Search

Refugees bring significant economic and cultural benefits to communities and yet face elevated risk of chronic disease and barriers to good health in the U.S. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) can benefit refugee communities and provide training/mentoring opportunities for students. The Cambodian Women's Health Study was a four-phase, multi-year CBPR university–community collaboration with the Massachusetts Cambodian community that focused on health, nutrition, pregnancy, and food security among primarily young women of Cambodian heritage ages 15–30 years old. Phase 1 was a focus group discussion (FGD, n = 4) and cross-sectional survey (n = 56) with pregnant women. Phase 2 was a cross-sectional survey (n = 107) with nonpregnant women. Phase 3 was a series of FGD (seven FGD, n = 38) with women. Phase 4 was a student-led translational nutrition intervention (three classes) with women (n = 11) and men (n = 10). The study design included compensation and support for the community partner and included structured mentoring of students (six graduates, eight undergraduates) in CBPR methods, adult learning, and cultural humility. Benefits to the community agency included enhanced research capacity, including supervising student research assistants, and robust compensation. Benefits to students included intensive mentoring and training. Successes included cost-effectiveness and strong recruitment and experiences with participants. Challenges included issues with student-led recruitment and organization that required additional mentoring and reflection. To work toward socially just and equitable research and interventions, CBPR collaborative efforts should include intentional meaningful compensation and community capacity-building as well as structured mentoring and training for student researchers and should build on existing work and relationships within communities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Low-income families have elevated rates of both food insecurity and chronic diseases. Food purchases and consumption throughout the month may contribute to both outcomes. Four sets of focus groups (n = 21) aimed to better understand budgeting and purchasing strategies of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participants. Content analysis was used to identify themes of food affordability and household purchasing power. Participants with consistent access to food reported budgeting, planning meals, strategically using public benefits, and limiting non-essential purchases. Individuals who used a combination of strategies such as meal planning, budgeting, and utilizing sales and coupons reported being better able to afford food throughout the month than those who did not. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The effect of skipping breakfast on health, especially in adults, remains a controversial topic. A secondary data analysis was conducted to examine associations between breakfast eating patterns and weight loss, nutrient intake, and metabolic parameters among participants with metabolic syndrome (MetS) (n = 240). Three randomly selected 24-h dietary recalls were collected from each participant at baseline and at the one-year visit. Skipped breakfast was seen in 32.9% at baseline and in 17.4% at the one-year visit, respectively. At baseline, after adjustment for demographics and physical activity, participants who ate breakfast had a higher thiamin, niacin, and folate intake than did breakfast skippers (p < 0.05); other selected parameters including body weight, dietary quality scores, nutrient intake, and metabolic parameters showed no significant differences between the two groups (p ≥ 0.05). From baseline to one year, after adjustment for covariates, mean fat intake increased by 2.7% (95% confidence intervals (CI): -1.0, 6.5%) of total energy in breakfast skippers in comparison to the 1.2% decrease observed in breakfast eaters (95% CI: -3.4, 1.1%) (p = 0.02). Mean changes in other selected parameters showed no significant differences between breakfast skippers and eaters (p > 0.05). This study did not support the hypothesis that skipping breakfast has impact on body weight, nutrient intakes, and selected metabolic measures in participants with MetS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The effect of skipping breakfast on health, especially in adults, remains a controversial topic. A secondary data analysis was conducted to examine associations between breakfast eating patterns and weight loss, nutrient intake, and metabolic parameters among participants with metabolic syndrome (MetS) ( n = 240). Three randomly selected 24-h dietary recalls were collected from each participant at baseline and at the one-year visit. Skipped breakfast was seen in 32.9% at baseline and in 17.4% at the one-year visit, respectively. At baseline, after adjustment for demographics and physical activity, participants who ate breakfast had a higher thiamin, niacin, and folate intake than did breakfast skippers ( p < 0.05); other selected parameters including body weight, dietary quality scores, nutrient intake, and metabolic parameters showed no significant differences between the two groups ( p ≥ 0.05). From baseline to one year, after adjustment for covariates, mean fat intake increased by 2.7% (95% confidence intervals (CI): -1.0, 6.5%) of total energy in breakfast skippers in comparison to the 1.2% decrease observed in breakfast eaters (95% CI: -3.4, 1.1%) ( p = 0.02). Mean changes in other selected parameters showed no significant differences between breakfast skippers and eaters ( p > 0.05). This study did not support the hypothesis that skipping breakfast has impact on body weight, nutrient intakes, and selected metabolic measures in participants with MetS.