Search

Future high chamber pressure LOX/hydrocarbon booster engines require copper-base alloy main combustion chamber coolant channels similar to the SSME to provide adequate cooling and resuable engine life. Therefore, it is of vital importance to evaluate the heat transfer characteristics and coking thresholds for LNG (94% methane) cooling, with a copper-base alloy material adjacent to the fuel coolant. High-pressure methane cooling and coking characteristics were recently evaluated using stainless-steel heated tubes at methane bulk temperatures and coolant wall temperatures typical of advanced engine operation except at lower heat fluxes as limited by the tube material. As expected, there was no coking observed. However, coking evaluations need be conducted with a copper-base surface exposed to the methane coolant at higher heat fluxes approaching those of future high chamber pressure engines.

Typically, low cycle fatigue life is a function of the cyclic strain range, the material properties, and the operating temperature. The reusable life is normally defined by the number of strain cycles that can be accrued before severe material degradation occurs. Reusable life is normally signified by the initiation or propagation of surface cracks. Hot-fire testing of channel wall combustors has shown significant mid-channel wall thinning or deformation during accrued cyclic testing. This phenomenon is termed cyclic-creep and appears to be significantly accelerated at elevated surface temperatures. This failure mode was analytically modelled. The cyclic life of the baseline SSME-MCC based on measured calorimeter heat transfer data, and the life sensitivity of local hot spots caused by injector effects were determined. Four life enhanced designs were assessed.

A reusable life requirement of 100 missions is met by controlling the combustion chamber hot-gas wall temperature and strain levels. Maximum life, maximum performance, and minimum engine weight are attained through a descriptive parametric assessment of the regenerative cooling circuit, combustor length, contraction area ratio, and coolant passage geometry. Life is categorized by low-cycle fatigue and creep-stress rupture. Relationships are developed to determine the impact of heat transfer rate, thermal strain level, and geometric influence parameters on life. It is empirically shown that a throat heat flux of 100 Btu/sq in./sec can be accommodated.

The regenerative cooling limits (maximum chamber pressure) are defined for oxygen/hydrocarbon (Methane, Propane, and RP-1) rocket engines over a thrust range of 20,000 to 600,000 lbf for a reusable life of 250 missions. Chamber pressure limits are first defined without a hot-gas wall carbon layer (unenhanced designs). Cooling enhancement chamber pressure limits are then established for seven thermal barriers (carbon layer, ceramic coating, graphite liner, film cooling, zoned combustion, transpiration cooling, and a combination of two of the above). The maximum regenerative-cooled chamber pressure is attained with the oxygen/methane propellant combination.

The regenerative cooling limits (maximum chamber pressure) for 02/hydrocarbon gas generator and staged combustion cycle rocket engines over a thrust range of 89,000 N (20,000lbf) to 2,669,000 N (600,000 lbf) for a reusable life of 250 missions were defined. Maximum chamber pressure limits were first determined for the three propellant combinations (O2/CH4, O2/C3H8, and O2/RP-1 without a carbon layer (unenhanced designs). Chamber pressure cooling enhancement limits were then established for seven thermal barriers. The thermal barriers evaluated for these designs were: carbon layer, ceramic coating, graphite liner, film cooling, transpiration cooling, zoned combustion, and a combination of two of the above. All fluid barriers were assessed a 3 percent performance loss. Sensitivity studies were then conducted to determine the influence of cycle life and RP-1 decomposition temperature on chamber pressure limits. Chamber and nozzle design parameters are presented for the unenahanced and enhanced designs. The maximum regenerative cooled chamber pressure limits were attained with the O2/CH4 propellant combination. The O2/RP-1 designs relied on a carbon layer and liquid gas injection chamber contours, short chamber, to be competitive with the other two propellant combinations. This was attributed to the low decomposition temperature of RP-1.