 patients in group 2 and 71 in group 1. Seven group 1 patients were treated with branched or chimney stent graft, and 64 with partial or total debranching and straight stent graft. The 29 patients in group 2 were younger (mean age, 61.9 vs 70.3; P = .005), more frequently females (48.2% vs 11.3; P < .001) with less cardiac (6.9% vs 38.2%; P = .001), hypertensive (58.5% vs 88.4%; P = .002), and peripheral artery (0% vs 16.2%; P = .031) disease. At 30 days, there were six deaths in group 1 and four in group 2 (8.5% vs 13.8%; odds ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-6.66; P = .47), and four strokes in group 1 and one in group 2 (odds ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-5.59; P = 1). Spinal cord ischemia occurred in two group 1 patients and in no group 2 patients. Three retrograde dissections (1 fatal) were detected in group 1. During a mean follow-up of 26.2 months, two type I endoleaks and three reinterventions were recorded in group 1 (all for persistent endoleak), and one reintervention was performed in group 2. According to Kaplan Meier estimates, survival at 4 years was 79.8% in group 1 and 69.8% in group 2 (P = .62), and freedom from late reintervention was 94.6% and 95.5%, respectively (P = .82)., Conclusions: Despite the older age and a higher comorbidity profile in patients with challenging aortic arch disease suitable and selected for endovascular arch repair, no significant differences were detected in perioperative and 4-year outcomes compared with the younger patients undergoing open arch total repair. An endovascular approach might also be a valid alternative to open surgery in average-risk patients with aortic arch diseases requiring 0 to 1 landing zones, when morphologically feasible. However, larger concurrent comparison and longer follow-up are needed to confirm this hypothesis., (Copyright © 2015 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aim: Dilation of one or both common iliac arteries (CIAs) is a major concern in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). One option for CIA aneurysm repair is hypogastric embolization followed by endograft extension into the external iliac artery. However, hypogastric occlusion does not always go unpunished and it may lead to ischemic complications. Aim of the paper was to evaluate early results with the Gore® Excluder® Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis (IBE) in the treatment of iliac aneurysms associated or not with abdominal aortic aneurysms., Methods: Between November 2013 and April 2014, in our Institution 7 Gore IBE were implanted in 5 patients. Technical success, 30-day mortality and complications were investigated., Results: Technical success and branch patency was 100%. There was no 30-day mortality. In 1 of the 2 bilateral cases an endovascular relining with bare stents was required due to a compression of iliac legs at level of aortic bifurcation., Conclusion: Use of Gore IBE device in the treatment of aorto-iliac disease is feasible and safe. Late results are necessary to evaluate the performance of this endograft in the long term.

Minimally invasive surgical solutions for patients with extensive aortic disease are eagerly awaited, since open repair is often associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. In the last decade, the development of fenestrated and branched aortic endografts has offered a therapeutic option to patients deemed unsuitable for major surgery. Preliminary studies showed promising early results, while mid- and long- term data are scarce. The aim of this paper was to review current results of total endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) with a single model of endograft in the published literature. A literature search was conducted, and our two-center experience with fenestrated and branched endografts in the treatment of TAAA, with the Cook Zenith endograft, is presented. Early results show perioperative mortality rates ranging from 0% to 21%, spinal cord ischemia from 0% to 33.3%. At a mean follow up ranging from 9 to 19 months, reinterventions are needed in 3.3% to 25% of the cases, with a mid term visceral branch patency of 90% to 100%. Current experiences with total endovascular TAAA repair show promising results, in selected centers with large experience in complex aortic endografting. With increasing follow- up times, need for reintervention is growing, while aneurysm-related deaths remain rare. Long-term results are still lacking, but these encouraging data and further technological developments will support wider adoption of the technique.

Objective: Currently, the best approach to the aortic arch remains unsupported by robust evidence. Most of the available data rely on small sample numbers, heterogeneous settings, and limited follow-up. The objective of this study was to evaluate early and midterm results of arch debranching and endovascular procedures., Methods: From 2005 through 2013, 104 consecutive patients underwent elective arch treatment with debranching and thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Rates of perioperative (30-day) mortality and neurological complications, and mortality, endoleak, supra-aortic vessel patency, and arch diameter changes at 5 years were analyzed., Results: Patients' mean age was 69.8 years, and 90 were males. Twenty arches were repaired for dissection. Nineteen patients required total debranching for diseases extended to zone 0. In 59, debranching and thoracic endovascular aortic repair procedures were staged. At 30 days, death, stroke, and spinal cord ischemia occurred in six, four, and three patients, respectively. Extension to ascending aorta (zone 0 landing) was the only multivariate independent predictor for perioperative mortality (odds ratio, 9.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.54-59.90; P = .015), but not for stroke. Four retrograde dissections, two fatal, occurred during the perioperative period. At 1, 3, and 5 years, Kaplan-Meier survival rates were 89.0%, 82.8%, and 70.9%, and freedom from persistent endoleak rates were 96.1%, 92.5%, and 88.3%, respectively. Over 5-year follow-up, 34 aneurysms shrank ≥ 5 mm, and four grew. Five reinterventions were required. Two supra-aortic vessel occlusions and no late aorta-related mortalities were recorded., Conclusions: Despite the perioperative mortality risk, the late outcome of endovascular arch repair presents a low rate of aorta-related deaths and reinterventions and acceptable midterm survival. Furthermore, more than one-third of the aneurysms' diameters decrease over 5 years as a measure of the long-term efficacy of treatment. Retrograde type A dissection remains a major concern in the perioperative period and careful arch approach is required., (Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Information on outcome of patients with long superficial femoral artery (SFA) obstruction undergoing endovascular treatment is scarce. The present study reports results from a prospective multicenter registry designed to evaluate the safety, effectiveness, and patency of the aSpire self-expanding polytetrafluoroethylene covered stent (Vascular Architects Inc, San Jose, Calif) in patients with femoropopliteal occlusive disease., Method: The aSpire Registry included 150 patients (166 limbs) enrolled in 16 centers during a 28-month period (2003 to 2005) for medium/long (>3 cm) occlusion (n = 115) or stenosis (n = 51) of the SFA (n = 51) or of the proximal popliteal (n = 115) arteries. Procedures were performed for intermittent claudication in 92, for rest pain in 33, and for limb savage in 41. The mean length of arterial segment covered was 107.35 +/- 73.7 mm. Indications for treatment included 44 type B1, 57 type B2, 47 type C1, and 18 type D lesions according to TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus classification. Clinical and ultrasound evaluation was performed at discharge and at 1, 6, 12 months, and yearly thereafter. Mean follow-up was 13 months (range, 1 to 36). Primary end points were immediate technical success (vessel recanalization with residual stenosis < or =30%) and stent patency., Results: Initial technical success was obtained in 162 (97.6%) of 166 procedures. More than one stent was applied in 48 procedures, for a total of 214 stents. No periprocedural deaths occurred. Procedure-related complications occurred in 22 of 166 procedures, including 6 peripheral embolizations, 7 thromboses, 2 hemorrhages requiring revision, 1 vessel rupture, and 6 vessel dissections. Life-table estimates of primary patency at 12, 24, and 36 months were 64%, 59%, and 59%, respectively. Thirty-two reinterventions were performed during follow-up, resulting in secondary patency rates at 12, 24, and 36 months of 74.2%, 67%, and 67%, respectively. Amputation was required in six of 41 patients treated for limb salvage. At multivariate analysis, critical limb ischemia was the only significant predictor of late failure., Conclusion: Endovascular treatment of SFA occlusive lesions provides interesting results. Length of lesion and clinical symptoms influence negatively the patency. The aSpire covered stent showed good mid-term results, but a number of reinterventions were necessary to obtain an optimal secondary patency. Risk of patency failure was related to critical limb ischemia as an indication for the procedure. Technologic and pharmacologic improvement and longer follow-up are needed to define the indications for the aSpire stent.