Search

Background: Reducing the turnaround time for reporting antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) results is important for adjusting empirical treatments and may impact clinical outcomes of septic patients, particularly in settings with high antimicrobial resistance. Disc diffusion could be useful for inferring β-lactam resistance mechanisms., Objectives: To evaluate the usefulness of EUCAST rapid AST (RAST) disc diffusion breakpoints for the screening of resistance mechanisms (sRAST) and interpretive reading of resistance phenotypes to infer ESBL and carbapenemases production in Enterobacterales., Methods: Blood cultures were artificially spiked with Enterobacterales clinical isolates with well-characterized β-lactam resistance mechanisms ( n  = 93), WT phenotypes ( n  = 26) and ATCC strains ( n  = 8). AST was performed by disc diffusion directly from blood cultures and inhibition zones were manually measured at 4, 6 and 8 h. To infer the presence of resistance mechanisms, EUCAST RAST breakpoints and screening cut-off values (sRAST) combined with the double-disc synergy test (DDS) for ESBLs or aztreonam susceptibility for carbapenemases detection were used., Results: DDS together with sRAST detected all ESBL producers as early as at 4 h incubation. Cefotaxime was the antibiotic with the highest discriminatory power. The suspicion of carbapenemase production by sRAST at 8 h was possible in 73% of Klebsiella pneumoniae and in 100% of Escherichia coli carbapenemase-producing isolates. Phenotypic analysis improves the detection of some low hydrolytic carbapenemases (OXA-48 or KPC-3 mutants)., Conclusions: Early detection of β-lactam resistance mechanisms directly from positive blood cultures was possible using sRAST together with the interpretive reading of antibiotic resistance phenotypes. Some carbapenemase types such as OXA-48 might be difficult to infer. Screening-positive isolates should be confirmed using an alternative technique., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.)

Background: Pseudomonas aeruginosa is of great concern among MDR bacteria and rapid and reliable in vitro antibiotic susceptibility testing methods are extremely necessary. Colistin is, in many cases, among the limited useful alternatives for these isolates. Unfortunately, only a few reliable in vitro methods are validated for testing susceptibility to colistin. Although EUCAST and CLSI recommend broth microdilution (BMD) as the standard method for antibiotic susceptibility testing, this method is not routinely performed in microbiology laboratories. However, some commercial products based upon BMD have tested well and offer consistent results., Objectives: To evaluate the performance of the colorimetric Rapid Polymyxin Pseudomonas Test (RPPT) (ELITech Microbiology, France)., Methods: Eighty-seven clinical P. aeruginosa strains, prospectively collected in two microbiology laboratories exhibiting either susceptibility or various degrees of multidrug resistance, including to colistin, were used. Different susceptibility testing methods were simultaneously performed and compared with reference BMD and interpreted using 2020 EUCAST criteria., Results: Results indicate an essential agreement (EA) of 97.7% for RPPT while the other tests did not reach 90% of EA [66.7% MicroScan, 63.2% Etest (bioMérieux, France) and 60.9% other MIC Test Strips (MTS, Liofilchem, Italy)]. The categorical agreement was 98.9% for RPPT, 87.4% for MTS, 85.1% for Etest and 64.4% for MicroScan., Conclusions: The RPPT was able to accurately detect both colistin-susceptible and -resistant isolates within 4 h, offering a rapid alternative for a prompt decision about the inclusion of this antibiotic in a patient's treatment., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.)

Background and Purpose: Specific respiratory tract infections, including COVID-19, may cause smell and/or taste disorders (STDs) with increased frequency. The aim was to determine whether new-onset STDs are more frequent amongst COVID-19 patients than influenza patients., Method: This was a case-control study including hospitalized patients of two tertiary care centres. Consecutive patients positive for COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction (cases) and patients positive for influenza polymerase chain reaction (historical control sample) were assessed during specific periods, employing a self-reported STD questionnaire., Results: Seventy-nine cases and 40 controls were included. No significant differences were found in basal features between the two groups. New-onset STDs were significantly more frequent amongst cases (31, 39.2%) than in the control group (5, 12.5 %) [adjusted odds ratio 21.4 (2.77-165.4, P = 0.003)]. COVID-19 patients with new-onset STDs were significantly younger than COVID-19 patients without STDs (52.6 ± 17.2 vs. 67.4 ± 15.1, P < 0.001). Amongst COVID-19 patients who presented STDs, 22 (70.9%) recalled an acute onset and it was an initial manifestation in 11 (35.5%). Twenty-five (80.6%) presented smell disorders (mostly anosmia, 14, 45.2%) and 28 (90.3%) taste disorders (mostly ageusia, 14, 45.2%). Only four (12.9 %) reported concomitant nasal obstruction. The mean duration of STD was 7.5 ± 3.2 days and 12 patients (40%) manifested complete recovery after 7.4 ± 2.3 days of onset., Conclusion: New-onset STDs were significantly more frequent amongst COVID-19 patients than influenza patients; they usually had an acute onset and were commonly an initial manifestation. The use of STD assessment in anamnesis as a hint for COVID-19 and to support individuals' self-isolation in the current epidemic context is suggested., (© 2020 European Academy of Neurology.)