Search

Purpose: To evaluate the repeatability of a new swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT)-based biometer to measure anterior segment parameters and to assess the agreement with 3 other imaging devices based on different measurement principles., Setting: Unit of Eye and Vision, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden., Design: Prospective, comparative case series., Methods: 3 consecutive measurements were obtained in unoperated eyes with the Eyestar900 (SS-OCT), Lenstar 900, MS-39, and Sirius. The following anterior segment parameters were evaluated: central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal diameter (CD), aqueous depth (AQD), and corneal power metrics. The repeatability limit (Rlim), coefficient of variation (CoV), and a repeated measures Bland-Altman analysis were performed., Results: 74 eyes of 74 participants were measured. The Rlims for CCT, CD, and AQD were lower than 10 μm, 0.3 mm, and 0.10 mm for all devices, respectively. The corresponding CoVs for these parameters never exceeded 1.2%. The Rlim for the corneal power metrics never exceeded 0.60 diopter (D) for any of the instruments. Lenstar showed the best agreement with the MS-39 to measure CCT, CD, and AQD (limit of agreement interval, LoA: 15.54 μm, 0.55 mm, and 0.16 mm, respectively). The mean difference for keratometry parameters was lower than 0.3 D for all device comparisons, and the LoA interval ranged between 0.52 D and 1.21 D., Conclusions: The repeatability for measuring anterior segment parameters was good, and the agreement among all the instruments was good for CD and AQD measurements. However, for CCT and keratometer parameters, the instruments cannot be used interchangeably due to large LoA interval., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS.)

Objectives: To assess the central corneal thickness (CCT) with 5 different devices, evaluate the repeatability of the devices, and determine the possible relationship between thickness values and sex., Materials and Methods: The study included 308 eyes of 154 patients (76 women, 78 men) between the ages of 18-30 who presented to the Ophthalmology Clinic of Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Training and Research Hospital. Autorefractor (Topcon, Japan), ultrasound pachymetry (UP) (Ceniscan, USA), high-resolution Pentacam (Oculus, USA), anterior segment-optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) (Optovue, USA), and Spectralis AS-OCT (Heidelberg, Germany) measurements were assessed., Results: The mean age of the study participants was 23.2±0.2 years and the mean CCT was 540±14.1 μm, with no statistically significant difference in CCT between sexes (p>0.05). Mean CCT values were 557.0±26.7 μm with the autorefractor, 543.6±32.9 μm with UP, 533.8±30.2 μm with the Oculus Pentacam, 519.8±30.1 μm with Optovue AS-OCT, and 547.5±31.6 μm with Heidelberg AS-OCT. Pairwise comparisons between devices showed that the Optovue AS-OCT gave significantly lower CCT measurements than the autorefractor and Heidelberg AS-OCT device (p=0.027 and p=0.033, respectively). The coefficient of repeatability for autorefractor, UP, high-resolution Pentacam, Optovue AS-OCT, and Heidelberg AS-OCT CCT measurements were 1.51%, 2.46%, 3.72%, 2.57%, and 3.34%, respectively., Conclusion: Measurements made with five different devices showed that CCT was comparable and clinically usable. However, it was determined that the Optovue AS-OCT showed lower CCT values compare to other devices. When compared in terms of repeatability, it was found to be lower in the Pentacam than other devices., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors., (©Copyright 2022 by Turkish Ophthalmological Association | Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology, published by Galenos Publishing House.)

Purpose: To evaluate the interday repeatability in the measurement of parameters used for the detection of progression of keratoconus by prediction limits (PL) for single measurements, and the repeatability coefficient (RC) for the mean of replicate measurements., Design: Prospective reliability analysis for cases and control eyes., Methods: Twenty-five eyes in 25 subjects with KC and 25 eyes in 25 healthy controls were included. Four consecutive measurements were made, 3 days apart, with a Pentacam HR tomographic instrument (denoted the Pentacam) and a Nidek ARK 560-A auto-keratometer (denoted the keratometer). Main outcome measures were the intra- and interday RC of parameters used in the detection of progression of keratoconus., Results: The most repeatable parameter obtained with the Pentacam was the curvature power of the central flat meridian (K1, 0.44 D [RC], -0.55 to 0.60 diopter [D] [PL]), followed by the central steep meridian (K2, 0.72 D [RC], -0.90 to 0.94 D [PL]). The interday repeatability of K1 and K2 was similar when using the keratometer (K1, 0.32 D [RC], -0.66 to 0.57 D [PL], K2, 0.93 D [RC], -1.36 to 1.08 D [PL]). The interday repeatability of the curvature power of the steepest point (Kmax, 0.84 D [RC], -0.90 to 1.11 D [PL]) would benefit from being stratified: RC = 0.44 D and PL = -0.49 to 0.67 D for Kmax < 49.0 D, and RC = 1.08 D and PL = -1.19 to 1.42 D for Kmax ≥ 49.0 D., Conclusions: The interday repeatability of measurements, single or replicate, in subjects with keratoconus should be considered when diagnosing progressive disease. K1 exhibited the best intraday repeatability. Kmax benefits from being stratified according to disease severity., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To compare intraocular pressure readings from three different tonometers, the Tono-Pen AVIA® (TP), TonoVet® (TV) and TonoVet Plus® (TV+) and to determine how measurements from each tonometer are affected by central corneal thickness (CCT)., Animals: Ninety dogs., Procedures: Normal dogs and dogs with ocular disease were selected for study inclusion. Central corneal thickness measurements were gathered with the Pachette 4 ultrasonic pachymeter, and IOP measurements were gathered with the three tonometers in random order. ANOVA or Wilcoxon tests were utilized for overall group comparisons. Linear regression analyses were utilized to determine the association between IOP and CCT., Results: When comparing tonometers to each other, for all dogs, readings from the TV+were significantly different compared to the TV (p = <.0001) and TP (p = <.0001); however, there was no significant difference between the TV and the TP (p = .999). Linear regression did not find any significant correlation between corneal thickness and IOP readings with any tonometer when looking at normal dogs or when including dogs with ocular abnormalities., Discussion: This study did not find a significant correlation between an increase in CCT and increase in IOP reading in any tonometer comparison amongst normal and dogs with ocular abnormalities. The TV+produced consistently and significantly higher readings, but measurements did not exceed the expected IOP range in normal dogs. For consistency, the same tonometer should be used when monitoring IOP over time., (© 2021 American College of Veterinary Ophthalmologists.)

Purpose: To evaluate the correlation between corneal thickness (CT) measurements obtained with two Scheimpflug devices, Pentacam HR and Precisio, and to elaborate, if necessary, a regression formula which could make these results comparable., Design: Retrospective, Comparative, Observational study., Setting: Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, "Scuola Medica Salernitana" University of Salerno, Italy., Methods: One hundred twenty four healthy eyes of 124 volunteers (65 males; range: 20-32 years; mean age of 24.8 ± 1.7) were included in this study. CT was measured using Pentacam HR and Precisio in three different points: the pupil center (PC), the corneal apex (CA) and the thinnest point (TP)., Results: CT obtained with both devices at the PC, at the CA and at the TP showed a good correlation (r = 0.97, r = 0.97, r = 0.97, respectively), but Pentacam HR measurements were significantly thicker than those provided by Precisio (p < 0.01). The differences between Pentacam HR and Precisio were 21.9 ± 8.8 μm at the PC, 21.9 ± 8.9 μm at the CA, 19.1 ± 9.0 μm at the TP. The calculated regression formulas were: y = 0.9558x + 2.3196 for the PC, y = 0.9519x + 4.5626 for the CA, y = 0.9364x + 15.436 for the TP, where x is the CT measured with Pentacam HR and y is the Precisio measurement., Conclusions: The findings provided by this study highlight that Precisio measures thinner corneas compared to Pentacam HR. The identified regression formulas could be utilized to make interchangeable the results obtained with these two devices., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

The purpose of this study was to use a portable optical coherence tomography (OCT) for characterization of corneal stromal striae (CSS) in an ovine animal model and human corneas with histological correlation, in order to evaluate their architectural pattern by image analysis. Forty-six eyes from female adult sheep (older than 2 years), and 12 human corneas, were included in our study. The eyes were examined in situ by a portable OCT, without enucleation. All OCT scans were performed immediately after death, and then the eyes were delivered to a qualified histology laboratory. In the ovine animal model, CSS were detected with OCT in 89.1% (41/46) of individual scans and in 93.4% (43/46) of histological slices. In human corneas, CSS were found in 58.3% (7/12) of cases. In both corneal types, CSS appeared as "V"- or "X"-shaped structures, with very similar angle values of 70.8° ± 4° on OCT images and 71° ± 4° on histological slices (p ≤ 0.01). Data analysis demonstrated an excellent degree of reproducibility and inter-rater reliability of measurements (p < 0.001). The present study demonstrated that by using a portable OCT device, CSS can be visualized in ovine and human corneas. This finding suggests their generalized presence in various mammals. The frequent observation, close to 60%, of such collagen texture in the corneal stroma, similar to a 'truss bridge' design, permits to presume that it plays an important structural role, aimed to distribute tensile and compressive forces in various directions, conferring resilience properties to the cornea.

Keratoconus is a progressive ectatic corneal disorder, which can result in severe visual impairment. The new ABCD keratoconus classification system allows differentiated description of the disease. Aim of the study was to evaluate the components of this novel staging system (ARC, PRC, thinnest pachymetry) as well as topometric indices, deviation of normality indices, and other parameters in terms of repeatability and reliability. 317 eyes with keratoconus were examined twice with a Scheimpflug device (Pentacam, Oculus). Bland Altman analysis and intraclass correlations were carried out to evaluate the parameters repeatability and reliability. Apart from IHA (ICC = 0.730), all parameters showed excellent reliability (ICC > 0.900). ARC, PRC, thinnest pachymetry, Kmax, CKI, KI, Rmin, and Progression Avg were the best repeatable parameters with relative repeatability values < 2.5%. Other parameters performing well in terms of repeatability were IHD, ISV, IVA, and final D (RR < 13%). Regression analysis revealed consistently high repeatability along all stages of keratoconus for PRC, thinnest pachymetry, and CKI. All parameters of the ABCD staging system showed excellent reliability and repeatability, PRC and thinnest pachymetry even at all stages of keratoconus and can consequently be reliably used in the determination of keratoconus progression.

Objective: Pachymetry plays a crucial role in the diagnosis and management of glaucoma and corneal diseases. There have been several outbreaks of epidemic ocular infections in ophthalmology clinics worldwide with reports of viral, parasitic, and prion disease. Contact pachymetry is a possible vehicle of transmission due to its risk of contamination. We aim to identify the types of pachymetry used and methods employed for cleaning and disinfection in eye units throughout the United Kingdom., Methods: A telephone survey was carried out, and a senior nurse or sister questioned based on the proforma created. A follow-up email was sent to units that did not respond with the questionnaire attached., Results: Of 109 responses, 10 eye units were unaware of the device name and 4 were unaware of the cleaning method used. Overall, 69/105 (66%) were cleaned with some form of alcohol wipe between patients, 12/105 (11%) used presept solution to soak the pachymetry head mainly 5 to 10 minutes, with 2 units soaking for 20 to 30 minutes. Milton solution was used by 4 units (4%) (10 s to 10 min). Three used a hydrogen peroxide solution for 10 minutes (3%). Three (3%) used an alcohol solution. Fifteen (14%) units used some chlorine-based solution (actichlor/chloraprep) for 5 to 10 minutes. Two (2%) units combined an alcohol-based wipe with solution to soak afterward., Conclusions: There is a large variation in methods and duration of tip disinfection with only a few units following the Royal College of Ophthalmologists (RCOphth) guidelines on pachymeter disinfection. The majority of eye units use alcohol/chlorine-based wipes for cleaning the pachymetry heads which is against the current recommended guidelines. The average immersion time when solutions were used was 5 to 10 minutes.

The purpose of this study was to compare central corneal thickness, thinnest corneal thickness, and the thinnest point of the cornea between Pentacam and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (ASOCT) in patients with dry eye disease (DED). This cross-sectional study included 195 participants between November 2015-June 2017. DED was diagnosed using the Asia Dry Eye Society criteria and further divided into mild and severe DED based on kerato-conjunctival vital staining. Central corneal thickness, thinnest corneal thickness, and the thinnest point of the cornea measured by Pentacam and ASOCT were compared, and Pearson's correlation coefficients were estimated. The differences in central corneal thickness and the thinnest corneal thickness between Pentacam and ASOCT were analysed using Bland-Altman and multivariate regression analyses adjusted for age and sex. This study included 70 non-DED subjects and 52 patients with mild and 73 with severe DED. The Pentacam and ASOCT measurements of central corneal thickness and thinnest corneal thickness were strongly correlated, but the respective values were higher when measured with Pentacam. The Bland-Altman analysis revealed differences in central corneal thickness (non DED, 11.8; mild DED, 13.2; severe DED, 19.6) and in thinnest corneal thickness (non DED, 13.1; mild DED, 13.4; severe DED, 20.7). After adjusting for age and sex, the differences in central corneal thickness (β = 7.029 μm, 95%CI 2.528-11.530) and thinnest corneal thickness (β = 6.958 μm, 95%CI 0.037-13.879) were significantly increased in the severe-DED group. The distribution of the thinnest point of the cornea in the cornea's inferior temporal quadrant between Pentacam and ASOCT deviated in severe DED (Pentacam: 90.4% vs. ASOCT: 83.6%). Clinicians should consider that there were significant differences in corneal-morphology assessment between the measurements with Pentacam and ASOCT in severe DED., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Purpose: To compare corneal tomography measurements (elevation and pachymetry) as made by two corneal tomographers: Pentacam AXL and CASIA 2., Material and Methods: The devices were used in a standard measuring mode. 77 normal eyes were measured five times with both devices. The data maps for anterior and posterior corneal elevation and pachymetry were exported and analyzed. Repeatability and average values were calculated for each valid data point on the exported data maps. We also calculated a corrected repeatability of the elevation data maps by removing rotation, tilt, and decentration through realignment of the elevation measurement of each eye prior to analyzing the variations in the measurement usingthe same method as for the repeatability., Results: Pentacam AXL offered the better (corrected) repeatability for anterior corneal elevation measurements. CASIA 2 offered better repeatability for the pachymetry measurements. The tomographers could not be used interchangeably. The central corneal thickness was measured 9 μm ± 3 μm larger when measured with Pentacam AXL compared to CASIA 2., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Purpose: To provide normal corneal elevation data for a large Caucasian population and to determine the impacts on these data of age, sex, axial length (AXL) and horizontal white-to-white (WW)., Setting: Centro Internacional de Oftalmología Avanzada, Madrid, Spain., Design: Retrospective, cross-sectional, observational., Methods: In this retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study, anterior and posterior corneal elevations were measured in 789 right eyes of subjects with no ocular disease at the thinnest corneal location in relation to a fixed 8-mm best-fit sphere using the Pentacam, and AXL and WW were measured with the IOLMaster. A multiple linear regression model was used to assess the effects of age, sex, AXL and WW on the elevation data., Results: Mean subject age was 50.5 ± 15 years (range 17-93 years); 64% were women. Mean anterior and posterior corneal elevations were 1.99 ± 1.75 µm (- 7 to 10 µm) and 7.70 ± 5.7 µm (- 6 to 28 µm). Anterior corneal elevations were higher by 0.165 μm and 0.033 μm for every mm reduction in AXL and every year reduction in age, respectively. Sex and WW were not significant predictors of anterior elevations (R 2  = 7.7%). Posterior corneal elevation increased by 0.186 μm/year of age, 0.707 μm/mm reduction in WW and 0.819 μm/mm reduction in AXL. This variable was also 0.866 μm greater in men (R 2  = 34.4%)., Conclusion: Anterior corneal elevations decrease with age and are higher for shorter AXL but are not influenced by sex or WW. Posterior corneal elevations increase with age, decreasing AXL, decreasing WW and are higher in men.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the intraobserver repeatability and agreement of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements by 2 commonly available instruments, Zeiss IOL Master 700 (SS-OCT-based optical biometry device) and Tomey corneal specular microscope EM-3000 (Noncontact specular microscopy)., Design: Retrospective study., Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of data from routine clinical practice in which preoperative CCT measurements of 105 patients scheduled for cataract surgery were analyzed. Two consecutive CCT measurements were measured using Zeiss IOL Master 700 and Tomey corneal specular microscope EM-3000 by the same examiner. The repeatability of CCT measurements was analyzed by mean intraobserver difference, coefficient of repeatability (CR), and intraclass correlation. The agreement between the 2 methods was analyzed by mean difference and limits of agreement (LoA) using the Bland-Altman method., Results: The mean absolute intraobserver difference between the 2 measurements by Zeiss and Tomey were 3.41 ± 3.98 μm and 8.62 ± 9.52 μm (P < 0.0001), respectively. For Zeiss, the CR was 10.3 μm with 95% LoA of -10.5 to 10.1 μm. For Tomey, the CR was 25.2 μm with 95% LoA of -25.2 to 25.2 μm. The mean CCT measurements ± standard deviation by Zeiss and Tomey were 544.0 ± 38.1 μm and 532.6 ± 40.0 μm, respectively (P = 0.003). The 95% LoA in CCT between the 2 methods was -15.8 to 38.7 μm., Conclusions: Zeiss IOL Master 700 has superior intraobserver repeatability and consistency than Tomey EM-3000. Zeiss produced higher CCT measurements than Tomey; hence, in clinical practice, interchangeability between these 2 methods is limited.

Purpose: To compare the repeatability and agreement of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT), corneal topography (CT) with a combined Scheimpflug-Placido system, optical biometry (OB), specular microscopy (SM), and ultrasound pachymetry (UP)., Methods: A single observer measured CCT twice in 150 eyes of 150 subjects with each of five devices: Nidek RS-3000 Advance OCT, CSO Sirius combined Scheimpflug-Placido disc system CT, Nidek AL-Scan partial coherence interferometry-based OB, Tomey EM-3000 SM, and Reichert iPac ultrasonic pachymeter. Pachymetry values corrected by the SM device software were also recorded. Levels of agreement between devices were evaluated by Bland-Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement, and repeatability for each device was analysed with intraclass correlation coefficients., Results: The mean CCTs measured by OCT, CT, OB, SM, corrected SM, and UP were 544.60 ± 29.56, 536.19 ± 32.14, 528.29 ± 29.45, 524.88 ± 32.38, 537.88 ± 32.38, and 545.29 ± 30.75 μm, respectively. Mean CCT differed significantly between the devices (p < 0.05) apart from between OCT and UP, and between CT and corrected SM. Mean paired differences between devices ranged between 0.68 and 20.41 μm. Repeatability with all devices was excellent (> 0.99). The range of limits of agreement was the least between OCT and UP., Conclusions: Different CCT measurement techniques produce quite different results, so CCT evaluation and follow-up should be performed using the same device or devices with close compatibility.

Purpose: To evaluate the relationship between biomechanical parameters measured with a dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer and glaucoma., Patients and Methods: Cross-sectional observational data of 47 eyes of 47 consecutive subjects with medically controlled primary open-angle glaucoma and 75 eyes of 75 healthy subjects examined with a dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer (Corvis ST) were retrospectively investigated. Eight biomechanical parameters were compared between eyes with and without glaucoma using multivariable models adjusting for intraocular pressure (IOP), central corneal thickness, age, and axial length., Results: In multivariable models, glaucoma was negatively correlated with A1 time (P<0.001, coefficient=-0.5535), A2 time (P=0.008, coefficient=-0.1509), radius (P=0.011, coefficient=-0.4034), and whole eye movement (P<0.001, coefficient=-0.0622). Negative correlation between glaucoma and 3 parameters (A1 time, A2 time, and radius) consistently indicate larger deformability of the cornea and negative correlation between glaucoma and whole eye movement indicate smaller eye movement, in glaucoma eyes. There were significant correlations of many biomechanical parameters with other baseline factors (8 parameters with IOP, 2 with central corneal thickness, 4 with age, and 7 with axial length)., Conclusions: Eyes with medically controlled glaucoma were more deformable than healthy eyes, which may increase the risk of optic nerve damage through an underestimation of IOP and biomechanical vulnerability of the globe. Many parameters showed a significant correlation with baseline factors, suggesting the importance of adjustment for these confounding factors when evaluating the correlation between biomechanical parameters and ocular diseases. These results suggest the relevance of measuring biomechanical properties of glaucoma eyes for accurate IOP measurement and risk assessment.

Purpose: To compare the outcomes of the combination of an image-guided system and intraoperative aberrometer with the surgeon's standard of care in correcting astigmatism using toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) or corneal incisions., Setting: Single site in United States., Design: Prospective case series., Methods: Contralateral eyes of patients having uncomplicated bilateral cataract surgery and astigmatism correction were randomly assigned to Group A or Group B. Group A received the surgeon's preferred standard of care. Group B had preoperative planning using an image-guidance system (VERION), intraoperative aberrometry (ORA System with VerifEye+), and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. The primary endpoint was the residual refractive astigmatism at 3 months., Results: Thirty-eight eyes were treated with toric IOLs and 40 eyes with corneal astigmatic incisions. On average, toric IOLs resulted in almost 0.25 diopter (D) less cylinder than corneal astigmatic incisions (P < .01), with no difference between groups (P = .41). There was no statistically significant difference in the mean spherical equivalent refraction by group (P = .51). At 3 months, the IOL in 4 eyes (11%) (2 in Group A and Group B each) was more than 10 degrees of absolute orientation from the intended orientation. The mean keratometry was 0.16 D higher with the image-guided system compared with optical biometry (Lenstar). The vector difference between the 2 measurements was 0.5 D or lower in all eyes., Conclusions: The combined use of an image-guided system and intraoperative aberrometer did not significantly improve outcomes compared with the surgeon's standard of care. Based on keratometry, there was good agreement in corneal astigmatism measurements between the image-guided system and the optical biometer., (Copyright © 2018 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To compare central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements obtained by the AL-Scan, Lenstar LS900, Galilei, and ultrasound pachymetry (UP) in normal and cataractous eyes., Methods: Eighty eyes of healthy subjects were included in the study. Each subject was assessed by four different methods of measurements using the AL-Scan, Lenstar LS900, Galilei, and UP by a single examiner. To assess the intraobserver repeatability, three consecutive measurements were taken for the AL-Scan., Results: The mean CCT [± standard deviation (SD)] for the AL-Scan, Lenstar LS900, Galilei, and UP were 554.6 ± 30.9 μm, 542.9 ± 31.3 μm, 570.7 ± 30 μm, and 552.7 ± 32.8 μm, respectively. The differences between pairs of mean CCT for the methods are statistically significant for the pairs of Galilei-UP, AL-Scan-Galilei, and Lenstar LS900-Galilei. Bland-Altman plots showed that AL-Scan-UP have the closest agreement, followed by Lenstar-UP and AL-Scan-Lenstar. Galilei was found to have the poorest agreement with the other three methods. The intraobserver repeatability of the AL-Scan was very good with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.980., Conclusion: We found that CCT measurements between the AL-Scan-UP, Lenstar LS900-UP, and AL-Scan-Lenstar LS900 showed very strong correlation and comparable agreement. AL-Scan-UP showed the closest agreement and these devices can be used interchangeably in clinical practice. Galilei significantly showed higher value of CCT compared to other methods. It was also observed that the Al-Scan had excellent intraobserver repeatability., Competing Interests: None

Background: To compare the repeatability and agreements of central corneal thickness measurements of healthy individuals obtained by Scheimpflug-Placido topographer (Sirius), anterior segment spectral domain optical coherence tomography (Spectralis) (AS-OCT), optical biometry (AL-Scan) and ultrasonic pachymetry., Methods: Sixty-four eyes of 32 subjects with no ocular or systemic diseases were included in this study. Central corneal thickness measurements performed with Sirius, AS-OCT, optical biometry AL-Scan and ultrasonic pachymetry were compared. Bland-Altman analysis was used to demonstrate agreement between methods. Intra-examiner repeatability was assessed by using intraclass correlation co-efficients (ICCs)., Results: Sixty-four eyes of 32 patients were enrolled (25 male and seven female). The mean age was 23.8 years (range 21-28 years). The mean central corneal thickness was 560.8 ± 37.2 μm, 528.8 ± 32.0 μm, 546.4 ± 33.8 μm, 543.4 ± 35.8 μm for the ultrasonic pachymetry, optical biometry AL-Scan, Sirius and AS-OCT values, respectively. The thickest mean central corneal thickness (560.8 ± 37.2 μm) was obtained from ultrasonic pachymetry. The thinnest mean central corneal thickness (528.8 ± 32.0 μm) was obtained from optical biometry AL-Scan. All four modalities of central corneal thickness measurements correlated closely with each other. Intra-examiner repeatability was excellent for all devices with ICCs > 0.90., Conclusions: In conclusion, although measurements obtained by various methods correlate well, the measurements are not directly interchangeable. Between ultrasonic pachymetry and the three optical instruments tested, significant diferences can be seen. Therefore, the same imaging method should be used in corneal thickness follow-ups., (© 2018 Optometry Australia.)

Background: Post-LASIK corneal conditions cannot be accurately measured by traditional optometric approaches. Therefore, we aimed to analyze the agreement of two rotating Scheimpflug cameras in corneal assessment., Methods: Fifty otherwise healthy volunteers who had undergone LASIK were recruited in this study. The values of mean and central total corneal power (TCP), including TCP1, TCP2, and TCP-IOL, were measured by GALILEI Scheimpflug camera. The values of total corneal refractive power (TCRP) readings at both 2 mm ring and 3 and 4 mm zones were detected by Pentacam Scheimpflug camera. Central corneal thickness (CCT) and thinnest corneal thickness (TCT) were quantified by GALILEI and Pentacam respectively. Paired t-tests and Bland-Altman analyses were used to evaluate statistical differences between measurement results obtained by GALILEI and by Pentacam., Results: Among these 50 subjects, the mean and central TCP1 values (37.31 ± 2.61 and 37.27 ± 2.64) derived from GALILEI measurements were consistent with the TCRP values (37.08 ± 2.76, 37.11 ± 2.74, and 37.19 ± 2.68; p > 0.05) determined by Pentacam at the 2 mm ring apex, 3 mm zone apex, and 4 mm zone apex. There were no statistically significant differences in central corneal thickness (CCT) values measured by the two cameras (463.64 ± 55.67 μm for GALILEI and 470.69 ± 44.04 μm for Pentacam, respectively; p > 0.05). However, the limits of agreement were wide when comparing mean TCP1 (-1.4 to 1.8 D, -1.4 to 1.8 D, and -1.3 to 1.6 D), central TCP1 (-1.2 to 1.6 D, -1.2 to 1.6 D, and -1.2 to 1.4 D) and CCT (-77.2-63.0 μm)., Conclusion: Corneal power and corneal thickness are disparate post-LASIK evaluation parameters when comparing the utility of GALILEI with that of Pentacam.

Background: To compare the consistency between the average scores of the contact central corneal thickness measurements from ultrasound pachymetry devices still gold standard, such as iPac ® and Echoscan US-500, and noncontact measurements via Pentacam HR and Sirius topography., Methods: This prospective study, subsequently admitted to the ophthalmology department, 76 healthy individuals were performed. The measurements were repeated three times for each eye, and average scores were statistically analyzed on the same day and almost at the same time. While measuring the eyes, Pentacam HR, Sirius topography, iPac ® , and Echoscan US-500 were used, respectively. The inter-rater agreement of measurements from the devices was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient, and 95% Confidence Interval and p values demonstrating statistically significance were also presented. In the graphical assessment of the agreement, the Bland-Altman graph was used., Results: Among 76 study participants, 43 (56.6%) were composed of women, and age level was 38.6 ± 12.5 years, ranging between 18 and 69. It was observed that the highest agreement was between the measurements obtained from Echoscan US-500 and iPac ® devices, but the agreement between the measurements of different devices was higher than 0.90. Bland-Altman graphics were also investigated; the results of four different devices were seen to be consistent with one another., Conclusions: Therefore, the devices we compared in the study can be used as alternatives to one another due to the higher consistency between CCT measurements provided with through UP devices of Echoscan US-500 and iPac ® , and Pentacam HR and Sirius topography devices., Clinical Trial Registration Number: 2016/112.

BACKGROUND To assess the repeatability and agreement between a new high-resolution optical coherence tomographer (OCT) and a Scheimpflug topographer. MATERIAL AND METHODS Sixty phakic and healthy participants were measured in this study, and one eye per participant was analyzed. Depending on their refractive error, each participant was allocated into a myopic, hyperopic, or emmetropic group. The Cirrus HD-OCT 5000 (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany), and the Sirius Scheimpflug topographer (Costruzione Strumenti Oftalmici, Florence, Italy) were used to take all measurements. RESULTS The repeatability of these instruments to measure the anterior chamber depth, angle-to-angle, thinnest pachymetry, and both nasal and temporal angles was smaller than 0.15 mm, 0.40 mm, 10 µm, and 10 degrees, respectively. However, the repeatability of the Scheimpflug instrument to measure the apex pachymetry was about 15 µm, and for the OCT, it was about 4 µm for all groups. On average, the Sirius Scheimpflug instrument measured shallower anterior chamber depth (about 0.10 mm), shorter angle-to-angle (about 0.5 mm), thinner corneas (approximately 10 µm), and narrower angles (around 5 degrees) for all refractive groups. CONCLUSIONS The repeatability of the Cirrus OCT and Sirius Scheimpflug instrument was good and independent of the refractive error. Nevertheless, to judge whether these instruments could be used interchangeable, clinical criteria are needed.

Objective: The VX120 multidiagnostic unit is a multidiagnostic instrument that combines several functions: autorefraction, keratometry, corneal topography, aberrometry, pachymetry, and noncontact tonometry. The purpose of this study was to determine the intrasession repeatability and the intersession reproducibility of all parameters measured by the VX120 multidiagnostic unit in a sample of normal healthy eyes., Methods: Three repeated measurements in the right eye of the volunteers were taken with VX120. Repeatability of the sphere, cylinder, axis, anterior corneal powers (K flat and K steep, 3-mm pupil), high- and low-order aberration root mean square (HOA-RMS and LOA-RMS, 3-mm pupil), eccentricity, white-to-white (WTW), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and central corneal thickness (CCT) (2-mm central) was analyzed. Within-subject SD (Sw), precision, repeatability, coefficient of variation (CV), and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated., Results: The CV was low for K flat and K steep, WTW, ACD, and CCT with a range from 0.34% to 1.16%. The CV was higher for sphere, cylinder, HOA-RMS, and LOA-RMS and eccentricity with a range among 6.92% to 54.24%. The ICC showed high values in all parameters except in HOA-RMS (0.720-0.776) and eccentricity (0.889) in first session with moderate agreement. Comparing the intrasession repeatability of first and second session, statistically significant differences (P<0.01) were found between both sessions just to the CV for all parameters (except cylinder values) measured with VX120. However, nonstatistically significant differences (P>0.13) were found for Sw, precision, and repeatability values., Conclusions: The VX120 multidiagnostic unit provides repeatable measurements in anterior corneal power (K flat and K steep), WTW, ACD, and CCT. However sphere, cylinder, HOA-RMS, LOA-RMS, and eccentricity showed worse repeatability. Intersession reproducibility showed good results with little differences between sessions in healthy subjects.

Purpose: To evaluate variability of central corneal thickness measurement (CCT) devices using a hitherto unprecedented number of CCT devices., Methods: CCT was measured consecutively in 122 normal corneas of 61 subjects with seven different devices using three distinct measurement technologies: Scheimpflug, Ultrasound, and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). Per device deviation from the mean CCT value per eye was used to determine which of the devices performed best, compared to the mean value., Results: Cirrus OCT yielded the lowest deviation. Deviations of the individual devices from the mean CCT of each eye were (OS/OD) 12.8±5.0/14.9±9.4 μm for Topcon noncontact specular microscopy (NCSM), 11.3±5.9/10.6±7.3 μm for Pentacam, 10.7±5.2/10.4±4.8 μm for Spectralis OCT, 6.0±3.9/6.2±4.9 μm for Topcon DRI OCT, 5.1±3.4/5.9±10.3 μm for AngioVue OCT, 4.8±4.1/5.7±4.6 μm for US pachymetry, and 4.2±3.2/5.7±4.6 μm for Cirrus OCT. The maximum differences between US pachymetry and the other devices were very high (up to 120 μm)., Conclusion: Central corneal thickness may be under- or overestimated due to high interdevice variations. Measuring CCT with one device only may lead to inappropriate clinical and surgical recommendations. OCT showed superior results., Competing Interests: I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Ambrósio: Zeiss: consultant. Barthelmes: Bayer: consultant/advisor, lecture fees, grant support. Novartis: consultant/advisor, lecture fees, grant support. Goldblum: Zeiss, Haag-Streit: consultant. Hasler: Topcon: consultant; Novartis, Zeiss, Topcon: lecture fees. Maloca: Topcon: consultant; Novartis, Zeiss, Topcon, Mediconsult: lecture fees. Studer: none. Tufail: Heidelberg Engineering, Optovue: consultant. Zweifel: Bayer: consultant/advisor, lecture fees, grant support. Novartis: consultant/advisor, lecture fees, grant support. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Purpose: To evaluate the correlation between anterior axial curvature difference maps following corneal cross-linking (CXL) for progressive keratoconus obtained from Scheimpflug-based tomography and Placido-based topography., Design: Between-devices reliability analysis of randomized clinical trial data., Methods: Corneal imaging was collected at a single-center institution preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively using Scheimpflug-based tomography (Pentacam; Oculus Inc, Lynnwood, Washington, USA) and scanning-slit, Placido-based topography (Orbscan II; Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, New York, USA) in patients with progressive keratoconus receiving standard protocol CXL (3 mW/cm 2 for 30 minutes). Regularization index (RI), absolute maximum keratometry (K Max), and change in K Max (ΔK Max) were compared between the 2 devices at each time point., Results: Fifty-one eyes from 36 patients were evaluated at all time points. Values were significantly different at all time points (56.01 ± 5.3 diopters [D] Scheimpflug vs 55.04 ± 5.1 D scanning-slit preoperatively [P = .003]; 54.58 ± 5.3 D Scheimpflug vs 53.12 ± 4.9 D scanning-slit at 12 months [P < .0001]) but strongly correlated between devices (r = 0.90-0.93) at all time points. The devices were not significantly different at any time point for either ΔK Max or RI but were poorly correlated at all time points (r = 0.41-0.53 for ΔK Max, r = 0.29-0.48 for RI). At 12 months, 95% limits of agreement were 7.51 D for absolute K Max, 8.61 D for ΔK Max, and 19.86 D for RI., Conclusions: Measurements using Scheimpflug and scanning-slit Placido-based technology are correlated but not interchangeable. Both devices appear reasonable for separately monitoring the cornea's response to CXL; however, caution should be used when comparing results obtained with one measuring technology to the other., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To compare and analyze the interchangeability of three measuring systems, each based on a different technique, for central corneal thickness (CCT) analysis., Methods: CCT measurements were measured using optical coherence tomography (OCT), non-contact specular microscopy (NCSM), and ultrasonic pachymetry (USP) in 60 eyes of 60 healthy patients with a mean age of 66.5±15.0 years and a mean spherical equivalent of 0.43±1.14 D. Analysis of variations in measurement concordance and correlation among the three different methods were performed. Comparison of CCT measurements were done using Bland-Altman plots (with bias and 95% confidence intervals), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and paired t-student analysis., Results: Mean CCT values were: 549.20±26.91μm for USP (range 503-618μm), 514.20±27.49μm for NCSM (range 456-586μm) and 542.80±25.56μm for OCT (range 486-605μm). CCT values obtained with NCMS were significantly lower than those obtained with OCT and USP methods. NCMS CCT value was 36.08±10.72μm lower than USP value (p<0.05), and NCMS CCT value was 7.88±8.86μm lower than OCT value (p<0.05). ICC between USP-NCSM pair was 0.488 and 0.909 between USP-OCT pair., Conclusion: OCT and UPS offered highly comparable results, whereas NCSM offered lower mean CCT values compared to the other two methods. Therefore, NCSM should not be considered a reliable method for measuring CCT and should rather be considered for assessing longitudinal changes in the same patient., (Copyright © 2017 Spanish General Council of Optometry. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Background: Corneal pachymetry is widely used for refractive surgery and follow up in keratoconus, accurate measurement is essential for a safe surgery., Objective: To assess intraobserver reliability of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements using optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR) technology and its agreement with ultrasonic pachymeter (US)., Method: Randomized and prospective comparative evaluation of diagnostic technology. One randomly healthy eye of subjects was scanned three times with both devices. Intraobserver within-subject standard deviation (Sw), coefficient of variation (CVw) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were obtained for reliability analysis; for study agreement, data were analyzed using the paired-sample t test and the Bland-Altman LoA method. The mean of three scans of each equipment was used to assess the LoA., Results: The study enrolled 30 eyes of 30 subjects with average age of 28.70 ± 8.06 years. For repeatability, the Sw were 3.41 and 5.96 µ, the intraobserver CVw was 2 and 4% and ICC 0.991 and 0.988, for OLCR and US respectively. The mean CCT difference between OLCR and US was 8.90 ± 9.03 µ (95% confidence interval: 5.52-2.27 µ), and the LoA was 35.40 µ., Conclusions: OLCR technology provided reliable intraobserver CCT measurements. Both pachymetry measurements may be used interchangeably with minimum calibration adjustment., (Copyright: © 2018 Permanyer.)

Background: To evaluate the intrasession repeatability of anterior chamber depth (ACD), central (CCT) and peripheral corneal thickness (PCT), white-to-white diameter (WTW), and irido-corneal angle (IA) measurements obtained with a multidiagnostic device in healthy eyes., Methods: A total of 107 eyes of 107 patients ranging in age from 23 to 65 years were examined with the VX120 system (Visionix-Luneau Technologies). Three consecutive measurements were obtained with this device to assess the intrasession repeatability of ACD, CCT, PCT at different nasal and temporal locations, WTW, and nasal and temporal IA. Data analysis included the calculation of within-subject standard deviation (S w ), intrasubject precision (1.96xS w ), coefficient of variation (CV) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)., Results: The S w and CV for ACD was 0.03 mm and 1.16%, respectively, with an ICC of 0.992. The S w values for central and peripheral pachymetric measurements were below 9 μm, with CV of less than 1.6% and ICC of 0.976 or higher. For IA measurements, S w values of 0.84 or lower were found, with a CV between 1 and 2%, and an ICC of more than 0.970. The S w for WTW was 0.24 mm and the CV was 1.95%. No statistically significant correlations were found between any anatomical parameter evaluated and their S w and CV values associated (-0.220 ≤ r ≤ 0.204, p ≥ 0.125)., Conclusions: The VX120 system is able to provide repeatable measurements of anatomical parameters in healthy eyes. Inter-observer repeatability should be evaluated in future studies.

Purpose: To investigate and compare the diagnostic ability of corneal tomography and dynamic corneal response to differentiate between normal eyes and those with forme fruste keratoconus and keratoconus., Methods: Corneal tomography was performed using Pentacam (Pentacam HR; Oculus Optikgeräte, Wetzlar, Germany). Corneal deformation response was captured via Corvis ST (Optikgeräte) using a beta version of Corvis software. Classification analysis between normal eyes and eyes with forme fruste keratoconus and between normal and keratoconic eyes was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) and partial AUC (pAUC) for each classifying parameter were compared., Results: Twenty-one patients with forme fruste keratoconus in one eye and clinically evident keratoconus in the fellow eye and 38 normal individuals were recruited. Overall, 21 eyes with forme fruste keratoconus and 18 eyes with keratoconus were compared with 73 normal eyes. The mean age of the participants was comparable between groups. Comparative analysis between Pentacam and Corvis ST parameters showed significantly lower AUC and pAUC for Corvis ST parameters in differentiating keratoconic from normal eyes (P ≥ .049). However, comparable AUC and pAUC was observed between the Corvis Biomechanical Index (AUC = 0.785; pAUC = 0.079) and D value of the Belin/Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia Display (AUC = 0.757; pAUC = 0.068) (P ≥ .477) for detection of forme fruste keratoconus with sensitivities of 63.2% and 52.6%, given a common specificity of 80.3%., Conclusions: The current study showed the feasibility of use of non-tomographical parameters obtained from the Corvis ST for differentiating normal eyes and those with forme fruste keratoconus and keratoconus. The diagnostic ability of the Corvis ST was comparable to that of the Pentacam for differentiating normal eyes and eyes with forme fruste keratoconus. [J Refract Surg. 2017;33(9):632-638.]., (Copyright 2017, SLACK Incorporated.)

Purpose: To assess the repeatability and reproducibility of Visante™ OCT and Oculus Pentacam HR® in measuring central (CCT) and topographic corneal thickness (TCT) along the principle meridians in keratoconus (KC) corneae., Method: Twenty participants diagnosed with KC were recruited. There were two study visits. On the first study visit, two repeated corneal thickness measurements were obtained with each instrument. Measurements were repeated at least 48hrs later in the same order. TCT were recorded in the 90, 180, 45 and 135 meridians at 1mm intervals across 8mm chord., Results: Mean CCT for Visante™ OCT was 484.97±43.14μm (range: 484.84-486.09) and Oculus Pentacam HR® was 478.86±45.31μm (range: 477.20-480.53). No significant difference in TCT between the two visits (p=0.54) and measurements (p=0.63) for Visante™ OCT. For Oculus Pentacam HR®, no significant difference was found for each visit (p=0.18) but differences existed in the measurements outside of the central region (p=0.001). Tukey post-hoc analysis shows the differences (p˂0.05) were found in the +1 and +4 (supero-temporal) locations in the 135 meridian. Significant differences were found comparing the two instruments, (p<0.05). Bland Altman plots were used to demonstrate the differences between the two instruments and indicate their limits of agreement., Conclusion: Both instruments gave repeatable measurements as no significant differences were found in most locations in all meridians. Comparing the two instruments, they were not reproducible in all locations., (Copyright © 2017 British Contact Lens Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Aim: The aim of the study is to compare the measurements of central corneal thickness (CCT) performed by two examiners with four different methods at different times inter- and intra-individually., Methods: Thirty healthy people were included in the study. In these measurements, an optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR), an optic coherence tomography (OCT), a specular microscopy (SM), and a corneal topography (CT) were used. Two examiners performed the measurements in a consecutive manner. After 1-7 days of the first measurements, the second measurements were performed again consecutively. The mean of three measurements was taken in each session for all devices., Results: In OCT measurements, there was a significant difference between two examiners in both sessions (p < 0.001), while no significant differences were found between two examiners in first and second sessions in SM, CT, and OLCR measurements. When each examiner's measurements were compared to two sessions, there were no significant differences (p > 0.05, for all) except the SM measurements of the first examiner (p = 0.041). When the first measurements of two examiners were compared, the smallest values were of OCT. At the first session of two examiners, there was a significant difference between OCT and CT measurements, and between OCT and OLCR (p < 0.001, p = 0.002 for the first examiner and p < 0.001 for the second examiner, respectively)., Conclusion: Our study showed that CCT measurements made by CT and OLCR methods were almost same and highly correlated for both the examiners' measurements. CCTs measured by OCT were on average 30 μm thinner than CT and OLCR.

Purpose: To evaluate the intraoperator repeatability and interoperator reproducibility of two Scheimpflug-Placido anterior corneal analyzers (Sirius; Costruzione Strumenti Oftalmici, Florence, Italy, and TMS-5; Tomey, Nagoya, Japan) for the measurement of posterior corneal surface in normal eyes and the agreement between the two devices., Methods: The current prospective study investigated 55 right eyes of 55 healthy patients in a random order. The posterior steep keratometry (Ks), flat keratometry (Kf), mean keratometry (Km), and astigmatism were randomly measured by two independent experienced operators using the Sirius and TMS-5 Scheimpflug-Placido systems. Three consecutive measurements were obtained. Vector analysis was used for astigmatism. To assess intraoperator repeatability and interoperator reproducibility, within-subject standard deviation (Sw) and test-retest repeatability (TRT, 2.77 Sw) were calculated. The Bland-Altman plots and 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were used to evaluate the agreement between the two systems., Results: In the Sirius Scheimpflug-Placido system, the Sw and TRT of keratometry and astigmatism were less than 0.04 and 0.12 diopters (D), respectively. The interoperator Sw and TRT were less than 0.03 and 0.07 D, respectively. In the TMS-5 Scheimpflug-Placido system, the intraoperator Sw and TRT did not exceed 0.03 and 0.08 D, respectively. The interoperator Sw and TRT were no greater than 0.02 and 0.05 D, respectively. All parameters showed minor fluctuations in the 95% LoA., Conclusions: Both Scheimpflug-Placido systems show high repeatability and reproducibility for posterior corneal surface measurement. A high concordance between the two devices suggests interchangeable use in normal eyes. [J Refract Surg. 2017;33(8):524-530.]., (Copyright 2017, SLACK Incorporated.)

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements of four noncontact devices in healthy eyes., Materials and Methods: In a sample of 45 healthy controls, CCT was measured using an optical biometer (IOLMaster 700) based on swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT), high-resolution rotating Scheimpflug camera system (Pentacam HR), spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT) device with an anterior segment module (Spectralis), and noncontact pachymetry (NCP) device (Topcon TRK-2P). Agreement among the devices was analyzed using mean differences (i.e., bias) and Bland-Altman analysis with 95% limits of agreement (LoA)., Results: Mean CCT measurements were 537.5 ± 47.5 μm for SS-OCT optical biometer, 532.3 ± 43.8 μm for Scheimpflug system, 521.3 ± 44.7 μm for SD-OCT device, and 518.0 ± 43.1 μm for NCP (P < 0.001). The SD-OCT device and NCP showed the closest agreement, with a bias of 2.6 μm (95% LoA, -3.6-8.8 μm), whereas the SS-OCT optical biometer and NCP showed the least agreement, with a bias of 18.7 μm (95% LoA, -2.1-39.5 μm). Bias was 16.1 μm (95% LoA, -3.1-35.3 μm) for SS-OCT optical biometer and SD-OCT, 5.1 μm (95% LoA, -6.8-17.0 μm) for SS-OCT optical biometer and Scheimpflug system, 10.9 μm (95% LoA, -15.1-36.9 μm) for SD-OCT device and Scheimpflug system, and 13.6 μm (95% LoA, -5-32.2 μm) for Scheimpflug system and NCP., Conclusions: SS-OCT optical biometer overestimates CCT measurements compared to Scheimpflug system, SD-OCT device, and NCP. Given mean differences and range variations in CCT measurements between devices, SS-OCT optical biometer and Scheimpflug system are interchangeable as are SD-OCT and NCP.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of postcollagen crosslinking (CXL) haze on the measurement and repeatability of pachymetry and mean keratometry (Km) of four corneal topographers., Materials and Methods: Sixty eyes of sixty patients with progressive keratoconus who had undergone accelerated CXL (ACXL) underwent imaging with a scanning slit imaging device (Orbscan II) and three Scheimpflug imaging devices (Pentacam HR, Sirius, and Galilei). Post-ACXL haze was measured using the densitometry software on the Pentacam HR. Readings of the thinnest corneal thickness (TCT) and Km from three scans of each device were analyzed. Effect of haze on the repeatability of TCT and Km measurements was evaluated using regression models. Repeatability was assessed by coefficient of variation., Results: Corneal densitometry in different zones affected the repeatability of TCT measurement of Orbscan (P < 0.05) significantly but not the repeatability of TCT with Pentacam HR and Sirius (P = 0.03 and 0.05, respectively). Km values were affected by haze when measured with the Pentacam HR (P < 0.05). The repeatability of Km readings for all devices was unaffected by haze. In the anterior 0-2 mm and 2-6 mm zone, TCT (P = 0.43 and 0.45, respectively), Km values (P = 0.4 and 0.6, respectively), repeatability of TCT (P = 0.1 in both zones), and Km (P = 0.5 and 0.1, respectively) with Galilei were found to be the most reliable., Conclusion: Galilei measurements appear to be least affected by post-ACXL haze when compared with other devices. Hence, topography measurements in the presence of haze need to be interpreted with caution.

Purpose: To investigate two new stiffness parameters and their relationships with the dynamic corneal response (DCR) parameters and compare normal and keratoconic eyes., Methods: Stiffness parameters are defined as Resultant Pressure at inward applanation (A1) divided by corneal displacement. Stiffness parameter A1 uses displacement between the undeformed cornea and A1 and stiffness parameter highest concavity (HC) uses displacement from A1 to maximum deflection during HC. The spatial and temporal profiles of the Corvis ST (Oculus Optikgeräte, Wetzlar, Germany) air puff were characterized using hot wire anemometry. An adjusted air pressure impinging on the cornea at A1 (adjAP1) and an algorithm to biomechanically correct intraocular pressure based on finite element modelling (bIOP) were used for Resultant Pressure calculation (adjAP1 - bIOP). Linear regression analyses between DCR parameters and stiffness parameters were performed on a retrospective dataset of 180 keratoconic eyes and 482 normal eyes. DCR parameters from a subset of 158 eyes of 158 patients in each group were matched for bIOP and compared using t tests. A P value of less than .05 was considered statistically significant., Results: All DCR parameters evaluated showed significant differences between normal and keratoconic eyes, except peak distance. Keratoconic eyes had lower stiffness parameter values, thinner pachymetry, shorter applanation lengths, greater absolute values of applanation velocities, earlier A1 times and later second applanation times, greater HC deformation amplitudes and HC deflection amplitudes, and lower HC radius of concave curvature (greater concave curvature). Most DCR parameters showed a significant relationship with both stiffness parameters in both groups., Conclusions: Keratoconic eyes demonstrated less resistance to deformation than normal eyes with similar IOP. The stiffness parameters may be useful in future biomechanical studies as potential biomarkers. [J Refract Surg. 2017;33(4):266-273.]., (Copyright 2017, SLACK Incorporated.)

Purpose: To assess the repeatability and agreement of keratometry and pachymetry measurements obtained using 3 tomographers in eyes with keratoconus., Design: Reliability analysis., Methods: setting: Institutional., Study Population: Fifty eyes of 50 participants with keratoconus. observational procedure: Steep keratometry, flat keratometry, central corneal thickness (CCT), and thinnest corneal thickness (TCT) measurements using Galilei, Orbscan II, and Pentacam HR., Main Outcome Measures: Repeatability was assessed using within-subject standard deviation (S W ), coefficient of variation (CV), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Bland-Altman plots and 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were used to evaluate agreement between device pairs., Results: For all studied parameters, ICC was >0.97 with the least repeatable measurements obtained using Orbscan II. Mean steep keratometry values were similar while mean flat keratometry values were significantly different between all devices. The Galilei and Pentacam HR had the lowest 95% LoA for both CCT and TCT. There were no significant differences in mean CCT between Galilei and Pentacam HR. Mean Orbscan II CCT measurements were not significantly different overall but had wide 95% LoA with Pentacam HR (-47.95 to 58.09 μm) and Galilei (-43.70 to 53.91 μm). Mean Orbscan II CCT measurements were significantly lower when an acoustic factor of 0.92 was applied (-33.6 μm vs Pentacam HR, P < .001; -33.6 μm vs Galilei; P < .001)., Conclusions: Keratometric and pachymetric measurements of keratoconic eyes obtained by Galilei, Orbscan II, and Pentacam were disparate. Measurements were less repeatable with Orbscan II compared with Pentacam HR and Galilei, although overall repeatability was high for all instruments., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Comparative analysis of central and peripheral corneal thickness in PEX patients using three different imaging systems: Pentacam-Scheimpflug device, time-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) Visante, and swept-source OCT Casia., Materials and Methods: 128 eyes of 80 patients with diagnosed PEX were examined and compared with 112 normal, non-PEX eyes of 72 cataract patients. The study parameters included 5 measured zones: central and 4 peripheral (superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal)., Results: The mean CCT in eyes with PEX syndrome measured with all three instruments was thicker than that in normal eyes. Corneal thickness measurements in the PEX group were statistically significantly different between Pentacam and OCT Casia: central corneal thickness ( p = 0.04), inferior corneal zone ( p = 0.01), and nasal and temporal corneal zones ( p < 0.01). Between Pentacam and OCT Visante inferior, nasal and temporal corneal zones were statistically significantly different ( p < 0.01). Between OCT Casia and OCT Visante, there were no statistically significant differences in measured parameters values., Conclusion: The central corneal thickness in eyes with PEX syndrome measured with three different independent methods is higher than that in the non-PEX group, and despite variable peripheral corneal thickness, this one parameter is still crucial in intraocular pressure measurements.

Purpose: To assess agreement between one ultrasonic (US) and nine optical instruments for the measurement of central corneal thickness (CCT), and to evaluate intra- and inter-operator reproducibility., Methods: In this observational cross-sectional study, two masked operators measured CCT thickness twice in 28 healthy eyes. We used seven spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) devices, one time-domain OCT, one Scheimpflug camera, and one US-based instrument. Inter- and intra-operator reproducibility was evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (CV), and Bland-Altman test analysis. Instrument-to-instrument reproducibility was determined by ANOVA for repeated measurements. We also tested how the devices disagreed regarding systemic bias and random error using a structural equation model., Results: Mean CCT of all instruments ranged from 536 ± 42 μm to 577 ± 40 μm. An instrument-to-instrument correlation test showed high values among the 10 investigated devices (correlation coefficient range 0.852-0.995; p values <0.0001 in all cases). The highest correlation coefficient values were registered between 3D OCT-2000 Topcon-Spectral OCT/SLO Opko (0.995) and Cirrus HD-OCT Zeiss-RS-3000 Nidek (0.995), whereas the lowest were seen between SS-1000 CASIA and Spectral OCT/SLO Opko (0.852). ICC and CV showed excellent inter- and intra-operator reproducibility for all optic-based devices, except for the US-based device. Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated low mean biases between operators., Conclusions: Despite highlighting good intra- and inter-operator reproducibility, we found that a scale bias between instruments might interfere with thorough CCT monitoring. We suggest that optimal monitoring is achieved with the same operator and the same device.

Background/aims: Serial Scheimpflug corneal tomography to monitor the progression of keratoconus has become standard practice in most countries where corneal cross-linking is available. The tomographic definitions of progression are, however, poorly defined. The aims of this study were: (a) to estimate the 95% limits of intraobserver and interobserver agreement of corneal shape parameters on Pentacam in patients with keratoconus and (b) to investigate whether these limits of agreement varied according to disease severity., Methods: 96 adult patients with keratoconus and no corneal scarring or history of previous surgery were recruited from a corneal clinic in a tertiary ophthalmology hospital. One eye of each subject was scanned twice by each of the two observers with the Pentacam HR. 95% limits of intraobserver and interobserver agreement for K1, K2, Kmax and corneal thickness at the thinnest corneal location (TCT) were calculated., Results: Reproducibility of keratometry measures was better for early keratoconus than advanced keratoconus. In patients of Pentacam-derived Krumeich stage 1 or 2, the 95% limits of interobserver agreement for Kmax were from -0.90 to 1.01. In patients of Pentacam-derived Krumeich stage >2, the 95% limits of interobserver agreement for Kmax were from -3.71 to 3.86., Conclusions: Keratometric measurements on Pentacam HR are less reproducible in advanced keratoconus than in early keratoconus. In patients of Pentacam-derived Krumeich stage 1 or 2, an increase in K1, K2 or Kmax of more than 1 dioptre is likely to represent the real change in the corneal shape., (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/)

Purpose:: To compare central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements of healthy individuals obtained with ultrasonic pachymetry (UP) and non-contact specular microscopy (NCSM)., Method:: In total, 148 eyes of 74 subjects with no ocular or systemic diseases were included in the study. Central corneal thickness measurements of all patients performed with UP and NCCM were compared., Results:: A total of 74 subjects (38 females) were included in this study. The mean age was 45.2 ± 18.4 (range 12-85) years. The mean central corneal thickness of all 148 eyes was 546.9 ± 40 μm with UP and 510.8 ± 42 μm with NCSM. The mean central corneal thickness measured with NCSM was 35 μm thinner than that measured with UP (p<0.001). A high degree of agreement was found between the two methods (r=0.942, p<0.001)., Conclusions:: Our results suggest that NCSM measures thinner corneas than UP and that the correction formula we identified should be applied when comparing between these two devices.

Pentacam is a rotating Scheimpflug-based corneal and anterior segment tomographer that gives as comprehensive analysis of corneal 3D geometry. With this device the detection of mild keratoconus or ectasia susceptibility is possible. This is fundamental for screening ectasia risk prior to laser vision correction. The identification of susceptible cases at risk for developing progressive iatrogenic ectasia should go beyond (but not over) corneal front surface topography., (Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier GmbH.)

Purpose: A new method to measure the horizontal corneal diameter using a Scheimpflug image (SFI) was introduced and compared with the automated iris camera photo (ICP) method on the Pentacam., Methods: Each one eye of 88 subjects without significant abnormality in the cornea was included. In SFI, diameters were measured manually using the built-in software tool with the edge-filter option. ICP value read from the overview display. Repeatability was determined from the first two measurements of each eye. The accuracy was assessed using Bland-Altman plot in comparison with caliper measurements., Results: The measurement failure rate of ICP was aggravated by pupil dilation, while that of SFI was unrelated to pupil dilation. Repeatability coefficients of ICP and SFI were 0.1mm and 0.12mm, respectively. The mean difference between ICP values and caliper values was not significant. SFI values were greater than caliper measurements by a mean of 0.13mm., Conclusions: New SFI was reliable and could complement ICP in dilated pupil. The measurement failure rates of Pentacam need to be improved., (Copyright © 2015 British Contact Lens Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To analyze single session, intrauser reliability of a Scheimpflug device for anterior chamber (AC) and corneal parameters., Methods: In this observational study, 100 normal candidates underwent Scheimpflug analysis with Sirius 3D Rotating Scheimpflug Camera and Topography System (Costruzione Strumenti Oftalmici, Italy). Two scans in dark room conditions were performed by the same experienced user. The candidates were asked to keep both eyes closed for 5min before the scans. Exclusion criteria were previous ocular surgery, corneal scarring and anterior segment/posterior segment anomalies. Only the right eyes were used for the analysis. Both corneal (central, minimum, and apical thickness, volume, horizontal visible iris diameter, and apical curvature) and anterior chamber (volume, depth, angle, horizontal diameter) measurements were evaluated., Results: There was no difference in the means of repeated measurements (p>0.05, ANOVA). Intraclass correlations between the measures were high and ranged from 0.995-0.997 for corneal to 0.964-0.997 for anterior chamber (AC) parameters. The precision of repeatability measures (1.96×Sw) was approximately 5μ for the central and minimum corneal thickness, 8μ for the apical corneal thickness, 0.06mm for AC (anterior chamber) depth and less than 2° for the AC angle., Conclusions: Sirius Scheimpflug system has high repeatability for both corneal and AC parameters in normal eyes., (Copyright © 2015 Spanish General Council of Optometry. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To investigate whether corneal thickness parameters measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT), such as central corneal thickness (CCT), central corneal stromal thickness (CCST), and central corneal epithelial thickness (CCET), influence the intraocular pressure (IOP) difference measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and non-contact tonometry (NCT)., Methods: In total, 50 eyes from 50 subjects without glaucomatous defects were included in this retrospective, cross-sectional study. We measured IOP using GAT and NCT and calculated the difference between the two methods. CCT was measured by a Cirrus HD-OCT device using anterior segment imaging. The basement membrane of the epithelium, which was seen as a high-reflection line in the OCT image, was taken as a reference line to measure CCST and CCET., Results: The mean IOP measured by GAT and NCT was 16.7 ± 3.0 and 18.1 ± 3.8 mmHg, respectively. The mean IOP difference was 1.5 ± 1.7 mmHg, and the IOP measured by NCT was 8.4% ± 11.3% higher than that measured by GAT. The CCET and CCST were 57.9 ± 5.6 and 501.7 ± 33.8 μm, respectively. CCT showed a positive correlation with both GAT IOP (r = 0.648, P < 0.001) and NCT IOP (r = 0.676, P < 0.001). Although CCST showed a significant correlation with GAT IOP and NCT IOP, CCET did not. The difference between GAT IOP and NCT IOP increased with CCT (r = 0.333, P = 0.018), and CCET was positively correlated with the IOP difference between GAT and NCT (r = 0.435, P = 0.002)., Conclusions: IOP increased with greater CCT, and CCST seemed to have a more important role than CCET. CCET also increased with greater CCT, and this may be a possible explanation for the increasing difference in IOP between GAT and NCT with increasing CCT.

Purpose: To assess the repeatability of corneal thickness (CT) measurements, along the horizontal meridian up to 5mm from centre, in healthy eyes with the Pentacam instrument., Methods: CT was measured in 82 right eyes (82 healthy subjects) at 11 corneal locations nominally 1mm apart along the horizontal meridian with Scheimpflug topography Pentacam. Two consecutive scans were performed in quick succession. The repeatability of CT was determined by assessing differences between measurements and calculating the coefficient of variation (CV). The relative repeatability (difference) was calculated as the ratio of the absolute peripheral CT difference to the central thickness. A variant of Bland-Altman analysis was carried out to determine the effect of the overall magnitude of CT on the absolute and relative differences., Results: Mean CT (μm) at the temporal 5mm location was 770 ± 51 and 823 ± 56 μm at the corresponding nasal location; central CT was 554 ± 36 μm. Good repeatability (CV < 1.2%) was found at all corneal locations. Differences (arithmetic; absolute and relative) were 3 ± 17 μm; 13 ± 11 μm; 2 ± 2%; respectively temporally and -1 ± 15 μm; 13 ± 8 μm; 2 ± 1% nasally, both at 5mm from the corneal apex. These values decreased for central CT (0 ± 6 μm; 4 ± 4 μm; 1 ± 1%). Differences between both measurements in all corneal locations were not statistically significant (p = 0.308 ANOVA Games-Howell)., Conclusions: Pentacam shows good repeatability for pachymetry measurements up to 5 mm away from the corneal apex across the horizontal meridian, even though repeatability decreases slightly towards the periphery. A single Pentacam scan will be sufficient for most clinical applications., (Copyright © 2015 British Contact Lens Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To compare corneal pachymetry values measured by three different optical devices: Orbscan II, Pentacam HR and Sirius in healthy eyes., Methods: The central corneal thickness (CCT) of 102 eyes of 102 healthy subjects (mean age of 33.09 ± 8.72 years and mean refractive defect -4.11 ± 4.74 D) was measured by three different physicians using Orbscan II, Pentacam HR and Sirius. The normality of the distribution was evaluated by with Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The correlations between CCT obtained from each device and refractive defect and age were evaluated using the Pearson test. The differences were evaluated by the Student paired t-test using SPSS 18.0 (IBM Corp. Armonk, New York)., Results: Orbscan II provided significant (p < 0.0001) lower CCT measurements then both Pentacam HR (-13.66 ± 16.53 μm) and Sirius (-15.18 ± 17.16 μm); Sirius showed values slightly higher than Oculus Pentacam HR (+1.52 ± 6.21 μm) that appeared to be statistically significant (p < 0.015)., Conclusions: The measurement of CCT by Sirius and Pentacam HR provides similar results. By contrast, the results obtained by Orbscan II are different from those obtained from both Sirius and Pentacam HR., (Copyright © 2015 British Contact Lens Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

To assess the intra-observer repeatability and inter-observer reproducibility of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements of PachPen (Accutome, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA), a hand-held, portable ultrasonic pachymeter when used by an ophthalmic nurse compared to an ophthalmologist. Ophthalmology Clinic, University of Malaya Medical Center In this prospective study, CCT was measured in 184 eyes of 92 healthy subjects, first by a corneal surgeon experienced in ultrasound pachymetry (Observer 1) followed by an ophthalmic nurse new to the procedure (Observer 2). Nine measurements were obtained from each eye by each observer, independently. Measurements were compared between the observers. Coefficients of repeatability and reproducibility were calculated. The Bland-Altman plot was used to assess agreement between observers. Mean age of the study population was 54.3 ± 15.2 years old and consisted of 43.5% male. Mean CCT as measured by Observers 1 and 2 were 528.3 ± 32.9 and 530.7 ± 33.3 µm, respectively. Observer 1 showed higher repeatability of measurements compared to that of Observer 2 (coefficient of repeatability 3.46 vs. 5.55%). The measurements by both observers showed high correlation (0.96) and good agreement (mean difference -2.4 µm; 95% limits of agreement -21.4, 16.7 µm). Coefficient of reproducibility of measurements between observers was 5.08%. Accutome PachPen hand-held ultrasound pachymeters gives excellent intra-observer repeatability and inter-observer reproducibility by personnel of different training grades.

Background: Analyses regarding accuracy and reproducibility of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements and pachymetry with corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology (Corvis ST®, CST)., Material Und Methods: Retrospective analysis of 72 eyes with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT) with no prior surgery or other pathology. The results of Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), non-contact tonometry (NCT) and ultrasound pachymetry (USP) were compared with repeat measurements with CST. For statistical analyses the t-test and Bland-Altman plots were applied., Results: The mean IOP was 15.5 ± 4.4 mmHg (CST), 14.8 ± 4.4 mmHg (GAT) and 15.6 ± 4.8 mmHg (NCT). The results of GAT and CST as well as GAT and NCT demonstrated statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) whereas NCT and CST displayed no significant differences in IOP (p = 0.72). The mean differences between the repeat measurements were 0.35 ± 1.7 mmHg (CST) and 0.04 ± 0.85 mmHg (GAT). The mean CST pachymetry results showed 551.3 ± 46.5 µm and the USP 526.5 ± 46.4 µm (p < 0.001). The mean difference between the repeated CST measurements was 24.8 ± 21 µm. No repeat measurement data were available for USP., Conclusion: The CST is a new device for simultaneously measuring the IOP, pachymetry and biomechanical properties of the cornea. Whether the deviations in the IOP measured by CST and CST pachymetry from the manually performed gold standard has to be evaluated as deficient, tolerable or maybe as an improvement, has to be evaluated in further studies. Because of the automated and contact-free measurement method as well as the potential for simultaneously analyzing biomechanical properties of the cornea, the CST is a device that might help the quest for measuring the 'true' IOP.

Purpose: To compare the anterior chamber depth (ACD; corneal epithelium to lens) using 3 modalities and compare the change 1 day and 3 months postoperatively., Setting: Private practice, Santa Monica, California, USA., Design: Nonrandomized prospective series., Methods: The mean optical pachymetry and immersion ultrasound (US) of the ACD and partial coherence interferometry (PCI) were measured. Optical pachymetry ACD was measured in 675 eyes postoperatively at 1 day and 3 months., Results: The optical pachymetry ACD in 492 eyes was 3.17 mm ± 0.42 (SD); by immersion US, it was 2.99 ± 0.51 mm (0.18 mm deeper; P < .0001). In 178 eyes, the optical pachymetry ACD was 3.23 ± 0.45 mm; the PCI was 3.19 ± 0.48 mm (0.04 mm deeper), which was not statistically different (P > .05). In 675 eyes, optical pachymetry ACD preoperatively was 3.19 ± 0.40 mm. The postoperative 1-day optical pachymetry ACD was 4.35 ± 0.35 mm with a mean refractive error of -0.30 diopter (D); the final 3-month optical pachymetry ACD was 4.47 ± 0.31 mm, with a mean refractive error of -0.07 D (P < .0001). This is a mean intraocular lens (IOL) position shift of +0.12 mm posteriorly; the +0.23 D change represents a ratio of 1.92 D/mm of IOL axial movement., Conclusions: The PCI ACD was comparable with optical pachymetry, but careful immersion US led to a 0.18 mm shorter ACD reading that cannot be corrected by sound velocity. The posterior capsule contracted and moved the IOL posteriorly 0.12 mm, resulting in 0.23 D hyperopic shift., Financial Disclosure: Dr. Hoffer owns the registered trademark name "Hoffer(®)" and receives royalties for its commercial use from Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Appasamy Associates, Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, DGH Technology, Inc., Ellex iScience, Inc., Haag-Streit AG, Nidek Co., Ltd., Tomey Corp., Topcon Medical Systems, Inc., and Ziemer USA, Inc., as well as royalties from Slack, Inc. for the textbook IOL Power. Neither author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned., (Copyright © 2015 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy and reproducibility of central corneal thickness measured by hand-held and desk-mounted ultrasound pachymeter in glaucoma patients under treatment., Methods: Prospective study of 65 glaucoma patients. Central corneal thickness was measured by two ultrasound pachymeters: the hand-held, portable PachPen (Accutome, Lynwood, WA), and the desk-mounted PacScan 300 (Sonomed, Lake Success, NY)., Results: The mean ± SD central corneal thickness was 526.5 ± 44.8 µm and 530.0 ± 44.7 µm for the hand-held and desk-mounted pachymeters, respectively (p = 0.15). Linear regression analysis revealed a slope of 0.97 with Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.96. Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference of measurements by both pachymeters of 3.22 µm with two standard deviations = 9.51. Both instruments showed high intraobserver correlation: 0.972 for the hand-held pachymeter and 0.993 for the desk-mounted pachymeter., Conclusion: Central corneal thickness measurements were comparable with the use of hand-held and desk-mounted ultrasound units in glaucoma patients with good intraobserver reproducibility.

Purpose: To compare the agreement of intraoperative central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements of the Wavelight EX500 (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX) that uses optical low coherence reflectometry to the Corneo-Gage Plus ultrasound pachymetry device (Sonogage, Cleveland, OH)., Methods: In this retrospective study, 50 eyes of 26 patients undergoing LASIK were evaluated. Following LASIK flap creation, each eye was measured by both optical low coherence reflectometry and ultrasound pachymetry immediately prior to flap lifting and then again after flap lifting., Results: The mean CCT value before lifting the flap was 556.9 and 557.78 µm as measured by ultrasound pachymetry and optical low coherence reflectometry, respectively. After lifting the flap, the mean ultrasound pachymetry value was 440.96 µm and the mean optical low coherence reflectometry value was 441.7 µm. A two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test demonstrated that the ultrasound pachymetry and the optical low coherence reflectometry distribution of measurements were the same. A Shapiro-Wilk test of normality could not be rejected. Bland-Altman plots showed strong agreement. The correlation between the two tests was 0.98 before flap lifting and 0.97 after flap lifting, both with a 95% confidence interval., Conclusions: The pachymetry measurements by the optical low coherence reflectometry correlated with those of the ultrasound pachymetry device. The Wavelight EX500 optical low coherence reflectometry may be used in place of the ultrasound pachymetry device for measuring CCT., (Copyright 2015, SLACK Incorporated.)

Purpose: To determine the repeatability of keratometry (K) measurements of a Scheimpflug pachymeter (Pentacam), Placido topographer (Eyesys), scanning-slit corneal topographer (Orbscan), partial coherence interferometry (PCI) device (IOLMaster), and Javal manual keratometer with different grades of keratoconus., Setting: Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran., Design: Retrospective case series., Methods: Keratometry was performed first with Scheimpflug pachymetry followed, in order, by Placido topography, scanning-slit corneal topography, PCI, and manual keratometry. Repeatability was examined in groups with a maximum K of less than 50.0 diopters (D), 50.0 to 55.0 D, and more than 55.0 D., Results: Seventy-eight eyes of 45 keratoconus patients were assessed. In Group 1, repeatability was highest with Scheimpflug pachymetry and lowest with scanning-slit corneal topography (0.36 to 1.24). In Group 2, the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for maximum K ranged from 0.823 with the scanning-slit corneal topography to 0.974 with Scheimpflug pachymetry. The repeatability index for minimum K (0.53 to 2.11) and maximum K (0.60 to 1.92) in this group was highest with Scheimpflug pachymetry and with for scanning-slit corneal topography. In Group 3, the ICCs for minimum K and maximum K ranged from 0.890 to 0.990, and the repeatability index for minimum K varied between 1.66 with Scheimpflug pachymetry to 2.98 with Placido topography; for maximum K, the index was from 2.15 with PCI to 2.81 with the manual keratometer., Conclusions: In mild keratoconus, the 5 devices had acceptable repeatability in K readings. In cases with a maximum K reading greater than 55.0 D, all devices had reduced repeatability as a result of measurement errors; thus, measurements might not be so reliable., (Copyright © 2015 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)