Search

Objectives and background Convalescent plasma (CP) has been used worldwide to contrast SARS-CoV-2 infection. Since April 2020, it has also been used in the treatment of patients with COVID-19 in the Veneto region (Italy), along with all the other available drugs and therapeutic tools. Here we report data analysis and clinical results in 1,517 COVID-19 inpatients treated with CP containing high-titre neutralizing anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (CCP). Mortality after 30 days of hospitalization has been considered primary outcome, by comparing patients treated with CCP vs all COVID-19 patients admitted to hospitals of the Veneto region in a one-year period (from April 2020 to April 2021). Patients and methods Adult inpatients with a severe form of COVID-19 have been enrolled, with at least one of the following inclusion criteria: 1) tachypnea with respiratory rate (RR) ≥ 30 breaths/min; 2) oxygen saturation (SpO2) ≤ 93% at rest and in room air; 3) partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ≤ 200 mmHg, 4) radiological picture and/or chest CT scan showing signs of interstitial disease and/or rapid progression of lung involvement. Patients received a maximum of three therapeutic fractions (TFs) of CCP with a neutralizing antibody titre of ≥ 1:160, administered over a period of 3–5 days. If TFs of CCP with titre ≥ 1:160 were unavailable, 2 with antibody titre of ≥ 1:80 have been administered. Results Of the 1,517 patients treated with CCP, 209 deceased at the 30-day follow-up (14%). Death was significantly associated with an older age (p30 (p

Carriers of a mutation in the prothrombin (clotting factor II) or factor V gene have a 2- to 4-fold greater risk for venous thromboembolism than subjects without the mutations. Whether both mutations also predispose to recurrent venous thromboembolism is unclear. Outpatients who had a first episode of proven symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis and a long-term follow-up were studied. The outcome measure was the cumulative incidence of confirmed venous thromboembolic complications. Two hundred fifty-one patients were enrolled in the study. Mean duration of follow-up was 8.3 years. The prothrombin gene mutation was demonstrated in 27 patients (prevalence, 10.8%; 95% CI, 6.9 to 14.6), and the factor V gene mutation was demonstrated in 41 patients (prevalence, 16.3%; 95% CI, 11.8 to 20.9). The cumulative incidence of venous thromboembolic complications after 10 years was 61.3% (95% CI, 35.7 to 87.9), and the hazard ratio was 2.4 (95% CI, 1.3 to 4.7; P = .004) in patients with the prothrombin gene mutation); the cumulative incidence of venous thromboembolic complications after 10 years was 55.2% (95% CI, 36.4 to 74.0), and the hazard ratio was 2.4 (95% CI, 1.4 to 4.1;P = .001) in patients with the factor V gene mutation. In comparison, the cumulative incidence of venous thromboembolic complications after 10 years was 23.1% (95% CI, 16.2 to 30.1) in patients without the mutations. Prothrombin and factor V gene mutations occur frequently in patients with venous thrombosis and are associated with an increased risk for recurrent venous thromboembolic complications

A recently discovered mutation in coagulation factor V (Arg506--Gln, referred to as factor V Leiden), which results in resistance to activated protein C, is found in approximately one fifth of patients with venous thromboembolism. However, the risk of recurrent thromboembolism in heterozygous carriers of this genetic abnormality is unknown.We searched for factor V Leiden in 251 unselected patients with a first episode of symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis diagnosed by venography. The patients were followed prospectively for a mean of 3.9 years to determine the frequency of recurrent venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.Factor V Leiden was found in 41 of the patients (16.3 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 11.8 to 20.9 percent). The cumulative incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism after follow-up of up to eight years was 39.7 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 22.8 to 56.5 percent) among carriers of the mutation, as compared with 18.3 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 12.3 to 24.3 percent) among patients without the mutation (hazard ratio, 2.4; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.3 to 4.5; P0.01).The risk of recurrent thromboembolic events is significantly higher in carriers of factor V Leiden than in patients without this abnormality. Large trials assessing the risk-benefit ratio of long-term anticoagulation in carriers of the mutation who have had a first episode of venous thromboembolism are indicated.

Antiphospholipid antibodies (APAs) are associated with venous thromboembolism in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). In patients without SLE, but with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) this association is established only for patients with lupus anticoagulant (LA). In a case-controlled study APAs were determined in 171 consecutive outpatients who underwent phlebography at the first episode of clinically suspected DVT of lower limbs. Phlebography confirmed the presence of DVT in 54 (32%) patients and excluded it in 117. Antiphospholipid antibodies (exluding LA) were detected in 5 (9.2%) of the 54 patients with DVT and in 7 (5.9%) of the 117 subjects without DVT, The prevalence of APAs tended to be higher in patients with DVT than in patients without DVT, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.3%). Antiphospholipid antibodies in the absence of LA are not associated with DVT in symptomatic patients. Therefore future studies should be performed before changing our clinical approach in APA-A positive but LA-negative patients. Key Words: Antiphospholipid antibodies-Deep vein thrombosis.

A 55-year-old woman with a previous history of thrombotic manifestations developed large left atrial thrombosis. Coagulative screening demonstrated the presence of severe activated protein C resistance due to homozygous factor V Leiden mutation that could explain the thrombophilic state in this patient. No other associated coagulation defects predisposing to thrombosis were identified. At the time of diagnosis of intra-atrial thrombosis, the patient presented with a moderate mitral valve stenosis and atrial fibrillation of recent onset. Both these conditions may account for the presence of left atrial thrombosis but it is suggested that inherited thrombophilia due to homozygous factor V Leiden mutation might have represented an additional predisposing factor for the development of the thrombotic phenomenon. The role of coagulation defects predisposing to thrombosis in the pathogenesis of intracardial thrombosis in patients with or without valvular diseases is still unknown and proper studies are required. Key Words: Thrombophilia-Factor V Leiden-Atrial thrombosis.

Accumulating evidence suggests that the ELISA determination of D-Dimer might be a useful tool for the exclusion of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of lower extremities, because of its high sensitivity and negative predictive value. However, conventional ELISA assay is time-consuming and, therefore, is not suitable for emergency use. To evaluate the accuracy of two rapid assays recently described, 126 consecutive outpatients with the clinical suspicion of DVT underwent the NycoCard D-Dimer and the Instant I.A. D-Dimer determination, using venography as the reference test. In all patients, the conventional ELISA assay was also performed. Venography confirmed the presence of DVT in 30 patients (23.8%), and ruled out the diagnosis in the remaining 96. Instant I.A D-Dimer was positive in 28 patients with DVT (sensitivity, 93.3%), and negative in 90 subjects free from thrombosis (specificity, 93.8%). Nycocard D-Dimer correctly identified 27 patients with DVT (sensitivity 90.0%), and was negative in 77 subjects free from thrombosis (specificity, 80.2%). Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values of both tests did not differ from those found with the classic ELISA method. In conclusion, both Instant I.A. D-Dimer and Nycocard D-Dimer assays show a great potential for clinical use. © 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd

SummaryIn a case-control study, fasting total homocysteinemia was determined in 208 consecutive outpatients who underwent phlebography because of the first episode of clinically suspected deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) of lower limbs. Contrast venography confirmed the clinical suspicion in 60 patients (28.8%). Hyperhomocysteinemia was detected in 15 of the 60 patients with DVT (25.0%), and in 17 of the 148 subjects without thrombosis (11.5%; p = 0.025). The OR for having an acute DVT in patients with hyperhomocysteinemia was 2.6 (95% Cl: 1.1-5.9). It is concluded that high plasma homocysteine levels are significantly associated with DVT in symptomatic patients. Further studies are needed to clarify the clinical implications of this association.

Background The optimal duration of thromboprophylaxis after major orthopedic surgery is controversial. Although oral anticoagulants are still widely used for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after hip replacement, to our knowledge no study has assessed the benefit of prolonging anticoagulation beyond the hospital stay. Methods Consecutive patients who had received warfarin sodium prophylaxis after total hip arthroplasty were randomized to stop taking the drug at the time of hospital discharge or to continue taking it for 4 more weeks. The rate of symptomatic and asymptomatic venous thromboembolic events (as shown by compression ultrasonography of the proximal-vein system) occurring during the study period was compared between the 2 groups. The study was prematurely terminated after the inclusion of the first 360 patients because a statistically significant and clinically relevant superiority of extended over short-term thromboprophylaxis was observed. Results Objectively confirmed venous thromboembolic complications were recorded in 10 patients: 9 (5.1%) in the group of 176 control patients, and 1 (0.5%) in the group of 184 patients who continued the warfarin treatment. The absolute difference in the incidence of events was 4.57% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-7.99). The relative risk of venous thromboembolism developing in control patients compared with patients assigned to extended thromboprophylaxis was 9.4 (95% CI, 1.2-73.5). The number needed to treat was 22. Major bleeding developed in 1 patient who was randomized to the extended prophylaxis group (0.5%; 95% CI, 0.02-3.0) compared with none in the control group. Conclusion Extending prophylaxis with warfarin for a few more weeks beyond the hospital stay has the potential to considerably improve the outcome of patients who undergo hip arthroplasty.