Search

Introduction: Coronoid process of mandible is seldom fractured during maxillofacial trauma. Majority of the cases of coronoid fracture are treated conservatively, but some lead to complications which are often overlooked. At present, the literature on coronoid fractures is inadequate for meta-analysis. Also, there exists no standardized classification in the literature. Hence, the purpose of this study was to analyze the incidence and establish a novel 'tripartite' classification. Material and Methods: In this study carried out at level 1 trauma center, all patients with coronoid fracture with or without associated maxillofacial fractures were included. Relevant data were noted from Hospital records and CT scans (computer tomographic scans). These cases were classified according to 'tripartite' classification and treated. Data feed was given to IBM® SPSS® statistics (version 21) for analysis. Results: Among 33 coronoid fracture patients, majority (57.57% cases) were from age group of 21–40 years with 82.85% cases attributed to road traffic accidents. 11.43% cases were bilateral, and the rest unilateral cases revealed right-side predilection. Conclusion: Novel tripartite classification allows us to easily categorize and visualize the coronoid fractures. Horizontal types 1 to 3 and vertical types 4 to 6 are in increasing order of incidence, which makes it easy for communication, treatment approach and record maintenance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Coronoid fractures are often part of a complex fracture-dislocation of the elbow. For an optimum prognosis, it is important to understand the characteristics of coronoid fractures in different elbow injury patterns. Significant differences in these characteristics have been observed in various studies, but these previous studies have suffered from limitations, such as insufficient quantification and unknown prognostic differences among different injury patterns. Therefore, we aimed to quantitatively analyze coronoid fracture characteristics and functional outcomes in different elbow injury patterns using three-dimensional computed tomography. All patients with coronoid fractures surgically treated at our hospital between January and December 2017 were categorized into 3 groups according to elbow injury pattern: posterolateral rotational instability (PLRI), varus posteromedial rotational instability (VPMRI), and olecranon fracture-dislocation (OFD). 3D models were reconstructed using Mimics 17.0, and the total volume and number of coronoid fragments were measured. The coronoid process edge was classified into different anatomical regions, and each region was assigned a number to quantify the distribution of fracture lines. At the last follow-up, the range of motion, visual analog scale, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, complications and reoperations were recorded. The 92 patients enrolled had an average age of 42 ± 15 years and a male-to-female ratio of 66:26. The median total volume in PLRI patients was less than that in VPMRI patients [431 (132, 818) mm3 vs. 1125 (746, 1421) mm3, adjusted P <.001] and OFD patients [431 (132, 818) mm3 vs. 2565 (381, 4076) mm3, adjusted P =.001]. The median number of coronoid fragments in PLRI patients was also less than that in VPMRI patients [1 (1, 2) vs. 2 (1, 3), adjusted P =.043]. Most of the P CFL -Rs (79%) were located around the volar edge of the lesser sigmoid notch. Compared with that of PLRI, the P CFL -Us of the VPMRI and OFD tended to be located on the more ulnodorsal side of the coronoid process edge. The median ROM [110 (90, 133), P =.001] and the median Mayo Elbow Performance Score [85 (68, 95), P =.038] of patients with OFD were significantly less than those of patients with the other 2 patterns. The incidence of elbow stiffness (56%, 5/9, P =.001) and implant-related irritation (44%, 4/9, P <.001) in the OFD group was significantly higher than that in the other 2 groups. Coronoid fractures differ significantly in fragment volume, comminution severity, and fracture line distribution among different elbow injury patterns. OFD has the worst functional outcomes among complex elbow injury patterns. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background The ideal treatment of terrble triad injuries and whether fixation of coronoid process fractures is needed or not are still debated. Therefore, we aimed to investigate if terrible triad injuries necessitate coronoid fracture fixation and evaluate if non-fixation treatments have similar efficacies and outcomes as fixation-treatments in cases of terrible triad injuries. Methods From August 2011 to July 2020, 23 patients with acute terrible triad injuries without involvement of the anteromedial facet of the coronoid process were included to evaluate the postoperative clinical and radiological outcomes (minimum follow-up of 20 months). According to the preoperative height loss evaluation of the coronoid process and an intraoperative elbow stability test, seven patients underwent coronoid fracture fixation, and the other eight patients were treated conservatively. The elbow range of motion (ROM), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), and modified Broberg-Morrey score were evaluated at the last follow-up. In addition, plain radiographs were reviewed to evaluate joint congruency, fracture union, heterotopic ossification, and the development of arthritic changes. Results At the last follow-up, the mean arcs of flexion-extension and supination-pronation values were 118.2° and 146.8° in the fixation group and 122.5° and 151.3° in the non-fixation group, respectively. The mean MEPSs were 96.4 in the fixation group (excellent, nine cases; good, tow cases) and 96.7 in the non-fixation group (excellent, ten cases; good, two cases). The mean modified Broberg-Morrey scores were 94.0 in the fixation group (excellent, sevev cases; good, four cases) and 94.0 in the non-fixation group (excellent, ten cases; good, tow cases). No statistically significant differences in clinical scores and ROM were identified between the two groups. However, the non-fixation group showed a significantly lower height loss of the coronoid process than the fixation group (36.3% versus 54.5%). Conclusions There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the fixation and non-fixation groups in terrible triad injuries.

Background: The ideal treatment of terrble triad injuries and whether fixation of coronoid process fractures is needed or not are still debated. Therefore, we aimed to investigate if terrible triad injuries necessitate coronoid fracture fixation and evaluate if non-fixation treatments have similar efficacies and outcomes as fixation-treatments in cases of terrible triad injuries. Methods: From August 2011 to July 2020, 23 patients with acute terrible triad injuries without involvement of the anteromedial facet of the coronoid process were included to evaluate the postoperative clinical and radiological outcomes (minimum follow-up of 20 months). According to the preoperative height loss evaluation of the coronoid process and an intraoperative elbow stability test, seven patients underwent coronoid fracture fixation, and the other eight patients were treated conservatively. The elbow range of motion (ROM), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), and modified Broberg-Morrey score were evaluated at the last follow-up. In addition, plain radiographs were reviewed to evaluate joint congruency, fracture union, heterotopic ossification, and the development of arthritic changes. Results: At the last follow-up, the mean arcs of flexion-extension and supination-pronation values were 118.2° and 146.8° in the fixation group and 122.5° and 151.3° in the non-fixation group, respectively. The mean MEPSs were 96.4 in the fixation group (excellent, nine cases; good, tow cases) and 96.7 in the non-fixation group (excellent, ten cases; good, two cases). The mean modified Broberg-Morrey scores were 94.0 in the fixation group (excellent, sevev cases; good, four cases) and 94.0 in the non-fixation group (excellent, ten cases; good, tow cases). No statistically significant differences in clinical scores and ROM were identified between the two groups. However, the non-fixation group showed a significantly lower height loss of the coronoid process than the fixation group (36.3% versus 54.5%). Conclusions: There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the fixation and non-fixation groups in terrible triad injuries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The goal of surgical management for unstable elbow injuries is the restoration of joint concentricity and stability. After internal fixation, concerns may exist regarding instability or durability of the fixation construct. Historically, these scenarios were treated with options such as transarticular pinning or external fixation. Recently, an internal joint stabilizer (IJS) that allows postoperative mobilization was introduced. Our objective was to systematically review the literature to aggregate the clinical and biomechanical evidence for the IJS of the elbow. Methods: A systematic review of the PubMed and Google Scholar databases was performed, following the PRISMA guidelines. The search results were narrowed from 2015 through 2023 to coincide with the inception of the device being reviewed. Results: A total of nine retrospective reports on the IJS (N = 171) cases at a mean follow-up of 10.8 months were included. The pooled rate of implant failure was 4.4%, and recurrent instability was 4.1%. Additionally, the we included seven case reports and two biomechanical reports. Conclusions: The aggregate literature describes satisfactory clinical outcomes with low rates of recurrent instability and device failure for the IJS of the elbow. The limited biomechanical investigations conclude efficacy for stability profiles. Clinical relevance: Across a spectrum of unstable elbow cases, the IJS prevented recurrent instability during the early postoperative period. Notably, the device requires an additional procedure for removal, and the long-term impact of the retained devices is currently unclear.

Complex elbow fractures featuring a comminuted coronoid process are infrequent and pose considerable treatment challenges. The optimal strategy for maximizing recovery of elbow function through osteosynthesis remains a subject of ongoing debate among surgeons. We applied the principle of internal fixation by implementing intra-osteal fixation with a mini plate, which facilitated the successful restoration of exceptional elbow function in the patient. This approach adeptly managed the complexity of the coronoid process fracture, encompassing its fragmentation and associated injuries, thereby demonstrating its feasibility and efficacy in achieving favorable clinical outcomes. This article investigates the viability of this surgical technique for managing such complex fractures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acute elbow dislocation is a common injury with an incidence in the general population estimated at around 5/100,000. Persistent (or static) elbow dislocation is a relatively rare problem but might occur due to inappropriate assessment or treatment of acute simple or complex elbow dislocations. Persistent elbow dislocation can be an invalidating and painful condition with a more ominous prognosis than an acute elbow dislocation with appropriate treatment. Surgical treatment of persistent elbow dislocation is a complex intervention that requires extended surgical exposure and arthrolysis in combination with circumferential ligamentous and osseous stabilization. Satisfactory results are described, but complication and reintervention rates are high. After-treatment with a dynamic external fixator is often necessary.

Fractures around the elbow are often challenging to treat and in most cases require an extensive approach. Since the development of elbow arthroscopy, most authors have pointed out the potential advantages of a less invasive technique that can be useful for visualization and reduction of the articular fragments with an eventual percutaneous fixation. Arthroscopic techniques provide a limited exposure that may lead to a faster wound healing, lower rate of complications and thus, better recovery of range of motion. However, elbow arthroscopy is also a demanding technique, especially in a swollen and fractured joint, and it is not exempt of risks. The overall rate of complications has been rated from 1.5% to 11% and nerve injury rates from 1.26–7.5%. The objective of this review is to present the arthroscopic setup and general surgical technique for the management of elbow trauma and to define some clear indications. Patient positioning and operating room display is key in order to obtain success. In addition to the arthroscopic equipment, fluoroscopy is almost always necessary for percutaneous fixation and precise preparation is mandatory. In the last decade, literature regarding new portals or surgical tips for arthroscopic treatment of elbow fractures have been published. The main indications for fracture arthroscopic-assisted fixation are those articular fractures involving the coronoid, distal humerus shear fractures in the coronal plane (trochlear and capitellum fractures) and, more controversially, those affecting the radial head. The treatment of these type of fractures all arthroscopically is exponentially demanding as it might also require ligament repair. For coronoid fractures, it can be useful in Morrey type II and III, and O´Driscoll anteromedial facet fractures associated to a posteromedial instability pattern that also require a repair of the LCL. Although excellent results have been published, comparative series are scarce. Radial head fractures can also be approached arthroscopically in simple non-comminute fractures that can be fixed percutaneously. In conclusion, arthroscopy of the elbow is an excellent tool to better understand and visualize articular fractures of the elbow. However, despite the advances in surgical technique, whether it improves clinical and radiological results is still to be proven. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Monteggia injuries are rare, but severe injuries of the elbow including various injury patterns. Treatment of these injuries is still topic of debate and strategies differ widely. In this systematic review on Monteggia injuries in adults, we aimed to clarify the incidence of different injury patterns within Monteggia injuries, investigate the main reasons leading to revision surgery and explore which surgical treatments should be favored to achieve satisfactory clinical results. We initially identified 182 publications and ultimately included 17 retrospective studies comprising 651 cases. All patients were classified using the Bado classification, leading to 30.5% Bado type I fractures, 60.4% type II fractures, 5.1% type III and 3.1% type IV fractures. Mean revision rate was 23%. Ulna non-union (28%) and limited range-of-motion (22%) are the main reasons for revision surgery. Meta-analysis shows a trend toward the use of locking plates for ulna fixation which may lead to less revision surgery and fewer ulna non-unions. Further biomechanical and clinical research is necessary to clarify the role of radial head surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Varus posteromedial rotatory instability is a difficult clinical problem to diagnose and treat. Fixation of the anteromedial coronoid fracture is often necessary to achieve elbow stability. We describe an extensile surgical approach to the anteromedial coronoid. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of all patients at our institution who had anteromedial coronoid fracture fixed with this approach between 2012 and 2020. Results: Six patients were identified. They all achieved a stable elbow. Four of 6 developed heterotopic ossification and 2/6 required further surgery for this. Only 1 patient had a transient ulnar sensory loss. Conclusion: We describe an approach to the coronoid that allows great visualization of the joint and access to large coronoid fractures. The approach is extensile and does not require extensive dissection or work around the ulnar nerve. Access to fracture and for fixation can be improved by release of the common flexor pronator origin and the medial collateral ligament.

Objective The fixation of the coronoid fractures in terrible triad injuries is quite challenging. In this study, we introduce a minimally invasive technique using a syringe as a guide for insertion of the cannulated screw in an anterior to posterior fashion to fix the coronoid fracture in patients with terrible triad injuries. Methods In this retrospective study, clinical data of patients suffering from terrible triad injuries between 2012 and 2019 were analyzed. Fifteen patients with an average age of 38.2 years old (21–56 years) were enrolled in this study, of which 12 were males and three were females. The Regan–Morrey type II and type III coronoid fractures in these patients were treated with cannulated screws, inserted anteriorly using a 1 mL syringe as a guide. Outcome measures included pain, range of motion, stability and daily function using Mayo Elbow Performance scores (MEPs). The anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were used for evaluating a healing fracture. Results After a mean follow up of 44.2 months (range 13–80), the mean elbow flexion was 128.2°, extension was 12.3°, forearm pronation was 74.6° and supination was 73.6°. A concentric reduction was maintained without severe pain, stiffness, and radiographic evidence of instability in all patients during the follow‐up period. The mean MEPs was 89.7 points. Conclusion The anteroposterior cannulated screw fixation via simple syringe guide is a minimally invasive and safe option for surgical treatment of coronoid fractures in terrible triad injuries.

Abstract Fractures around the elbow are often challenging to treat and in most cases require an extensive approach. Since the development of elbow arthroscopy, most authors have pointed out the potential advantages of a less invasive technique that can be useful for visualization and reduction of the articular fragments with an eventual percutaneous fixation. Arthroscopic techniques provide a limited exposure that may lead to a faster wound healing, lower rate of complications and thus, better recovery of range of motion. However, elbow arthroscopy is also a demanding technique, especially in a swollen and fractured joint, and it is not exempt of risks. The overall rate of complications has been rated from 1.5% to 11% and nerve injury rates from 1.26–7.5%. The objective of this review is to present the arthroscopic setup and general surgical technique for the management of elbow trauma and to define some clear indications. Patient positioning and operating room display is key in order to obtain success. In addition to the arthroscopic equipment, fluoroscopy is almost always necessary for percutaneous fixation and precise preparation is mandatory. In the last decade, literature regarding new portals or surgical tips for arthroscopic treatment of elbow fractures have been published. The main indications for fracture arthroscopic‐assisted fixation are those articular fractures involving the coronoid, distal humerus shear fractures in the coronal plane (trochlear and capitellum fractures) and, more controversially, those affecting the radial head. The treatment of these type of fractures all arthroscopically is exponentially demanding as it might also require ligament repair. For coronoid fractures, it can be useful in Morrey type II and III, and O´Driscoll anteromedial facet fractures associated to a posteromedial instability pattern that also require a repair of the LCL. Although excellent results have been published, comparative series are scarce. Radial head fractures can also be approached arthroscopically in simple non‐comminute fractures that can be fixed percutaneously. In conclusion, arthroscopy of the elbow is an excellent tool to better understand and visualize articular fractures of the elbow. However, despite the advances in surgical technique, whether it improves clinical and radiological results is still to be proven.

Objective: The fixation of the coronoid fractures in terrible triad injuries is quite challenging. In this study, we introduce a minimally invasive technique using a syringe as a guide for insertion of the cannulated screw in an anterior to posterior fashion to fix the coronoid fracture in patients with terrible triad injuries. Methods: In this retrospective study, clinical data of patients suffering from terrible triad injuries between 2012 and 2019 were analyzed. Fifteen patients with an average age of 38.2 years old (21–56 years) were enrolled in this study, of which 12 were males and three were females. The Regan–Morrey type II and type III coronoid fractures in these patients were treated with cannulated screws, inserted anteriorly using a 1 mL syringe as a guide. Outcome measures included pain, range of motion, stability and daily function using Mayo Elbow Performance scores (MEPs). The anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were used for evaluating a healing fracture. Results: After a mean follow up of 44.2 months (range 13–80), the mean elbow flexion was 128.2°, extension was 12.3°, forearm pronation was 74.6° and supination was 73.6°. A concentric reduction was maintained without severe pain, stiffness, and radiographic evidence of instability in all patients during the follow‐up period. The mean MEPs was 89.7 points. Conclusion: The anteroposterior cannulated screw fixation via simple syringe guide is a minimally invasive and safe option for surgical treatment of coronoid fractures in terrible triad injuries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Trans-ulnar fracture-dislocations of the elbow are complex injuries that can be difficult to classify and treat. Trans-ulnar basal coronoid injuries, in which the coronoid is not attached to either the olecranon or the metaphysis, present substantial challenges to achieve anatomic reduction and stable internal fixation. The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcome of surgical treatment of trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture-dislocations., Materials and Methods: Between 2002 and 2019, 32 consecutive trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture-dislocations underwent open reduction and internal fixation at our institution. Four elbows were lost to follow-up within the first 6 months after surgery and were excluded. Among the 28 elbows remaining, there were 13 females and 15 males with a mean age of 56 (range 28-78) years at the time of injury. The mean clinical and radiographic follow-up times were 37 months and 29 months, respectively. Radiographs were reviewed to determine rates of union, Hastings and Graham heterotopic ossification (HO) grade, and Broberg and Morrey arthritis grade., Results: Union occurred in 25 elbows. Union could not be determined for 1 elbow at most recent follow-up and the remaining 2 elbows developed nonunion of the coronoid. Complications occurred in 10 elbows (36%): deep infection (4), ulnar neuropathy (2), elbow contracture (2), and nonunion (2). There were reoperations in 11 elbows (39%): irrigation and débridement with hardware removal (4), hardware removal (2), ulnar nerve transposition (2), contracture release with HO removal (2), and revision with iliac crest autograft (1). At most recent follow-up, the mean flexion-extension arc was 106° (range 10°-150°), and the mean pronation-supination arc was 137° (range 0°-170°). The mean Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 11 (range 0-39) points with a mean Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation-Elbow score of 81 (range 55-100) points. At final radiographic follow-up, 16 elbows (57%) had HO (8 class I and 8 class II), and 20 elbows (71%) had arthritis (8 grade 1, 6 grade 2, and 6 grade 3)., Discussion: Trans-ulnar basal coronoid fracture-dislocations are severe injuries associated with high rates of reoperation, HO, and post-traumatic arthritis. However, the majority of elbows achieve union, a functional range of motion, and reasonable patient reported outcome measures. Over the study period, surgeons were more likely to utilize multiple deep approaches and separate fixation of the coronoid (either with lag screws or anteromedial plates) to ensure anatomic reduction., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Ulna coronoid fracture is a complicated elbow injury. Comprehensive classification of coronoid fracture can assist diagnosis, guide treatment, and improve prognosis. Existing coronoid fracture classifications are insufficient to interpret all fracture patterns. The coronoid fracture classification is associated with elbow-specific trauma patterns. Coronoid fractures are often associated with other elbow injuries, commonly with radial head fractures, which makes the clinical strategies inconsistent and prognosis poor. The current fracture classifications do not contain information about combined injuries. Preservation of ulnohumeral joint contact after trauma is critical to elbow mechanical and kinematic stability. Important fracture types for treatment include terrible-triad injuries and anteromedial facet fractures. Open reduction and internal fixation of these two fractures should be conducted when marked displacement of the fragment, elbow instability under stress, and complicated associated injuries. The current surgical tactics based on classifications are still controversial.

Background: Elbow fracture dislocations represent difficult injuries to treat, with a high percentage of complications. Classically, they are divided into posterolateral, posteromedial and transulnar pattern. It is essential to distinguish them to guide intraoperative treatment to achieve an anatomic and stable reduction that allows early mobility. Methods: A retrospective study of 89 adult patients diagnosed with elbow fracture dislocations who underwent a standardized surgery between 2013 and 2018 with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Demographic data, characteristics of the injury, and associated procedures were collected. Patients were evaluated with functional scores (Mayo elbow performance score/Broberg and Morrey score) and ranges of movement at the end of the follow-up. Results: The mean age was 41 ± 12 years, mostly men (82%), with an average follow-up of 29 months. We present 42 patients with posterolateral fracture dislocation (47%), 21 posteromedial (24%) and 26 transulnar (29%). The average range of motion at the end of follow-up was −12 ± 11° extension, 124 ± 20° flexion, 76 ± 16° pronation, and 73 ± 20° supination, with a Mayo elbow performance score of 88.7 ± 12 points and 87.2 ± 12 points in the Broberg and Morrey scale. Reoperation rate was 23%, with no infection or heterotopic ossification cases. Transulnar fracture dislocations have significantly worse extension and supination. As per the functional result (Mayo elbow performance score/Broberg and Morrey scale), there are no significant differences between the different patterns. Conclusion: Proper injury pattern recognition and a standardized surgical management lead to a stable joint and good results in range of motion. Functional results are encouraging at least at short term, despite the high reoperations rate.

Monteggia fractures classically involve a proximal ulna fracture with an associated radial head dislocation. The presence of radial head/neck fracture and comminution of the proximal ulna with coronoid involvement elevates the complexity of surgical reconstruction considerably. The Jupiter classification captures this injury pattern as a subgroup of Bado posterior Monteggia lesions. Access to the critical coronoid fragment can be problematic from the posterior approach and may result in tenuous reduction and fixation, directly affecting the functional outcome. Multiple operative techniques have been described to address the broad spectrum of injuries seen in Monteggia fractures. This article will cover commonly used fixation techniques for Monteggia fractures with a comprehensive literature review, including technical tips, outcomes, and complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Among the few techniques described for the treatment of coronoid fractures, osteosynthesis techniques include screw osteosynthesis from anterior to posterior (AP) or from posterior to anterior (PA) and plate osteosynthesis. The aim of this study was to test the biomechanical stability of screw osteosynthesis and plate osteosynthesis using anatomical plates in coronoid process fractures. Materials and methods: On a total of 25 biomechanical synthetical ulnae, a coronoid shear fracture including 70% of the coronoid height was simulated. Osteosynthesis was then performed using two 2.7 mm screws from anterior, posterior and with use of three different anatomical plates of the coronoid process. For the biomechanical testing, axial load was applied to the fragment with 1000 cycles from 5 to 250 N, load to failure and load at 100 µm displacement. Displacements were measured using a point-based three-dimensional motion analysis system. Results: Osteosynthesis using the PA-screw showed significant more displacement during cyclic loading compared with all other osteosyntheses (0.99 mm), whereas AP-screw showed the smallest displacement (0.10 mm) during cyclic loading. The PA-screw technique showed a significant lower load to failure compared to all other osteosynthesis with the highest load in AP-screw osteosynthesis. The load for 100 µm displacement was the smallest in PA-screw with a significant difference to the AP-screw and one plate osteosynthesis. Conclusion: Osteosynthesis of large coronoid shear fractures with two small-fragment screws from anterior allows stable fixation that is not inferior to anterior plate osteosynthesis and might be an alternative in specific fracture types. Posterior screw fixation was found as the weakest fixation method. Level of evidence: Basic science study [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Management of varus posteromedial rotatory instability (VPMRI) of the elbow presents a challenging problem, sometimes requiring supplemental external fixation or ulnohumeral cross-pinning. A relatively new treatment adjunct for posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow has become available with the development of the internal joint stabilizer (IJS) implant. However, this has not been studied for VPMRI because the implant is thought to be ineffective at treating this instability when placed in the usual manner on the lateral side of the elbow. We hypothesize that modifying the IJS technique to place the implant medially will make it as effective as external fixation at preventing VPMRI. Nine whole-arm cadaveric specimens were tested on a rig that allowed for gravity stress of the elbow at 60° of abduction. Intact specimens (INT) were tested to find the baseline stability with all structures intact. Then, O'Driscoll type 2–subtype III coronoid fractures were created with a microsagittal saw, and these same specimens were again tested without any fixation (WAF), with a static lateral external fixator (SLEF), and with a medially placed IJS (MIJS). The method for medial IJS placement is detailed within. The WAF specimens were significantly more unstable than the INT, SLEF, and MIJS groups (P <.001). There was no difference in stability between the INT and the SLEF (P =.59) or MIJS group (P =.21). In this cadaveric model, a medially placed IJS was as effective as an SLEF at maintaining elbow stability in a coronoid-deficient elbow. This technique allows for early elbow range of motion, with no external hardware, and may eliminate the complications associated with external fixation or ulnohumeral cross-pinning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Case: A 31-year-old man with recurrent instability after treatment of a terrible triad elbow fracture-dislocation that was reconstructed with revision coronoid fixation and a novel use of a medially applied internal joint stabilizer (IJS). Conclusion: A medially applied IJS is an option to supplement coronoid fixation in cases with tenuous repair because of comminution or relative coronoid insufficiency. This location may be more protective for this instability pattern and, in revision settings, can avoid a second lateral incision. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Elbow dislocations, particularly those associated with varus posteromedial rotary instability, are relatively uncommon. We present the case of a 25-year-old male initially managed nonoperatively for a posterior elbow dislocation, who subsequently experienced irreducible re-dislocation with characteristic fractures of the anteromedial facet and tip of the coronoid, indicative of varus posteromedial rotary instability., Case Report: Following an unsuccessful attempt at closed reduction under general anesthesia, open reduction was performed, revealing the interposition of the posterior capsule of the humero-ulnar joint as the cause of irreducibility. Fixation of the coronoid fracture was undertaken, and the patient exhibited excellent functional outcomes at a 4.5-year follow-up., Conclusion: This case underscores the rarity of irreducible elbow dislocation in the context of varus posteromedial rotary instability and highlights the crucial role of capsular interposition in such cases. Successful open reduction, coronoid fixation, and attentive postoperative care contributed to the patient's favorable long-term functional outcome., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest: Nil, (Copyright: © Indian Orthopaedic Research Group.)

Background: The Terrible Triad of the elbow is a constellation of elbow dislocation, radial head fracture and coronoid process fracture. A common type of coronoid fracture documented with this triad is type II Regan-Morrey coronoid fractures. The preferred fixation method for this fracture type is the lasso technique, medial-lateral tunnel orientation being the traditional approach. Considering elbow anatomy, we saw an opportunity to potentially improve fixation by altering the suture lasso tunnel orientation to a proximal-distal orientation., Hypothesis: Two tunnels in the proximal-distal direction would result in greater biomechanical stability as compared to the traditional lasso technique., Material and Methods: A type 2 Regan-Morrey fracture was created in 12 fresh frozen cadaveric elbows at 50% of the coronoid height using an oscillating saw. The humero-ulnar joint was placed in 0 degrees flexion then loaded at a rate of 10mm/min to failure., Results: The control technique (medio-lateral tunnels) showed failure load of 150±81N that was not significantly different (p=0.825) than the 134±116N measured for the modified technique (distal-proximal tunnels). The portion of the load-displacement curve used to calculate stiffness was linear (R^2=0.94±0.04) with determination coefficients that did not differ between the two groups (p=0.351). For stiffness, we measured 17±13N/mm and 14±12N/mm respectively for control and modified techniques that did not result in a significant difference (p=0.674)., Conclusion: In this attempt to improve the shortcomings of the lasso technique, we found that changing from medio-lateral to proximal-distal drilling directions did not result in an appreciable biomechanical benefit., Level of Evidence: Basic science study; Biomechanics., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Abstract Background This study aimed to report the radiographic findings and surgical outcomes of anteromedial facet (AMF) fracture of the ulnar coronoid process and to suggest an optimal approach. Methods In this retrospective study, 20 consecutive patients with unilateral AMF fracture of coronoid process were surgically treated and divided into two groups without (group A) and with (group B) additional proximal ulnar fractures in equal case number. Time from injury to surgery averaged 4.38 ± 2.56 weeks. Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and Shortened Disability of the Arm and Shoulder and Hand (quickDASH) score were used for functional evaluation. Cohen kappa coefficient (kappa) analysis was used to determine interobserver reliability on a radiographic reading. Results All cases had a mean follow-up of 2.3 years. MEPS at 2 years averaged 87.75 ± 12.51; quickDASH, 7.05 ± 6.19. A significantly higher MEPS was found in subtype 3 than in subtype 2 (p = 0.036) and in group B than in group A (p = 0.020). Significantly lower quickDASH cores were found in group B than in group A (p = 0.011). Kappa analysis showed moderate agreement in the O’Driscoll classification (kappa = 0.56) and substantial agreement in categorization of the additional proximal ulnar fractures (kappa = 0.76). Conclusions Additional proximal ulnar lesions were considered an integral part of varus posteromedial rotatory instability and required further categorization in the management of AMF fractures. Significantly better functional outcomes were achieved when those lesions were fully addressed.

Background: Coronoid fractures often occur with complex elbow dislocations, accounting for 15% of elbow fractures. The effectiveness of open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) versus arthroscopic-assisted reduction internal fixation (ARIF) surgeries for coronoid fractures remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of these two surgical approaches in treating varus posteromedial injuries., Methods: This study was conducted and reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO. The primary outcomes assessed in this study were the functional outcomes measured by the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and the complications associated with each surgical approach., Results: Analysis of the data from 759 patients included in this study revealed that the mean postoperative MEPS score was higher in the ARIF group compared to the ORIF group (97.5 Vs. 90.7), with the mean improvement in MEPS was 16.6 points (19 for ORIF and 14.3 for ARIF). The complication rate in the ORIF group was 24.6%, while the ARIF group reported a complication rate of 6%., Conclusion: This study suggests that ARIF surgery can yield comparable and promising outcomes to ORIF surgery for coronoid fractures., Level of Evidence: IV., Competing Interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (© The Author(s) 2024.)