Search

Zusammenfassung Hintergrund: Hausmittel (HM) gelten als Ressource der Selbstfürsorge bei chronischen Erkrankungen. In der BMBF-geförderten, cluster-randomisierten HoPES3-Studie wurde die Nutzung von HM durch ältere Patient/-innen untersucht. Ziel war es, die Aspekte Spiritualität, soziale Aktivität und Selbstfürsorge (durch Beratung zu HM) in der hausärztlichen Versorgung zu stärken. Fragestellungen: Welche Maßnahmen sind zur Selbstfürsorge älterer Menschen geeignet? Wie hoch ist die Anzahl der HM Nutzer/-innen? Welche HM Arten werden angewendet? Welche Einstellungen und Beweggründe haben ältere Patient/-innen hinsichtlich HM Anwendung? Methode: Entwicklung von Infozepten (Anleitungen zur Selbstanwendung von Hausmitteln), Fragebogengestützte Erhebung der teilnehmenden Patient/-innen (n= 297). Leitfadengestützte Interviews mit Patient/-innen (n=29). Ergebnisse: Es wurden 17 Infozepte entwickelt. Zu Studienbeginn nutzten 33 % der Patient/-innen der Interventionsgruppe (IG) und 39 % der Kontrollgruppe (KG) HM. Nach sechs Monaten waren es 47 % (IG) und 35 % (KG). Zentrale Beweggründe scheinen die Stärkung der Selbstwirksamkeit, das Gefühl der Selbstbestimmtheit im Umgang mit der eigenen Gesundheit und die Vermeidung von Medikamenten zu sein. Diskussion und Schlussfolgerung: Die Ergebnisse können dazu beitragen die Ressource HM besser in die Therapieentscheidung bei älteren Patient/-innen einzubeziehen. Die Beratung zu HM in der hausärztlichen Praxis könnte eine niederschwellige Maßnahme zur gezielten Stärkung der Selbstwirksamkeit und Lebensqualität von älteren Patient/-innen sein.

Zusammenfassung Hintergrund: Im Rahmen des Forschungsprojektes „Ganzheitliches Versorgungsprogramm für ältere Patienten zur Stärkung von spirituellen Bedürfnissen, sozialer Aktivität und Selbstfürsorge in der hausärztlichen Versorgung (HoPES3)“ wird die Implementierung von Spiritual Care in allgemeinärztlichen Praxen untersucht. Forschungsfragen: Wie reagieren kranke ältere Menschen auf das Angebot einer spirituellen Anamnese? Was sind hinderliche Faktoren für spirituelle Gespräche in Hausarztpraxen? Methode: Ärzte und Ärztinnen aus 24 Praxen boten 164 ihrer Patienten und Patientinnen eine spirituelle Anamnese an. Mit 29 der Patienten bzw. Patientinnen wurden bis zu sechs Monate später qualitative leitfadengestützte Interviews geführt. Die Interviews wurden mittels Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) ausgewertet. Ergebnisse: Insgesamt hatten von den 29 befragten Patienten/Patientinnen nur elf das vollständige Anamnesegespräch geführt, die Mehrheit hatte das Gespräch abgelehnt. Als Gründe werden angegeben: Vorbehalte gegenüber religiösen Institutionen, Einschätzung der Thematik als „zu persönlich“ und ein Bedürfnis nach Selbstwirksamkeit. Die Beziehung zum Arzt oder der Ärztin wird mehrheitlich positiv geschildert, gleichzeitig wird ein allgemeines Bedürfnis nach einem Austausch auf Augenhöhe deutlich. Diskussion: In den Reaktionen der Patienten/Patientinnen kann die Wirkung einer Machtasymmetrie in der Arzt-Patienten-Beziehung beobachtet werden, verstärkt durch das strukturelle Setting der Praxis sowie durch Parallelen des Gesundheitssystems mit religiösen Systemen, die bei der spirituellen Anamnese zum Tragen kommen können. Schlussfolgerung: Bei Weiterbildungen im Feld Spiritual Care sollte die Sensibilität für das Thema Machtasymmetrien gestärkt werden.

Background Spiritual needs gain importance in old age but are often ignored in health care. Within the ‘Holistic care program for elderly patients to integrate spiritual needs, social activity and self-care into disease management in primary care (HoPES3)’ a complex intervention was evaluated in a cluster-randomized trial. The aim of this study was to explore the acceptability, feasibility, benefits, and harms of a spiritual history taken by general practitioners (GPs) as part of the complex intervention. Methods In this mixed-methods study telephone interviews with 11 German GPs and 12 medical assistants (MAs) of the HoPES3 intervention group were conducted and analysed using a content-analytical approach. Furthermore, GPs were asked to complete a questionnaire after each spiritual history. One hundred and forty-one questionnaires from 14 GPs were analysed descriptively. Results GPs considered the spiritual history very/quite helpful for the patient in 27% (n= 38) and very/quite stressful in 2% (n = 3) of the cases. Interviews indicated that GPs found discussing spiritual history easier than anticipated. GPs and MAs saw a difficulty in that many patients associated spirituality with religion or church and reacted with surprise or rejection. Benefits for patients were seen in the opportunity to talk about non-medical topics, and increased awareness of their own resources. Benefits for GPs mainly related to information gain and an intensified patient–physician relationship. Conclusions A spiritual history in general practice has the potential to reveal important information about patients’ lives and to improve the patient–physician relationship. Implementation barriers identified in this study have to be considered and addressed.

Background This study presents a concept for training general practitioners (GPs) in taking a spiritual history. In the same workshop, medical assistants (MAs) were trained in counselling elderly, chronically ill patients on social activities and home remedies. After the training, GPs and MAs will apply the acquired skills in their practices within the scope of the HoPES3 intervention study, which aims at raising patients’ self-efficacy. Methods Sixteen GPs and 18 MAs were trained in a 5-hour workshop and completed an evaluation questionnaire. Results All participants reported great satisfaction. In particular, 85% of GPs (n=11) affirmed increased capacity to address patients’ spiritual needs. About 88% (n=15) of MAs were satisfied with the training, yet expressed difficulties in integrating theoretical knowledge into daily professional routine. Discussion While the evaluation of the workshop is promising, the results of the randomized-controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of the complete HoPES3 intervention have to be awaited. Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the first interdisciplinary, holistic care training in primary care in Germany. It fosters GPs’ and MAs’ competency in providing a proactive support in spirituality, social activities, and home remedies to their patients. If the concept proves to be effective, it could be integrated into existing care models and curriculums and provide clear guidance on how to consider elderly patients’ spiritual needs and strengthen their self-efficacy in primary care settings., Video abstract Point your SmartPhone at the code above. If you have a QR code reader the video abstract will appear. Or use: https://youtu.be/hcz-CKYOk8s

To understand if GPs’ spiritual competence, their personal spirituality and attitude towards enquiring about spirituality in practice interrelate, we conducted a cross-sectional survey of 30 German GPs regarding issues of SC. We found correlations between GPs’ personal spirituality, their spiritual competence and their attitudes towards SC. The ability to perceive spiritual needs of patients was the competence most strongly related to GPs’ attitude towards SC. The competence with the strongest correlation to personal spirituality was Self-awareness and Proactive opening. No correlation was found between affiliation to a spiritual community and GPs’ attitude towards SC. The results show that GPs’ personal spirituality and spiritual competence are indeed related to addressing spirituality with their patients. To foster SC, training programmes should raise awareness for one’s personal spirituality and encourage one to reflect on spiritual competence.

Background: The “Holistic Care Program for Elderly Patients to Integrate Spiritual Needs, Social Activity and Self-Care into Disease Management in Primary Care” (HoPES3) examines the implementation of a spiritual history (SH) as part of a multifaceted intervention in German general practices. While the effectiveness of the interventions was evaluated in a cluster-randomized trial, this article investigates the patients’ views concerning the acceptability of the SH and its effects. Methods: A mixed-methods study was conducted in which 133 patients of the intervention group filled in a standardized questionnaire after the intervention. Later, 29 of these patients took part in qualitative semi-standardized interviews. Results: According to the survey, 63% (n = 77) of patients found the SH helpful. In the interviews, however, many indicated that they either kept the conversation brief or declined the offer to talk about spirituality. Contents of longer conversations referred to difficult life events, personal sources of strength, and experiences with religious institutions. Many patients who had a longer conversation about spirituality reported that their relationship with their general practitioner (GP) had improved. Almost all patients recommended integrating a personal conversation of this kind into primary care. Conclusions: The SH seems to be a possible ‘door opener’ for a trusting doctor-patient relationship, which can then be built upon.

In the research project HoPES3, the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention, where one of the aims was to encourage social activities among older patients, was investigated in a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Patients were offered a conversation about their spirituality (spiritual history) which also included questions about their social relationships. The aim of this study was to examine patients' experiences regarding the acceptability, feasibility, conversational content and perceived benefits and harms of the interventions focusing on social relationships and activities.Semi-structured interviews with 29 patients of the intervention group aged 70 years or older.Loneliness in old age is the result of a long history with underlying complex reasons. Activities proposed by the practice team were rarely carried out, but if they were, patients reported strong benefits. Patients reported their GPs' interest in their lives had resulted in a more trusting doctor-patient relationship. Almost all patients recommended to implement the intervention in general practices.When raising the topic of loneliness, it is crucial to give patients the opportunity to explain the biographical developments which led to their situation. Therefore, embedding the conversation into a broader context such as a spiritual history might be helpful.

About one third of Europe’s elderly population takes ≥5 drugs. Polypharmacy increases their risk of adverse drug reactions. To ensure drug safety, innovative approaches are needed. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to explore the relationship between psychosocial factors and medication-related beliefs and behaviors. Medication lists of 297 patients were recorded according to the ATC classification. Correlations between the dependent variables, Medication Adherence (MARS) and Beliefs about Medicines (BMQ), and independent variables, General Self-Efficacy (GSE), self-efficacy for managing chronic diseases (SES6G), spiritual needs (SpNQ), patient activity (PAM), loneliness (DJG), and social networks (LSNS), were measured. Patients with higher self-efficacy (OR: 1.113, 95% CI [1.056–1.174], p &lt, 0.001) or self-confidence in managing their chronic condition (OR: 1.188, 95% CI [1.048–1.346], 0.007) also showed higher adherence. Lonely patients (OR: 0.420, 95% CI [0.267–0.660], 0.001) and those with a need for inner peace (OR: 0.613, 95% CI [0.444–0.846], p = 0.003) were more likely nonadherent. Stronger positive beliefs about medications’ usefulness weakly correlated with higher scores on the SES6G (ρ = 0.178, p = 0.003) and GSES scale (ρ = 0.121, p = 0.042), patient activity (ρ = 0.155, p = 0.010) and functioning social networks scale (ρ = 0.159, p = 0.008). A weak positive correlation was found between loneliness and the belief that drugs were harmful (ρ = 0.194, p = 0.001). Furthermore, interesting correlations were detected regarding the number of medications and overuse beliefs. Psychosocial factors, such as self-efficacy, loneliness, and spiritual needs and medication-related beliefs and behaviors seem to interrelate. Addressing these factors may improve medication management and drug safety.

Objectives Patient-centered medication lists are a useful documentation method to support safe drug treatment, but they are still inconsistently used and are of varying quality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of an information campaign on the prevalence and use of medication lists. Material and methods We launched a population-based, low-threshold information campaign within a large region in Germany in order to sensitize the population to the use of medication lists. A survey was sent out at baseline and after 18 months to 5,340 citizens aged ≥ 65 years, covering ~ 4% of the region's population. Results The response rate was 49.4% (N = 2,640) at baseline and 45.4% (N = 2,427) at follow-up. Sociodemographic details of respondents were similar at both time-points as was the possession rate of a medication list among participants with regular medicine intake (51.6%, N = 1,181/2,288 vs. 51.4%, N = 1,082/2,107). Combining baseline and follow-up data, respondents indicated that their general practitioner was involved in issuing the list most often (N = 1,668/2,263, 73.7%), however, in 195 cases (8.6%), respondents indicated being solely responsible for the list. The majority (90.8%, N = 2,055/2,263) indicated having their list in use for longer than 1 year, but for only half of those, the list was updated within the last year. After the intervention, 6% of the respondents indicated being familiar with the campaign those being more likely to possess a list (69.7% N = 83/119 vs. 50.2% N = 999/1,988). Conclusion The campaign did not change overall possession rate, but respondents who were familiar with the campaign were more likely to possess such a list.

BACKGROUND: Self-efficacy is decisive for the quality of life of elderly, multimorbid persons. It may be possible to strengthen patients’ self-efficacy can be strengthened by the targeted reinforcement of individual spirituality, social activity, and self-care. This hypothesis was tested with the aid of a complex intervention. METHODS: A non-blinded, exploratory, cluster-randomized, controlled trial was carried out, with primary care practices as the randomization unit (registration number DRKS00015696). The patients included were at least 70 years of age, had at least three chronic diseases, were taking at least three medications, and were participating in a disease management program. In the intervention group, primary care physicians took a spiritual history, and medical assistants advised the patients on the use of home remedies (e.g., tea, application of heat/cold) and on regionally available programs for the elderly. The primary endpoint—health-related self-efficacy, measured using the SES6G scale—and further, secondary endpoints were evaluated with multistep regression analyses. RESULTS: Data from 297 patients treated in 24 primary care practices were evaluated. The analysis of the primary endpoint indicated no effect (mean difference between study arms 0.30 points, 95% confidence interval [-0.21; 0.81], d = 0.14, p = 0.25). Subgroup analysis revealed the following situation for the secondary endpoint “mental well-being” (SF-12 subscale): patients who had already been using home remedies before the trial began experienced a marked improvement (a difference of 7.3 points on a scale from 0 to 100; d = 0.77, p < 0.001). This was also the case for patients who stated that spirituality played a major role in their lives (a difference of 6.2 points on a scale from 0 to 100; d = 0.65; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The main hypothesis concerning health-related self-efficacy was not confirmed. The results of the analysis of secondary parameters indicate that some subgroups of patients can benefit from the interventional approach.

Background High continuity of care has a positive impact on health outcomes, but insight into the mechanisms underlying this impact is limited. Information continuity, on which our study focuses, is especially important when relational continuity is not given, which is often the case at hospital admission or hospital discharge. The aim of this study is to provide insight into the information flows between general practices and hospitals in Germany, and to identify factors associated with these flows of information. Methods This is a qualitative interview study in a purposeful sample of staff from hospitals and general practices (general practitioners, care assistants in general practice, hospital management, hospital physicians, and nursing staff). Interviews were conducted via telephone or face-to-face using a self-developed semi-structured interview guide. Stepwise systematic content analysis was used to structure collected material into themes and sub-themes that related to the study aim. Data was analysed by two researchers in several cycles, alternating between inductive and deductive approaches. Results A total of 49 interviews were conducted. Duration of the interviews varies between 21 and 78 min (mean duration 43 min). Across all groups, more than two thirds of participants were female (n = 34, 69%). The analysis highlighted six interdependent main themes regarding factors that affect information flows between hospitals and general practices: organisational, legal, financial, patient factors, individual characteristics, and emotional & social factors. The latter theme emerged as particularly rich and was therefore divided into four subthemes: appreciation and understanding of the respective other, (intrinsic) motivation, socialisation, and relationships. Organised meetings and events were mentioned as strategies to address emotional and social factors. Conclusions Digitalisation can facilitate information flows between care providers. However, knowing each other and good personal relations remain important for effective collaboration. Cooperation between all stakeholders is needed to aim to achieve continuity of care. Trial registration: DRKS00015183 on DRKS/ Universal Trial Number (UTN): U1111-1218–0992. Date of registration 23/08/2018.

Item does not contain fulltext Background: Key recommendations for the management of patients with polypharmacy are structured medication counselling (SMC), medication lists and systematic medication reviews. Objective: The aim of this study was to identify determinants (hindering and facilitating factors) for the implementation of the recommendations in general practice. Methods: This study was linked to a tailored intervention aimed at improving the implementation of the recommendations in German general practice. Interviews and focus groups with different healthcare professionals were carried out in the design phase and after delivery of the intervention. The material from both data collections was analysed separately in a content analytical approach resulting in two sets of categories. For this study, the subcategories of both sets were assigned to the Tailoring Interventions for Chronic Diseases (TICD) checklist, a comprehensive framework of determinants of practice. Results: Interviews with 24 general practitioners (GPs), 4 other medical specialists, 1 pharmacist, 3 nurses and 6 medical assistants as well as 2 mixed focus groups with 17 professionals were conducted. We identified 93 determinants: 29 referred to medication counselling, 21 to the use of medication lists, 20 to medications reviews and 23 to all recommendations. The determinants were related to all 7 main domains and to 25 of the 57 subdomains on the TICD checklist including guideline factors, patient factors, individual healthcare professional factors, social, political and legal factors, incentives and resources, and capacity for organizational change. Conclusion: While many interventions to improve polypharmacy focus on the provision of pharmacological knowledge, a much wider range of domains need to be addressed, such as communication skills, patient involvement and practice organization.

In 2015, more than 890,000 asylum seekers were registered in Germany. The provision of medical and psychosocial care for asylum seekers is facing numerous obstacles. Access to health care is mostly insufficient, particularly in initial reception centres. The present article describes the development and implementation of an interdisciplinary outpatient clinic for asylum seekers at the main registration authority in the state of Baden-Wuerttemberg operated by physicians of the University Hospital of Heidelberg and the local Medical Association in Heidelberg. A steering committee was appointed to plan and implement the interdisciplinary outpatient clinic. Semi-structured interviews with nine steering committee members were conducted to elucidate perceived barriers during the planning and implementation phase. The steering committee's strong personal commitment and the health authorities' impartial management were cited as the main contributing factors to the success of the implementation process. Significant barriers were seen in the funding of personnel, equipment, and language mediation as well as in legal liability and billing-related aspects. Results are discussed with a focus on financing, administrative and legal framework as well as language mediation, documentation and further matters that are essential to ensure high-quality care.

Zusammenfassung Hintergrund Hausarzte zahlen zu den Facharztgruppen mit den haufigsten Medikamenten-verordnungen. Die Vertiefung pharmakologischer Kenntnisse ist deshalb ein wichtiger Bestandteil der hausarztlichen Fort- und Weiterbildung. Das hausarztliche Selbstverstandnis, als erster Ansprechpartner bei allen Gesundheitsproblemen zu helfen, macht es zu einer Herausforderung, Weiterbildungsinhalte zu definieren und zu erwerben. Wahrend das von der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Allgemeinmedizin entwickelte „Kompetenzbasierte Curriculum Allgemeinmedizin" essentielle Diagnosen, Beratungsanlasse und Kompetenzen fur die hausarztliche Tatigkeit definiert, fehlt eine solche Orientierung fur den pharmakologischen Bereich. Ziel dieser Arbeit ist, Wirkstoffe zu identifizieren und zu charakterisieren, die jeder Hausarzt so gut beherrschen sollte, dass er dazu beraten und Monitoringmasnahmen einleiten und durchfuhren kann. Methodik Es wurden die Verordnungen von Privat- und Kassenrezepten aller am CONTENT-Projekt teilnehmenden Praxen des Zeitraums 2009 bis 2014 analysiert. Die Analyse wurde auf oral applizierbare Wirkstoffe beschrankt, die von mindestens 25% (n=11) der Hausarztpraxen mindestens einmal verordnet wurden. Wahrend die hundert am haufigsten verordneten Wirkstoffe, die bereits uber 80% der Gesamtverordnungen ausmachten, aufgrund ihrer Verordnungshaufigkeit eingeschlossen wurden, wurden die weniger haufig verordneten Wirkstoffe in einem Rating-Verfahren zusatzlich nach ihrem Risikopotential und der hausarztlichen Relevanz beurteilt. Die auf dieser Basis eingeschlossenen Wirkstoffe wurden nach Beratungsanlassen/Diagnosen klassifiziert dargestellt. Ergebnisse Es wurden 1.912.896 Einzelverordnungen auf Basis der anatomisch-therapeutisch-chemischen Klassifikation (ATC) aus 44 Hausarztpraxen von 112.535 Patienten analysiert. Nach Anwendung der Einschlusskriterien verblieben 453 Wirkstoffe, von denen 302 Wirkstoffe als hausarztlich-relevant eingeschatzt wurden. Diese konnten 45 Beratungsanlassen/Diagnosen zugeordnet werden. Schlussfolgerung Das Ergebnis dieser Arbeit kann als Entwicklungsversion eines hausarztlich-pharmakologischen Curriculums gesehen werden und perspektivisch das kompetenzbasierte Curriculum Allgemeinmedizin sinnvoll erganzen.

Item does not contain fulltext BACKGROUND: The aim of this umbrella review was to summarize the research evidence on programs to improve the transition between ambulatory and hospital care. METHODS: The MEDLINE database and the Cochrane library were searched. Systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials published between January 2000 and September 2018 in English or German were included. Studies were eligible if an assessment or coordination intervention had been evaluated and if patients had been transferred between hospital (defined as internal medicine, surgery, or unspecified hospital setting) and home (defined as any permanent residence). Risk of bias was assessed using the AMSTAR criteria. Results are presented descriptively and in table format. RESULTS: Thirty-nine systematic reviews comprising 492 different studies were included. More than half of these studies were conducted in the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia. All studies evaluated strategies to improve discharge management (introduced after patients' arrival at the hospital); no study assessed strategies to improve admission management (initiated in primary care before patients' transition to hospital). The reviews included focused on a specific patient group, a specific intervention type, or a specific outcome. Overall, interventions focusing on elderly patients and high-intensity interventions seemed to be most effective. An overview of classifications of care transition strategies is provided. CONCLUSIONS: Future research should focus on hospital admission management programs.

IntroductionThe aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a patient-held health record (PHR) for asylum seekers on the availability of health-related information.MethodsAn explorative, cluster-randomised stepped-wedge trial with reception centres as unit of randomisation was conducted. All reception centres (n=6) in two large administrative areas in South Germany with on-site health services were included. All physicians working at these centres were invited to participate in the study. The intervention was the implementation of a PHR. The primary outcome was the prevalence of written health-related information. Secondary outcomes were the physicians’ dissatisfaction with the available written information and the prevalence of missing health-related information. All outcomes were measured at the level of patient–physician contacts by means of a standardised questionnaire, and analysed in logistic multi-level regression models.ResultsWe obtained data on 2308 patient–physician contacts. The presence of the PHR increased the availability of health-related information (adjusted OR (aOR), 20.3, 95% CI: 12.74 to 32.33), and tended to reduce missing essential information (aOR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.39 to 1.26) and physicians’ dissatisfaction with available information (aOR 0.5, 95% CI: 0.24 to 1.04). The availability of health-related information in the post-intervention period was higher (aOR 4.22, 95% CI: 2.64 to 6.73), missing information (aOR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.42 to 1.88) and dissatisfaction (aOR 0.43, 95% CI: 0.16 to 1.14) tended to be lower compared with the pre-intervention period.ConclusionsHealthcare planners should consider introducing PHRs in reception centres or comparable facilities. Future research should focus on the impact of PHRs on clinical outcomes and on intersectoral care.Trial registrationISRCTN13212716. Registered 24 November 2016. Retrospectively registered. http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN13212716

Background Despite increasing digitalisation the paper-based medication list remains one of the most important instruments for the documentation and exchange of medication-related information. However, even elderly patients with polypharmacy who are at high risk for medication errors and adverse drug events, frequently do not receive or use a complete and comprehensible medication list. Increasing the use of medication lists would be a great contribution to medication safety and facilitate the work of health care providers. Methods This study is related to the project MeinPlan (MyPlan) which comprised an information campaign on safe drug administration in the Rhine-Neckar region in South Germany. The campaign was evaluated in a before-and-after study based on a survey among two independent, representative samples of citizens over 65 years. In total, 5034 questionnaires were analysed. While the effects of the primary outcome (the percentage of citizens using a medication list) have been reported elsewhere, this analysis focusses on the effects of the campaign on citizens’ medication beliefs and assesses whether medication beliefs are associated with the use of medication lists, the use of over-the-counter drugs and the use of the tools offered by the campaign. Medication beliefs were assessed with the German version of the General Beliefs About Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) which results in subscales for “General Overuse”, “General Usefulness” and “General Harm”. The use of medication lists and over-the-counter drugs was assessed with self-developed questionnaire items. Results No statistically significant change in citizens’ medication beliefs before and after the campaign could be detected. Likewise, no association between medication beliefs and the use of medication lists, the use of over-the-counter drugs or the use of the tools offered by the campaign could be shown. Conclusions A campaign focussing on the risks of drug administration did not change the medication beliefs of the targeted population. Moreover, citizens’ general medication beliefs do not seem to be crucial for their decision to use a medication list or over-the-counter drugs. Strategies to improve the use of medication lists by patients should focus on other influential factors, such as individual benefits and barriers and socio-psychological factors.

In 2015 Germany received more than 476 600 asylum applications.1 Incoming asylum seekers are accommodated in reception centres (RCs) for up to 6 months before they are dispersed to other federal states or districts. Due to the high immigration since the end of 2014, many federal states established new RCs to expand their capacities in hosting asylum seekers. Baden Wurttemberg, for example, one of the largest federal states receiving about 13% of incoming asylum seekers, expanded its capacity from one RC up until 2014 to five RCs thereafter. Since there are no nationwide standards in place, healthcare provision in RCs is highly heterogeneously organised and fragmented.2 In Heidelberg, former barracks of the US army were reorganised as an RC in August 2015 and hosted about 6500 asylum seekers. The concentration of asylum seekers in the RC, linked with insufficient provision of primary health care, led to an unmanageable number of consultations in emergency departments of nearby hospitals. Asylum seekers have specific healthcare needs due to exposure to pre-, peri-, and postmigration health risks. These include traumatic events,3 endemic infectious diseases in the countries of origin or transit,4 and chronic conditions which may have been exacerbated during the migration process. They are also at higher risk of developing psychological distress5 and acquiring infectious diseases in the host country due to mass accommodation.6 To address both the shortcomings in primary care provision and the special needs, a walk-in clinic jointly led by the university hospital, the public health services, and the local physicians’ association was established in the RC with funds from the state government and the university hospital. The clinic provides general medicine as well as gynecological, paediatric, and psychiatric and psychosomatic health care. The aim of this article is to report challenges and solutions of …

In 2015, more than 890,000 asylum seekers were registered in Germany. The provision of medical and psychosocial care for asylum seekers is facing numerous obstacles. Access to health care is mostly insufficient, particularly in initial reception centres. The present article describes the development and implementation of an interdisciplinary outpatient clinic for asylum seekers at the main registration authority in the state of Baden-Wuerttemberg operated by physicians of the University Hospital of Heidelberg and the local Medical Association in Heidelberg. A steering committee was appointed to plan and implement the interdisciplinary outpatient clinic. Semi-structured interviews with nine steering committee members were conducted to elucidate perceived barriers during the planning and implementation phase. The steering committee's strong personal commitment and the health authorities' impartial management were cited as the main contributing factors to the success of the implementation process. Significant barriers were seen in the funding of personnel, equipment, and language mediation as well as in legal liability and billing-related aspects. Results are discussed with a focus on financing, administrative and legal framework as well as language mediation, documentation and further matters that are essential to ensure high-quality care.

General practitioners (GPs) are among the specialists who prescribe the highest number of medication. Therefore the improvement of pharmacological competencies is an important part of the GP specialist training. The self-concept of general practice stating that GPs are the first contact persons for all health problems makes it challenging to define and acquire competencies for specialist training. While the "Competence-based Curriculum" developed by the German College of General Practitioners and Family Physicians defines diagnoses, reasons for counselling and competencies which are essential for general practice, a similar orientation guide is lacking for the pharmacological field. The aim of this study is to define and characterize pharmacological substances which every GP should know so well that he or she is able to conduct counselling and monitoring.We analysed private and public health insurance prescriptions of all general practices participating in the CONTENT project in the period from 2009 to 2014. The analysis was limited to substances with oral application which were prescribed at least once by at least 25 % (n = 11) of the practices. While the 100 most frequent prescriptions were included due to their frequency, less frequently prescribed substances were assessed concerning their relevance for general practice in a rating procedure. The substances included were classified by diagnoses and reasons for counselling.We analysed 1,912,896 prescriptions from 44 practices and 112,535 patients on the basis of the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system. After applying the inclusion criteria, 453 substances were left, 302 of which were considered relevant for general practice and could be assigned to 45 diagnoses / reasons for counselling.The result of this study could be considered a working draft for a pharmacological curriculum for general practice, which may complement the "Competence-based Curriculum" in the medium term.