1. Predictors and moderators of the response of adults with intellectual disabilities and depression to behavioural activation and guided self-help therapies
- Author
-
Melville, CA, Hatton, C, Beer, E, Hastings, RP, Cooper, SA, McMeekin, N, Dagnan, D, Appleton, K, Scott, K, Fulton, L, Jones, RSP, McConnachie, A, Zhang, R, Knight, R, Knowles, D, Williams, C, Briggs, A, Jahoda, A, Melville, CA, Hatton, C, Beer, E, Hastings, RP, Cooper, SA, McMeekin, N, Dagnan, D, Appleton, K, Scott, K, Fulton, L, Jones, RSP, McConnachie, A, Zhang, R, Knight, R, Knowles, D, Williams, C, Briggs, A, and Jahoda, A
- Abstract
Background: No previous studies have reported predictors and moderators of outcome of psychological therapies for depression experienced by adults with intellectual disabilities (IDs). We investigated baseline variables as outcome predictors and moderators based on a randomised controlled trial where behavioural activation was compared with guided self-help. Methods: This study was an exploratory secondary data analysis of data collected during a randomised clinical trial. Participants (n = 161) were randomised to behavioural activation or guided self-help and followed up for 12 months. Pre-treatment variables were included if they have previously been shown to be associated with an increased risk of having depression in adults with IDs or have been reported as a potential predictor or moderator of outcome of treatment for depression with psychological therapies. The primary outcome measure, the Glasgow Depression Scale for Adults with Learning Disabilities (GDS-LD), was used as the dependant variable in mixed effects regression analyses testing for predictors and moderators of outcome, with baseline GDS-LD, treatment group, study centre and antidepressant use as fixed effects, and therapist as a random effect. Results: Higher baseline anxiety (mean difference in outcome associated with a 1 point increase in anxiety 0.164, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.031, 0.297; P = 0.016), lower performance intelligence quotient (IQ) (mean difference in outcome associated with a 1 point increase in IQ 0.145, 95% CI 0.009, 0.280; P = 0.037) and hearing impairment (mean difference 3.449, 95% CI 0.466, 6.432; P = 0.024) were predictors of poorer outcomes, whilst greater severity of depressive symptoms at baseline (mean difference in outcome associated with 1 point increase in depression −0.160, 95% CI −0.806, −0.414; P < 0.001), higher expectation of change (mean difference in outcome associated with a 1 point increase in expectation of change −1.013, 95% CI −1.711, −0.314; p 0.005
- Published
- 2023