Search

Background: In the SCOPE I trial (Safety and Efficacy of the Symetis ACURATE Neo/TF Compared to the Edwards SAPIEN 3 Bioprosthesis), transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the self-expanding ACURATE neo (NEO) did not meet noninferiority compared with the balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3 (S3) device regarding a composite end point at 30 days due to higher rates of prosthetic valve regurgitation and acute kidney injury. Data on long-term durability of NEO are scarce. Here, we report whether early differences between NEO and S3 translate into differences in clinical outcomes or bioprosthetic valve failure 3 years after transcatheter aortic valve implantation., Methods: Patients with severe aortic stenosis were randomized to transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation with NEO or S3 at 20 European centers. Clinical outcomes at 3 years are compared using Cox proportional or Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models by intention-to-treat. Bioprosthetic valve failure is reported for the valve-implant cohort., Results: Among 739 patients, 84 of 372 patients (24.3%) had died in the NEO and 85 of 367 (25%) in the S3 group at 3 years. Comparing NEO with S3, the 3-year rates of all-cause death (hazard ratio, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.73-1.33]), stroke (subhazard ratio, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.56-1.92]), and hospitalization for congestive heart failure (subhazard ratio, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.51-1.07]) were similar between the groups. Aortic valve reinterventions were required in 4 NEO and 3 S3 patients (subhazard ratio, 1.32 [95% CI, 0.30-5.85]). New York Heart Association functional class ≤II was observed in 84% (NEO) and 85% (S3), respectively. Mean gradients remained lower after NEO at 3 years (8 versus 12 mm Hg; P <0.001)., Conclusions: Early differences between NEO and S3 did not translate into significant differences in clinical outcomes or bioprosthetic valve failure throughout 3 years., Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov, Unique identifier: NCT03011346., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Lanz has received speaker fees from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Möllmann has received speaker fees or is a proctor from Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Kim is a proctor for Boston Scientific and Abbott, and has received speaker fees from Boston Scientific, Abbott, and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Linke is a consultant to Medtronic, Edwards, Boston Scientific, Abbott, Transverse Medical Inc, Astra Zeneca, and Claret Medical. He owns stock options from Emboline and Transverse Medical Inc, and has received speaker honoraria from Edwards, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Abbott, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, and Novartis. Dr Prendergast has received unrestricted research grants and speaker fees from Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Conzelmann reports personal fees from Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Conradi is advisory board member for Abbott, Medtronic, JenaValve, and Neovasc, and has received personal honoraria from Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, NVT, and Microinterventions. Dr Stortecky reports grants from Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Abbott; and personal fees from BTG, Teleflex, and Boston Scientific. Dr Windecker reports research and educational grants to the institution from Abbott, Amgen, BMS, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Cardinal Health, CardioValve, CSL Behring, Daiichi Sankyo, Edwards Lifesciences, Johnson&Johnson, Medtronic, Querbet, Polares, Sanofi, Terumo, and Sinomed. Dr Windecker serves as unpaid member of the steering/excecutive group of trials funded by Abbott, Abiomed, Amgen, BMS, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Cardiovalve, Edwards Lifesciences, MedAlliance, Medtronic, Polares, Sinomed, V-Wave and Xeltis, but has not received personal payments by any pharmaceutical company or device manufacturer. Dr Windecker is also member of the steering/excecutive committee group of several investigated-initiated trials that receive funding by industry without impact on his personal remuneration. Dr Pilgrim has received institutional research grants from Biotronik, Boston Scientific, and Edwards Lifesciences; speaker/consultancy fees from Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Abbott, Medtronic, and HighLife SAS. The other authors report no conflicts.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is now a standard procedure for the treatment of symptomatic aortic valve stenosis in many patients. In Germany, according to the annual reports from the German Institute for Quality Assurance and Transparency in Healthcare ( Institut für Qualitätssicherung und Transparenz im Gesundheitswesen ), the rate of serious intraprocedural complications, such as valve malpositioning or embolization, coronary obstruction, aortic dissection, annular rupture, pericardial tamponade, or severe aortic regurgitation requiring emergency cardiac surgery has decreased markedly in recent years from more than 5.5% in 2012 to 2.0% in 2019. However, with increased use, the total number of adverse events remains about 500 per year, about 100 of which require conversion to sternotomy. These, sometimes, fatal events can occur at any time and are still challenging. Therefore, the interdisciplinary TAVI heart team should be prepared and aware of possible rescue strategies., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

This study was completed to understand the resilience of an ion exchange (IEX) process for its ability to remove variable ammonium (NH 4 + -N) loads) and to prove its environmental benefits through a life cycle assessment (LCA). The tertiary 10 m 3 /day demonstration scale IEX was fed with variable NH 4 -N /L) naturally found in municipal wastewater. Zeolite-N was used as ion exchange media and regeneration was completed with 10% potassium chloride (KCl). The influent NH + -N concentrations (<0.006-26 mg NH 4 + -N/L, the Zeolite-N released NH 4 + -N concentration impacted the ion exchange capacity, which ranged from 0.9-17.7 mg NH 4 + -N/g media. When the influent concentration was <2.5 mg NH 4 + -N/L, the Zeolite-N released NH 4 + -N (up to 12%). However, the exchange increased up to 62% when the influent NH 4 + -N load peaked, confirming the resilience of the process. A 94% regeneration efficiency was obtained with fresh regenerant, however, with the increase of the mass of NH 4 + -N on the media, the regeneration efficiency decreased. An optimisation of the volume of brine and regeneration contact time is suggested. To further measure the benefits of the IEX process, an LCA was conducted, for a 10,000 population equivalent reference scenario, and compared with traditional nitrification-denitrification WWTP. The LCA revealed that IEX with regenerant re-use and NH 4 + -N recovery through a membrane stripping process resulted in reductions of: 25% cumulative energy demand; 66% global warming potential and 62% marine eutrophication potential, when compared to traditional WWTP. This work demonstrated that the IEX process is an efficient and an environmentally benign technology that can be widely applied in WWTPs., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The number of elective surgeries for patients who are over 70 years of age is continuously growing. At the same time, postoperative delirium (POD) is common in older patients (5-60%) depending on predisposing risk factors, such as multimorbidity, cognitive impairment, neurodegenerative disorders and other dementing disorders, and precipitating factors, such as duration of surgery. Knowledge of individual risk profiles prior to elective surgery may help to identify patients at increased risk for development of POD. In this study, clinical and cognitive risk factors for POD were investigated in patients undergoing various elective cardiac and non-cardiac surgeries. Methods: The PAWEL study is a prospective, interventional trial on delirium prevention. At baseline, 880 inpatients at five surgical centers were recruited for sub-sample PAWEL-R. Multimodal assessments included clinical renal function, medication, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification System, geriatric and cognitive assessments, which comprised the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA), Trail-making Test, and Digit Span backward. Delirium incidence was monitored postoperatively by the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) and a chart review for up to a week or until discharge. Multivariate regression models and Chi-square Automatic Interaction Detectors (CHAID) analyses were performed using delirium incidence as the primary outcome. Results: Eighteen risk factors were investigated in elective cardiovascular and orthopedic or general surgery. A total of 208 out of 880 patients (24%) developed POD. A global regression model that included all risk variables predicted delirium incidence with high accuracy (AUC = 0.81; 95% CI 0.77, 0.85). A simpler model (clinical and cognitive variables; model CLIN-COG) of 10 factors that only included surgery type, multimorbidity, renal failure, polypharmacy, ASA, cut-to-suture time, and cognition (MoCA, Digit Span backward, and preexisting dementia), however, exhibited similar predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.80; 95% CI 0.76, 0.84). Conclusion: The risk of developing POD can be estimated by preoperative assessments, such as ASA classification, expected cut-to-suture time, and short cognitive screenings. This rather efficient approach predicted POD risk over all types of surgery. Thus, a basic risk assessment including a cognitive screen can help to stratify patients at low, medium, or high POD risk to provide targeted prevention and/or management strategies for patients at risk., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Eschweiler, Czornik, Herrmann, Knauer, Forkavets, von Arnim, Denkinger, Küster, Conzelmann, Metz, Maurer, Kentischer, Deeken, Sánchez, Wagner, Mennig, Thomas and Rapp.)

Background: Permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) remains one of the main drawbacks of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), but scarce data exist on PPI after valve-in-valve (ViV) TAVR, particularly with the use of newer-generation transcatheter heart valves (THVs)., Objectives: The goal of this study was to determine the incidence, factors associated with, and clinical impact of PPI in a large series of ViV-TAVR procedures., Methods: Data were obtained from the multicenter VIVID Registry and included the main baseline and procedural characteristics, in-hospital and late (median follow-up: 13 months [interquartile range: 3 to 41 months]) outcomes analyzed according to the need of periprocedural PPI. All THVs except CoreValve, Cribier-Edwards, Sapien, and Sapien XT were considered to be new-generation THVs., Results: A total of 1,987 patients without prior PPI undergoing ViV-TAVR from 2007 to 2020 were included. Of these, 128 patients (6.4%) had PPI after TAVR, with a significant decrease in the incidence of PPI with the use of new-generation THVs (4.7% vs. 7.4%; p = 0.017), mainly related to a reduced PPI rate with the Evolut R/Pro versus CoreValve (3.7% vs. 9.0%; p = 0.002). There were no significant differences in PPI rates between newer-generation balloon- and self-expanding THVs (6.1% vs. 3.9%; p = 0.18). In the multivariable analysis, older age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.05 for each increase of 1 year; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02 to 1.07; p = 0.001), larger THV size (OR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.20; p = 0.02), and previous right bundle branch block (OR: 2.04; 95% CI: 1.00 to 4.17; p = 0.05) were associated with an increased risk of PPI. There were no differences in 30-day mortality between the PPI (4.7%) and no-PPI (2.7%) groups (p = 0.19), but PPI patients exhibited a trend toward higher mortality risk at follow-up (hazard ratio: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.91; p = 0.04; p = 0.08 after adjusting for age differences between groups)., Conclusions: In a contemporary large series of ViV-TAVR patients, the rate of periprocedural PPI was relatively low, and its incidence decreased with the use of new-generation THV systems. PPI following ViV-TAVR was associated with a trend toward increased mortality at follow-up., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr. Alperi was supported by a grant from the Fundación Alfonso Martin Escudero (Madrid, Spain). Dr. Rodés-Cabau holds the Research Chair “Fondation Famille Jacques Larivière” for the Development of Structural Heart Disease Interventions, and has received institutional research grants from Edwards Lifesciences and Medtronic. Dr. Montorfano is a proctor for Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott, and Boston Scientific. Dr. Adam has received personal fees from Edwards Lifesciences and Boston Scientific; and has received grants and personal fees from Medtronic during the conduct of the study. Dr. Noble has received institutional research grants from Abbott Vascular, Edwards Lifesciences, and Medtronic; and is a proctor for Medtronic. Dr. Erlebach has received fees from Medtronic. Dr. Kempfert has received fees from Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, and Abbott. Dr. Pilgrim has received institutional research grants from Biotronik, Boston Scientific, and Edwards Lifesciences; has received speaker fees from Biotronik and Boston Scientific; has received consultancy fees from HighLife SAS (CEC); and has performed proctoring for Medtronic and Boston Scientific. Dr. Kim has received personal fees from, performed proctoring for, and has served on advisory boards for Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Meril, Medtronic, and Shockwave Med. Dr. Hildick-Smith has served as a proctor and advisor for Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic. Dr. Dvir has provided consulting for Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, and Abbott. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Due to bioprosthetic valve degeneration, aortic valve-in-valve (ViV) procedures are increasingly performed. There are no data on long-term outcomes after aortic ViV. Our aim was to perform a large-scale assessment of long-term survival and reintervention after aortic ViV., Methods and Results: A total of 1006 aortic ViV procedures performed more than 5 years ago [mean age 77.7 ± 9.7 years; 58.8% male; median STS-PROM score 7.3% (4.2-12.0)] were included in the analysis. Patients were treated with Medtronic self-expandable valves (CoreValve/Evolut, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) (n = 523, 52.0%), Edwards balloon-expandable valves (EBEV, SAPIEN/SAPIEN XT/SAPIEN 3, Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) (n = 435, 43.2%), and other devices (n = 48, 4.8%). Survival was lower at 8 years in patients with small-failed bioprostheses [internal diameter (ID) ≤ 20 mm] compared with those with large-failed bioprostheses (ID > 20 mm) (33.2% vs. 40.5%, P = 0.01). Independent correlates for mortality included smaller-failed bioprosthetic valves [hazard ratio (HR) 1.07 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.13)], age [HR 1.21 (95% CI 1.01-1.45)], and non-transfemoral access [HR 1.43 (95% CI 1.11-1.84)]. There were 40 reinterventions after ViV. Independent correlates for all-cause reintervention included pre-existing severe prosthesis-patient mismatch [subhazard ratio (SHR) 4.34 (95% CI 1.31-14.39)], device malposition [SHR 3.75 (95% CI 1.36-10.35)], EBEV [SHR 3.34 (95% CI 1.26-8.85)], and age [SHR 0.59 (95% CI 0.44-0.78)]., Conclusions: The size of the original failed valve may influence long-term mortality, and the type of the transcatheter valve may influence the need for reintervention after aortic ViV., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2020. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is the preferred treatment option for older patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Differences in the properties of available TAVR systems can affect clinical outcomes. Among patients undergoing TAVR, we compared the self-expanding ACURATE neo TAVR system with the balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3 TAVR system with regard to early safety and efficacy., Methods: In this randomised non-inferiority trial, patients (aged ≥75 years) undergoing transfemoral TAVR for treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, and who were deemed to be at increased surgical risk, were recruited at 20 tertiary heart valve centres in Germany, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and the UK. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive treatment with the ACURATE neo or the SAPIEN 3 with a computer-based randomly permuted block scheme, stratified by study centre and Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality (STS-PROM) category. The primary composite safety and efficacy endpoint comprised all-cause death, any stroke, life-threatening or disabling bleeding, major vascular complications, coronary artery obstruction requiring intervention, acute kidney injury (stage 2 or 3), rehospitalisation for valve-related symptoms or congestive heart failure, valve-related dysfunction requiring repeat procedure, moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation, or prosthetic valve stenosis within 30 days of the procedure. Endpoint assessors were masked to treatment allocation. Non-inferiority of ACURATE neo compared with SAPIEN 3 was assessed in the intention-to-treat population on the basis of a risk-difference margin of 7·7% for the primary composite endpoint, with a one-sided α of 0·05. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT03011346) and is ongoing but not recruiting., Findings: Between Feb 8, 2017, and Feb 2, 2019, up to 5132 patients were screened and 739 (mean age 82·8 years [SD 4·1]; median STS-PROM score 3·5% [IQR 2·6-5·0]) were enrolled. 30-day follow-up was available for 367 (99%) of 372 patients allocated to the ACURATE neo group, and 364 (99%) of 367 allocated to the SAPIEN 3 group. Within 30 days, the primary endpoint occurred in 87 (24%) patients in the ACURATE neo and in 60 (16%) in the SAPIEN 3 group; thus, non-inferiority of the ACURATE neo was not met (absolute risk difference 7·1% [upper 95% confidence limit 12·0%], p=0·42). Secondary analysis of the primary endpoint suggested superiority of the SAPIEN 3 device over the ACURATE neo device (95% CI for risk difference -1·3 to -12·9, p=0·0156). The ACURATE neo and SAPIEN 3 groups did not differ in incidence of all-cause death (nine patients [2%] vs three [1%]) and stroke (seven [2%] vs 11 [3%]); whereas acute kidney injury (11 [3%] vs three [1%]) and moderate or severe prosthetic aortic regurgitation (34 [9%] vs ten [3%]) were more common in the ACURATE neo group., Interpretation: TAVR with the self-expanding ACURATE neo did not meet non-inferiority compared to the balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3 device in terms of early safety and clinical efficacy outcomes. An early composite safety and efficacy endpoint was useful in discriminating the performance of different TAVR systems., Funding: Boston Scientific (USA)., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the outcome of endovascular treatment of true-lumen collapse (TLC) of the downstream aorta after open surgery for acute aortic dissection type A (AADA)., Methods: Retrospective, observational study with follow-up of 16 ± 7.6 months. From April 2010 to January 2012, 89 AADA-patients underwent aortic surgery. Out of these, computed tomography revealed a TLC of the downstream aorta in 13 patients (14.6%). They all received additional thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in consequence of malperfusion syndromes., Results: In all 13 TLC-patients, dissection after AADA-surgery extended from the aortic arch to the abdominal aorta and malperfusion syndromes occurred. Remodeling of the true-lumen was achieved by TEVAR with complemental stent disposal in abdominal and iliac arteries in all cases. One patient died on the third postoperative day due to intracerebral hemorrhage. Another patient, who presented under severe cardiogenic shock died despite AADA-surgery and TEVAR-treatment. Thirty-day mortality was 15.4% in TLC-patients (N = 2/13). In the follow-up period, 3 patients required additional aortic stents after the emergency TEVAR procedures. After 20 weeks, a third patient died secondary to malperfusion due to false-lumen recanalization. Therefore, late mortality was 23.1%., Conclusion: After proximal aortic repair for AADA, early postoperative computed tomography should be demanded in all patients to exclude a TLC of the descending aorta. Mortality is still substantial in these patients despite instant TEVAR application. Thus, in case of TLC and malperfusion syndrome of the downstream aorta, TEVAR should be performed early to alleviate or even prevent ischemic injury.

Background: The working group "Aortic Surgery and Interventional Vascular Surgery" of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (GSTCVS) set up the German registry for acute aortic dissection type A (GERAADA) in July 2006. This web-based database was developed to record data of patients who had undergone surgery for aortic dissection type A (AADA). The aim of GERAADA is to learn from analyzing the data of AADA patients how to improve the perioperative management and surgical treatment of patients with AADA and to identify possible parameters affecting patient risk and outcome., Patients and Methods: Between July 2006 and June 2009 (2010), 1558 (2137) patients with AADA were enrolled in the multi-center, prospective GERAADA database by 50 cardiac surgery centers in German-speaking countries in Europe. Data on patients' preoperative and intraoperative status, postoperative complications, midterm results and circumstances of death were recorded. Data were analyzed to identify risk factors influencing the outcome of these patients. The Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI) in Mainz performed the statistical analyses., Results: Analyses from GERAADA reveal a thirty-day mortality of 17% in 2137 AADA patients. Only short interventions in aortic arch surgery are safe during hypothermic circulatory arrest even without selective cerebral perfusion. If circulatory arrest times of over 30 min. are anticipated, antegrade cerebral perfusion is strongly recommended during the entire arch intervention using cardiopulmonary bypass. Surgical strategy in terms of isolated ascending aortic replacement versus ascending aortic replacement combined with aortic arch repair had no statistical relevant influence on 30-day mortality. AADA surgical results in elderly patients are more encouraging than those treated without surgery. Surgery is even feasible in octogenarians with a 35% mortality rate., Conclusion: The aim of this registry is to optimize AADA patients' medical care, thereby reducing their morbidity and mortality. AADA treatment should always involve open surgery. Initial analyses from GERAADA provide clinically relevant insights concerning patients with AADA, and may enable therapeutic recommendations for improving perioperative and surgical management. Our latest study detected significant influencing risk factors for the outcome of AADA patients and may contribute to a consensus in setting guidelines for standard medical treatment., Perspective: A European Registry of Aortic Diseases ("EuRADa") is being established this year under the leadership of the "Vascular Domain" of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). This database will collect parameters on all aortic diseases, dissection types A and B, aneurysms, perforating ulcer (PAU), intramural wall hematoma (IMH), traumatic aortic ruptures, and all potential treatment strategies (medical treatment, open surgical and endovascular).

Aim: To investigate the effects of (dietary) glycine against oxidant-induced injury caused by bile duct ligation (BDL)., Methods: Either a diet containing 5% glycine or a standard diet was fed to male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats. Three days later, BDL or sham-operation was performed. Rats were sacrificed 1 to 3 d after BDL. The influence of deoxycholic acid (DCA) in the presence or absence of glycine on liver cells was determined by measurement of calcium and chloride influx in cultivated Kupffer cells and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity was determined in the supernatant of cultivated hepatocytes., Results: Serum alanine transaminase levels increased to about 600 U/L 1 d after BDL. However, enzyme release was blunted by about two third in rats receiving glycine. Release of the alkaline phosphatase and aspartate aminotransferase was also blocked significantly in the group fed glycine. Focal necrosis was observed 2 d after BDL. Glycine partially blocked the histopathological changes. Incubation of Kupffer cells with DCA led to increased intracellular calcium that could be blocked by incubation with glycine. However, systemic blockage of Kupffer cells with gadolinium chloride had no effects on transaminase release. Incubation of isolated hepatocytes with DCA led to a significant release of LDH after 4 h. This release was largely blocked when incubation with glycine was performed., Conclusion: These data indicate that glycine significantly decreased liver injury, most likely by a direct effect on hepatocytes. Kupffer cells do not appear to play an important role in the pathological changes caused by cholestasis.